Jump to content
singhbj singh

Should we use Graffiti to spread Awareness ?

Recommended Posts

You know..people piss on those walls? Do you really want any symbols of our Faith to be on there? Like Gurbani?

Edited by Kira

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest London jwaan

Graffiti is defacing others property and effectively vandalism.

What if everyone did this? Would you like a mural of Muhammed spray painted on the side of your house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no gurbani on there :/

Love it. I'm all for art as long as people don't start worshipping it or giving it undue significance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who's the man with the cresent moon and star behind his head? Mohammed? Aren't pictorial representations of their prophet supposed to be haram?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Kira said:

You know..people piss on those walls? Do you really want any symbols of our Faith to be on there? Like Gurbani?

Just leave 4-5 foot space from ground n then paint.

No symbols & Gurbani.

Plenty of art promoting Sikh culture n history is available online & museums.

That should inspire graffiti artists to create their own work.

I think Sikh organisations should commission them to paint.

They could organise a competition, give artists a Theme to create.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, S4NGH said:

There's no gurbani on there :/

Love it. I'm all for art as long as people don't start worshipping it or giving it undue significance.

Totally Agree 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Who's the man with the cresent moon and star behind his head? Mohammed? Aren't pictorial representations of their prophet supposed to be haram?

Who knows & cares as long as it's not offensive.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, singhbj singh said:

Who knows & cares as long as it's not offensive.

 

It matters because he's been painted sitting next to Guru Sahib. Why not research something before posting it, if that's not too much hard work for you. "Who knows & cares..." Stupid response.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

It matters because he's been painted sitting next to Guru Sahib. Why not research something before posting it, if that's not too much hard work for you. "Who knows & cares..." Stupid response.

Ang 479 Line 7 Raag Asa: Bhagat Kabir

ਜੇ ਏਹ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਸਾਚੀ ਹੈ ਤਉ ਗੜ੍ਹਣਹਾਰੇ ਖਾਉ ॥੩॥

Jae Eaeh Moorath Saachee Hai Tho Garrhanehaarae Khaao ||3||

जे एह मूरति साची है तउ गड़्हणहारे खाउ ॥३॥

If this stone god was true, it would devour the sculptor for this! ||3||

Likewise if the depiction of Guru ji was real & intent disrespectful then it would devour the painter for this !

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

No! We should not support this. Even though Guru Sahib has no picture this guy is supporting a form of Manmat that Sikhi is equal to false religions like Islam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, singhbj singh said:

Fair enough, no depiction of Mahapurakhs but what is your opinion about other links ?

problem is the medium Graffiti is temporary and often overwritten/drawn , It makes more sense to have dynamic sewa  in locales to get the buzz about sikhi going instead , that way Guru ji is appreciated firstly for creating us .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Another point I would like to mention for fellow history lovers like is that generally if we look at all non Sikh sources mentioning Sihs and their practises we get a clearer picture than reading our Granths. The Granths were written from a certain mindset, schooling, 'sect' influence and sometimes even vested interests. While non Sikh authors usually wrote after observing Sikhs from several places and often even contrasting, comparing the behaviours of Sikhs across India. While narrow minded non Sikh narratives exist, a dozen sources can be found which clearly imply that Sikhi of the 18th century was more devoid of anti-Gurmat influences than that of the 19th century or Sikh literature (written mostly by Nirmalas who did not represent a majority of the Sikh dharam). Lots of non Sikh sources clearly mention that Sikhs generally did not observe casteist practises.
        “When a person is once admitted into that (Sikh) fraternity, they make no scruple of associating with him, of whatever tribe, clan or race he may have been hitherto; nor do they betray any of those scruples and prejudices so deeply rooted in the Hindu mind.”
      – Mir Ghulam Hussain Khan (Siyar ul mutakherin, 1783)
    • Chibber's narrative should be read in a context. He was born in a family which was held in great respect and esteem by the Sikh community; several prominent members of this family being treasurers, constant companions or martyrs of the Guru's house. The last notable Chibber in the community was Chaupa Singh who was executed in the 1720s. It seems that the Chibber influence within the community diminished in the coming decades, bolstering envy and rage amongt the Chibbers who had seen their parivaars influence wane over the decades. Hence there were several attempts in Chibber literature of the mid 18th century to infer a preferential ranking of Chibber Brahmins and introduce casteist practises once again (see Rehatnama Chaupa Singh for example). This a theory I have developed myself so can not quote scholars who advocated this theory but all the facts can be double checked. We always have to read into an authors background and motives for writing a certain text. The sect that manipulated Guru Nanak Dev's Janamsakhis saying the Guru married a Muslim woman did so to cover the defect of their own leader who had married a Muslim lady (and was thus viewed as an outcaste by the larger society). Similarly several writers have tried to link Mani Singh to their own lineage or caste (Gyani Gian Singh 'Dullat' made Bhai Mani Singh a Dullat as well despite the lack of proof in 18th century literature of any such claim).

      Therefore I do not believe the Sakhi posted by the OP to be true, Chibber had a vested agenda to promote casteism and more specifically the preferential ranking of the (Chibber) Brahmins. Ever noticed how the Chibber literature cleverly says a Chibber put Patasey in the first Khandi Di Pahul ceremony, were the first to take amrit and so on? (historically contradicted by all existing written sources) [Bansawlinama Chapter 10 I believe]. Similarly the Rehatnama (oldest copy 1765, written by Kesar Singh Chibbers father Gurbaksh Singh Chibber) asks Sikhs to give preferential treatment to Chibber Brahmins.
    •     I know why he got arrested.  And I am not saying they targeted him because they thought "oh he is a mona so it makes him an easy target."   I am saying that because he is a mona, and because he is used to being able to identify as a Sikh when it suits him and fly under the radar when it is inconvenient, he was not as vigilant as he should have been.  Someone who goes through their entire life being identifiable as a Sikh every minute of every day, and experiences all of the baggage that that entails, is not going to have any illusions about what would await him in India if he was behind a website like neverforget84.
×