Jump to content

Another Violent Attack on a Missionary?


BhForce
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jonny101 said:

That's it. Missionaries have spread so many lies against Gurpreet Singh just because he was once a Mona in his lifetime. Yet they all have no problem supporting a calendar made by Purewal who was also a former Mona

 

Bro 

There are many gursikhs from muslim and hindu roots... my philosophy know them by their deeds ...Bhai Rama Singh ji no better example in my life for model Khalsa  I'm sure there are many buti  Purewal is not amritdhari or even an honest person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PokeYourPinealGland said:

i do wonder if the proponents and opponents of dasam granth have thoroughly studied the teachings of Guru Granth Sahib ji, and then compared the thought process of the two and see what our guru says versus what dasam granth says....probably unlikely.

 

Yea that has been happening since 1708. Until about 100 years ago, there was no problem. Then some foolish Singh Sabha extremists starting doubts part of Sri Dasme Patshah's Granth and then moved onto Sri Guru Granth Sahib. You need to study more Sheikhyobooty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

well I had seen the questioning videos but had heard him speak in mona form talking about dasam Granth defending it so I just said to myself he has some knowledge but I also know from RSS parchar for their tranining camps that they do go heavy on training in Dasam Granth to manipulate sangat into believing hindu devi devta pooja is jehaz for sikhs. So just left it as oh well nice to know ( I feel mixed about monay knowing so much and yet not getting influenced by the bani they read enough to feel for bringing their guroop out)

Gurpreet Singh's family background is that he comes from a long line of scholars. HIs father was a former Ragi in Sri Harmandir Sahib, Amritsar. His uncles are well educated scholars as well. That is why he has a lot of knowledge of Sikh scriptures. Of course even the best of us can sometimes come under bad sangat and become Mona as he was when he was a young man. But very soon he realized his mistake and became a Gurmukh. This should certainly not be used against him. In fact this is a point which should only be used to inspire others to follow his example of coming back to his Guru ji.

 

If one reads Hindu propaganda, it is Bani from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee which they use the most since Dasam Bani is the most critical of Hindu Devtas and shows them as weak who get easily beaten up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chatanga said:

 

Yea that has been happening since 1708. Until about 100 years ago, there was no problem. Then some foolish Singh Sabha extremists starting doubts part of Sri Dasme Patshah's Granth and then moved onto Sri Guru Granth Sahib. You need to study more Sheikhyobooty.

there are many echoes and points linking the two not to mention the battle theme in both ...shame people believe worldly book knowledge above Guru ji's shabads. Guess being seen as 'modern and educated' really brings out the ignorance for all to see. I would love to have lived back then and had true vichar opportunity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

and is now doing great Seva in defending Dasam Granth against these heretics.

 

And we need to follow BHai Gurpreet Singh's example.

 

13 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

but I also know from RSS parchar for their tranining camps that they do go heavy on training in Dasam Granth to manipulate sangat into believing hindu devi devta pooja is jehaz for sikhs

 

The RSS actually quote more from SGGS than they do from Sri Dasme Patshah's Granth Sahib. Guru Granth mentions "Ram" "Hari" "Ishwar" and these are the lines they use. There is very little/nothing  in Sri Dasme Patshah's granth that RSS can use in terms of manipulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jonny101 said:

Gurpreet Singh's family background is that he comes from a long line of scholars. HIs father was a former Ragi in Sri Harmandir Sahib, Amritsar. His uncles are well educated scholars as well. That is why he has a lot of knowledge of Sikh scriptures. Of course even the best of us can sometimes come under bad sangat and become Mona as he was when he was a young man. But very soon he realized his mistake and became a Gurmukh. This should certainly not be used against him. In fact this is a point which should only be used to inspire others to follow his example of coming back to his Guru ji.

 

If one reads Hindu propaganda, it is Bani from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee which they use the most since Dasam Bani is the most critical of Hindu Devtas and shows them as weak who get easily beaten up.

they usually troll by saying that Dasam Bani is just ripped off from Markande Puran and Gita whereever there is a video on Dasam Bani, sikhi or Guru Pita ji

I get what you are saying but they are totally obsessed with their argument they cannot see its pointlessness

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PokeYourPinealGland said:

i only study from Guru Granth Sahib.

Yes MrSingh you say this but then come out with :

4 minutes ago, PokeYourPinealGland said:

maybe its those parts of dasam granth that include pornography?

 

4 minutes ago, PokeYourPinealGland said:

i still wonder why it used to be called bachitar natak first

 

Why are you wondering this if you study only from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2017-5-20 at 10:09 AM, BhForce said:

Meaning that we turn our back on Punjabi, and in a generation or so, we (young generation) won't be able to speak, understand, or read Punjabi/Gurmukhi? Do note that many/most of the schisms in Christianity are due to differences of translation. For example, was it wine or grape juice that Jesus drank at the Last Supper? In Gurbani, does Deen mean "poor" or "religion"? If we're familiar with Punjabi/Gurmukhi, then you just leave it as is "deen". If not, then you make the decision right there as to what it's going to be translated as, and you have one set of people wanting to fight for the poor, and another to fight for religion. (Lare deen ke het).

Do you mean to say (some) "homegrown" parcharaks aren't troublemakers? AFAIK, the tradition-denying "Tiger Jatha" is "homegrown". So is Niddar and crew. It's quite naive to think that "homegrown" parcharaks will have no agenda and full Gurmat gian.

tiger jatha have not produce anything but troll video no parchaar vids as far I remember , and Niddar well less said best said. I'm talking about the real deal guys and girls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jkvlondon said:

they usually troll by saying that Dasam Bani is just ripped off from Markande Puran and Gita whereever there is a video on Dasam Bani, sikhi or Guru Pita ji

I get what you are saying but they are totally obsessed with their argument they cannot see its pointlessness

 

True but till this date they have not been able to prove where in Markande Puran or which ever Puran translations are from. Guru Jee writes Chandi Di Vaar and Chandi Charitar from a Gurmat perspective. These Banis give Sikhs our warrior spirit. And that is exactly what the Indian government wants to destroy. It is just a coincident that all the Shaheeds have been full believes in Dasam Bani? Yet why is it that not one missionary who has doubt on Dasam Bani has been to produce even one Shaheed till date. They just like to talk tough but cannot even kill a mosquito.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use