Jump to content

Islam to take over christianity


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

fact is it was the Indian Secret services that did that job , it was investigated and written about in the book 'soft target' by a couple of Canadian journalists ... Alam's Black Cats killed hindus and sikhs during those times to defame sikhs in general . Try not to peddle propaganda of the GOI to cover historical fact... look at the uygurs  they were Buddhists until  Muslims arrived . Same with Afghanisthan and other nations ... it is simple fact , forced conversions in past centuries are giving their fruit still . 

we have same mentality in our community too.Always put the blame on others.Just as you are trying to put everything on Indian govt or Alam.We have many people in pak who believe talibans are not muslims those who are committing terrorism are not muslims they are non muslims funded by americans/jews balck water etc many still bleieve 9/11 was inside job to defame Islam and Muslims.That's why i'm not surprised to see your response.Why some people have hard time accepting the truth ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YOYO29 said:

we have same mentality in our community too.Always put the blame on others.Just as you are trying to put everything on Indian govt or Alam.We have many people in pak who believe talibans are not muslims those who are committing terrorism are not muslims they are non muslims funded by americans/jews balck water etc many still bleieve 9/11 was inside job to defame Islam and Muslims.That's why i'm not surprised to see your response.Why some people have hard time accepting the truth ?

fact : there are zero sikhs, muslims, buddhists or jains in the Indian secret services - so ALL operations were run by Hindus against minorities and pakistan .

fact: there was a lockout of sikhs in the forces hierarchy in terms of information preoperation for any and all of the continued attacks planned against the (GUrdwarey starting with Bluestar) and Punjab's populations.

fact : Kids schools and many businesses were shut down for over two months whilst operation Woodrose swept the villages and captured and disappeared many many sikh men and boys .

Yes some Prominent hindus/ sikhs were assasinated by Sikhs but they have been claimed in toto.

but what else the GOI wants to blame us for is not true

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

Islam is projected to become biggest religion by numbers. Mainly due to muslim population having a median younger age then other religions. 

This is a quite significant. The fruits of historic forced conversions is paying off for the muslims. For instance indonesia was originaly buddist and hindu country. Now its all muslim. Same is true with nigeria. Once it was all christian now half is muslim. 

Nigerians and Indonesians converted due to traders, not forced conversions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, YOYO29 said:

First link is a wikipedia stub expended by whom  and for what reason , the fact that it is part of a list of anti-hindu violence list since partition helps give a context ...i.e. scare tactics of Gandhi regime to keep the attention and justification up against sikhs . 

Yeah , post Delhi riots zero  is mentioned of the homeless destitute, , widowed and orphaned sikhs of Delhi but yet we should worry endlessly for people who chose to migrate to delhi  with their goods and money as 'refugees' ...give it a rest ...

These were primetime Alam operations . and please note the article mentions that this body count made it the YEAR'S worst terrorist attack and we are in December of 1986  so where are the thousands and thousands of body count ? I think 35,000 is the figure bandied about by hindu people on their opinion pieces these days - 24 lost souls ...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preparing for an Islam demographic take over should have been foreseen by our Sikh political and religious leaders but they have zero IQ and only think about day to day living. So before we blame muslims for bringing their backward 7th century religion and imposing it on anyone we should look at our leadership and what have they done to prepare the youth for a future where there could be trouble ahead.

The western oligarch powers and other abrahmic religions (jews and Christians) have foreseen Islams demographic rise and have sought to take action via illegal wars on muslim countries in an attempt to lay control their countries.

End of the day we the average Sikh and average muslim get on fine there is no hostility we can co-exist the problem only arises when we have Muslim extremists like salafi's who try to impose their will their ideology their political narrative paid for by their oil rich saudi masters in how us non-muslims should live. If you see and read their lectures they openly say to discriminate against the kufr to treat them with contempt so that they are either forced to convert to islam or they leave the land of muslims or if they become hostile to kill them. They think being a non-muslim is a sin against Allah. Even moderate and liberal relatively pluralistic muslims like sufi's are hunted down by the salafi muslims where they cant even practice their own sectarian traditions without fear of attacks and persecution.

So we know not just from history from mughuls and partition in 1947 about Islam's evil and oppressive side. We know that if your a non-muslim in a conservative muslim majority area your seen as a 3rd class person with little rights and freedoms.

Interestingly andres breviek the far right white nationalist freemasonic terrorist who killed nearly 80 people in norway a few years ago predicted a civil war between white Europeans and Islam around 2080s where Islam will be removed from Europe. I believe this will happen but much sooner around 2040s-50s....because Islamic ideology of conquest can not co-exist with liberal secular pluralistic societies.... so the ground work is being prepared right now by the rich oligarchs they have allowed millions of backward thinking arab muslims to pour into europe especially germany.

In India we have hindu nationalists and supremacists like RSS taking action by forcing mostly dalit muslims to "revert" back to hindu at the point of violence. They know having a high muslim demographic in your country is highly dangerous for the host nation and population so they starting the ground work and have been doing so for the last 10years.

The sparks of conflict and wars of civilizations can already be seen. Sadly from what we know of history things will only get worse in coming years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Qwe123 said:

Nigerians and Indonesians converted due to traders, not forced conversions.

Are you 100& sure about that.  What happened to all the buddist and hindu temples in indoesia. Also have you not watched the news. Boko haraam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll happen without any bloodshed in Europe. There will simply be more of them. The numbers will overwhelm everyone who isn't Muslim. By 2100 the entirety of Europe will be Muslim majority. Places like Sweden, France, Holland, Germany, and Norway will succumb earlier. The indigenous populations will have no reply because they'll have been conditioned to not resist. Actually, the wealthy elites will flee, whilst the rest will have to tough it out. It will be a gradual process, and therefore resistance will be minimal. Any attempts to form uprisings will be eliminated quite efficiently by the authorities. I'm just curious how or when the Muslims will then make their move for complete control, i.e. administrative and governmental, and what the process will be. Interesting times ahead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think the picture is that bleak.

The only way to stop this is have tougher immigration laws. Which europe needs to implement and stop excepting huge amount of refegees from middle east. Also we all know know that muslims from middle east are not as extreme as those from pakistan. 

Infact they are quite liberal. Mosque attendence in middle eastern countries is low and many leave the faith altogether. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use