Jump to content
S4NGH

Huddersfield grooming gang 2 "sikhs"

Recommended Posts

Jacfsing2    1,834
16 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

You hit the nail on the head. Gosh you know me so well. Mother?! Is this you?!

Wake up pal.

Exactly who said this:

58 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

Suddenly, I have an issue with Sikhs. 

Oh yeah Mr. SJW or RSS, I don't know maybe you are someone who enjoys washing the feet and kissing the butt of Anglos? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541
1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Exactly who said this:

Oh yeah Mr. SJW or RSS, I don't know maybe you are someone who enjoys washing the feet and kissing the butt of Anglos? 

Have a little decorum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/sex-offender-shopkeeper-caught-obscene-12653620

I suppose this too is a case of racist cops? "Amritdhari", married 3/4 times (I've lost count) God knows how many kids he's fathered. His brother went down for gang rape. Anyone want to pay him a visit? Pm me.

Edited by S4NGH
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jacfsing2    1,834
9 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

Have a little decorum.

I've been trying to stay neutral the entire time. But you made the insult towards Sikhs general, not specific people or Jathas.

9 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/sex-offender-shopkeeper-caught-obscene-12653620

Don't try telling me this too is a case of racist cops. I know this man well. "Amritdhari", married 3/4 times (I've lost count) God knows how many kids he's fathered. His brother went down for gang rape. Anyone want to pay him a visit? Pm me.

Nobody has any interest in meeting anyone mate, but you never answered this:

1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

(Nobody mentioned what Jathas these guys were from that would change everything).

Just cause somebody says they are Amritdhari doesn't mean they actually are, even Badal is considered Amritdhari as is SGPC. Ypu never said what Jatha they were from mate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541
5 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I've been trying to stay neutral the entire time. But you made the insult towards Sikhs general, not specific people or Jathas.

Nobody has any interest in meeting anyone mate, but you never answered this:

Just cause somebody says they are Amritdhari doesn't mean they actually are, even Badal is considered Amritdhari as is SGPC. Ypu never said what Jatha they were from mate.

Ok sure thing Jose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541

Can you identify Mr singh with his kara on display. Dirty b*stard.  Zero sharam.

Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, of Huddersfield is charged with 54 offences. He is charged with 21 counts of rape, 14 counts of trafficking, as well as inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault, sexual touching, possession of indecent images of a child, racially aggravated assault and inciting a child into prostitution.

Edited by S4NGH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dallysingh101    1,582
1 hour ago, S4NGH said:

Can you identify Mr singh with his kara on display. Dirty b*stard.  Zero sharam.

Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, of Huddersfield is charged with 54 offences. He is charged with 21 counts of rape, 14 counts of trafficking, as well as inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault, sexual touching, possession of indecent images of a child, racially aggravated assault and inciting a child into prostitution.

This is bad. I couldn't believe an Amritdhari could do such stuff, and truth be told, it does seem like such cases are rare (remembering he hasn't been convicted yet). You can see this bloke has a khula daara behind his 'mask'. Soon they'll get a proper picture of him and blast it all over the media.

3F2FD91E00000578-4405262-image-a-51_1492

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
8 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

This is bad. I couldn't believe an Amritdhari could do such stuff, and truth be told, it does seem like such cases are rare (remembering he hasn't been convicted yet). You can see this bloke has a khula daara behind his 'mask'. Soon they'll get a proper picture of him and blast it all over the media.

3F2FD91E00000578-4405262-image-a-51_1492

should get the singhs together and pay him a visit and tell him he has no right to the bhes of a gursikh .... just like a nihang who has dishonoured his Guru ji through his behaviour is stripped of his bana.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541
2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

This is bad. I couldn't believe an Amritdhari could do such stuff, and truth be told, it does seem like such cases are rare (remembering he hasn't been convicted yet). You can see this bloke has a khula daara behind his 'mask'. Soon they'll get a proper picture of him and blast it all over the media.

3F2FD91E00000578-4405262-image-a-51_1492

54 offenses. Jesus wept. Bad does not some it up. So far everyones labelling them a muslim gang. When the media get hold of his mugshot, everyones gunna know it's Mr singh. Then the term "asian" will surely apply; the term we've been crying over. The Muslim community continue to brush the issue under the carpet. We need to openly condemn these child raping kuthay. Not under my name. Loud and clear before they tarnish us all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541
10 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Oh man, what the hell is this? 

How did he get involved with this bakwaas?

Haha how did he get involved?! With that many charges, it appears he's the leader mate. He's taken the child rapist gold medal. How did he get involved in sikhi is the better question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541
2 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

should get the singhs together and pay him a visit and tell him he has no right to the bhes of a gursikh .... just like a nihang who has dishonoured his Guru ji through his behaviour is stripped of his bana.

Stripped of his head.

Anyone willing to visit this scum, PM me. Please.

Edited by S4NGH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4NGH    541

Back in the sikh day, the punishment for rapists was death. Lutti izat can never be returned.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
17 minutes ago, S4NGH said:

Haha how did he get involved?! With that many charges, it appears he's the leader mate. He's taken the child rapist gold medal. How did he get involved in sikhi is the better question.

I feel ashamed. I have no reason to, but i do. It's a strange sensation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Heretic or a Turk. Both are repulsive. The heretic is an internal threat where as the Turk is external. Whether or not he's insulted the Gurus (as of yet), is not the issue. It's the fact that he's Turk-Beeraj.
    • I do not believe in an absolute morality, dharam is not the same for each and every individual. This is not to say that dharam does not exist, only that it doesn't exist in a monolithic form.  This concept is reflected very well in the life of the Mahapurakh Sant Baba Thakur Singh, 14th jathedar of Damdami Taksaal. Babaji was a strict vegetarian like all members of Taksaal, so for him eating meat was a great sin. However when he visited the chaunis (encampments) of Nihang Singhs around Chowk Mehta he would often bring offerings of goats to be jhatkaa'd by the nihangs and later consumed. Because eating meat was not a great paap for them as it was for babaji, rather it was their tradition and he respected that the role they were given by the Almighty was different from his own.  Satguru's Hukam affects each person differently.  Eastern dharams tend not to impose moral codes on the whole of humankind, as though such codes apply to everybody. Yes there are certain basic guiding principles of human morality - don't murder, don't rape, but most sane people don't really need to be told not to do these things by a religion because they feel an inherent revulsion towards them. However beyond this things can get quite flexible. Some people are meant to be householders and provide for a family, whilst others are meant to be celibates and devote their lives and all their energy to Akaal Purakh and Seva of the Panth. If God creates someone with the intention that they will become a warrior, battle becomes dharam for this person, a righteous deed. If however God creates a man and by his hukam determines that this man is to be peaceful saint, battle is adharam for him, not righteous. This is why different sampardas/jathebandiaan exist in Sikhi. Guru Ji is not/was not anti-samparda or anti-jathebandi, if they were, they wouldn't have created or blessed so many of them themselves. I don't know if what I'm saying is right, but this is the conclusion I have arrived at from my study of Sikhi. Others will have arrived at different conclusions, and good thing too -  Sikhi is a garden full of many diverse flowers.  I do not believe Guru Ji aspired to make all Sikhs, or all people,  identical in their religious outlook and practice. 
    • So you think that Sikhs and Muslims need to remain bitter enemies for as long as this world exists?   And because of 84 do we also need to become eternal enemies of the Hindus forever and ever?   Yesterday Hindus were our friends but they ended up knifing us in the back. And Yesterday's enemies can become strategic allies of today. Try to see the bigger picture.
    • This one statement just proves you should know before commenting on such complex topics.
×