Mahakaal96

Why Muslims should never be trusted

67 posts in this topic

9 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

You claim it`s not called `Hari Mandir` if I``m not mistaken.. right? Now I can`t read gurmukhi, but I can read hindi. Just look at the name ``ਹਰਿਮੰਦਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ``! The danda with the head pointing towards the right gives an i sound ``ਹਰਿ`` the one in between that word.. Would that not spell out Hari then? Rather than Har being ਹਰ

That sounded funny Preet, "Now I can`t read gurmukhi, but I can read hindi."  So how did you read the Gurmukhi ? 😏

Found this:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

You claim it`s not called `Hari Mandir` if I``m not mistaken.. right? Now I can`t read gurmukhi, but I can read hindi. Just look at the name ``ਹਰਿਮੰਦਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ``! The danda with the head pointing towards the right gives an i sound ``ਹਰਿ`` the one in between that word.. Would that not spell out Hari then? Rather than Har being ਹਰ

There's a difference. It's not ਹਰੀ which is what you keep trying to force, the word is ਹਰਿ , the sound is softer and completely different. Maybe an idea might be to learn Gurmukhi script before coming on here and lecturing others about what the real name of anything is. If you're mispronouncing a basic word like that I shudder to think what you're doing to other ones. Seek out a Taksali Teacher and get proper Santhiya. That is, if you're willing to become a student and not act like an all knowing master.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Gurmukhi level is really basic, so I won't be responding to the whole pronunciation point, but it is wise not to be posting stuff like you know how to pronounce it, when you don't. But I do know from the limited knowledge I do know that Gurmukhi evolved not from Hindi, but rather the language of the people of Mahadesha. It's more similar to the Middle-Eastern languages than Hindi or Sanskrit, (they even sound different).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

Im by far not a master when it comes to gurmukhi! In Hindi the danda when pointed towards the left gives an hard ee sound, while pointing towards the right gives an ih sound. I noticed with all aryan&dravid languages they use those same dandas and they all give the same sounds. When it comes to hari in harimandir, I think you have misunderstood what I was saying. I pronounce it as `har-ih mandir``, not har-ee mandir``.

English and Gurmukhi are 2 separate languages with separate sounds and utterations. Hari <- like that will always be  pronounced wrong, that's why Harmandir is far more accurate but still not the same as the pure Gurmukhi of it. 

 

Edited by Kira
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

My Gurmukhi level is really basic, so I won't be responding to the whole pronunciation point, but it is wise not to be posting stuff like you know how to pronounce it, when you don't. But I do know from the limited knowledge I do know that Gurmukhi evolved not from Hindi, but rather the language of the people of Mahadesha. It's more similar to the Middle-Eastern languages than Hindi or Sanskrit, (they even sound different).

Yeah I've noticed that too. Though I'm not an expert on this, not by a long shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

Of course, this is why I suggest to everyone who cannot read gurmukhi to do what I did.. Play a recording of whichever respected paath you wish to recite, and read it with english transliterations while listening.. & then after some time then start to recite it outloud. That`s what worked for me.

or a better idea might be learn Gurmukhi? That method was only for those who were illiterate or speechless. Reading it with English Translations will result in someone completely making a butchery of it. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

Allah in the kuran is also praising GOD. I have no issues with anyone praising GOD in any ethical way. I do not know Muhhammad ji, and his teachings could have been misinterpreted, so I would rather keep no opinion of him rather than just guessing. My only concern is for me to follow my own dharma. Allah is a name of God, but we have been instructed to do jaap of Sri Vaheguru during amrit sanchar since it was made from the 4 yugas. Vaheguru Vaheguru Vaheguru

You are in your own league.  Let me guess you were the special student throughout your life.  You still have this title here.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how preet claims to be amritdhari and yet follows mandirs and idols and jyotirlingas and what not.

People often say they follow everything and are not restricted to one religion.

Why don't same people put their one leg in one boat and other leg in other boat when crossing a lake ?

why they only sit in one boat then ? because they know they will drown. Stick to one path , be it sanatan or sikhi. both are great.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is so much muslim hatred in this thread .

If we were really so cautious of muslims , why then so many cases of our girls being eloped by muslim boys ? 

also most people seem to be missing that Gurbani has its own definition of muslim . A whole shabad where a new definition of muslim is given in terms of old muslim terminologies. 

Secondly , a muslim in truest sense (as per islam itself) is "one who submits to will of Allah (Waheguru)" . then in that sense all bhagats and all shaheeds and all of true sikhs are "muslims" .

Sufis are not universally peaceful . Shaik Ahmad Sirhindi who got Guru Arjan dev martyred was a sufi . Sufis believe there are 4 layers to reaching truth. Shariat, Tariqat , Marfat and Haqeeqat . Those who're serious in their spiritual quest will obviously be peaceful 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/04/2017 at 1:21 PM, Mahakaal96 said:

Spot on. In general sikhs are a very honest, non discriminating, trustworthy & friendly people who treat everyone equal regardless of religion etc... however the rest of humanity is not like that & we need to smarten up.

Muslims are the worst because it is quite simply a part of their belief that everyone is not equal.. and that those who are not Muslim (kafirs) can be lied to, exploited, raped & even killed without the risk of any retribution from god.... there's a reason why Guru Gobind Singh Ji exposed their lieing & deceitful ways at Anandpur Sahib when the Muslim swore oaths on the Koran only to then break them at the first available oppurtunity. Guru Sahib did that to open our eyes & to make us aware.

I urge all my brothers & sisters on this site to be more aware, cautious & extremely careful when having any kind of dealing with any Muslim. It's a testament to the greatness of our Guru that we as a community are very tolerant & respectful towards all... but our Guru also taught us to be budhi maan (of discerning intellect) & raj neetic (politically aware).

its good to be cautious , but not good to hate 1.2 billion people with same brush ! gross generalization. Indian and Paki muslims must def be having beef against sikhs. A UAE muslim I doubt has anything against sikhs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadiq Khan must be feeling sad how come sikhs survived and most musslims are aware that wherever sikh community will go , there islam's image will get spoiled because sikhism is only religion whose history started as a testament to extremist islam's brutality 

And Sadiq is pakistani . Paki / Indian / Afghani muslims are more kattar than the UAE / qatari ones I think .

Otherwise muslims in UAE wouldn't have allowed to build a grand gurudwara in dubai . I am sure muslims in UAE don't even know rash history of Sikhs with extremist islam . 

But a pakistani or indian muslim is well aware ! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will go on a leap and say Muhamad was a failed prophet . And his misdeeds are what is reverberating as Islamist fanaticism worldwide.

There's a concept called "Satanic verses" . Its said early life of muhammad wasn't easy. He was pitted against powerful pagan arabs who were idol worshippers and polytheists . Mecca was still a hotspot of pilgrimage and a source of revenue for tribes of mecca.

When muahamad introduced monotheistic islam and rejected idol worship, he found himself at strange odds with powerful arabs . It is well known many wars took place of his new muslims and pagan arabs.

Muhammad longed to convert his kinsmen and neighbors of Mecca to Islam. As he was reciting Sūra an-Najm, considered a revelation by the angel Gabriel, Satan tempted him to utter the following lines after verses 19 and 20:

Have ye thought upon Al-Lat and Al-‘Uzzá
and Manāt, the third, the other?
These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for.

Most of his conversion of arabia to islam was by hocus pocus means . Otherwise islam wouldn't have even become majority religion in arabia , forget about rest of countries

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How come when I expose Pakhandi Babas everyone goes on some tangent, but when someone else exposes them it's perfectly fine? (😒)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

allah and hari,ram,bhagwan,etc of SGGS Ji is not the same as the Hindu and Muslim names for God.

The Allah of Quran is a blood thirsty abrahamic God that has contempt for non-muslims and even if your still a muslim and not of the right muslim sect your going to hellfire.

Hari and other hindu Gods mentioned in SGGS Ji are not literal Gods they are methapors to explain to the hindu converts to Sikhi the stories so they can understand the concepts of the one God.

When Allah is mentioned in SGGS Ji its not the al-lah of profit muhammad its allah metaphor for 1 God.

muhammads meccan pagan tribe used to worship lah (their moon God). And "al" means 'the' in arabic... so they made al-lah meaning 'the God' (of muhammads tribe). Muhammads father was called abdulllah (ab dul lah  meaning slave of al-lah or slave of the mood god). IT is widely acknowledged by muslims of all sects that muhammads father was a strict polytheist meccan pagan... so therefore their God was a pagan god too.

So now that you guys are educated you can inform any hindus or muslims or fellow confused Sikhs about this particular issue and why we dont worship allah of quran or hindu gods we worship our own version of God (waheguru meaning great teacher) but our scriptures refer to their Gods as metaphors.

Edited by genie
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for not trusting any muslims was from guru ji?..... well that's false.

Guru Gobind Singh Ji stated in zafarnama he wouldn't trust any oath on Quran by Aurangzeb or his foot-soldiers for their and his treachery. But guru Ji didnt say never trust muslim's or their oath on Quran again and nor should Sikhs. He had many muslim's who gave him shelter many muslims who fought for him and fought against him. Every different muslim had their own agenda and Guru Ji knew that you cant blanket label them all untrustworthy.

However we know what kinda stuff abrahmic religions teach jews, muslims and Christians. I would not trust oaths on their scriptures from these 3 groups of people based on their overt missionary or overt discriminatory agenda's towards respective non-believers.

The hindu hill raja kings and various brahmins and other powerful hindus also practiced treachery they also backstabbed Guru ji and got chotay sahibzaday martyred. But again guru Ji didnt say never trust hindus or their word or oath on their vedas/geeta,etc.

End of the day all people of all religion and none will backstab you if they are dishonorable and bad evil people. Just look at the SGPC rulers of past and present, DT's dhumma, Akali Dals Badals and Punjab Congress's captain amrinder singh and KPS Gill.

Any of these so called Sikhs seem people of their word? or power hungry politicians willing to lie and see death and destruction of Sikhs to keep their positions of power.

These people are probably even responsible for Guru Ji's beadhi thats happening in punjab... they wont put CCTV camera's or provide 24/7 security for Guru ji's saroops but will cry and shout about incidents only when people come out on the streets in disgust and fury.

 

Edited by genie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, genie said:

As for not trusting any muslims was from guru ji?..... well that's false.

Guru Gobind Singh Ji stated in zafarnama he wouldn't trust any oath on Quran by Aurangzeb or his foot-soldiers for their and his treachery. But guru Ji didnt say never trust muslim's or their oath on Quran again and nor should Sikhs. He had many muslim's who gave him shelter many muslims who fought for him and fought against him. Every different muslim had their own agenda and Guru Ji knew that you cant blanket label them all untrustworthy.

However we know what kinda stuff abrahmic religions teach jews, muslims and Christians. I would not trust oaths on their scriptures from these 3 groups of people based on their overt missionary or overt discriminatory agenda's towards respective non-believers.

The hindu hill raja kings and various brahmins and other powerful hindus also practiced treachery they also backstabbed Guru ji and got chotay sahibzaday martyred. But again guru Ji didnt say never trust hindus or their word or oath on their vedas/geeta,etc.

End of the day all people of all religion and none will backstab you if they are dishonorable and bad evil people. Just look at the SGPC rulers of past and present, DT's dhumma, Akali Dals Badals and Punjab Congress's captain amrinder singh and KPS Gill.

Any of these so called Sikhs seem people of their word? or power hungry politicians willing to lie and see death and destruction of Sikhs to keep their positions of power.

These people are probably even responsible for Guru Ji's beadhi thats happening in punjab... they wont put CCTV camera's or provide 24/7 security for Guru ji's saroops but will cry and shout about incidents only when people come out on the streets in disgust and fury.

 

Jews are not bad IMHO.. Also they don't believe non-jews go to hell.. Wonder how its children religions Islam and christianity are horrible 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 01/05/2017 at 6:40 AM, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Jews are not bad IMHO.. Also they don't believe non-jews go to hell.. Wonder how its children religions Islam and christianity are horrible 

er you have no idea that the horrible language used about non-believers stems from the copying of jewish scriptures , jews refer to non-jews as beasts/cattle etc . for instance films try to be cute and call non-jew girls SHIKSHAs explainig it just mean cute non-jew but:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shiksa

"The more insulting terms for non-Jews are shiksa (feminine) and shkutz (masculine). I gather that these words are derived from the Hebrew root Shin-Qof-Tzadei, meaning loathsome or abomination. The word shiksa is most commonly used to refer to a non-Jewish woman who is dating or married to a Jewish man, which should give some indication of how strongly Jews are opposed to the idea of intermarriage. The term shkutz is most commonly used to refer to an anti-Semitic man. Both terms can be used in a less serious, more joking way, but in general they should be used with caution."

taken from jewfaq.org

Personally , I was ignored totally by my jewish classmates even though we were in the same classrooms for four years just because they thought whatever they thought - their loss . You cannot generalise there are extreme Jews who do believe they are the chosen , despite what their rabbis may have taught them .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now