Brainwashed Sikhs how to stop them defending Islam and other non-sikh ideologies?

[genie]

10 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

Remember we got half castes as well whose one parent IS sikh and the other muslim. So they get prwtty confused.

It's more like one parent is Sikh and the other is hindu punjabi / hindu guji. I've come across so many alleged "half sikhs" who come from mixed hindu/sikh parents and so grow up confused and dont end up follow Sikhi at all they follow atheist punjabi or communist ideology/

And then there's others who say they are Sikh when i probed a bit further about their background turns out they are either namdhari, nirankari or some other sect so parents dont teach them real mainstream Sikhi and their offspring end up confused and easy to convert to other faiths/ideologies.

[genie]

I've just read a *face in palm* moment comment in an instagram post in sikh youth bham's page where a liberal leftist sikh girl said "Guru nanak said be a good human being first before being a Sikh".

Guru nanak never said such a thing, this is how brainwashed they are and how much they know about Sikhi.

[Jonny101]

We should be very careful to not confuse strategic statements of Westerners in regards to historic persecution of Sikhs at the hands of Mughals  as sympathy for Sikhs. The west and Islam are currently at war. And the west is not exactly innocent in all of this either if you see what they have done in Iraq, Syria and Lybia.

 

If they have genuine sympathy for the Sikhs they would raise their voice for the Sikh genocide which occurred in 1984.

[MisterrSingh]

32 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

If they have genuine sympathy for the Sikhs they would raise their voice for the Sikh genocide which occurred in 1984.

The western establishment has been very clever to reframe the above event as an unfortunate side effect of the Indian government legitimately tackling "Sikh militancy," whilst simultaneously attributing the systemic violence inflicted on the Sikh Indian population as an unfortunate case of mob rule. Basically, they're suggesting we brought it upon ourselves, and the subsequent riots were sporadic cases of vigilantism, instead of the government-directed attempted genocide of a minority.

And the tragically laughable aspect of the whole sorry situation is that most of our own Sikhs in the West parrot this demented and false theory, yet they step onto their soapbox and express their distaste for Israel by virtue signalling their support for the Palestinians!

[genie]

10 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

The western establishment has been very clever to reframe the above event as an unfortunate side effect of the Indian government legitimately tackling "Sikh militancy," whilst simultaneously attributing the systemic violence inflicted on the Sikh Indian population as an unfortunate case of mob rule. Basically, they're suggesting we brought it upon ourselves, and the subsequent riots were sporadic cases of vigilantism, instead of the government-directed attempted genocide of a minority.

And the tragically laughable aspect of the whole sorry situation is that most of our own Sikhs in the West parrot this demented and false theory, yet they step onto their soapbox and express their distaste for Israel by virtue signalling their support for the Palestinians!

Some of our current generation of Sikhs in the west are the only religious minority group I know that are moronic enough to fight against their own interests while upholding the rights and and struggles of other communities we have no business being involved.

34 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

We should be very careful to not confuse strategic statements of Westerners in regards to historic persecution of Sikhs at the hands of Mughals  as sympathy for Sikhs. The west and Islam are currently at war. And the west is not exactly innocent in all of this either if you see what they have done in Iraq, Syria and Lybia.

 

If they have genuine sympathy for the Sikhs they would raise their voice for the Sikh genocide which occurred in 1984.

True, Non-Sikhs don't give a toss and don't care for the plight of Sikh struggles that goes for the right wing white working class and the far right white nationalists who want to align themselves to us for support against muslims.... only tommy robinson and his cousin (when they were leading the the EDL) have stood by Sikhs in Sikh protests like the rape of a Sikh girl by a muslim in luton the rest of the thousands of EDL members were no where to be seen.

You can count the number of non-sikhs coming along to june 1984 demonstrations on two hands. In the UK out of a population of 70 million brits only 10 non-sikhs at the most would come to our protests to show solidarity.

So I agree Sikhs should stay out of other peoples mess especially when they do not come to see us in our movements and demonstrations.