Jump to content

Pattaka Kabit about Bhai Ranjit Singh Dhadhrianwale by Kamalroop Singh


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote: 

ਪਟਾਕਾ ਕਬਿੱਤ

ਭਾਈ ਰਣਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਝੂਠ ਕੌ ਬਣਾ ਕੇ ਸਾਚ, ਭੋਲੀ ਭਾਲੀ ਸੰਗਤ ਕੋ ਪੁੱਠੇ ਰਾਹਿ ਪਾਵਤਾ॥
ਤੇਗ ਕੇ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਸੋ ਹਿੰਦ ਕੀ ਹੈ ਚਾਦਰ ਜੋ; ਕੀਆ ਨਾਹੀ ਤੱਪ ਭੋਰੇ, ਬੈਣ ਰਹੇ ਗਾਵਤਾ॥
ਮਹਿੰਗਾ ਗਿਰੰਥ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਕਵੀ ਸੰਤੋਖ ਸਿੰਘ; ਸੂਰਜ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ ਕੋ ਭੀ ਝੂਠ ਹੀ ਬਤਾਵਤਾ॥
ਅਸੰਤ ਏਹ ਢੱਡਰੀ ਕਾ ਪੜ੍ਹਿਆ ਕੀਤੋਂ ਭੀ ਨਾਹੀਂ, ਖਾਲਸੇ ਮੇ ਨਿੱਤ ਰੋਜ ਵਾਦ ਹੈ ਵਧਾਵਤਾ॥

ਚਉਪਈ॥

ਕਹੇ ਇਤਹਾਸ ਬੰਦਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਲਿਖਿਆ॥
ਮੈ ਕਿਉ ਮਾਨੂ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਸਬ ਮਿਥਿਆ॥

ਗੁਰ ਅਵਤਾਰ ਦੇਹ ਧਾਰ ਹੀ ਆਵੈਂ॥
ਦੇਹੀ ਧਾਰ ਬਾਣੀ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਪ੍ਰਗਟਾਵੈਂ॥

ਢਡਰੀ ਭੀ ਤੋ ਮਾਤਾ ਕਾ ਜਾਇਆ॥
ਇਹ ਭੀ ਤੋਂ ਗਰਭ ਜੂਨੀ ਆਇਆ॥

ਇਹ ਸਭ ਇਸ ਕੀ ਮੂਰਖਤਾਈ॥
ਸਾਕਤ ਇਸਕੀ ਬੁਧ ਉਲਟਾਈ॥

ਦੋਹਰਾ॥

ਰਣਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਢਡਰੀਆਂ ਕਾ, ਅਪਨਾ ਹੀ ਪੰਥ ਚਲਾਇ॥
ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਬਲਵਾਨ ਜੋ, ਖਿਨ ਮਹਿ ਇਸੇ ਖਪਾਇ॥

Dialogue should be held with Ranjit Singh - not anger or violence

ਹਿੰਦੂ ਸਾਹ ਲੈਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਸਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਲੈਣਾ। ਜੋ ਲਵੇ ਸੋ ਤਨਖਾਹੀਆ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਪਾਣੀ ਪੀਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਪਾਣੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਪੀਣਾ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਰੋਟੀ ਖਾਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਰੋਟੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਖਾਣੀ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਕੱਪੜੇ ਪਾਉਂਦਾ - ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਕੱਪੜੇ ਤਿਆਗ ਦੇਣੇ ਹੁਣ।
ਹਿੰਦੂ ਟੱਟੀ-ਪਿਸ਼ਾਬ ਕਰਦਾ , ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਹੁਣ ਟੱਟੀ-ਪਿਸ਼ਾਬ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਨਾ। ਜੋ ਕਰੇ ਸੋ RSS ਦਾ ਗੁਲਾਮ।

ਹੋ ਗਈਆਂ ਪੰਜ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਕਠੀਆਂ ? ਦੱਸੋ ਕੀ ਫਰਕ ਹੈ ਸਾਡੇ ਚ ਤੇ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਚ ?

Unquote:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Kamalroop is going to pick on a child version of Ranjit Singh is an unfair standard, (he's still wrong though). Ranjit Singh doesn't know that even the Light of God put a tilak on, but again Ranjit hasn't once said that Guru Sahib is God. This is basic history which proves how stupid the things he says is, but Kamalroop is also in the wrong for being an RSS agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
8 minutes ago, genie said:

You believe Guru Sahib is God? And if so which Guru sahib?

This question has been addressed hundereds of times. But my unchanged view you can read here: 

haven't you already asked this question before: 

But yes Guru Sahib is Vaheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

This question has been addressed hundereds of times. But my unchanged view you can read here: 

haven't you already asked this question before: 

But yes Guru Sahib is Vaheguru.

In my personal view and my reading of gurbani scriptures he clearly is not God but a messenger/agent of God. The light of God was in him (is it is in all of us) to do Waheguru's work but he was more enlightened and blessed with powers more than any of us will ever be. Here are my main reasons why he was not God:

1) Because Guru Nanak Sahib Ji himself praises God as an external entity. He does not state he is Waheguru and for him to be worshipped.

2) Guru Gobind Singh Ji (whose light of guruship was transferred to him) stated he is not God and says anyone who claims he is will be cursed.

So if the light of the Guru's has been carried from the 1st to the last we can see there is a consistent message of Waheguru being an external force and the Guru's were messengers of Waheguru who had attained the power and permission from God to do what they came on earth to do.

As for the instances where some lines are said to have state in SGGS Ji that Guru Nanak was God this can be explained by the use of metaphors and not literally meaning he was Waheguru himself descended on earth. Because that would have clearly been a false premise as had Waheguru really came down to earth then logic would tell us that all crimes, sins and other evil deeds would have come to an end and there would be perfect harmony and peace in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
54 minutes ago, genie said:

In my personal view and my reading of gurbani scriptures he clearly is not God but a messenger/agent of God. The light of God was in him (is it is in all of us) to do Waheguru's work but he was more enlightened and blessed with powers more than any of us will ever be. Here are my main reasons why he was not God:

1) Because Guru Nanak Sahib Ji himself praises God as an external entity. He does not state he is Waheguru and for him to be worshipped.

2) Guru Gobind Singh Ji (whose light of guruship was transferred to him) stated he is not God and says anyone who claims he is will be cursed.

So if the light of the Guru's has been carried from the 1st to the last we can see there is a consistent message of Waheguru being an external force and the Guru's were messengers of Waheguru who had attained the power and permission from God to do what they came on earth to do.

As for the instances where some lines are said to have state in SGGS Ji that Guru Nanak was God this can be explained by the use of metaphors and not literally meaning he was Waheguru himself descended on earth. Because that would have clearly been a false premise as had Waheguru really came down to earth then logic would tell us that all crimes, sins and other evil deeds would have come to an end and there would be perfect harmony and peace in the world.

I'm not going to argue on the issue on this topic, but if you are interested in arguing about it; then you can create a new thread and add me on it. (The result of being considered one of the most sarcastic people on this site, prevents me from doing it). But before ending it your last paragraph asks about sin ending if Guru Sahib was Vaheguru and he came on the world, but Vaheguru is already everywhere and has existed before time; so that would just be going on a decline for humanity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use