London bridge attack by islamic salafi devil worshippers

[BhForce]

40 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I'm trying to wrap my head around the natural conclusion to this entire terrorism process and the UK's government response post attack.

So, are they suggesting there's absolutely no official response aside from taking it on the chin and hoping for the best? Really? I wonder what the cut-off point will be, in terms of the total number of citizens killed, before something significant is done. Seems to be a greenlight to the terrorists. 

The Prime Minister, Theresa May, put forward a 4-point program: 

1) Counter extremist ideology. This sounds good, but it will only work if she works to shut down the UK's friends' Saudi Wahhabist funding.

2) Regulate extremism online

3) Military action against ISIS, and preventing segregated communities in the UK

4) New penalties for extremism short of violence.

 

Some of this sounds good, but I think that #2 will possibly mean that if you post on Facebook against Islamic terrorism, or the roots of Islamic terrorism, you will be called an extremist, and your Facebook account will be invalidated, and possibly our online access to the Internet will be curtailed.

[jkvlondon]

26 minutes ago, BhForce said:

The Prime Minister, Theresa May, put forward a 4-point program: 

1) Counter extremist ideology. This sounds good, but it will only work if she works to shut down the UK's friends' Saudi Wahhabist funding.

2) Regulate extremism online

3) Military action against ISIS, and preventing segregated communities in the UK

4) New penalties for extremism short of violence.

 

Some of this sounds good, but I think that #2 will possibly mean that if you post on Facebook against Islamic terrorism, or the roots of Islamic terrorism, you will be called an extremist, and your Facebook account will be invalidated, and possibly our online access to the Internet will be curtailed.

she left the definition of extremism wide open so it could be anyone who doesn't agree with the government, or jeopardises her wheeling and dealing like us say

she's just a mouthpiece these are ideas cameron had try to pass

[genie]

 

41 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

she left the definition of extremism wide open so it could be anyone who doesn't agree with the government, or jeopardises her wheeling and dealing like us say

she's just a mouthpiece these are ideas cameron had try to pass

Just what I was about to say.

Also If freedom fighters seeking independence for their community against a foreign brutal terrorist tyrannical state and their rebel media expressing free speech and free expression coming under the definition of extremism / extremists then theirs going to be huge problems and possible riots and political uprising against an overt totalitarian police state from the many diverse communities (where the problem of islamic terrorism is not coming from).

The problem UK is facing is salafi jihadi islamic terrorism and its extremist ideology in masjid textbooks and narrated by mad imam mullahs funded by British/western puppet states of saudi, qatar, turkey, pakistan and others. If sly British establishment diverts attention to group a wider net then we know what the real game and agenda is the denial of basic human right of free speech/expression and freedom of thought.

Its a fine line for the UK government to tread they cant be seen denying basic human rights in a civilized democracy but also they cant be seen to allow extremists encouraging public hate and inciting violence propaganda against others in UK society/state. Though people need to be allowed to express their fundamental human right of anger, hate and physical uprising against a foreign power that's brutalizing/oppressing the civilians of their community that's fair game in my view.

[StarStriker]

https://audioboom.com/posts/5117918-maajid-talks-to-former-extremist?utm_campaign=embed&utm_content=retweet&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

Interesting interview with an a ex-muslim ex-jihadi, who left islam for christianity.

[MisterrSingh]

8 hours ago, BhForce said:

Some of this sounds good, but I think that #2 will possibly mean that if you post on Facebook against Islamic terrorism, or the roots of Islamic terrorism, you will be called an extremist, and your Facebook account will be invalidated, and possibly our online access to the Internet will be curtailed.

Devious politicking. 

Anyone want to wager that Sikhs who express support for our own separatist aspirations might also find themselves in the 'extremist' camp according to Theresa May? 

This policy is as much about preventing criticism of Islam, than it is a method of preventing Muslims from spreading their poison online. The goreh are crafting legislation to HELP them. What the hell is going to happen when Muslim numbers are so great that they're in a position to influence and form legislation? This is suicide. There's no other word for it.

[Ranjeet01]

17 hours ago, genie said:

True....however either the western establishments are supremely stupid allowing the mass immigration of muslims on their shores, allowing them to convert and breed with non-muslim women and eventually take over areas demographically or they (the west) are playing a very sly game.

I suspect the 2nd... there is something sinister at play and I suspect its to make way for a civil war in europe because of the coming world financial crisis bigger than 2008.

I do not think that the Elites and the Islamists are as smart as they like to that they are.

I wonder if the elites think that having a majority muslim Europe is easier to control.

Though Europe for decades has been fairly docile and have been under control, so what is to be gained by this.

If they want to reduce the population through civil war, it would be pointless because European birthrates have been reducing.

On the other hand it could be said that a younger workforce is needed because of the low birthrate.  However, the mass muslim imports are mostly on welfare which means it's a drain on resources.

Therefore with ageing Euro population and no good welfare scrounging muslim population,  there is no more productivity, therefore less wealth for the elites.

That is pretty stupid in my book.

I wonder if the elites are really that homogenous and I wonder if there are factions that play off each other.

 

[jkvlondon]

Poland's PM refusing the agenda:

 

[genie]

Look at the way these cowardly evil islamic salafi beasts were lunging and attacking innocent people and the police pulled up and heroically shot them dead in a hail of bullets.

All criminals carrying knifes or guns attacking innocent people should be shot dead like this its a good deterrent to others,