Tommy Robinson On Manchester Terrorist Attack

[Hammertime007]

There was a protest in Manchester today a new group called 'unite against hate'.  Headed by Tommy Robinson it isn't to do with football supporter groups.  It a cross section of people,  who spoke about grooming and terrorism.

[Premi5]

On 2017-6-3 at 2:57 PM, Not2Cool2Argue said:

Thats why i made sure to say SGGS  

And in dasam granth, he is not portrayed as a person to be revered

do you have some quotes from Dasam Bani?

[MisterrSingh]

13 minutes ago, Hammertime007 said:

There was a protest in Manchester today a new group called 'unite against hate'.  Headed by Tommy Robinson it isn't to do with football supporter groups.  It a cross section of people,  who spoke about grooming and terrorism.

That's all well and good, but I get the impression the likes of Robinson either deliberately or inadvertently miss the point when they get together and begin to protest about these issues. Muslims are doing what they're doing because the social and political culture has allowed them to. Whoever sets the tone of society and life in general needs to be the true object of people's ire. It's like being angry at the ventriloquist's dummy for something offensive uttered by the ventriloquist. It doesn't make sense. 

[13Mirch]

On 5/29/2017 at 4:30 PM, MisterrSingh said:

There's just something... I get suspicious when we're used, however innocuous it may be, to help someone's argument against Muslims. It makes me feel as if we're being flattered for cynical ends. As a community, and more so on an individual basis, we are incredibly susceptible to flattery and praise, which occasionally leads us to undertaking ill advised action, or at least adopting certain unhelpful attitudes. Yet I do think it's important the stark distinction between Sikh and Muslim must be made to the wider public, especially to the average person who assumes a beard and a covered head denote the same ideology. 

Islamic apologists amongst Sikhs, and some Muslims, will always cite the "divide and conquer" mantra, which is laughable in itself due to the mistaken belief that we as two distinct faith groups were ever unified, but to my mind that's another symptom of an interesting issue that's been brought into sharp focus since the Manchester attack whereby it's clear that Muslims (and some traitorous Sikhs) cannot bear to see Sikhs illuminated in a positive light in mainstream society, especially if it serves to highlight the contrast between our two religions and their respective people.

Be very, very wary of those who are quick to decry Sikhs for daring to differentiate themselves from Islam and Muslims. More often than not such behaviour is rooted in a devious enviousness and downright maliciousness. The unspoken subtext on the part of Muslims for not wanting us to be viewed positively is, "If we're being made to look bad, why are Sikhs being singled out for praise? They should be made to suffer for Muslim devilry." That's the mindset we're dealing with here; a vindictive, warped, and malicious desire to see Sikhs tarred with the same brush as them. Don't fall for their games. 

Valid, very valid. Our battle should be on three fronts:

1.) Against Islamic falsification of Sikhi and the Sikh past.

2.) Against the neo-liberals in our own Qaum.

3.) Against exploiters who would have us as front-line fodder in the battle against the Koranic state.

[MisterrSingh]

6 hours ago, 13Mirch said:

Valid, very valid. Our battle should be on three fronts:

1.) Against Islamic falsification of Sikhi and the Sikh past.

2.) Against the neo-liberals in our own Qaum.

3.) Against exploiters who would have us as front-line fodder in the battle against the Koranic state.

Why has the above in bold reared its head? What's the logic behind it? I'm frankly quite surprised. The Indian subversion is an open secret, but why are the Islamics getting involved? 

[MisterrSingh]

A march against radical islam took place in Manchester yesterday. The media and the press re-branded it as a "Far Right" gathering. 

A white woman telling a black man - who was a witness to the National Front in the 70's and 80's - that he's a Nazi. Lol.

[jashb]

51 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

A march against radical islam took place in Manchester yesterday. The media and the press re-branded it as a "Far Right" gathering. 

A white woman telling a black man - who was a witness to the National Front in the 70's and 80's - that he's a Nazi. Lol.

 

The so called "anti-fascists" are inherently more intolerant, fascist and racist than those they pretend to oppose. The complete stupidity, incoherence and lack of any kind of skill of the women in this "debate" speaks volumes. If these are the kind of degenerates that eulogise and form the base of support of Jeremy Corbyn, I'm glad Labour didn't win.

In truth, what these communists really oppose is the right of anybody to criticise islam.

[Ranjeet01]

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

A march against radical islam took place in Manchester yesterday. The media and the press re-branded it as a "Far Right" gathering. 

A white woman telling a black man - who was a witness to the National Front in the 70's and 80's - that he's a Nazi. Lol.

What I find even more interesting is that way the Police Liaison officer goes up to the black guy rather than the white woman.

The black guy was much more measured compared to the hysterical white woman. 

The police it seems have been told who to target.

I do not think from a race or gender point of view, but from political point of view.

[MisterrSingh]

1 minute ago, Ranjeet01 said:

What I find even more interesting is that way the Police Liaison officer goes up to the black guy rather than the white woman.

The black guy was much more measured compared to the hysterical white woman. 

The police it seems have been told who to target.

I do not think from a race or gender point of view, but from political point of view.

Yes, that's exactly my point. Look at those who are doing the protecting and enabling of these so-called victim classes. 

[Kira]

18 hours ago, Premi5 said:

do you have some quotes from Dasam Bani?

It isn't so much he shouldn't be revered. He's in the same boat as the Devtas like Vishnu,Brahma, Shiva even Durga who's said to be above them as well. All of them are lost in Maya who has enslaved them all. 

 

ਮਹਾਦੀਨ ਤਬ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਉਪਰਾਜਾ ॥ ਅਰਬ ਦੇਸ ਕੋ ਕੀਨੋ ਰਾਜਾ ॥੨੬॥ ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਏਕ ਪੰਥ ਉਪਰਾਜਾ ॥ ਲਿੰਗ ਬਿਨਾ ਕੀਨੇ ਸਭ ਰਾਜਾ ॥ ਸਭ ਤੇ ਅਪਨਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਾਯੋ ॥ ਸਤਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਕਾਹੂੰ ਨ ਦ੍ਰਿੜਾਯੋ ॥੨੭॥
 

That's the verse Guru Gobind Singh Ji wrote as coming directly from Akaal.