Jump to content
Mahakaal96

Why Muslims should never be trusted

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Should we remove the bani of Baba farid ji from ggsj? 

Baba Farid Ji were non-Muslim and a true Gurmukh. 

Sufi and Muslim are mutually exclusive terms though nowadays the false misnomer term of so-called Sufi Muslims has arisen as a response to Muslim persecution of non-Muslim Sufi's in their societies.

Baba Farid Ji were from a Sufi background however it is crucial to realise that they were non-Muslim. As whilst Sufi's believe in one God (who may be called Allah or other True Names like SatNaam) true Sufi's reject the role model of Muhammad on account of the Prophet being an unabashed terrorist, murderer, slaveowner and paedophile as is universally well documented. 

True Sufi's (ie Gurmukhs) like Baba Farid Ji Maharaj reject terrorism, slavery, paedophilia and the like. True Muslims regrettably have to state in shahada that Prophet Muhammad is the best role for humanity in eternity.

Thus I hope you clearly see that Baba Farid Ji Maharaj were not Muslim.

And hence JKVLondon was merely saying that ... those who actively feel slavery, terrorism, paedophilia, murder of innocents are acceptable actions as promoted in Islam and the Quran ... are indeed people to be somewhat cautious of.

 

 

 

 

Edited by SinghSabha1699
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
3 minutes ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Lol what a joke... You a bhangra star cause you sure know how to dance! 

the only joke is you don't understand what you are told

As Bro has explained and I have, SHeikh Farid ji was a sufi Bhagat and did loads of non-muslim things like singing and dancing in rapture of Akal Purakh  so no Sufis are not tied to the muslim faith but searching for the creator through bhagti of myriad forms that's why they also took Guru Nanak Dev ji's bani also into their embrace 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
Just now, Sukhvirk76 said:

Lol so now your an expert on Islam.. It makes perfect sense your world view is wahhabist putting people in narrow little boxes... 

Baba farid predates guru nanak by about 200 years 

How funny that you're opinions are congruence to the bigots, Pakistan taliban who view sufis as heretics.. He's not Muslim because he sings and dance.. 

Keep going Bro keep digging 

Moorakh 

Fariduddin shakarganj is the first Farid ji but the one that met Guru ji was Farid the second .

Sufis say themselves their roots are deeper than islam ...read and educate yourself :

http://sufiway.org/about-us/the-origins-of-sufism

I can respect true seekers of all denominations, shame you cannot ...

I know about dancing , singing even art restrictions because of muslim classmates when growing up ...so grow yourself 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Akalifauj    784
9 hours ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

You are one! 

When did you become troll?  Why are you running away from this question.  Can't answer a simple question and he wants to speak on Bhagat Farid ji.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Akalifauj    784
3 minutes ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Paji baba farid ji self identified as a Muslim. 

Troll, you have no proof of this.  No Shabad in Gurbani claims any Bhagat was Muslim.  You are a liar and cheat.

Answer the question.  When did you become a trol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Akalifauj    784
4 minutes ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

As I said he self identified as a Muslim, why don't you go study some more about him.. This is ridiculous! 

Dimwitt, his shabads in Gurbani would say so the Gurus shabads would have said so.  Either never did.

Answer the question troll, when did you become a troll?

Edited by Akalifauj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Akalifauj    784
Just now, Sukhvirk76 said:

I became a troll right after you became a nindak. 

Happy now! 

Seriously what a douche 

Troll, you have no gyan.  I showed that in a few words.  

Douche and nindak is someone who claims something without proof.  That makes you douche and nindak.  Again answer my question troll, when did you become a troll?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Akalifauj    784
3 minutes ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Lol I have plenty of proof you are a nindak so once you figure out exactly when you became one add 1sec to it and precisely at that point I became a troll! 

The troll has nothing.  Not going to waste anymore words on a troll.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RanjeetSingh    20

from historical references and Gurbani,  I am confident that our Guru would not force this mayor to matha tek to Guru Granth Sahib Ji....respect for all but follow your own?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Paji baba farid ji self identified as a Muslim, I agree that the sufi approach to Islam is different than mainstream sunni but nonetheless is Muslim. Sufism rejects the dominant interpretation and practices of mainstream Islam believing that the core message is corrupted by literalism and absolutism leads people away from the core message.. Something which guru nanaks jis message was congruent with.. That institutionalized or organised religion leads people to become obsessed with identity politics and something we should transcend.. I.e tisar panth a third way one in which we lose our ego's recognise the oneness of all creation. 

 

Not at all brother. Mere acceptance of one God (who may be called Allah, Ram or Vaheguru or other True Names interchangably) does not mean that Dhan Dhan Baba Farid Ji Maharaj self-identified as a Muslim.

In order to be Muslim the second line of the Muslim shahada referring to Prophet Muhammad is compulsory. True Sufi's (like Baba Farid Ji Maharaj) being the non-Muslims they are obviously wholeheartedly reject the Prophet Muhammad on account of the well documented and universally acknowledged acts of terrorism, slavery, genocide, paedophilia and misogyny that the Prophet openly engaged in without remorse. Remember in Pakistan the Muslims make the similarly false allegation that Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj were Muslim.

Think about it logically Paji. Can we as tisar panth ever sit comfortable when such an accusation is labelled against one of our greatest Gurmukhs (who were so blessed that they authored the Truth of Gurbani)!? Accusing Baba Farid Ji Maharaj of being Muslim is the most vile accusation thinkable for a Sikh to read. Though to be fair to you I don't believe you meant it to insult to them as much as myself and perhaps Akalifauj may have perceived.

This myth that Baba Farid Ji Mahraj were Muslim needs to be destroyed. The nonsensical belief that the 1st Sikh in history (Bhai Mardana Ji) despite being the most ardent Guru ka Sikh somehow should be labelled as a non-Sikh is horrible to read (not that you have said this - but others mistakenly have). And similarly in relation to Dhan Dhan Baba Kabir Ji Maharaj who positively despised the falsehood of Islam (and yet are somehow labelled as belonging to beliefs that they repeatedly exposed as falsehoods). And it's crucial we do not inadvertently sully the great names of Gurmukhs who rejected terrorism, slavery, genocide, paedophilia and misogyny as openly glorified in the Holy Quran.

 

Edited by SinghSabha1699
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802

Pfft, the imam's probably undercover Mossad. Or he's exhibiting internalised Islamophobia. Everything's fine. Don't worry.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mahakaal96    243
20 hours ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

absolutism leads people away from the core message.

It's a shame you fell to this exact same thing when reading the original post. When Guru Gobind Singh Ji warned us not to trust the word of a Muslim, mahraj made that statement in the hope that most of his sikhs would have enough budhi (intellect) to know which Muslims that statement would apply to & not be of low intellect where they start applying that warning to Bhagats. 

 How many sikhs do you think have come across a genuine Muslim bhagat in their lives & wondered if that warning should apply to them?? Mahraj knew exactly the type of Muslims we would be dealing with hence the warning. 

Anyone reading Bhagat Farid Ji's Bani can clearly see that taqqiya is not being deployed even remotely.... Bhagat jis Bani is inline with gurmat and therefore beyond any doubt or suspicion.

Edited by Mahakaal96

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Preeet said:

Agreed. Even a lot of Amritdharis don``t even matha tek when they go to the mandir. & why is there no like button for me to click regarding your posts?? 

Amritdharis dont go to mandirs. As for the thread I think making a blanket statement like that is pretty stupid and Guru Gobind Singh Ji never said that ALL muslims should never be trusted. Like it or not there are some muslims who are great human beings ofcourse there also are alot of bad ones(perhaps even out of porportion to other quams except hindus) and we should never forget that but that doesnt mean we become obsessed with them.

Edited by ThunderousDominator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Harmandir? Lol 

What a ridiculous statement, if guru nanak dev ji traveled to all religious sites and respected them all even kaaba sharif then why wouldn't a amritdhari have a problem going to a mandir? No one is asking them to do Pooja to a moorti,? 

Would amritdharis also refuse to go to a church? 

Harmandir sahib is a gurudwara not a mandir I know your not this stupid stop playing with words. Idol worship is against sikhi no ifs ands or buts about it I know you know this too why else would u go to a mandir if u wernt gna practise idol worship? If a hindu freind invites a sikhi to mandir for a function or event than aslong as he doesnt worship a rock I have no problem with it if he shows up just to show his face out of respect for the invite however worshiping any idol is completey against sikhi. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very nice post. 
    • Where in his Bani or his writings does Guru Gobind Singh give any indication of having that motive for helping Bahadur shah? You should not impose your own motives/agenda on Guru Sahib and assume that you speak for him, particularly when there is zero scriptural evidence for your position. Neither is there any historical evidence that I'm aware of - the histories say that Guru Sahib's motivation for allying with him was the condition that non-Muslims would be treated fairly under his regime. So, I ask you, how do you know that was Guru Sahib's motive for helping Bahadur Shah?     
    • The Dogras were the most immediate cause of the empire's downfall, but the fundamental cause for the collapse of the Sikh Kingdom was Ranjit Singh's fatal decision to make himself king of the Sikhs and replace the Khalsa's republicanism (Sarbat Khalsa, Gurmatta, Jathedari) with a system of absolutist monarchy which centralized all power in his hands - this had no place in a 'Sikh' nation. His miscalculation ensured that the kingdom would all but fall apart his death and be vulnerable to vultures, particularly in light of the uselessness of his heirs.  I disagree veerji. This Sikh kingdom would never have become as powerful as it did if not for non-Sikhs. The Sikh Empire was so successful while Ranjit Singh was alive precisely because he managed to integrate and secure the loyalty of the Punjabi musalman who constituted most of his subjects - and thereby ensured economic productivity and public order. The Khalsa army of the Lahore durbar was also not just made up of Sikhs - all cavalry were Sikh, but virtually the whole of the artillery was Muslim, as was a significant portion of the infantry of the regular army (included Pathans, Punjabi Muslims and Gurkhas). Secondly if not for the induction of non-Sikh European officers into the Sikh army, it would never have relinquished its fixation with irregular cavalry or its revulsion at the idea of infantry. Without the innovations of these non-Sikhs, therefore, the Fauj would never have advanced to first rank among the armies of Asia. An army composed entirely of cavalry is fine when you're fighting a guerilla war, not so much when you're building and defending an empire against men with guns and artillery.  Furthermore not all non-Sikhs in the kingdom were disloyal to the durbar, and not all Sikhs were loyal. The Muslims of Punjab routinely resisted the calls of the Afghans (and later, the mutineers of 1857) to join them in jihad against the infidel Sikhs. The Fakir brothers (Muslims) were loyal to Ranjit Singh's memory to the last, as were several of the other Hindu Dogra generals of the Khalsa army (Dogras are a race, not a family. It was one family of Dogras in particular which caused most of the trouble). And while there were good, loyal Sikh nobles such as the Attariwalas and the Nakkais, there were many more who were fickle and treacherous.  Rani Jindaan was notoriously corrupt , as were the Sandhawalias, who murdered Sher Singh, the only successor of Ranjit Singh with even a shred of competence, by blowing him to pieces with a shotgun. I think your stance is way too absolute bro.   An empire is by definition multicultural and cosmopolitan. The Vatican is not the most apt comparison here (It is a country in name only).   
    • The passage reads: Vol I, Life of Guru Nanak, p51
    •   This is indeed a good post.     
×