AjeetSinghPunjabi

Punjabi / Sikh woman goes to her own wedding with just her sweat shorts as lowers

38 posts in this topic

5 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Just imagine a guy going in shorts. 

Oh wait, patriarchy only wants women to dress skimpy 

A male's anatomy is different than a woman. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. In pre-Sikh times, the Hindus didn't believe in respect for women at all, so they promoted outfits which didn't care about Issat at all. (Which is before the Sikh religion, everyone wore less clothing, even their Devti barely wore any clothing).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

A male's anatomy is different than a woman. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. In pre-Sikh times, the Hindus didn't believe in respect for women at all, so they promoted outfits which didn't care about Issat at all. (Which is before the Sikh religion, everyone wore less clothing, even their Devti barely wore any clothing).

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

How can you be barechested if you're also wearing a blouse? Also, do you have any references that say that people were barechested back then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BhForce said:

How can you be barechested if you're also wearing a blouse? Also, do you have any references that say that people were barechested back then?

 I didn't make the fashion just telling how it was 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-6-7 at 1:45 PM, Jacfsing2 said:

. If a male takes Amrit, he shouldn't wear any bottom other than Kachera. 

Are you saying a man who has taken amrit shouldn't cover his kachhera with say cargo shorts or trousers ? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-6-7 at 2:05 PM, jkvlondon said:

I know in the time period of Ram and SIta the fashion for women was barechested as indicated by sculptures/art of that period . tight blouse but bare chest with chunni certainly changes the image of Sita as portrayed now .

women in vedic period didn't use to wear blouse ! blouse is a recent invention to saree. 3000 yrs ago women just wore saree without blouse but still kept their nangez covered. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

women in vedic period didn't use to wear blouse ! blouse is a recent invention to saree. 3000 yrs ago women just wore saree without blouse but still kept their nangez covered. 

I saw a statue a while back  which looked bare but had the look of a waistcoat type (like they put in bollywood movies on tawaif's  dress to emphasis breasts). something similar in Minos fashion too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

I saw a statue a while back  which looked bare but had the look of a waistcoat type (like they put in bollywood movies on tawaif's  dress to emphasis breasts). something similar in Minos fashion too

Blouse was imposed or suggested by the british. One can tell from the word  origin.  Usually indian women just wore sari, as it was easier to breast feed. I think in indian culture, bare chest was not seen as bad or suggestive. The barechest was a symbol of motherhood. That is why, in india women are allowed to breast feed openly.Even now some fisherwomen in maharastra still wear sari without blouse.

Rule by the mughal and british ppl has changed the attitude of ppl. Tho i wonder when panjabi women adopted kaghare, garaare instead of sari. The transition from kagare/garaare to suits is fairly recent. My grandma says it happened when she was young. Her grandmother would not leave the house without tying a garaara over her salwaar, even just to deliver food to the fields. Suit and salwaar was common, but her grandma stuck to the old ways and did not feel comfortable stepping out of the house without a garaara.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


49 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:




Blouse was imposed or suggested by the british. One can tell from the word  origin.






You do know the Indian word is choli, right?



There was an extremely popular (and controversial) song called "Choli ke peeche kya hai"



https://www.google.com/search?q=choli+ke+peeche



 

Edited by BhForce
hyperlink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baba Deep Singh once removed his dastar to cover the modesty of a female who had been abducted by the Muslims... countless times Singhs preserved the honour of thousands of women and what do we have today.... pathetic half men defending this kind of behaviour! What she wears in her day to day life is her business but you clowns are defending her appearing infront of Guru Sahib dressed like that. To all you pro feminist half men... ask your mother, sister, daughter or wife to dress like that & take her to the gurdwara... let's see how your feminism is then. A REAL man is naturally a feminist in that he respects, honours & protects his woman.... a real feminist is not someone who supports a woman parading half naked infront of Guru Sahib. 

News flash for all you pathetic 'feminist' half men.... women want a real man, an alpha male who respects her, keeps her safe & protected & supports her....real women don't want a pathetic doormat.

Edited by Mahakaal96
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, CHaamCHrick said:

Her feet look darker than her rest of the body with toe nails covered with chipped nail colour. They have ghastly looks.

Mehndi layi a pairan te 😂. You got X-ray vision or wat, lol@chipped nail colour. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Look at this shameless dog he knows this will inflame tensions by using Sikh girl in his video. He is giving advice to convert so called sikh girls to Islam in a covert way not directly. Basically he makes up situations or muslims send him in fake stories and he tries to promote Islam over other religions. Check the last video in the videos section https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKGeFv3Gaho3bD4-hoUx4eg I didnt want to paste the video url as it would give it undeserved publicity I wonder if Sikhs parchariks and Sikh groups will respond to this. if bhai jagraj was still alive he would have definitely responded because he's already tackled and defeated dawah kid in debate with him but now he is no more this coward dawah kid takes advantage knowing full well basics of sikhi wont be responding to this sly dig at Sikh girls and sikhi.
    • She's the one that directed Bend it Like Beckham. 
    • Your right that 7 days documentary  is heavily biased against Sikhs and painted our folks as extremists who started it all. When the fact of the matter is it was the hindu punjabis of hindu mahasahaba, arya samaj and RSS that went around kicking off with muslims all the time in the led up to events of 1947. The pakistani muslim league and Hindu mahasaba were the main ones responsible for starting the killings. The british reported cloak and dagger tactics were being used, basically people trying to pretend to be another religion in false flag attacks to get Sikhs framed and attacked and thus Sikhs would jump in and start attacking also. Alot of the nirankaris looked Sikh but were not Sikhs they are hindu punjabi, arya samajists also had infiltrated Sikh circles. Master tara singh was a hindu convert to Sikhism who was very friendly with fellow hindus nehru and gandhi and tried to inflame tensions against muslims before partition. Real Sikhs had alot of patience but you can only be patient and peaceful for so long after killings get too much and only then did later did our Sikhs under akali dal and various jatha groups aided by Sikh military generals and Sikh Maharajah's do revenge attacks on muslims to clear out east punjab of islam after their relatives were being wiped out in west punjab villages and Sikh dominated area's like sialkot, sargodha, rawalpindi, jhelum, mirpur,etc.
    • I meant the production of the movies.