Has anyone here read the Quran

[BhForce]

3 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I'm referring to the only major translation available, the Singh Khalsa version.

There are actually many English translations available (meaning available the next time you visit Amritsar--might be available on Amazon, I don't know). By "Singh Khalsa" are you referring to the Sant Singh Khalsa version?

Dr. Sant Singh Khalsa was a white (if that matters) American follower of Harbhajan Singh Yogi. His translation has deficiencies, but those deficiencies are not of English usage. If anything, people have praised the Sant Singh Khalsa version for using more modern English.

Broken English is, in my consideration, when you mean to say:

--I gave the book to the man.

saying instead

--Me give book man

That's broken.

But saying "smite" for "strike" or "kine" for "cows" is not wrong in any way.

[jkvlondon]

1 hour ago, BhForce said:

Yes, it's true, ancient India did not have sewn clothes. Guru's bana is stitched clothing, and the reason Sikhs wear stitched clothing (chola, kurta-pajama, salwar-kameez) as opposed to sari and dhoti is as a rejection of Vedic values.

http://www.sanatan.org/en/a/290.html shows Hindu preference for unstitched clothes. See also http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/14/saris-reflect-hindu-values/

first thing is kacchera instead of two dhotis , how the hell did they go to battle and keep their clothes in order without belts etc?

[Guest Jacfsing2]

14 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

first thing is kacchera instead of two dhotis , how the hell did they go to battle and keep their clothes in order without belts etc?

Only Ksychatrias fight in Hinduism, their warrior clothes would be different from regular people's clothes. 

[jkvlondon]

4 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Only Ksychatrias fight in Hinduism, their warrior clothes would be different from regular people's clothes. 

the indian films (modern) depicting such fighters seem to be wearing a version of the dhoti , but the pyjami is Indian or made by apne later in history?

[Guest Jacfsing2]

40 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

the indian films (modern) depicting such fighters seem to be wearing a version of the dhoti , but the pyjami is Indian or made by apne later in history?

A movie is entertainment. There is so much special effects and visual effects you can't even imagine.

[Guest Muhammad]

 

[pavitarsk]

@

[Guest Beautiful Video]

On 23/04/2017 at 7:18 PM, MisterrSingh said:

“I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)

He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hassan’s) shirt and kissed his (little) <banned word filter activated>..”
روى أنه صلى الله عليه و سلم قبل زبيبة الحسن أو الحسين
He (the prophet) kissed the (little) <banned word filter activated> of al Hassan or al Husein
رأيت النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart and kissed his (little) <banned word filter activated>

Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawa’id, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 مجمع الزوائد لعلي بن أبى بكر الهيثمي

رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
رواه الطبراني و إسناده حسن
translated into English: “I saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Husein’s legs apart and kissing his (little) <banned word filter activated>.”

 

You're chatting nonsense. Show me the beauty in any of the above.

 

[MisterrSingh]

On 25/04/2017 at 10:59 PM, Guest Beautiful Video said:

 

No, no, no. No amount of justifications and "scholarly interpretations" can explain away the founder of a major faith kissing little boys' penises. Try that with the mentally ill and gullible, not with me.

[Akalifauj]

On 2017-4-24 at 0:28 AM, Guest Muhammad said:

 

You are a total piece of <banned word filter activated>.  Your time is coming again when Sikhs will burn you cowards alive before skinning you alive and feeding this non halal meat to rest of your brothers begging not to be burnt alive.