Singh1989

Story from an EX - gambler and why we shouldn't gamble

2 posts in this topic

Waheguru Ji ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji ki fateh, 

As a new member a bit about myself. I was 17 when I got baptised. 11 years on wards I have, so far, enjoyed every minute of it. STILL am! with kirpa. BUT you have not clicked this post to read about this am sure? So let's got on with the title. Why Sikhs should not gamble...

In late August 2015 I had came up with an idea, to gamble online. I had known it is against the rehat especially for Amritdhaaris. It even states in SGGS "Gamblers, adulterers leave this world barefooted/ empty handed" (referring to NOTHING good can come out of it in the long run), whether you lost a couple of thousands or made millions from less than 100 (pound/ dollar take your pick). But I applied worldly thoughts on myself and thought I could hit it BIG with this shortcut system, besides I been failing lately in life education/ job wise anyways... I opened an account and proceeded to gamble.

Does anyone know why alcohol is bad for you? (NO I do not drink). But thing is, with alcohol intoxicated the mind goes into a state of frenzy. The next morning the drunk person wakes up and says "Where am I? what happened last night?" They may notice their hair has gone short, they have woken up with someone beside them. They do not know what happened. Maharaaj Foresaw the future and asked himself "Drink drivers? How many Sikhs will suffer as victim or perpetrator?" Maharaaj also realised (did this happen back in the days)? that alcohol comes in strengths, like from 3% start (I think thas the start)? to 90% in volume (Accent in France as told by my friend).

Maharaaj also must have thought "Well, if I give the go ahead and say Sikhs can drink a little then it's ok?" BUT Guru Gobind Singh Ji also realised that Sikhs like to bypass Rehats and everyone will waste away their time on debate "How much is less?" IF Maharaaj gave a unit or figure and said "I suppose 100ml glass once a week?" PEOPLE WOULD HAVE DEBATED THAT TODAY AND USED THEIR MANN CHATURIAA OR "INTELLIGENCE" AND 100ML WOULD HAVE BEEN 500ML somehow. We Sikhs can be excellent in by passing rehats as such. 

Dussa Paasha came to a straight point and said "Do not even touch the bottle of alcohol" NO means NO! Let's get back to the point of gambling (I will get back to the point of alcohol and gambling). Anyone familiar with Mahabharaat story will know that the punj pandavs had lost EVERYTHING on gambling. Land, estates, Money, Army, any Businesses right down to their wife!!! Why had they kept playing despite it was a rigged game? THEY KNEW IT WAS RIGGED! because they had HOPE! They hoped the game will eventually turn in their favour.

Today slot machines have a message written on them, that "There is no money within these machines overnight" so robbers know not to rob the place overnight. What will a gambler do first thing in the morning? THEY HAVE HOPE TO POP IN A QUID AND TAKE OUT MAXIMUM WINNINGS! SAME PRINCIPLE, SAME HOPE, SAME SCHEME AS THE TIME OF MAHABHARAT!!! Just like the alcoholist makes fake promises "I'll stop soon" I would like to speak from first hand experience, when gambling and winning you say "I'll stop soon" IT WILL NOT HAPPEN. Like people call money Maya (I don't, i hate that) gambling and alcohols are physical forms of maya too. Once you indulge in them the mind says MORE MORE MORE! and you make these false promises (lying is against rehat too) and you lie to yourself. I can speak from ONE point of view why gambling is forbidden. BECAUSE YOU DO NOT STOP WHEN WINNING UNTIL YOU LOSE ALL THE MONEY!!! It drives you crazy and depressed. Maharaaj does not want to see his Sikhs crazy, depressed and broke. Just like an alcoholist will promise "I shall stop drinking soon" but the brain is pulled like a magnet towards the evils of the physical form of Maya. 

What I mean is, when I was on the website I thought "Okay, if I win £300 I stop for 7 whole days then go again. Where will I be in a year's time?" However, when I got on, first day guess how much I won? from £100 deposit to £3,000!!! Any guesses what happened then? I carried on and until.. I lost the winnings and my deposit too! Within 2 days I had lost £2,000 of REAL money. So much for 7 days, I was not a santokhi bandha to stop first day. THE GAME GIVES YOU FALSE HOPE AND FALSE DREAMS! All the material gains, big cars, big bank balances etc etc. But your mind gets trapped LIKE AN ALCOHOLISTS!!! YOU DO NOT KNOW WHEN TO STOP! 

Now, am sure many people state "Gambling is forbidden as the morals of it, not your money, against an honest living" etc etc THATS 100% TRUE! But it's also true, the only way you'll know why it's TRULY forbidden, the ultimate true way is if you become a gambler (please don't. Just take this ex- gambler's word for it). So, it was an ongoing battle where I lost, won, lost, won lost and won. Whether I won/ lost or neither is not relevant here.

Second part in why not to gamble is because the morals behind it. It's like taking money that does not belong to you. And let's not forget about Karma! If a person wins from gambling like £200,000, enjoys the cash what will happen to them in their next life? Will they be born in a rich family only to lose ALL their wealth of £200,000 and live in poverty? Who has stolen/ taken their cash? maybe the person/ people in the past life that had lost the money on gambling, that YOU then won? This is all perception and an idea. Only Maharaaj knows why bad things happen to good decent people, why people suffer and how much to balance out the Karmas.

I shall write more posts on here, Saakhis, Rehats and, like this post, personal experiences of life. Until then, Bhul chuk maaf, take it easy and feel free to ask questions.  

WJKKWJKF.  

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Singh1989 said:

Maharaaj also must have thought "Well, if I give the go ahead and say Sikhs can drink a little then it's ok?" BUT Guru Gobind Singh Ji also realised that Sikhs like to bypass Rehats and everyone will waste away their time on debate "How much is less?" IF Maharaaj gave a unit or figure and said "I suppose 100ml glass once a week?" PEOPLE WOULD HAVE DEBATED THAT TODAY AND USED THEIR MANN CHATURIAA OR "INTELLIGENCE" AND 100ML WOULD HAVE BEEN 500ML somehow. We Sikhs can be excellent in by passing rehats as such. 

Thanks for sharing your personal sakhi. And thanks also for encouraging people to follow the Rehat in letter and spirit. Some people are so desperate to find little "outs" to get out of following Rehat, they'll do things like take the tuk on alcohol:

ਜਿਤੁ ਪੀਤੈ ਮਤਿ ਦੂਰਿ ਹੋਇ ਬਰਲੁ ਪਵੈ ਵਿਚਿ ਆਇ ॥ 
ਆਪਣਾ ਪਰਾਇਆ ਨ ਪਛਾਣਈ ਖਸਮਹੁ ਧਕੇ ਖਾਇ ॥

and say that it only bans alcohol if you're actually incapacitated by it. Thus ignoring the next tuk (p554):

ਜਿਤੁ ਪੀਤੈ ਖਸਮੁ ਵਿਸਰੈ ਦਰਗਹ ਮਿਲੈ ਸਜਾਇ ॥ 
ਝੂਠਾ ਮਦੁ ਮੂਲਿ ਨ ਪੀਚਈ ਜੇ ਕਾ ਪਾਰਿ ਵਸਾਇ ॥ 

Which says you'll be punished in God's court for drinking it, and to not drink at all.

The reason people do this is they don't accept that they are the learner and that the Guru is the all-knowing teacher. They think that they can be smarter than the Guru, and you don't really need to follow him. This is the same mistake that Ajamal made.

So, yeah, No Means No. 

Edited by BhForce
added vowel marks to Gurbani quotes
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Simple lack of control over the mind.If the mind tells you to do IT you say no and do something else.
    • Ardaas without action is not the solution. Praying for the best outcome whilst doing nothing proactive is madness.
    • I happen to be a statistical nerd so if there are any figures you disagree with that I have quoted above - then mention them and I will justify my figures. Or feel free to offer your statistics in contrast to mine above related to the specific figures I have mentioned and I will tell you why I disagree with you. I will concede that we only have puratan sources to go on regarding my assertion of around 90% of Sikhs being killed in the vadda GhalluGhara 1746-1762. I am also willing to concede that during the Congress Genocide of Sikhs that the percentage of Sikh victims may have been less than 1 in 200 ballpark figure if we extrapolate Shaheed Bhai Jaswant Singh Khalra Ji's figures. Similarly it is possible that in the Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs there may have been more than 20% fatalities. Either way you look at it, in percentage of losses suffered per capita, the Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs was between 50-100 times worse (in percentage terms) than the Congress Genocide of Sikhs between 1984-1995. Thanks  
    • Hey DhadrianWaleZindabad, did you know 97% of stats are made up on the spot? 
    • Ajeet Singh no community should be trusted en masse. Even Sikhs in leadership positions should only be trusted on the basis solely of their actions rather than on the vague basis that they were/are supposedly a Brahmgiani Mahapurkh (eg Mahapurkh Sant Baba Harnam Singh Dhumma Khalsa Bhindranwale or "Faqr-e-Qaum" Badal or Santa or Beanta). Using Lakhpat Rai, Gangu and the various low level employees of the Islamic Mughal Empire is like saying that KPS Gill and General Brar or Punjab Police under Beanta or Badal recently represent the Sikh community. Pawns do the bidding of their more powerful masters. The 1984 Genocide was done in Delhi by a mixture of Hindu's and Muslims. But in the context of Delhi 1984 who physically did the murders is not as crucial as understanding who orchestrated the violence against Sikhs - Congress (Indira) and Rajiv. Interestingly, Damdami Taksal campaigned for Congress (Indira) in the 1980 elections, so we as Sikhs are not without blame for allowing a terrorist like Indira to gain power in 1980. By 1977, 30 years after the Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs in which 20% of our Qaum was killed there (the equivalent of if 6million Sikhs were killed today) most Sikhs had completely forgotten about the Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs and some were more focussed on Indira's pawn Gurbachana. During the Islamic vadda Ghallughara Genocide of Sikhs over 90% of the Sikh population at the time was killed off. During the Congress Genocide of Sikhs up to 1 in 200 of our community's population was murdered by no more than 0.001% to 0.0001% of the Hindu population at the time. Ie 99.99% or 99.999% of Hindu's committed no violence against us. Even the Congress (Indira) supporters at the Rajiv 1984 victory election constituted no more than 15% of the Indian population at the time (which is the maximum extent of the Hindutva minority which currently successfully cons 79% of Indians into falsely thinking that they are Hindu - despite the word "Hindu" being an Arabic word meaning a "black-skinned thief"). So it is highly counterproductive to our own Sikh interests to consider so-called Hindu's in a generalised way as enemies. Rather we should regard the minority of Hindutva supporters as our opponents but regard the general one billion so-called Hindu masses as future sehajdhari Sikhs. They are the biggest and easiest population for Sikhs to expand our numbers (for Sarbat da Bhala) fastest. Realise that the RSS and Hindutva elements are happy when we express generalised hate for Hindu's as they know that keeps their so-called Hindu flock safe from wholescale conversion into sehajdhari Sikhs. The best way to attack Hindutva is to expand the Sikh population by incorporation of erstwhile Hindu's as new Sikhs. If Sikhs are a minority by the 2021 census in Punjab then we will only have ourselves to blame for not reaching out to Hindu Punjabi's and Bihari's in Punjab despite Dashmesh Pita being born in Bihar and most Hindu Punjabi's ancestors attending Gurdwara prior to the terrorist Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Very well said Singh598! 1. True acsap Singh that Santa Niddar Dal Nangs and Damdami Taksal are trying to push their Hindu soch upon ordinary Sikh masses but in Punjab these two so-called jatha's are becoming increasingly irrelevant, People see through them and Dhumma's support of Indira Gandhi in 1980 as well as his murderous attacks on Shaheed Bhai Bhupinder Singh Ji, Bhai Ranjit Singh Dhadrianwale and Bhai Panthpreet Singh Khalsa. 2. Sikhi can NEVER be absorbed by Hinduism! Falsehood (Hinduism) can never absorb the Truth (Sikhi). It is Sikhs who need to absorb our brother peoples in India into Sikhi and liberate them from the lies of Hinduism. All poor and good people in India are fundamentally sehajdhari Sikhs. But if we don't term all Gurdwara attendees as Sikhs and try to restrict the definition of Sikh to as small a population as possible whereas Hindutva strategists do the opposite and include anything with a pulse as being Hindu (for the political power to be gained from falsely terming people as Hindu's) then the fault is ours as Sikhs. But yes I agree with you if we don't include as many people within the Sikh Panth (whereas our enemies strive to include include everyone under the Hindu umbrella) then clearly one method will defeat the other - so we need to strive to include as many non-Punjabi sehajdhari's within the Sikh Panth as possible - as the next Hindutva attack on Sikhs will be to try declare that sehajdhari are non-Sikhs so that Amritdhari Sikhs are reduced to a 3% minority in Punjab (which would be lesser in number than Muslims and Christians in east Punjab) which would be politically impotent in real terms. The puratan definition of a Sikh was anyone who bowed down in matha tek before Guru Sahib.