Jump to content
AjeetSinghPunjabi

Punjabi / Sikh woman goes to her own wedding with just her sweat shorts as lowers

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

you are having a laugh aren't you ...this tramp wouldn't dress like that to go to the queen's house  because she'd know you have a level of decorum for such places. Simply put she does not respect or understand Our Guru ji's Darbar is the Darbar of the King of Kings

Did the sevadaars at the Gurdwara actually let her enter the building dressed like that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was photoshopped, you think they couldn't change the underwear color from black to red ? lol its easiest 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Did the sevadaars at the Gurdwara actually let her enter the building dressed like that? 

given that the story says that was her outfit and she is now married ....one can only deduct that must have happened

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From other pics I seen she wore a proper bottom in the gurduwara and took it off later on

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe you guys actually think she went to the Gurdwara like this!  You really think that would happen?  Why would anyone get decked out, and wear nike shorts for the bottom?  Here's what i think could have possibly happened:

- they could have just finished taking pictures somewhere, and it was hot out, so she took off her lehnga for a while to cool down

- her lehnga wasn't fitting properly, or kept slipping off, so they were getting alterations done, and someone took a pic while she was waiting for the alterations to be completed

-something accidentally spilled on her lehnga, and someone was trying to get the stain out

 

I'm not supporting her behaviour, but it's funny to see people jumping to worst case scenarios, and losing common sense.  You really think she would wear that to a Gurdwara?  I'm sure any bride's friends, relatives, cousins etc. would tell her that she would look like a fool.  My point:  don't jump to conclusions without knowing anything about the situation/story.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Akal Warrior said:

I can't believe you guys actually think she went to the Gurdwara like this!  You really think that would happen?  Why would anyone get decked out, and wear nike shorts for the bottom?  Here's what i think could have possibly happened:

- they could have just finished taking pictures somewhere, and it was hot out, so she took off her lehnga for a while to cool down

- her lehnga wasn't fitting properly, or kept slipping off, so they were getting alterations done, and someone took a pic while she was waiting for the alterations to be completed

-something accidentally spilled on her lehnga, and someone was trying to get the stain out

 

I'm not supporting her behaviour, but it's funny to see people jumping to worst case scenarios, and losing common sense.  You really think she would wear that to a Gurdwara?  I'm sure any bride's friends, relatives, cousins etc. would tell her that she would look like a fool.  My point:  don't jump to conclusions without knowing anything about the situation/story.

Which bride poses for a photo in an underwear and how come her husband is cool with that. Lmao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Akal Warrior said:

I can't believe you guys actually think she went to the Gurdwara like this!  You really think that would happen?  Why would anyone get decked out, and wear nike shorts for the bottom?  Here's what i think could have possibly happened:

- they could have just finished taking pictures somewhere, and it was hot out, so she took off her lehnga for a while to cool down

- her lehnga wasn't fitting properly, or kept slipping off, so they were getting alterations done, and someone took a pic while she was waiting for the alterations to be completed

-something accidentally spilled on her lehnga, and someone was trying to get the stain out

 

I'm not supporting her behaviour, but it's funny to see people jumping to worst case scenarios, and losing common sense.  You really think she would wear that to a Gurdwara?  I'm sure any bride's friends, relatives, cousins etc. would tell her that she would look like a fool.  My point:  don't jump to conclusions without knowing anything about the situation/story.

I can believe it as I have seen with my own eyes a female attending gurdwara with near transparent white pedal pushers(cropped trousers) with sleeveless low cut top and when she did matha tek the sangat there couldn't avert their eyes fast enough as it was made clear she was wearing a thong . The bechare babey  sharam de maare si looked down and outraged bibian approached and told her that this was no way to dress in a gurdwara , so I can believe that people can be that besharam 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/5/2017 at 1:48 PM, jkvlondon said:

I can believe it as I have seen with my own eyes a female attending gurdwara with near transparent white pedal pushers(cropped trousers) with sleeveless low cut top and when she did matha tek the sangat there couldn't avert their eyes fast enough as it was made clear she was wearing a thong . The bechare babey  sharam de maare si looked down and outraged bibian approached and told her that this was no way to dress in a gurdwara , so I can believe that people can be that besharam 

Just imagine a guy going in shorts. 

Oh wait, patriarchy only wants women to dress skimpy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
5 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Just imagine a guy going in shorts. 

Oh wait, patriarchy only wants women to dress skimpy 

A male's anatomy is different than a woman. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. In pre-Sikh times, the Hindus didn't believe in respect for women at all, so they promoted outfits which didn't care about Issat at all. (Which is before the Sikh religion, everyone wore less clothing, even their Devti barely wore any clothing).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

A male's anatomy is different than a woman. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. In pre-Sikh times, the Hindus didn't believe in respect for women at all, so they promoted outfits which didn't care about Issat at all. (Which is before the Sikh religion, everyone wore less clothing, even their Devti barely wore any clothing).

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

How can you be barechested if you're also wearing a blouse? Also, do you have any references that say that people were barechested back then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BhForce said:

How can you be barechested if you're also wearing a blouse? Also, do you have any references that say that people were barechested back then?

 I didn't make the fashion just telling how it was 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-6-7 at 1:45 PM, Jacfsing2 said:

. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. 

Are you saying a man who has taken amrit shouldn't cover his kachhera with say cargo shorts or trousers ? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bigger the difference in height, the more odd you will look together, and you might not feel comfortable with a well-below height partner
    • https://uk.yahoo.com/news/conmen-jailed-92-year-old-victim-plays-game-lures-arrests-084708670.html
    • but he also says later that if the husband becomes nastik a wife has the right to disassociate herself from him .
    • Agree with the fact that Talaq is not compatible with Sikhi. Even the word comes from Muslim lands. However, I think you paint with too broad a brush when you call divorce an "abrahamic thing". Christianity doesn't allow divorce, except for just a couple of specified situations: Jesus said:  He said to them, “It was because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery.”[a] Matthew 19 Marriage is seen as a holy sacrament in Christianity. By contrast, there is nothing holy about marriage in Islam. It is merely a worldly contract, and divorce is explicitly allowed in the Koran.
    • I don't totally believe this. Yes leave the bad influences but most shastardhari rehit is still kept in India, and you will see the pooran gursikhs get together in Anandpur Sahib on Vaisakhi and Hola Mohalla. Yes you can see them trying hard here in the west, and there are those who have kept full bana even with some shastars, but still something is missing from being all-rounder pooran gursikh compared to the ladliyaa faujan in India.
×