jkvlondon

Jagsaw's thread : Apology

13 posts in this topic

Just a quick note to apologise  To Jag

It was not my intention to stop your only outlet , I had forgotten that was the the nature of that one thread in the heat of the mudslinging between the various arguing parties . 

I still stand by the fact I felt the discussion was going nowhere as it was going in circles over stuff that has been brought up by Harkiran/Satkiran before on other threads and had actually degenerated into a cussing down of white newbies describing them as malech (a bit too much)and her husband for sticking up for her (isn't that what he is supposed to do?) . I don't accept her views as my own, but still in the name of openminded discussion listened to her viewpoint . She doesn't represent all white females or even all sikh females , just herself . I would have liked more input from those who could highlight Gurbani, rehit maryadas, itihaas takes on the subject because we all grow from it . That's all , it just made me sad to see my brothers give credence to the supposed misogynistic stereotype that she was promoting  by being goaded by her words and retaliating at that low level . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that he was allowed his own thread despite being banned, was quite a strange decision. Gupt or not, he was still allowed the privilege to express his opinions and engage with other forum members. So either lift his ban and allow him to return, or prevent him from starting another thread even as a gupt poster, because as things stand on this site, being banned is not a measure to prevent anyone from posting. So what's the point?

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't mind having him open another new thread for his posts only. He can post anything he like but it would be the choice of other members to go read his thread or not. They can simple choose to avoid that thread.

jag- open new thread as you like but pls keep the posts a bit civil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

I won't mind having him open another new thread for his posts only. He can post anything he like but it would be the choice of other members to go read his thread or not. They can simple choose to avoid that thread.

jag- open new thread as you like but pls keep the posts a bit civil.

But.. but it's like a car crash. One can't resist the temptation.

I'm kidding, Jagsaw. Don't get salty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, S1ngh said:

I won't mind having him open another new thread for his posts only. He can post anything he like but it would be the choice of other members to go read his thread or not. They can simple choose to avoid that thread.

jag- open new thread as you like but pls keep the posts a bit civil.

to be fair SIngh ji it wasn't down to him really 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly the mods/admins are a bit too forgiving and lenient. That Sukhvirk76 is apparently on quality control, yet still posts like anyone else here. I wouldn't mind if this website is more runned like Gurmatbibek.com where each and every post has to be approved by the mods. As things stand right now we could post anything and everything and there seems to be no external power other than Vaheguru Ji running these forums. If Vaheguru Ji himself is running these forums that's nice, but that's not how normal people think. (Unless you make someone that's a regular member here a mod then I'm afraid it's going to continually go down-hill.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sukhvir has about 10% posts approval rate. I understand with  totally but we try to be very less restrictive and let the sangat runs on its on. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possible title ideas for Jagsaw's new thread:

- Hum Jagsaw Hai

- Mahajagsaw

- Long Walk To Southhall

- My Left Chappal

- Mein Kam... no, sorry, that's been used.

Anything but 'Some Home Truths.' So pretentious, lol.

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MisterrSingh said:

- Hum Jagsaw Hai

- Mahajagsaw

 

I laughed when I read these 2, a better recommendation would be Guest Singh Jagsaw, (I couldn't imagine having a thread named Hum Jacfsing2 Hai, not something I'd do).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I laughed when I read these 2, a better recommendation would be Guest Singh Jagsaw, (I couldn't imagine having a thread named Hum Jacfsing2 Hai, not something I'd do).

I'm glad you got the reference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Yes thank fully the lunatics haven't overrun the asylum yet..

Nanak naam Chardi Kala! Bani sets you free.. The truth is the truth, however elusive and unattainable, a part of khoj is to form a opinion then be brave enough for it to be challenged, then be brave enough to modify it and accept ones version or original understanding may have been wrong.. Bani like mathematics/physics / is a expression of truth however as the realm of truth it deals with is metaphysical 1+1 can equal both 1 and 3.

Sangat, parchaar, exegesis should not be a fascist state where the 'ministry of posts' polices opinions, if you believe that people's thoughts should be controlled or regulated, repressed by a pseudo-priestly-administrative moderator caste. In my opinion any one who believes that it should be has little faith in sat naam. I would recommend people revisit mool mantar.. 

Ajooni saibhang akaal moorat 

If the truth is and will always be it makes little difference about mere mortals opinions and interpretations of it.. If you agree with and believe in mool mantar you would never want censorship.. 

Unless you were only paying lipservice, plastic piety hiding behind self righteous indignation masking internal misgivings. 

#justsaying 

You haven't said one truth since you came on this website. You still believe interfaith buffoonery is ok. When it's clearly not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the ban should be lifted on jagsawsingh. He is quite knowledgable and I agree with alot of his posts. But also disagree with some of his posts also just like other members I see posting here. 

One issue he does have is he goes off on tangents on occasions where he starts talking about things irrellevant to the topic. Like his love for West London. Put a sock in it. West london is a boring little suburb. 

Other then that I think he should be allowed back. Alot better then some posters on here like those immature kids who think they know it all. 

Edited by Big_Tera

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

One issue he does have is he goes off on tangents on occasions where he starts talking about things irrellevant to the topic. Like his love for West London. Put a sock in it. West london is a boring little suburb. 

And his love for his jaat-paat, which would put a Bahman in the shade. If he hasn't figured out that Sikhi is a bit more than some sort of peasant movement, and that being loyal lapdogs for Anglos during colonialism wasn't the 'greatest thing that happened to us' - even if his grandpa got some 5hite job in a factory out of it afterwards - he's better off staying away and concentrating on developing his intellect and self-esteem a bit more. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now