Jump to content

How can we educate sikhs who go to hindu mandirs ? ... How about using reverse psychology ?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
19 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

You must have done a half-ar5ed job if you missed it. I'll try and find them again for you when I get some time. 

And look, I haven't got a problem with homosexuality. But given where I am right now, (in the UK), I do have a big problem with ANY Sikh men acting effeminate, even more so if they are wearing a dastaar. It just sends out a weak message and men from other communities respond accordingly. 

Thank Waheguru you are not here. 

Btw may I ask whats ur age ? because such homophobic attitudes certainly aren't common among britain's youth, as per polls.

Are you above 60 ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
21 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Let's be real too. Dasmesh pita made a hyper-masculine identity with the Khalsa. One that led blokes to smack jihadis into oblivion despite being heavily outnumbered and outresourced. 

where's our hyper masculine identity when our young girls get lured by cutbullahs in UK and elsewhere ? We're so so different from our historical co-religionists that some might as well go on to say we fabricated a sikh history of brave soormas. We're nothing like that, as you said our youth grow up mollycuddled, in other thread.

Apparently , a gay man is easier target for you . So you attack them whereas they're the least of your priorities, when infact the kaum is plagued by plethora of other issues staring us in the face. Can we focus on those brother ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

where's our hyper masculine identity when our young girls get lured by cutbullahs in UK and elsewhere ? We're so so different from our historical co-religionists that some might as well go on to say we fabricated a sikh history of brave soormas. We're nothing like that, as you said our youth grow up mollycuddled, in other thread.

Apparently , a gay man is easier target for you . So you attack them whereas they're the least of your priorities, when infact the kaum is plagued by plethora of other issues staring us in the face. Can we focus on those brother ?

okay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2017 at 8:00 PM, Singh559 said:

I agree and I am pro gay goo rights ect. When men start acting like women in Sikh saroop it's not a good outlook. On top of spiritual aspect, when someone is initiated with Khande di pahul, you're literally a soldier in Khalsa and should act as such. Debated a couple <banned word filter activated> from UK a while back and average hippy lib apna would have said ve are believings 1 luv we r sorry for offendings joo. I was pretty direct and told him straight same things I would post here and in end he apologized and said he respected Sikhs.

When you have abrahamic faiths who don't understand prema bhagti and prem in general - they only respect tribal alpha maleness.

swear down this was going through my mind in some portions of your post.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

where's our hyper masculine identity when our young girls get lured by cutbullahs in UK and elsewhere ?

That's the whole point. The reason this is happening is because SIkh men are not acting like men. Then people like you jumping in, normalising effete, camp behaviour, just adds to the problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

That's the whole point. The reason this is happening is because SIkh men are not acting like men. Then people like you jumping in, normalising effete, camp behaviour, just adds to the problem. 

So now faggs like me are a convenient trash bin to throw the failures of kaum on. Right! 

Reminds me of an incident from 12 yrs back when i was new in a sikh college. The other 6 feet tall, strapping young sikh lad sad ,pointing to me, albeit jokingly "because of this guys we face issues in panth"lol yeah we pansies were also responsible for rss,  indira,  47 blunder and wat not. 

Man up nd own to ur mistakes rather than throwing them on pansies

Also @dallysingh101 please don't mind me saying  but if you were so concerned abt issues facing panth, u wud start with urself by keeping kes. "be the change you wish to see in the world"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/07/2017 at 10:04 AM, Big_Tera said:

Were your ancestors not Hindu? Why treat Hindus and Hinduism so badly. 

Unless you would really like to be  Hindu instead. Im sure you probably look like one.

He quoted gurbani.  Your ancestors are monkeys according to science.  So go marry your family off to them.  You are very dim.  He's talking about jeevan.  Learn to read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use