Jump to content
CHaamCHrick

EU COURT ENDORSES A BAN ON SIKH TURBAN

Recommended Posts

CHaamCHrick    126

http://dalkhalsa.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/eu-eu-court-endorses-ban-on-turban-w.html?m=1

I am not sure if they are going to ban the Sikh turban in the EU or the UK? Can someone please translate what is being said on the video. Why is no one talking about this in the gurdwaras or Sikh channels? 

Edited by CHaamCHrick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kcmidlands    64

With the greatest of respect to the person speaking in this video it seem's he's got the wrong end of the stick or he's been wrongly informed as to how EU law works in relation to the UK irrelevant of whether we were going to stay in the EU or not (which we aren't anymore). He's speaking about an issue on France and claiming it is going on all over Europe.

This all relates to France's obsession (and law) with banning religious symbols in schools and the workplace, it started with the banning of a full burka because it covered the face and any religious dress that cover's the full face.

As a result of these laws Sikh's are not allowed to present a photo to the government authorities wearing a turban to obtain a passport, driving licence or any government identification document (ID); nor is a Sikh allowed to attend a state school wearing a turban.

The UN human rights body has backed French Sikh's in fighting this, for more information see the link below:

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/France_turban_issue

As far as the relevance to the UK, it has none, we have strong law's protecting religious identity and freedom and even if we stayed in the EU these would bear no relevance to us.

The reason no one is taking about it, no idea, as far as i know it's only France that kicks up a fuss about these things and the forthcoming election's over there are going to be interesting to say the least, especially if Marine Le Pen win's (which we all better pray she doesn't)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ranjeet01    1,098

There are about 15000 Sikhs in France and they live in the Paris area/region.

If things are so difficult for them, why don't they just move?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802

I don't think we in the UK have anything to worry about, as the forummer above has explained in good detail.

What is quite disappointing from a Sikh perspective is the fact that a cowardly and ineffectual white establishment sees fit to throw the members of the Sikh religion - a faith that has no precedence in undermining social cohesion in Europe - under the bus, so to speak, for the sake of "fairness" instead of confronting the elephant in the room that is Islam and a certain strand of its followers. Under the devious cover of being seen to be just and fair, they'd rather attack all religious articles of faith rather than single out the one particular faith that has the problem. That's the kind of cowardice we're dealing with here in Europe. Do any of you honestly believe any of these people will stand up for us when the dark times arrive? Of course they won't. We'll only have ourselves to blame if we continue to wallow in a mistaken sense of security.

Edited by MisterrSingh
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kcmidlands    64
33 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

If things are so difficult for them, why don't they just move?

If Le Pen win's the Presidential election that starts this weekend i think they may well have to move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,218
Just now, kcmidlands said:

If Le Pen win's the Presidential election that starts this weekend i think they may well have to move.

are her policies really that anti-religion? I don't know too much about the French Election as I dont really focus too much on that region.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ranjeet01    1,098
5 minutes ago, kcmidlands said:

If Le Pen win's the Presidential election that starts this weekend i think they may well have to move.

The fact that we are a tiny minority in France may work in our favour.

However, I agree with MisterrSingh that because of the Islamic problem in France all other religions are made to suffer.

LePen if voted in will try to initiate Frexit. The integrity of the EU hinges on France/Germany.  

If France leaves, the EU project will be in jeopardy. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ranjeet01    1,098

It just so happens that a police officer has been shot dead in Paris by a suspect that belongs to a particular ideology that bows to a particular city in the Arabian peninsula.

As well as people from this particular ideology that happen to run people over with trucks, or shoots people in nightclubs and cafes, create no go areas, regularly firebombs cars.

Just remember that there are  millions of non French origin people that may be poor with lack of opportunities that do not follow the Arabian city bowing ideology that do not do those things that I have mentioned above.

When people's from the Arab bowing ideology did things like this during the Khalsa Raj, we knew how Hari Singh Nalwa dealt with them.

The French have to deal with this menace with their hands tied behind their backs whilst trying to keep whatever structure of their nation intact.

Edited by Ranjeet01
Extra stuff to add
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
41 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

When people's from the Arab bowing ideology did things like this during the Khalsa Raj, we knew how Hari Singh Nalwa dealt with them.

I can't decide whether this hesitation to confront these ugly truths is an admirable form of optimism that would put even the most spiritually benevolent to shame, or it's a psychological infirmity that's paralysed their human predisposition for planning ahead in order to deal with all eventual outcomes. Whatever it is, their negligence will result in bloodshed. I don't understand why people cannot sense the simmering tensions that seem to get worse with each passing year. Something must give, and when it does it won't be pretty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ranjeet01    1,098
2 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I can't decide whether this hesitation to confront these ugly truths is an admirable form of optimism that would put even the most spiritually benevolent to shame, or it's a psychological infirmity that's paralysed their human predisposition for planning ahead in order to deal with all eventual outcomes. Whatever it is, their negligence will result in bloodshed. I don't understand why people cannot sense the simmering tensions that seem to get worse with each passing year. Something must give, and when it does it won't be pretty. 

It is cowardice. 

This is something Hindus did in centuries past. 

People think that if you fight back that somehow the enemy will come back harder. But by the same token, by doing nothing it further emboldens.

If this happened 50-60 years ago, people of this ideology would face some terrible repercussions.

If there is anything that will put Le Pen in power , this will.

According to reports, at least 51 percent of French police will vote for Le Pen.

The North African community in Europe is an extremely belligerent one. It is one that Europeans are very aware of from the Carthage days, the Moors, the Barbary coast.

Only the Spaniards in the 15th century and the Romans in the Punic Wars knew how to deal with them.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BhForce    520
4 hours ago, CHaamCHrick said:

http://dalkhalsa.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/eu-eu-court-endorses-ban-on-turban-w.html?m=1

I am not sure if they are going to ban the Sikh turban in the EU or the UK? Can someone please translate what is being said on the video. Why is no one talking about this in the gurdwaras or Sikh channels? 

When you asked if someone could translate the video, I thought it might be in French or something, but it was just in normal Punjabi. Don't take this the wrong way, but I would like to encourage you, friend, to learn Punjabi. There are a ton of resources on the Internet, not to mention just talking in Punjabi with your parents, starting with the absolute basics ("mera naam Chaamchrik hai"). Without Punjabi and Gurmukhi, we can't have a relation with our Guru.

We, as Sikhs, should no more countenance not learning Punjabi than we would countenance not learning English, which we wouldn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
24 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The North African community in Europe is an extremely belligerent one. It is one that Europeans are very aware of from the Carthage days, the Moors, the Barbary coast.

Only the Spaniards in the 15th century and the Romans in the Punic Wars knew how to deal with them.

 

When the likes of France decided to open their doors to the same third-world people they subjugated and oppressed in the name of colonialism, what on earth were they hoping would happen in the future? Sure, the same could be said for us and a few others, but i think our mentality is slightly different to the likes of the Algerians and others of that ilk. 

Was the collective guilt for WWII so immense that it destroyed all sense of pragmatism? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BhForce    520
3 hours ago, kcmidlands said:

This all relates to France's obsession (and law) with banning religious symbols in schools and the workplace, it started with the banning of a full burka because it covered the face and any religious dress that cover's the full face.

I think this comes down to the difference in freedom in the Anglo-American sense (which is freedom to do what you want), and freedom in the French sense (freedom to do what the state wants you to do).

I believe the Anglo conception of freedom is more compatible with the Sikh sense since we did not pass any laws in the Sikh Raj forcing people to wear kanghas or karas (as far as I know).

There is a sense of discrimination in the French law, though, because only "ostentatious" symbols are banned, includinge "large" crosses. So what's a "large" cross? Something human-sized, like the one Jesus Christ was crucified on? And so "small" crosses would automatically be the size that Christians wore anyways.

Not only that, but there have been cases of principals of schools sanctioning (Muslim) girls for wearing long dresses, because, according to them, that's "ostentatious". Meanwhile, it's just fine for French-origin girls to wear whatever they want, including long dresses. By that theory, even if we take off our turbans, our long, uncut hair plus beards can be easily called an "ostentatious" religious display.

Finally, there's the issue of Christian nuns, which AFAIK, have not been sanctioned in any way. While acknowledging the problem of radical Islam, I bristle at the blatant discrimination of some Europeans while being blind to their own faith traditions of covering up or religious displays. Here's one Italian with a moderate view:

Quote

“We have nuns on the beach all the time,” Marco Beoni, a barista at a coffee bar along the sea near Sabaudia, about an hour south of Rome, told The Daily Beast. “They go in the water in their skirts and sit on blankets just like everyone else. Who cares what they are wearing. What’s the problem?” 

Then there's the issue of the burqini, which far-rightists and leftists are having trouble banning because it's basically a wet suit with a built-in cap. Since many pools are used for scuba instruction, it would seem extremely difficult to ban wet suits. The anti-burqini crowd delves into ridiculousness when it says it's banning burqinis because of "hygiene" reasons.

Does anybody know what "hygiene" reasons those could possibly be?

I think much of the anti-religion animus derives from the anti-religious tilt of the French revolution, whereas in other countries it is less so.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BhForce    520
10 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

When the likes of France decided to open their doors to the same third-world people they subjugated and oppressed in the name of colonialism, what on earth were they hoping would happen in the future? Sure, the same could be said for us and a few others, but i think our mentality is slightly different to the likes of the Algerians and others of that ilk. 

I think the reason for free immigration from Algeria was that France was maintaining the pretense that Algeria is just a part of France, and that moving from Algiers to Paris was no different than moving from Marseilles to Paris. They did have to give Algeria up at some point, maybe that would have been the time to deport the Algerians. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
9 minutes ago, BhForce said:

I think the reason for free immigration from Algeria was that France was maintaining the pretense that Algeria is just a part of France, and that moving from Algiers to Paris was no different than moving from Marseilles to Paris. They did have to give Algeria up at some point, maybe that would have been the time to deport the Algerians. 

It was free movement from Algeria to France? Gosh, i never knew that. I assumed it was a similar immigration policy to the one the UK adopted for its former Eastern colonies. 

I'm not condoning current Algerian actions and attitudes, but from what I've read the French were despicably cruel when they were over there. It's quite horrific the extent to which they held power over those people and that country. All the more baffling as to why they'd be so magnanimous in allowing them access to France in such considerably huge numbers. Was it a desire to atone for past sins?

Edited by MisterrSingh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What're you talking about ??!!! In Bhai Gurdas ji's vaaran , it's clearly mentioned WaHeGuRu mantra is composed by uniting the names of god in 4 yugas. W - Wasudev (Satjug) H - Hari (Dwapar) G - Gobind (Kalyug) R - Raam (Treta) As per hindus , Parbrahm is the origin of all things  Hari means Krishna , and Krishna lived in Dwapar yug. But Krishna was named after Parbrahm , as Krishna means "attractor" , one of the names of brahm. Hindus slowly started equating Krishna to Hari.  Ramchandar is from treta, the son of Dasrath. Ram chandra means (moon of Raam) or that which reflects the character of Raam. So Raam was actually another name of Parbrahm.  Wasudev is from Satjug . Wasudev means "the residing lord". And Guru Gobind Singh ji maharaj is from Kalyug.  Go(earth / vedas/ knowledge) + bind (center focal point). So Gobind means "the focal point of knowledge".  So the mantar makes sense . And TBH , our current abrahamic kinda views of sikhi are far more superficial. We really need to chew in our understanding the baani properly. I agree we don't believe in hindu devi devte, but TBH karam , dharam philosophy is much older than sikhi . What was lost and found & something which was not earlier revealed is what we collectively call "sikh matt". It's purely our egos that we despise at anything "hindu" , whereas we ourselves believe in concepts like Karam philosophy, Rebirth, need of Guru , etc which were first found in upanishads (concluding portion of vedas).  
    • As per the vedantists , there're three different types of karams : 1) Prarabdha karam This are the past karam because of which we got the current configuration in this earthly plane.  These are the karams that have fruited . There is no way to extinguish the effects of these karams , except by bearing them , whether good or bad.  It's like an arrow shot from the archer's bow cannot come back. It's destined to hit. Its too late now to undo the effect of the arrow. It only can be bore now.   Prarabdha karam makes up a person's destiny.  2) Sanchit karam These are accumulated karams , from many lifetimes. Prarabdha karam is that portion of sanchit which is taken for bearing in this lifetime. I think sanchit karam are the first ones to be destroyed by naam simran.  3) Kriyaman karam These are the current karam we're doing, the fruits of which we're destined to bear in the coming time.   
    • How about the UK-based arm of him, 'Nirvair Khalsa Jatha', is there anything wrong with them or are we all blinded by them as well?
    • This reminds me of a quote from the Godfather movie "They're animals anyway, so let them lose their souls."
    • Wow!! Can someone please give his cult the  address of Scientologist religion. He belongs in that nut house.
×