Jump to content

digraceful indian punjabi woman sukwinder javeed and her muslim husband going to be on uk big brother tv show


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

Those Sikh girls that are in relationships with Muslims took that decision before watching Big Brother, lol. 

So, ask yourself what aspects of our existence and our collective culture (in terms of the NRI life)  leads these relationships to happen? You're getting upset at the manifestation of the problem whilst completely ignoring the causes.

Do you know what the causes are?

First of all I am not getting worked up. 

I am not sure why I have to explain things in minute details. But here we go. 

Girls could be at the stage were they are thinking of going with a muslim. They see this randi on tv who has actually married one and then get influenced by it to go ahead with their relationship. This girl is normalizing it and taking away the shock factor of seeing this happen.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

First of all I am not getting worked up. 

I am not sure why I have to explain things in minute details. But here we go. 

Girls could be at the stage were they are thinking of going with a muslim. They see this randi on tv who has actually married one and then get influenced by it to go ahead with their relationship. This girl is normalizing it and taking away the shock factor of seeing this happen.  

Again, why are obsessing over the final step? Why are you struggling to identify the myriad stages - as you describe it "thinking of going with a Muslim" - leading up to the fateful act?

What's transpiring in these girls' minds, in their families, in their social circle, their community, in their god-forsaken countries, that are leading them to make these decisions?

Banning Big Brother or whatever it is you hope to do, isn't going to prevent the cognitive processes of such people from making those choices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

If it is any consolation - and it really shouldn't be - we aren't alone in experiencing these policies of the erosion and gradual destruction of our religious and ethnic identity. It's just felt more keenly by us because these issues are closer to home.

And for those of you who exist to expound the bachchans of your beloved Karl Marx and his Bolshevik cohorts, distorting the message, "Recognise the human race as one," is NOT the same as, "The human race should merge into one." So don't even try playing semantics with me, lol.

this is whats taking place here :

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-peoples-of-europe/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

First of all I am not getting worked up. 

I am not sure why I have to explain things in minute details. But here we go. 

Girls could be at the stage were they are thinking of going with a muslim. They see this randi on tv who has actually married one and then get influenced by it to go ahead with their relationship. This girl is normalizing it and taking away the shock factor of seeing this happen.  

 

If, by now, SIkh families haven't twigged on to what goes on, and we haven't learnt (let alone actively practice) psychological inoculation education towards young girls (and boys) about these things, we're screwed anyway. 

This doesn't mean simplistic 'musalmaan khol naheen jaana!' lectures but more in depth stuff. Especially moms and dads forming practical, close bonds with daughters (instead of watching bull5hit TV dramas all day or going to the pub). Conditioning and socialising the girls correctly. 

Any apnee growing up in the west today, will have the 'shock factor' diminished by the time they are in their early teens. Especially in this day and age, when we have a small army of 'half Sikh, half sullah' kids running around. (Plus other mixed-race kids).  Goray will encourage them to elope with any one they fancy (both on a personal level and through media as in this example), and many sullian around them in schools/colleges/universities will encourage them to have relations with other tonday. 

The starting point is to have Sikh boys become the toughest, strongest, smartest males around, so they are at least attractive in comparison to other masculine males. Moms are big time guilty of pussifying Sikh males from what I've seen, so we have to keep an eye on them. Sikh men have to take charge again. We've had matriarchy for a generation or two now, and all it has done is f**k us over and turned us into he-b1tches. I notice that non-dramatic, clued up, strong Sikh women often create strong Sikh sons.

We should all know now - we have to keep a close eye on what the females are doing. Not only sisters and daughters but moms and massis and chachis etc. At this moment in time (and our history tells us it wasn't always like this), they are our weak link (and all other communities know this about us). That doesn't mean blokes let rip into the girls like dumbos over any little thing by the way, but just quietly know what kind of stupidity they are getting themselves into and subvert it for their own good (knowing they will resent you and hate you for it - but they're girls so most don't know any better).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

If, by now, SIkh families haven't twigged on to what goes on, and we haven't learnt (let alone actively practice) psychological inoculation education towards young girls (and boys) about these things, we're screwed anyway. 

This doesn't mean simplistic 'musalmaan khol naheen jaana!' lectures but more in depth stuff. Especially moms and dads forming practical, close bonds with daughters (instead of watching bull5hit TV dramas all day or going to the pub). Conditioning and socialising the girls correctly. 

Any apnee growing up in the west today, will have the 'shock factor' diminished by the time they are in their early teens. Especially in this day and age, when we have a small army of 'half Sikh, half sullah' kids running around. (Plus other mixed-race kids).  Goray will encourage them to elope with any one they fancy (both on a personal level and through media as in this example), and many sullian around them in schools/colleges/universities will encourage them to have relations with other tonday. 

The starting point is to have Sikh boys become the toughest, strongest, smartest males around, so they are at least attractive in comparison to other masculine males. Moms are big time guilty of pussifying Sikh males from what I've seen, so we have to keep an eye on them. Sikh men have to take charge again. We've had matriarchy for a generation or two now, and all it has done is f**k us over and turned us into he-b1tches. I notice that non-dramatic, clued up, strong Sikh women often create strong Sikh sons.

We should all know now - we have to keep a close eye on what the females are doing. Not only sisters and daughters but moms and massis and chachis etc. At this moment in time (and our history tells us it wasn't always like this), they are our weak link (and all other communities know this about us). That doesn't mean blokes let rip into the girls like dumbos over any little thing by the way, but just quietly know what kind of stupidity they are getting themselves into and subvert it for their own good (knowing they will resent you and hate you for it - but they're girls so most don' know any better).

I feel lax for not pushing the lads into training , we did try karate when they were little, then when young teens jujitsu but they didn't take to it ... We have a full gym built out back and there is a traditional boxing gym within walking distance  but until they say they are interested I feel like I should back off . The younger one of the twins was asking about training up so maybe they will still do it for themselves. Do you reckon this is a better way to handle it , provide the means then let them decide?

Isher Kaur saw wonder woman and is fascinated by fighting like her (many scenes of her training starting from little age)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jkvlondon said:

I feel lax for not pushing the lads into training , we did try karate when they were little, then when young teens jujitsu but they didn't take to it ... We have a full gym built out back and there is a traditional boxi

I can say that having an older role model that encourages them into training (especially weights, calisthenics) from a young age helps. It's like a psychological trick. Boys simply watching an older male they love and aspire to, training, when they are young (I mean like 5/6 onwards) makes most keen to take it up as soon as they can. I don't think  martial arts (which as you might remember was the common thing in the 70s/80s) is a good idea these days. Unless it is boxing and the kids want to do it of their own volition.    

I definitely think good dietary choices by parents, that makes the kids grow as big and strong as they can be is important. 

Them having easy access to a good gym at home is a good and essential step! You have to remove all barriers to them not training, and getting out to the gym (esp. when cold) is usually the first major barrier. Having everything at home saves travel time, gym membership money and allows them not to have to mix with any old fudhu they might meet otherwise. 

Just wait till one of them gets beaten up or loses a girl they feel emotions for, to some muscle head - and watch them jump on the the training! lol  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

The starting point is to have Sikh boys become the toughest, strongest, smartest males around, so they are at least attractive in comparison to other masculine males.

It's unfortunate  that general world culture has gradually moved away from the idea that facial and lengthy hair in general is the default norm for the male appearance, and the idea that a smart and visually appealing demeanour is generally only possible through the careful grooming of hair. Any trends that come into being where long hair becomes fashionable are cyclical and fleeting in nature, and certainly not comparable to the long-term commitment expected of orthodox Sikhs.

Over the course of a few hundred years the trend of shaving and trimming hair has become the norm, and this has unfortunately coincided with the emergence of our faith, and has impacted us as a group more forcefully than anyone else, due to the religious requirements for Sikhs keeping uncut hair being fundamental to our unique identity and spiritual growth.

Essentially, this has hit Sikh males who don't cut their hair the hardest, because, in a broad sense, females - and society as a whole - have been conditioned to accept the clean-shaven appearance to be the attractive norm, and therefore when your women don't find the males belonging to their own religious and cultural group to be worthy of their attention as potential mates, you are going to end up with males of other races and religions swooping in and making the most of those situations. Put it this way: the Sukhwinders of the world aren't running off into the arms of Bin Laden lookalikes, are they? The appeal lies in the clean-shaven visage. The ideology behind that appearance, as it speaks to the female in question, only emerges after some time.

Clearly, in contemporary society, appealing to members of the opposite sex is arguably one of the biggest contributors to Sikh males cutting their hair, with the assumption being that if a Sikh male doesn't cut his hair, he won't attract a mate he assumes he deserves. Obviously, as I keep reiterating, I'm identifying majority behaviour, and not the outliers that buck these trends such as Gursikh females who gladly and willingly embrace the Gursikhi of their partner, uncut hair and all. There are many minor caveats and exceptions in these instances of course.

This is fundamental stuff. It's probably upsetting to read for some, but these issues must be identified and discussed. 

The argument about clean-shaven Punjabi males being eschewed by Sikh females in favour of non-Sikh men - as in the case of this Big Brother couple - is a somewhat separate discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

If, by now, SIkh families haven't twigged on to what goes on, and we haven't learnt (let alone actively practice) psychological inoculation education towards young girls (and boys) about these things, we're screwed anyway. 

This doesn't mean simplistic 'musalmaan khol naheen jaana!' lectures but more in depth stuff. Especially moms and dads forming practical, close bonds with daughters (instead of watching bull5hit TV dramas all day or going to the pub). Conditioning and socialising the girls correctly. 

Any apnee growing up in the west today, will have the 'shock factor' diminished by the time they are in their early teens. Especially in this day and age, when we have a small army of 'half Sikh, half sullah' kids running around. (Plus other mixed-race kids).  Goray will encourage them to elope with any one they fancy (both on a personal level and through media as in this example), and many sullian around them in schools/colleges/universities will encourage them to have relations with other tonday. 

The starting point is to have Sikh boys become the toughest, strongest, smartest males around, so they are at least attractive in comparison to other masculine males. Moms are big time guilty of pussifying Sikh males from what I've seen, so we have to keep an eye on them. Sikh men have to take charge again. We've had matriarchy for a generation or two now, and all it has done is f**k us over and turned us into he-b1tches. I notice that non-dramatic, clued up, strong Sikh women often create strong Sikh sons.

We should all know now - we have to keep a close eye on what the females are doing. Not only sisters and daughters but moms and massis and chachis etc. At this moment in time (and our history tells us it wasn't always like this), they are our weak link (and all other communities know this about us). That doesn't mean blokes let rip into the girls like dumbos over any little thing by the way, but just quietly know what kind of stupidity they are getting themselves into and subvert it for their own good (knowing they will resent you and hate you for it - but they're girls so most don't know any better).

this is definatley what has been happening - as I gave in my example from school.

But in my opinion the issue goes deeper - we need to know what is happening with the females in our community, why are they so disgruntled with our society, especially when Sikhs as a whole are very easy going, allowing daughters to study and pursue careers.

many apnian just don't wanna know, and from my understanding its the conditioning at home.

Im not event talking about modern auntyian - Im reffering to some very traditional women, who tell their daughters they need not worry if there potential match is not a sikh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
4 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's unfortunate  that general world culture has gradually moved away from the idea that facial and lengthy hair in general is the default norm for the male appearance, and the idea that a smart and visually appealing demeanour is generally only possible through the careful grooming of hair. Any trends that come into being where long hair becomes fashionable are cyclical and fleeting in nature, and certainly not comparable to the long-term commitment expected of orthodox Sikhs.

Over the course of a few hundred years the trend of shaving and trimming hair has become the norm, and this has unfortunately coincided with the emergence of our faith, and has impacted us as a group more forcefully than anyone else, due to the religious requirements for Sikhs keeping uncut hair being fundamental to our unique identity and spiritual growth.

Essentially, this has hit Sikh males who don't cut their hair the hardest, because, in a broad sense, females - and society as a whole - have been conditioned to accept the clean-shaven appearance to be the attractive norm, and therefore when your women don't find the males belonging to their own religious and cultural group to be worthy of their attention as potential mates, you are going to end up with males of other races and religions swooping in and making the most of those situations. Put it this way: the Sukhwinders of the world aren't running off into the arms of Bin Laden lookalikes, are they? The appeal lies in the clean-shaven visage. The ideology behind that appearance, as it speaks to the female in question, only emerges after some time.

Clearly, in contemporary society, appealing to members of the opposite sex is arguably one of the biggest contributors to Sikh males cutting their hair, with the assumption being that if a Sikh male doesn't cut his hair, he won't attract a mate he assumes he deserves. Obviously, as I keep reiterating, I'm identifying majority behaviour, and not the outliers that buck these trends such as Gursikh females who gladly and willingly embrace the Gursikhi of their partner, uncut hair and all. There are many minor caveats and exceptions in these instances of course.

This is fundamental stuff. It's probably upsetting to read for some, but these issues must be identified and discussed. 

The argument about clean-shaven Punjabi males being eschewed by Sikh females in favour of non-Sikh men - as in the case of this Big Brother couple - is a somewhat separate discussion.

Totally agree with this, the issue of Kesh must be discussed whenever someone mentions these issues. In most societies it has been considered a terrible thing for a male to keep long hair, (not talking about the religious figures of various religions). The same issue also effects Kaurs who refuse to dishonor Kesh in the face, as well as the rest of the skin. Usually when most females do mention they like facial hair it's usually merely a trend, which will die out soon. But sometimes on both sides people expect unrealistic perfect standards for their marriage partners on the Gursikh side of things.

Also we should not pretend that most people of either gender ever if they are hard-core devotees, don't want an attractive partner as well. So being devout is not good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use