genie

digraceful indian punjabi woman sukwinder javeed and her muslim husband going to be on uk big brother tv show

107 posts in this topic

11 hours ago, BhForce said:

Well, if you mean that this forum is donating to political parties, and keeping tallies of their subsequent votes, then no. But that's that's not the point of this forum.

With all due respect, it's not just pointless ranting. A lot of people come to this forum, the vast majority just read the headline posts and never sign up for an account or post. The kind of stuff that @genie posts performs the function of socialization, the process of learning how to behave acceptably in society. In this case Sikh society, and one unacceptable behavior is going off and marrying non-Sikhs. Instead of sitting under a banyan tree in the village, we've electronicized the conversation, and are expressing what's unacceptable behavior in that way.

As for Sukhwinder, yeah, you're right, it's pointless to think we'll bring her back. We won't. But the point is by expressing disapproval of Sukhwinder, we'll helping to stop the next Sukhwinder, either someone who's reading this forum, or a friend of someone reading this forum.

It's accepted that there are always outlier cases, such as Ram Rai (renegade son of Guru Har Rai Ji). What we're trying to prevent is the wholesale destruction of our faith community by intermarriage with Muslims (or Hindus or others).

Sure, some attention should be paid to mental issues. But I don't think that 99% of Sikh girls marrying Muslims are because they have some mental disorder. Rather, I think 99% of them are in full command of their mental faculties, they simply choose to show their backs to their community because that's how they've been socialized.

I agree with all your points, but compared to mass media, this forum is less than 1% of that.

You can only have a legit conversation if you bring the other side into the equation, here at least 90% of us agree that it's wrong, and the other 10% would neither be influenced or allow themselves to talk about the issue. In the real world, when you are trying to influence someone, you have to bring up their ideas and debate them, not just post something with a group that already agrees with you. (Guru Sahib went to sinners, he didn't hide to some remote place from the world, but went into the world, to save us).

People are going to do what they want, and again, this forum has very few active members, and even the guests are only a small percentage of the global Sikh population.

If you ask me, I stand by the mental issues idea or these people are just remarkably stupid. Let's not forget that our people have been making lots of other mistakes in the past century that have caused serious problems. Also nobody addresses the mental health of Punjabis and everyone just laughs at it, including those who need health. Let's stop pretending that the average Punjabi is mature about these things.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like this randi is now a poster girl for muslim sikh marriages. If it was not bad enough what she has done. She is now advertising to the world that this is the right thing to do.

Feel sorry for the parents of this randi.

Lets not get angry though. Anyone who wants to marry a muslim go ahead. We dont need randis like you in the faith.

Edited by Big_Tera
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, StarStriker said:

Btw That was a false accusation against neelam, she never was with zayne malik, just saying.

Not that I give a sh1te about what she gets up to, but how do you know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

QUESTION! Is this what we as Sikhs have come down to? To ridicule other's cause whom they're married to? AND to ridicule/ call them names behind keyboards?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Singh1989 said:

QUESTION! Is this what we as Sikhs have come down to? To ridicule other's cause whom they're married to? AND to ridicule/ call them names behind keyboards?

Brother, either you're amazingly naive or amazingly clever. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the former.

When you ask if this is what we've come down to, you seem to imply that there was some golden age when Sikhs happily married people who wanted to destroy the Sikh community (and every other community). Is that what you believe? (Not a rhetorical question, please respond.) Clue: From the blessed mouth of Guru Gobind Singh ji in their final words: Marry your children to a house where there is "Akal Purkh di Sikhi".

I wouldn't promote the use of vulgar names, but ridicule is absolutely something that the Khalsa used to express their disapproval of a number of things. This is shown in the Khalsa Bola (Khalsa code-language) which used words like "Budh-avtar" for a disabled person to express their belief against pacifism.

What's wrong with ridicule? It's not like we're killing (or even beating) anybody. Ridicule is a non-violent method of expressing disapproval.  A recap:

23 hours ago, BhForce said:

The kind of stuff that @genie posts performs the function of socialization, the process of learning how to behave acceptably in society. In this case Sikh society, and one unacceptable behavior is going off and marrying non-Sikhs. Instead of sitting under a banyan tree in the village, we've electronicized the conversation, and are expressing what's unacceptable behavior in that way.

Are you against socialization? (Please respond.) If so, that would be unbelievable. You are actually against any socialization whatsoever? If not, are you only against socialization when done by Sikhs?

Here's the reason for the ridicule, by the way (excuse the small grammatical error):

23 hours ago, BhForce said:

As for Sukhwinder, yeah, you're right, it's pointless to think we'll bring her back. We won't. But the point is by expressing disapproval of Sukhwinder, we'll helping to stop the next Sukhwinder, either someone who's reading this forum, or a friend of someone reading this forum.

Do you agree or disagree that Sikhs should take steps to stop the decimation of their community? Finally, do you agree with the mission of Guru Nanak Dev ji, and do you want to preserve the Sikh community or not?

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Not that I give a sh1te about what she gets up to, but how do you know?

I dont either blud.

Well there was no evidence of it, i fink at the time, only 1 paper was runnin wit this news, nobody else did (i maybe wrong with that). They both denied it aswel as their camps. Normally these popstars dont deny anyfink wen it comes to stuff like this i noticed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Singh1989 said:

QUESTION! Is this what we as Sikhs have come down to? To ridicule other's cause whom they're married to? AND to ridicule/ call them names behind keyboards?

Question is why does it bother you so much?

Just stay out of a thread next time if you haven't got anything worthwhile to contribute in.

Edited by genie
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BhForce said:

Brother, either you're amazingly naive or amazingly clever. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume the former.

When you ask if this is what we've come down to, you seem to imply that there was some golden age when Sikhs happily married people who wanted to destroy the Sikh community (and every other community). Is that what you believe? (Not a rhetorical question, please respond.) Clue: From the blessed mouth of Guru Gobind Singh ji in their final words: Marry your children to a house where there is "Akal Purkh di Sikhi".

I wouldn't promote the use of vulgar names, but ridicule is absolutely something that the Khalsa used to express their disapproval of a number of things. This is shown in the Khalsa Bola (Khalsa code-language) which used words like "Budh-avtar" for a disabled person to express their belief against pacifism.

What's wrong with ridicule? It's not like we're killing (or even beating) anybody. Ridicule is a non-violent method of expressing disapproval.  A recap:

Are you against socialization? (Please respond.) If so, that would be unbelievable. You are actually against any socialization whatsoever? If not, are you only against socialization when done by Sikhs?

Here's the reason for the ridicule, by the way (excuse the small grammatical error):

Do you agree or disagree that Sikhs should take steps to stop the decimation of their community? Finally, do you agree with the mission of Guru Nanak Dev ji, and do you want to preserve the Sikh community or not?

Great reply, there are those of us who care about the Sikh panth, kaum and desh and there are others who are probably non-sikhs who dont really care what happens in the panth.

We can easily find who they are on the forum and they usually who try question us or try to stop us speaking out against issues that harm Sikh interests, Sikh faith, Sikh families and future Sikh demographics.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Singh1989 said:

QUESTION! Is this what we as Sikhs have come down to? To ridicule other's cause whom they're married to? AND to ridicule/ call them names behind keyboards?

Good question? It seems like It's far easier to sit and condemn people who have no material relevance to our lives.. Rage against a non-existent threat.. Rather in the imagined defense of the quam people undermine and degenerate the beliefs they think they are supposed to be upholding. Ironic isn't it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Good question? It seems like It's far easier to sit and condemn people who have no material relevance to our lives.. Rage against a non-existent threat.. Rather in the imagined defense of the quam people undermine and degenerate the beliefs they think they are supposed to be upholding. Ironic isn't it 

Arent you meant to be on quality control?

Wasnt your last account placed in quality mode for mocking one of the 52 commandments of guru gobind singh ji stating a sikh daughter should only be given to another sikh family for marriage?

 

Edited by genie
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, genie said:

Arent you meant to be on quality control?

Wasnt your last account placed in quality mode for mocking one of the 52 commandments of guru gobind singh ji stating a sikh daughter should only be giving to another sikh?

 

it would help if you constructed a coherent question.. 

Are someone mocked 'one of the 52' (interesting mix between numerals and words) commandments (are you talking about hukumnana? )  stating "a Sikh daughter should only be giving to another Sikh" what exactly is a Sikh (if you are going to quote hukumnana then atleast try and be 'Shudh') ?  If you gonna step up raise your game 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

it would help if you constructed a coherent question.. 

Are someone mocked 'one of the 52' (interesting mix between numerals and words) commandments (are you talking about hukumnana? )  stating "a Sikh daughter should only be giving to another Sikh" what exactly is a Sikh (if you are going to quote hukumnana then atleast try and be 'Shudh') ?  If you gonna step up raise your game 

http://sikhsangat.com/index.php?/profile/45987-sukhvirk76/

This you right? The same he/she that was wetting them-self with sheer idiocy as you put it because you got called out for promoting inter-faith relationships and mocking Guru Ji's commandments against such relationships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, genie said:

http://sikhsangat.com/index.php?/profile/45987-sukhvirk76/

This you right? The same he/she that was wetting them-self with sheer idiocy as you put it because you got called out for promoting inter-faith relationships and mocking Guru Ji's commandments against such relationships.

Hahaha.. can you even quote a commandment? Come on let's see how far your intellect takes you.. Isn't it ironic that you call yourself 'genie'? Shall I pretend  I'm Aladdin lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You obviously have no respect for the tropes and values you so hide behind.. If you did you wouldn't make such lazy comments 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Hahaha.. can you even quote a commandment? Come on let's see how far your intellect takes you.. Isn't it ironic that you call yourself 'genie'? Shall I pretend  I'm Aladdin lol 

Just as I thought...spoken like a true non-sikh.

Go read up on the 52 commandments of Guru Gobind Singh Ji....find the one that is talking about Sikh daughters then come back to me if you think I'm wrong.

 

Edited by genie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, genie said:

Just as I thought...spoken like a true non-sikh.

Go read up on the 52 commandments of Guru Gobind Singh Ji....find the one that is talking about Sikh daughters then come back to me if you think I'm wrong.

Hahaha 

You're the one who made the claim.. Show me where you get your assertion from.. 

Don't worry I don't expect you will because you can't, because you're lazy and can't think or understand the importance of being concise (shudh). Jog on 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-6-5 at 9:19 PM, genie said:

kids they got muslim names. I feel sorry for the kids it must be embarrassing having a mom like that.

Muslim names.. Hahaha 

From someone who is self named "genie" from the Arabic story of 1001 nights.. Jinn

How ridiculous lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Some people don't know sikhi if it came and slapped them in the face 

http://sikhsangat.com/index.php?/profile/45987-sukhvirk76/

Why you creating new accounts to escape quality control?

And sikhi according to you is mocking the commandments of Guru Ji and allowing interfaith Sikh marriages/relationships? 

And now your posting like an hysterical woman post after post after post. Calm down dear you cant escape, your exposed now.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, genie said:

http://sikhsangat.com/index.php?/profile/45987-sukhvirk76/

Why you creating new accounts to escape quality control?

And sikhi according to you is mocking the commandments of Guru Ji and allowing interfaith Sikh marriages/relationships? 

And now your posting like an hysterical woman post after post after post. Calm down dear you cant escape, your exposed now.

 

Lol.

You can't even substantiate anything you have said.. You have falsely  referenced a hukumnama and attributed something to Guru gobind Singh Ji, dashmesh pita.. Shame on you.. Your worse than ram rai 

The wording of your reference is totally wrong which demonstrates the respect you have for the words of Guru sahibs. 

Better to post as a woman than as a half baked fake.. You shook? 

I tell you what let's go back to basics.. Since you are a authority on things can you please provide me with a reference number of the hukumnama you are talking about and a link to it.. 

Forgive me for assuming that you probably have never done your own research 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now