Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 21/04/2017 at 7:26 PM, SinghSabha1699 said:

Not at all brother. Mere acceptance of one God (who may be called Allah, Ram or Vaheguru or other True Names interchangably) does not mean that Dhan Dhan Baba Farid Ji Maharaj self-identified as a Muslim.

In order to be Muslim the second line of the Muslim shahada referring to Prophet Muhammad is compulsory. True Sufi's (like Baba Farid Ji Maharaj) being the non-Muslims they are obviously wholeheartedly reject the Prophet Muhammad on account of the well documented and universally acknowledged acts of terrorism, slavery, genocide, paedophilia and misogyny that the Prophet openly engaged in without remorse. Remember in Pakistan the Muslims make the similarly false allegation that Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj were Muslim.

Think about it logically Mr Virk.

Can any Sikh ever sit comfortable when such an accusation is labelled against one of our greatest Gurmukhs (who were so blessed that they authored the Truth of Gurbani)!? 

Accusing Baba Farid Ji Maharaj of being Muslim is the most vile accusation thinkable for a Sikh to read. Though to be fair to you it may be that your belief is that all religions are equal and whether one religion condones slavery, terrorism, paedophilia, genocide and misogyny is merely something that should be ignored and is perfectly acceptable to accuse Dhan Dhan Baba Farid Ji Maharaj of supporting.

This myth cooked up Mughal scribes and the followers of Jinnah that Baba Farid Ji Maharaj were Muslim needs to be destroyed. The nonsensical belief that the 1st Sikh in history (Bhai Mardana Ji) despite being the most ardent Guru ka Sikh somehow should be labelled as a non-Sikh is horrible to read (not that you have said this - but others mistakenly have). And similarly in relation to Dhan Dhan Baba Kabir Ji Maharaj who positively despised the falsehood of Islam (and yet are somehow labelled as belonging to beliefs that they repeatedly exposed as falsehoods). It's crucial we as Sikhs do not inadvertently sully the great names of Gurmukhs who rejected terrorism, slavery, genocide, paedophilia and misogyny as openly glorified in the Holy Quran.

So he was a sufi.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, genie said:

Basically no he wasnt muslim. Not according to mainstream sunni and shia ideological sects who form around 95% of muslim populations.

He would have been and is still considered a heretic (by majority of muslims) and out of the fold of islam for not following the sunnah/hadiths (in his own words he doesn't believe in islamic orthodox beliefs).

Was he a Sikh? Yes he would have come under the defination of a Sikh. All the sufi saints and hindu bhagats in SGGS Ji are not mainstream muslims or mainstream hindu's they had begun the path into forming Sikhi.

So he was a sufi 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

So Baba farid was a Sikh and a sufi? 

Erm, are you the same poster as @Sukhvirk76? The username is almost the same.

If so, why did you create a different account. You must know there are policies against posting using multiple accounts. And it makes locating old content of a user difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
2 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Erm, are you the same poster as @Sukhvirk76? The username is almost the same.

If so, why did you create a different account. You must know there are policies against posting using multiple accounts. And it makes locating old content of a user difficult.

I've had to make a seperate account due to not being able to log-in with it due to that one having to be connected from Facebook, and this site no longer connects with Facebook and I don't really have access to Facebook that much anymore. If I can log-in with the name @SSD, I will show that they are both the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I've had to make a seperate account due to not being able to log-in with it due to that one having to be connected from Facebook, and this site no longer connects with Facebook and I don't really have access to Facebook that much anymore. If I can log-in with the name @SSD, I will show that they are both the same.

Now I'm well and truly confused. Is @Jacfsing2 the same as @Sukhvirk76 or are you just commenting in general about having to make new accounts? Is @Jacfsing2 the same as @SSD?

I do sympathize with having lost passwords and so forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I've had to make a seperate account due to not being able to log-in with it due to that one having to be connected from Facebook, and this site no longer connects with Facebook and I don't really have access to Facebook that much anymore. If I can log-in with the name @SSD, I will show that they are both the same.

Yeah, I got access towards it, but that was only because I had to disconnect the previous log-in system, I rarely use this account for that reason especially with and I had lost access for this account, (and I will continue with @Jacfsing2.)

Just now, BhForce said:

Now I'm well and truly confused. Is @Jacfsing2 the same as @Sukhvirk76 or are you just commenting in general about having to make new accounts? Is @Jacfsing2 the same as @SSD?

I do sympathize with having lost passwords and so forth.

Me and @Sukhvirk76 are not the same person and this is a general conversation of lost accounts and making new ones, as you can see this account isn't on quality control or banned. But I lost access so I made @Jacfsing2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

So Baba farid was a Sikh and a sufi? 

Why are you bothering with whether Sheikh Farid ji was a Sufi at some point or another?

I've explicitly ceded ground that Sheikh ji may have been a Sunni, Shia, or whatever at some point in his life. The debate question is whether  in the end Sheikh ji was a Muslim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

So Baba farid was a Sikh and a sufi? 

Well, as in most debates, things hinge on definitions.

If you define "Sikh" as somebody who has taken Khanda-bata Amrit, wears 5 kakkars, and goes everyday to a Gurdwara (defined as a place of worship where Guru Granth Sahib is installed), and reads Nitnem everyday (Jap, Jaap, Swayye, Chaupai, and Anand), then, no Sheikh ji was not a Sikh.

However, I believe the Bhagats (including Sheikh ji) were of the same basic faith as us: the path of loving devotion towards God, aka, Bhagti. As per Guru's word:

ਸਰਬ ਧਰਮ ਮਹਿ ਸ੍ਰੇਸਟ ਧਰਮੁ ॥ ਹਰਿ ਕੋ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਿ ਨਿਰਮਲ ਕਰਮੁ ॥
Of all religions, the best religion
is to chant the Name of the Lord and maintain pure conduct.

(p266)

Of course, as additional hukums were revealed, they were adhered to. But it's the same basic dharam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use