Jump to content

ALL real Sikhs should actively tarnish the Hindustan and India brand just as they do so to Sikhs and Khalistan


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Lately I have seen a resurgence of hindu extremists with their fellow bedfellows atheist indian nationalist extremists trying to tarnish Sikhi, the image of Sikh martyred shaheeds of 1980s/90s and the khalistan movement. Especially on social media on sites such as youtube and twitter.

It is not coming out of thin air, this is all funded by RSS hindutva extremists and the Indian government in general in a war of propaganda and defamation to try to ruin the Sikhs in the west image and Khalistan image basically negative perceptions of the brand in marketing terms just like they had done so in the 1980s.

Lately we have seen fake news articles to defame Sikh Canadian women trying to link them with islamic terrorists of ISIS. We have seen how Indian news channels show Sikhs in canada fighting for peaceful democratic referendum in punjab for khalistan in 2020 being called Khalistani terrorists and being lumped in with jihadi muslim terrorists who hate all non-muslims. This is a clever tactic to brainwash simple minded low IQ people into thinking Muslim Jihadi terrorists have the same agenda as Sikh separatists/nationalists when they clearly don't.

As usual we have the usual low IQ fake Sikhs in india with Stockholm syndrome trying to be patriots knowing full well Indian government's genocide, state terrorism and war crimes against ethnic and religious minorities

Unfortunately the REAL Sikhs who are allowed to think outside the box and do not fall for Indian propaganda seem to be quite as a mouse in the face of such hostility. It seems like the kaums intelligentsia and wise political intellectuals have gone asleep or not caring about that anti-sikh anti-freedom rhetoric coming out from India and Indians against Sikhs and their political aspirations.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi

Even Gyaani Maskeen ji acknowledged that sikhs in punjab were merely 5% more than non-sikhs and that there was a purposeful evil agenda of reducing this 5% so that demographically the sikhs can be crushed 

because in a democracy , demography is the only winning factor ! (Yes Gyaani maskeen ji acknowledged this too)

Source :

 

Meanwhile when we ask fellow sikhs to help in increasing our numbers, they scoff at the idea and would rather say "quality is more important than quantity" . Such sikhs prefer to live in la-la land and they're only sabotaging the future of kaum. We already have suffered loss by trusting the hindu nation in 1947 . 

Muslims understood this brahminical agenda well and thats why they opted for separate country for sovereignty in 1947 . You should read the earlier works of Muhammad Iqbal (founding poet of pakistan ) much before of 1947 and just a few years before 1947. Much before 1947 , he penned the famous song "Sare jahaa se achha" (still sung widely in india) and just a few years before 1947 he had said something on the lines of "Ab toh sharm aati hai iss watan ko apna watan kehte hue"

Point is: Pakis knew very well that in post 1947 india, brahmans would be calling the shots and before 1947 itself , brahmans had shown their true colors  (RSS was formed in 1925)  towards muslims, christians and sikhs. 

For the muslims and sikhs they wanted their assimilation back in the hindu fold . Too bad that while our muslim brothers saw this beforehand and acted , while we couldn't ! Since then the kaum has suffered, both religiously and politically.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Even Gyaani Maskeen ji acknowledged that sikhs in punjab were merely 5% more than non-sikhs and that there was a purposeful evil agenda of reducing this 5% so that demographically the sikhs can be crushed 

because in a democracy , demography is the only winning factor ! (Yes Gyaani maskeen ji acknowledged this too)

Source :

 

Meanwhile when we ask fellow sikhs to help in increasing our numbers, they scoff at the idea and would rather say "quality is more important than quantity" . Such sikhs prefer to live in la-la land and they're only sabotaging the future of kaum. We already have suffered loss by trusting the hindu nation in 1947 . 

Muslims understood this brahminical agenda well and thats why they opted for separate country for sovereignty in 1947 . You should read the earlier works of Muhammad Iqbal (founding poet of pakistan ) much before of 1947 and just a few years before 1947. Much before 1947 , he penned the famous song "Sare jahaa se achha" (still sung widely in india) and just a few years before 1947 he had said something on the lines of "Ab toh sharm aati hai iss watan ko apna watan kehte hue"

Point is: Pakis knew very well that in post 1947 india, brahmans would be calling the shots and before 1947 itself , brahmans had shown their true colors  (RSS was formed in 1925)  towards muslims, christians and sikhs. 

For the muslims and sikhs they wanted their assimilation back in the hindu fold . Too bad that while our muslim brothers saw this beforehand and acted , while we couldn't ! Since then the kaum has suffered, both religiously and politically.

 

Yes the writing on the wall for religious minorities was on the wall in 1947 by the oppression of dominant communities. If Sikhs had opted for Pakistan they would have had the same conditions perhaps worse due to Islamification of punjab agenda by the pakistani islamic politicians and mullahwad clerics. The situation isn't any better in India where they have given us genocides and attacks on our holiest shrines, scriptures and institutions. The brahminwad priestly class do not want people in Indian subcontinent to escape their power clutches. The late british prime minister Winston Churchill himself didnt want indian Independence for preciously that reason.

The best course of action would have been a separate Sikh nation state of sikhistan or khalistan back in 1947. However its never too late to back independence for Khalistan, it is important for Indian Sikhs to keep supporting Khalistan covertly even if they are "proud Indian Sikhs" so that they can hold the hindutva orgs and indian government accountable for any misdeeds against Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
1 hour ago, genie said:

However its never too late to back independence for Khalistan, it is important for Indian Sikhs to keep supporting Khalistan covertly even if they are "proud Indian Sikhs" so that they can hold the hindutva orgs and indian government accountable for any misdeeds against Sikhs

sorry bro ! time's out .

It is too late to back independence for sikh nation. Most indian sikhs are way too assimilated into indian culture that majority of them won't back independence from india and even if they did, they would be shot down again like '84. We have to be a foolish lot to try again method which failed previously.

Hindus have tried all ways of chanakya neeti to oppress sikhs and sikhi .

Saam , Daam , Dand, Bhed

Saam (equality) : pretend sikhs are their equals . Recent 100 crore donation by govt of India to celebrate birth anniversay of Guru Gobind Singh 

Daam (pay to enemy) : Badals and 100 crore.

Dand (punishment) : 1984

Bhed (division in enemy) :   Causing division in sikhs by creating radhasoamis and nirankaris , separating ravidasias from sikhs (although we too are faulty in this one).

Most indian sikhs can not cause sedition because we're too less in numbers and will be easily crushed. Why were pakis able to assert politically and take away pakistan ? their numbers !

Still sikhs think our merit is in our low population. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Hindus have tried all ways of chanakya neeti to oppress sikhs and sikhi .

Saam , Daam , Dand, Bhed

Most indian sikhs can not cause sedition because we're too less in numbers and will be easily crushed. Why were pakis able to assert politically and take away pakistan ? their numbers !

Still sikhs think our merit is in our low population. 

Yes that part is true they have implemented chanakya system to the fullest but they also had help from their soviet USSR allies the KGB to enact the oppress techniques against Sikhs and other minorities.

There are pockets of support for Khalistan in india not all are brainwashed the working class Sikhs are the biggest supports of Khalistan in india however there are even some in the middle class and some in the elites layers of the system that secretly hold the dream of Khalistan.

Even if they may say so to your face in the open they don't support Khalistan however deep down they know Sikhs made a huge mistake in 1947 not fighting unitedly for a separate Sikh country and that you need their own country in order to survive and thrive in this world because the dominant communities continue to oppress them as a minority without readdress.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

sorry bro ! time's out .

It is too late to back independence for sikh nation. Most indian sikhs are way too assimilated into indian culture that majority of them won't back independence from india and even if they did, they would be shot down again like '84. We have to be a foolish lot to try again method which failed previously.

Hindus have tried all ways of chanakya neeti to oppress sikhs and sikhi .

Saam , Daam , Dand, Bhed

Saam (equality) : pretend sikhs are their equals . Recent 100 crore donation by govt of India to celebrate birth anniversay of Guru Gobind Singh 

Daam (pay to enemy) : Badals and 100 crore.

Dand (punishment) : 1984

Bhed (division in enemy) :   Causing division in sikhs by creating radhasoamis and nirankaris , separating ravidasias from sikhs (although we too are faulty in this one).

Most indian sikhs can not cause sedition because we're too less in numbers and will be easily crushed. Why were pakis able to assert politically and take away pakistan ? their numbers !

Still sikhs think our merit is in our low population. 

pakistan was made to make life easy for zionist sponsored govt in India despite 'freedom'  we still saw immense kowtowing to UK interests in India and preferential treatment. By splitting our homelands neither pakis nor Hindians were bothered by a strong sikh political voice  because they were busy trying to play catch up after all the carnage, homelessness and monetary loss.  When we did start to look up from our daily toil, to speak up for ourselves by to refuse signing the constitution the first Hamla on Harmandir Sahib happens ...to teach us who is boss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
22 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Not an example to aspire to. They are a laughing stock and a real menace in equal measures. Political correctness prevents western leaders and politicians speaking openly and freely about Pakistan.

Pakistan is still a country ! It started well in 1947 atleast , though nowadays china is colonizing it economically. 

The mistake jinnah made was handing over the country to mullahs , well I guess he didn't have much of a chance since the country was founded on basis of religion.

I think paki muslims were wise enough than us as they got away with partitioning india , despite LOTS OF opposition from hindu politicians even back then. 

Atleast they have their country, an international representation, What do we have ? we have to beg to india's foreign ministry everytime a sikh gets killed in foreign country . 

We can't even frame laws based on our religion to promote it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use