Guest Bham

Birmingham Amrit Sanchar 2017

12 posts in this topic

Fateh ji

Anyone know when there a Taksal Amrit Sanchar in birmingham please? Urgent. Thanks.

Fateh ji.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw poster at walsall Nagar Kirtan which said there's one happening on 20 May at Rolling Mill Gurdwara in Walsall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes 20th may at the darbar sahib on rolling mill street 

just call them up 

I'm blessed to be having my Amrit on this day 

waheguru 🙏🏾

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baba Deep Singh gurdwara 22nd July during Raensabhai keertan - hey it might not be a Taksaali one, but what's the difference when 5 Gurmukhs who's faces glow with naam make the Amrith 😊

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Veerae i agree with you to an extent but nowadays I think as a Gurmukh who strives to do whats Gurmat I insist on Taksali Panj Singh. Whats the difference you ask?

AKJ: Dont accept Dasam Bani, dont accept Mool Mantr in its FULL beauty of length, dont accept Raagmaalaa as Bani, have something called "Naam Dhrirr" - a new concept developed in modern day - I cant imagine Guru Gobind Singh doing such actions

Nanaksari: Dont accept Panj Kakaars in their full beauty, lack connection or love for Dasam Pita and His Maryada, do not fall under Akaal Takhat Sahibs order

Nihang Singhs: Not much difference between these and Taksaal - I wouldnt mind such Panj Singhs but in UK it's quite difficult to get genuine Nihang Singhs Jatha.

These are the reasons why I choose Taksaal over the above jathae. Please everyone dont get offended I am just clearing up why I specifically said Taksali Jatha

Vaheguru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can take Amrit anywhere there are 5 Singhs and just follow the Taksal Maryada and if they do proper Punj Bania: Japji,Jaap,Swaiya,Chaupai, and Anand Sahib: especially in this age when most Amrit Sanchars give out SGPC Maryada. (Now some pro-SGPC groups are giving Amrit without Punj Banis, such as Missionaries). But if they follow the basics you could go anywhere and give Isaat to your Guru with Taksal Maryada for your personal life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Guest OP Vaheguru said:

Veerae i agree with you to an extent but nowadays I think as a Gurmukh who strives to do whats Gurmat I insist on Taksali Panj Singh. Whats the difference you ask?

AKJ: Dont accept Dasam Bani, dont accept Mool Mantr in its FULL beauty of length, dont accept Raagmaalaa as Bani, have something called "Naam Dhrirr" - a new concept developed in modern day - I cant imagine Guru Gobind Singh doing such actions

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਹਿ jee, I cannot speak on behalf of any other jathebandeean however from what I can see you have only seen a very biased view against AKJ. In Bhai Randhir Singh jees books we can see they held Dasam baanee very dearly and loved to quote Guroo Gobind singh jee maharaaj time after time; the fact that there are "some" Sikh who question dasam baanee is completely derived from their own mat, as AKJ never ever preach against Dasam baanee, as it is a sensitive topic to many, charitropakhyan and other baaneea are not discussed as often as Guroo Granth Sahib jee. Secondly raagmalaa can or cannot be accepted as baanee depending on your own view jee, nobody should be pointing out their own views of raagmalaa in hopes to persuade others for the sake of panthic ekthaa. Naam dhrir, or more commonly known as saas giraas has been around longer than Sikhi itself jeeo! Sufi mussalman have been doing saas giraas for around 2000 years, if you are unsure if this is true, type dhikr into YouTube and watch for yourself. Buddhists practice saas giraas and learn to manipulate the ways they can control their swaas, and as a result many get blessed with ridhiyan sidhiyan extremely quickly as a result of this. Sau Sakhi explains Guroo Gobind singh jee demonstrating saas giraas to mata sundar kaur jee, and Max Arthur Caulfields book, a history of the Sikhs (which was written at the guroos time) explains Guroo Naanak Dev jee imparting saas giraas into every abhilakee after drinking charn pahul di Amrith! Also jee mool manthar can be different depending on your own view again; the reason the latter part is usually left out during mool manthar jaap is because it comes up again as a salok in sukhmanee sahib with a slight spelling difference, hence it becomes a salok; yet there are Gurmukh pyaareh who consider mool manthar up to the first panj paurian, so who is to say they are wrong?? The more the better right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comments. I hold no hate for any jatha. Life is too short to debate over all the matters I noted and everything you have noted. I love and die for Damdami Taksaal. I just stated it as I see it. Just as you have stated it as you see it. This world drama is so beautiful how everyone as their own story - each pair of eyes read a different story yet of the same drama book. I see all types of Smaagams and now do not question 'why' - I believe let everyone take Sikhi on how they see it. Its a waste of precious time debating over matters that will never change either or. Yes do the parchaar but if someone chooses not to accept - then why lose ones cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-5-16 at 3:48 AM, Guest OP Vaheguru said:

Veerae i agree with you to an extent but nowadays I think as a Gurmukh who strives to do whats Gurmat I insist on Taksali Panj Singh. Whats the difference you ask?

AKJ: Dont accept Dasam Bani, dont accept Mool Mantr in its FULL beauty of length, dont accept Raagmaalaa as Bani, have something called "Naam Dhrirr" - a new concept developed in modern day - I cant imagine Guru Gobind Singh doing such actions

Nanaksari: Dont accept Panj Kakaars in their full beauty, lack connection or love for Dasam Pita and His Maryada, do not fall under Akaal Takhat Sahibs order

Nihang Singhs: Not much difference between these and Taksaal - I wouldnt mind such Panj Singhs but in UK it's quite difficult to get genuine Nihang Singhs Jatha.

These are the reasons why I choose Taksaal over the above jathae. Please everyone dont get offended I am just clearing up why I specifically said Taksali Jatha

Vaheguru

Naam japna; gurmantar hai Vaheguru is part of Sikhi.  How AKJ tell people to do Naam dhrirr, I don't know.  Maybe they are doing something wrong and they do it to say ONLY we have the Naam.  I just watched an akj elder say all concept of Naam simran (he says Naam dhrirr, he has to give it a special name so they can increase their numbers. So new people would be like.....OOO WOAH they have something new....lets go over there) was lost after 1708 due to Sikhs having bounty on their heads.  So I do see the lunatic beliefs that you are objecting too.  However read Gurbani and you will find Guru sahib telling us to repeat his name in every moment.  If you knew this, perfect and maybe this post will help others and not get turned off by these cults teachings. Rest you are spot on.  Akj is the special child the Panth is fed up making exceptions for anymore.  They need to get their act together.....no more special treatment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question for the akj.  You state the following:

Gurbani gives the hints that when a seeker receives Naam from the Guru in the form of the Panj Pyaare then the Panj Pyaare place their hands on the head of seeker and make the devotee repeat Naam:

ਮੇਰੈ ਹੀਅਰੈ ਰਤਨੁ ਨਾਮੁ ਹਰਿ ਬਸਿਆ ਗੁਰਿ ਹਾਥੁ ਧਰਿਓ ਮੇਰੈ ਮਾਥਾ ॥
ਜਨਮ ਜਨਮ ਕੇ ਕਿਲਬਿਖ ਦੁਖ ਉਤਰੇ ਗੁਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਦੀਓ ਰਿਨੁ ਲਾਥਾ ॥੧॥
“(When) the Guru placed His hand on my forehead, the Jewel of the Lord’s Name came to abide within my heart. (Whoever) the Guru has blesses with Naam, the Name of the Lord, their sins and pains of countless incarnations are cast out and the debt (of sins) is paid off. ||1||”
(SGGS – Ang 696) 

from the following site: http://akjfaq.com/questions-about-akhand-kirtani-jatha/what-is-naam-dhrir/

yet why did one of your brothers make a pornography video with two transgender people?  You guys say placing the hand on the head is very important and others should be punished for administering Amrit wrong.  This guy had the hand of akj Punj pyare on his head and the Naam should have been in his heart.  But this guy, well you know what he did, anyone of you cult boys going to answer my question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having Guroo sahib place their hand on your head doesn't make you perfect that's why jee. Everyone in any jathebandee is capable of committing a kurehat and we all fall. Some fall harder than others.

Yeah naam can be revealed to you by Guroo sahib but it's only a very lucky few who can keep aath pehar simran going on in their hearts from that moment onward; it takes some of us lifetimes to work up to that level hunna. 

I also know of many youth today that claim to be akali nihangs and vidvaans of taksaal, I could probably name up to 30, who are twice as young as the guy you're on about and are doing gandhi kam twice as bad as that; sort them out aswell if you're going to take on that role of exposing these people, so don't be a hypocrite just because you hate one jatha; and don't harbour hate for such people whether they're bujjar kurehati or not. Gurmukhs get to a stage in their jeevan where upon having someone's darshan, they can read all of their karams and all of their thoughts, past present and future; yet the thing that makes them Gurmukh is that even by knowing the deepest darkest parts of ones soul, the Gurmukh will still never hesitate to show hat person pyaar and do their seva!

 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Guru Nanak Dev Ji WAS  Waheguru as there is no difference between God and his servants. The reason Guru Nanak Dev Ji never said it out loud was because the last time people started down that path it ended with their teachings being distorted and warped. If that doesn't convince you then just read Gurbani  ਜੋਤਿ ਰੂਪਿ ਹਰਿ ਆਪਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕੁ ਕਹਾਯਉ ॥ ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ <- that literally says that the Guru and the Lord are one. Why do you think Gurbani is full of that same message, again and again and again. Fun fact that was written by Guru Arjun Dev Ji, Do you want a translation of it too? Know that the Guru and the Transcendent Lord are One.  Sukhamani Sahib has an entire Astpadhi dedicated to brahmgyanis (the beings aware of God and enlightened) and Guru Sahib flat out says they're God.  Water has in its 3 forms is given different names but at the end of the day it's always going to be H2O. God has limitless forms, but he exists in Sargun and Nirgun forms as well. Nirgun is the original form but Sargun is also God but God with characteristics and attribution. Humans are unable to comprehend anything unless they see it so God entered the world as Guru Nanak Dev Ji.  You're free to quote any Sant or Mahapurkh and they will say that exact thing. Guru Nanak Dev Ji was God.  This concept is ingrained within Gurmukhi itself, Feel free to quote any text written from the time of the Gurus to about 100 years after and its all there. You're telling other people to take the SGGSJ as a whole but you're unsure about the highlighted verse. Are you sure you're a Sikh? So are the banis by the other authors less important? Guru Arjun Dev Ji complied the Adi Bir and he included it all within it. Including the verses calling the Gurus God. He put it in there as it's the truth. Will you now say that you suddenly knew better than him? the stale argument that because Guru Sahib never said it outright so it's not true is truly grasping for straws. Bhai Gurdas Ji flat out calls Guru Nanak Dev Ji God, so is he wrong? the "random person's book" you refused to read is a noted brahmgyani, Gurbani as a whole says Guru=God.  Ask yourself this, Guru Nanak Dev Ji was the most humble being that ever walked the Earth. He wouldn't utter a statement such as that, no humble person would.     Makes me think as I was in the same boat as this user about 2ish years ago. Thank god I snapped out of it.
    • I just posted explicit lines and you keep rambling that I can't post any, do you not believe every line from Gurbani is the same? Are you autistic or something? "ਵਾਹੁ ਵਾਹੁ ਬਾਣੀ ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰ ਹੈ ਤਿਸੁ ਜੇਵਡੁ ਅਵਰੁ ਨ ਕੋਇ ॥ 
      वाहु वाहु बाणी निरंकार है तिसु जेवडु अवरु न कोइ ॥ 
      vāhu vāhu baṇī nirankār hai ṯis jevad avar na ko▫e. 
      Waaho! Waaho! is the Bani, the Word, of the Formless Lord. There is no other as great as He is. " (Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Ang 515), this was written by Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Amar Das Ji and even still if you are going to play dumb, this is my last response to you to on this site.
    • Correct interruption and context is the key. Anyone can quote lines of gurbani to fit in with their narrative or agenda but taking the whole SGGS ji in context and verses of gurbani in correct understanding will make you realise what is being said. Guru's true role in liberating people is teaching them about God and how to get to God ie  their role is being a spiritual teacher and you being the student (sikh) is to learn how to get there. Guru is not God nor did any of them claim they was God. Lets stop going around in circles and agree that this is fact because I know you wouldn't be able to produce a verse anywhere that states that a Guru in gurbani says he is God.
    • I don't understand I thought you said they were on Instagram?... 
    • I noticed there's alot of racist violent blacks around in the UK that been targeting innocent asian citizens for decades now.  Alot of the  have this chip on their shoulder thinking the world owes them a living or a racist mentality thinking asians are weak, easy to bully and will take and tolerant any disrespect shown to them without any physical readdress.