Jump to content
AjeetSinghPunjabi

Punjabi / Sikh woman goes to her own wedding with just her sweat shorts as lowers

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

you are having a laugh aren't you ...this tramp wouldn't dress like that to go to the queen's house  because she'd know you have a level of decorum for such places. Simply put she does not respect or understand Our Guru ji's Darbar is the Darbar of the King of Kings

Did the sevadaars at the Gurdwara actually let her enter the building dressed like that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this was photoshopped, you think they couldn't change the underwear color from black to red ? lol its easiest 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Did the sevadaars at the Gurdwara actually let her enter the building dressed like that? 

given that the story says that was her outfit and she is now married ....one can only deduct that must have happened

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From other pics I seen she wore a proper bottom in the gurduwara and took it off later on

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe you guys actually think she went to the Gurdwara like this!  You really think that would happen?  Why would anyone get decked out, and wear nike shorts for the bottom?  Here's what i think could have possibly happened:

- they could have just finished taking pictures somewhere, and it was hot out, so she took off her lehnga for a while to cool down

- her lehnga wasn't fitting properly, or kept slipping off, so they were getting alterations done, and someone took a pic while she was waiting for the alterations to be completed

-something accidentally spilled on her lehnga, and someone was trying to get the stain out

 

I'm not supporting her behaviour, but it's funny to see people jumping to worst case scenarios, and losing common sense.  You really think she would wear that to a Gurdwara?  I'm sure any bride's friends, relatives, cousins etc. would tell her that she would look like a fool.  My point:  don't jump to conclusions without knowing anything about the situation/story.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Akal Warrior said:

I can't believe you guys actually think she went to the Gurdwara like this!  You really think that would happen?  Why would anyone get decked out, and wear nike shorts for the bottom?  Here's what i think could have possibly happened:

- they could have just finished taking pictures somewhere, and it was hot out, so she took off her lehnga for a while to cool down

- her lehnga wasn't fitting properly, or kept slipping off, so they were getting alterations done, and someone took a pic while she was waiting for the alterations to be completed

-something accidentally spilled on her lehnga, and someone was trying to get the stain out

 

I'm not supporting her behaviour, but it's funny to see people jumping to worst case scenarios, and losing common sense.  You really think she would wear that to a Gurdwara?  I'm sure any bride's friends, relatives, cousins etc. would tell her that she would look like a fool.  My point:  don't jump to conclusions without knowing anything about the situation/story.

Which bride poses for a photo in an underwear and how come her husband is cool with that. Lmao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Akal Warrior said:

I can't believe you guys actually think she went to the Gurdwara like this!  You really think that would happen?  Why would anyone get decked out, and wear nike shorts for the bottom?  Here's what i think could have possibly happened:

- they could have just finished taking pictures somewhere, and it was hot out, so she took off her lehnga for a while to cool down

- her lehnga wasn't fitting properly, or kept slipping off, so they were getting alterations done, and someone took a pic while she was waiting for the alterations to be completed

-something accidentally spilled on her lehnga, and someone was trying to get the stain out

 

I'm not supporting her behaviour, but it's funny to see people jumping to worst case scenarios, and losing common sense.  You really think she would wear that to a Gurdwara?  I'm sure any bride's friends, relatives, cousins etc. would tell her that she would look like a fool.  My point:  don't jump to conclusions without knowing anything about the situation/story.

I can believe it as I have seen with my own eyes a female attending gurdwara with near transparent white pedal pushers(cropped trousers) with sleeveless low cut top and when she did matha tek the sangat there couldn't avert their eyes fast enough as it was made clear she was wearing a thong . The bechare babey  sharam de maare si looked down and outraged bibian approached and told her that this was no way to dress in a gurdwara , so I can believe that people can be that besharam 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/5/2017 at 1:48 PM, jkvlondon said:

I can believe it as I have seen with my own eyes a female attending gurdwara with near transparent white pedal pushers(cropped trousers) with sleeveless low cut top and when she did matha tek the sangat there couldn't avert their eyes fast enough as it was made clear she was wearing a thong . The bechare babey  sharam de maare si looked down and outraged bibian approached and told her that this was no way to dress in a gurdwara , so I can believe that people can be that besharam 

Just imagine a guy going in shorts. 

Oh wait, patriarchy only wants women to dress skimpy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
5 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Just imagine a guy going in shorts. 

Oh wait, patriarchy only wants women to dress skimpy 

A male's anatomy is different than a woman. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. In pre-Sikh times, the Hindus didn't believe in respect for women at all, so they promoted outfits which didn't care about Issat at all. (Which is before the Sikh religion, everyone wore less clothing, even their Devti barely wore any clothing).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

A male's anatomy is different than a woman. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. In pre-Sikh times, the Hindus didn't believe in respect for women at all, so they promoted outfits which didn't care about Issat at all. (Which is before the Sikh religion, everyone wore less clothing, even their Devti barely wore any clothing).

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

How can you be barechested if you're also wearing a blouse? Also, do you have any references that say that people were barechested back then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BhForce said:

How can you be barechested if you're also wearing a blouse? Also, do you have any references that say that people were barechested back then?

 I didn't make the fashion just telling how it was 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-6-7 at 1:45 PM, Jacfsing2 said:

. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. 

Are you saying a man who has taken amrit shouldn't cover his kachhera with say cargo shorts or trousers ? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Guest London jwaan
      Err no......that's not a fact. That's your sensationalist factually incorrect anal hyperbole again! You really do need to visit a colo-rectal specialist with some urgency to find out why so much tutee is coming out of your mouth.  The full list of non signatories is here. See what I did there? Showed evidence of a fact. Not empty my anus on a forum for no reason, unlike you.
    • https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15 Interesting article from Nassim Nicholas Taleb regarding how halal has got it's way in the UK. It is quite long though. 
    • Jus Reign is technically correct in his argiement that Sikhi isn’t a religion, however I don’t think he thought about this on a deeper level, and just made an edgy statement that happens to be true once examined on a deeper level.  Guru Nanak Dev Ji never intended to start a “religion”. Sikhi isn’t a “religion” it’s the Sach Dharam. This modern day “Sikhism” most people follow is an Abrahamic knockoff created by the Singh Sabah era with the help of the British, which takes away Sikhi’s universalist Dharmic framework, and replaces it with this abomination calles Sikhism.  Jus Reigns statement also comes from a place of duality. For any educated Sikh, it’s obvious that Guru Nanak never “left” us, and Guru Gobind Singh Ji is just the same as Guru Nanak, who is just the same as Siri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. The Guru is the Bani, the Bani is the Guru, and within it all the Amrit is contained.  As for his comment about rocking the Turban and doing whatever HE wants, from a Sikh point of view his completely wrong. The entire point of being a Sikh is to recognize your own defincies and realize you cannot achieve anything by yourself, this is why you dedicate yourself to an enlightener (Guru) and follow his teachings. Bani time and time again tells us to destroy this false sense of self (ego) and recognize the One. Sikhi isn’t about following yourself, it’s about following the One Guru.  When a Sikh, especially a “Singh” (Man who has received Khand Di Phaul) as Jus Reign claims to be, wears a Dastaar (Turban) then they are representing the Khalsa and the Gurus Saroop. Of course there are things you cannot do, like smoking, drinking (He drinks), or other immoralities because reflects back on the Khalsa. When you go out and do something retarded it reflects bad on that real Singh who keeps the 5K’s, who gets up at Amritvela, who follows Rehat, etc. The fact is that in the modern day, especially for someone who uses the Khalsa title of “Singh”, wearing the Dastaar is not a joke. It’s either you follow the Rehat and maintain proper conduct in the world, or take off the Dastaar, and remove Singh from your name (which you didn’t earn in the first place). 
    • I see.                            
    • Vahiguroo kirpa Big t and bivi  nu Jio_/\_,   big t if your wife was not a man before she became a  woman, then she is who Vahiguroo chose for you ji_/\_pass His test and earn Naam laha together, all will be bliss ji_/\_
×