Jump to content
AjeetSinghPunjabi

Can daily masturbation ruin my prospects of having a healthy child ?

Recommended Posts

I am 27 and a half. 

Although I am gay (only attracted to males and not females) , so one would wonder I would die childless. However if in future I choose to have a child, do I risk having serious issues with his/her health ? will my child be born normal as i think that by then there might be chromosomal abnormalities in DNA of sperms.

for me masturbation is like smoking. its a stress buster , as I never smoke or drink ever. 

So do I have to quit it off although it would be really tough. The longest I have been without waanking was 42 days last july

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,845

Masturbation does absolute nothing in terms of ruining the prospect of having a child, (there are dangers, but infertility is not one of them). But what you do need for a child is an erection,(you could fake an erection, but that's totally different), and masturbation does cause erection problems, but I wouldn't consider you stopping masturbation until you are married, because unless you get that Gur-prassad needed remedy, (blessed Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji:waheguru:), you are going to be horny a lot. 

The rest, I wouldn't know since I've never had sex, nor am I married.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
singh598    381

Masturbation causes physical weakness poor cognition as well problems with the genitalia...Gurbani clearly states the results of lust and anger 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not talking about physical issues (impotence, etc).

Impotence means inability to get erect which is true in my case because erection can't happen without sexual desire which I don't feel for women at all. Infertility means some problem in sperm and this is what my concern is .

As you're aware , cell division can at times cause errors in dna copying and this is where genetic variation and sometimes diseases like autism, aspergers, etc come into pic. If a guy masturbate a lot, I am PRESUMING that guy will have more genetic copying and therefore chance of error because sperm is produced at greater rate than a guy who's not so masturbating and hence might produce lesser sperm.

Ofcourse, this is purely my presumption. Nocturnal emissions do happen in case of men . I didn't masturbate once for 15 days and on 15th night I had a flood in my boxers lol. 

So my question still stands, rephrased "Does a guy who fapp much has more sperm production per day than a guy who doesn't or less ?" or maybe I am thinking too much .

but its true that if you have kids later in life (post 35) , chances of genetic defects in them are higher because chances of sperm or egg that they grew out of has higher chances of genetic errors due to chromosomal duplication. And also at times errors in genetic code tend to build on

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,845

If you can't get erect to your wife, that's basically the same as being infertile. And since you aren't even willing to fake an erection, (which could also get her pregnant), how do you really expect her to be happy, or even you to have your dream of a kid.

Sperm dies anyway, so if your not using it in sex, or anything related, it'll natural come out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Predominantly, yeah. england. By the way, the goreh built roads and trains in Bharat ('India') only to easily distribute the goods that they wanted to loot (this word was, also, looted by them when they were looting South Asia) throughout the continent before shipping all of it back to the uk. They did this only for themselves, so it is not a legacy for the people or country but merely a by-product that was left behind. That wealth included: cotton, textiles and metals, which started the industrial revolution in the 1940's/50's tonnes and tonnes of wheat, rice and grains that left millions upon millions of people starving to death through mass famine countless hundreds of trillions of pounds (~ 600), on which the uk economy has been built today historical Sikh artefacts that were 'forced' to be relinquished and are now kept in museums for profit Ironically, the money that Sikhs and other 'Indians' earn today is what, arguably, belonged to their ancestors. You might already know this but before the empire, Panjab was, apparently, one of, if not, the most literate and well-off places in the world. It had thriving industries created from home-grown materials and some of the mughals were investing some of their wealth too e.g. palaces. Now look at the state of it. The hindus and muslims are to blame for this, too, but the goreh started the trail of destruction, in my eyes. People can do their own research and decide for themselves on how they see them but from my experience, they're nice to your face but cunning behind your back. I'm not just talking about the middle-class elite but the common working-class too. You won't always hear or see them say it because it goes against their preferred method. As far as I'm concerned, they're all the same. According to a recent uk survey, 59% of the uk population are 'proud' of the empire and its colonial rule. I think that says it all.
    • I have a question, these Singhs are probably amritdhari so do they manage to get their paath done whilst in jail?
    • the attack happened on 30 September 2012 Mandeep Singh Sandhu and Dilbag Singh were sentenced to 14 years, Harjit Kaur was jailed for 11 years while Barjinder Singh Sangha received a sentence of 10 years and six months. I don't think they are out of jail @S1ngh source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25316370
    • Mandeep Singh Sandhu (the bottom right), Dilbag Singh (second top), Harjit Kaur (bottom left), and Barjinder Singh Sangha (top first)
    • He is a military general for all of his life and above Sikhs were just a common folks. Big difference. That is not the point of the post. Can anyone update if they are up for any parole? Can we write them letters?
×