• advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
singhbj singh

Should we use Graffiti to spread Awareness ?

25 posts in this topic

You know..people piss on those walls? Do you really want any symbols of our Faith to be on there? Like Gurbani?

Edited by Kira

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Graffiti is defacing others property and effectively vandalism.

What if everyone did this? Would you like a mural of Muhammed spray painted on the side of your house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no gurbani on there :/

Love it. I'm all for art as long as people don't start worshipping it or giving it undue significance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who's the man with the cresent moon and star behind his head? Mohammed? Aren't pictorial representations of their prophet supposed to be haram?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Kira said:

You know..people piss on those walls? Do you really want any symbols of our Faith to be on there? Like Gurbani?

Just leave 4-5 foot space from ground n then paint.

No symbols & Gurbani.

Plenty of art promoting Sikh culture n history is available online & museums.

That should inspire graffiti artists to create their own work.

I think Sikh organisations should commission them to paint.

They could organise a competition, give artists a Theme to create.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, S4NGH said:

There's no gurbani on there :/

Love it. I'm all for art as long as people don't start worshipping it or giving it undue significance.

Totally Agree 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Who's the man with the cresent moon and star behind his head? Mohammed? Aren't pictorial representations of their prophet supposed to be haram?

Who knows & cares as long as it's not offensive.

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, singhbj singh said:

Who knows & cares as long as it's not offensive.

 

It matters because he's been painted sitting next to Guru Sahib. Why not research something before posting it, if that's not too much hard work for you. "Who knows & cares..." Stupid response.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

It matters because he's been painted sitting next to Guru Sahib. Why not research something before posting it, if that's not too much hard work for you. "Who knows & cares..." Stupid response.

Ang 479 Line 7 Raag Asa: Bhagat Kabir

ਜੇ ਏਹ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਸਾਚੀ ਹੈ ਤਉ ਗੜ੍ਹਣਹਾਰੇ ਖਾਉ ॥੩॥

Jae Eaeh Moorath Saachee Hai Tho Garrhanehaarae Khaao ||3||

जे एह मूरति साची है तउ गड़्हणहारे खाउ ॥३॥

If this stone god was true, it would devour the sculptor for this! ||3||

Likewise if the depiction of Guru ji was real & intent disrespectful then it would devour the painter for this !

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No! We should not support this. Even though Guru Sahib has no picture this guy is supporting a form of Manmat that Sikhi is equal to false religions like Islam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, singhbj singh said:

Fair enough, no depiction of Mahapurakhs but what is your opinion about other links ?

problem is the medium Graffiti is temporary and often overwritten/drawn , It makes more sense to have dynamic sewa  in locales to get the buzz about sikhi going instead , that way Guru ji is appreciated firstly for creating us .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

No! We should not support this. Even though Guru Sahib has no picture this guy is supporting a form of Manmat that Sikhi is equal to false religions like Islam.

That is your interpretation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

It matters because he's been painted sitting next to Guru Sahib. Why not research something before posting it, if that's not too much hard work for you. "Who knows & cares..." Stupid response.

There's nothing to say the face covered man/woman is supposed to be Mohammed. The painting to the left is also NOT guru sahib. It's simply an artist impression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still stuck on the thought of passersby peeing against the wall, and how much disrespect would that be! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

problem is the medium Graffiti is temporary and often overwritten/drawn , It makes more sense to have dynamic sewa  in locales to get the buzz about sikhi going instead , that way Guru ji is appreciated firstly for creating us .

Wall Graffiti is meant to create Awareness amongst non-Sikhs.

Poor Americans on street don't know about Sikh attire, culture & beliefs.

Which is the reason for promoting such initiatives.

Temporary is good that way old makes way for new artwork.

Gurdwara's with help of local council can organise an Annual Event to draw crowds n votes :p

Rich sponsors can get their faces painted in the theme too O:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, singhbj singh said:

Wall Graffiti is meant to create Awareness amongst non-Sikhs.

Poor Americans on street don't know about Sikh attire, culture & beliefs.

Which is the reason for promoting such initiatives.

Temporary is good that way old makes way for new artwork.

Gurdwara's with help of local council can organise an Annual Event to draw crowds n votes :p

Rich sponsors can get their faces painted in the theme too O:)

problem is a picture cannot speak and correct misinterpretations , graffiti has links with claiming territory and may be seen as foreign entities taking over a neighbourhood especially now , nothing better than the human touch and talking.

You a catholic by any chance because they love this style of selling space in their churches to rich folks? .

Edited by jkvlondon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

problem is a picture cannot speak and correct misinterpretations , graffiti has links with claiming territory and may be seen as foreign entities taking over a neighbourhood especially now , nothing better than the human touch and talking.

You a catholic by any chance because they love this style of selling space in their churches to rich folks? .

The first graffiti has been around for years.

I thought it was new but checked other sources which go back to 2014.

There have been no report of any bad incident relating to this graffiti.

Human touch & talking is good so get BOS or Sikh Channels to interview the artist n locals.

Am no catholic or even a Sikh just straight forward practical person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, singhbj singh said:

Am no catholic or even a Sikh 

I wouldn't really expect that you weren't Sikh, but it seems to make sense now. (Your words not mine.) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, S4NGH said:

That is your interpretation.

Do you think Muhammad was a nice guy? (At a minimum?) I may not be a supporter of Jesus; however, at least his intention was legit, (not logical; however, for a false God his heart was in the right place), but with Muhammad he was a mad man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/03/2017 at 4:26 PM, Jacfsing2 said:

Do you think Muhammad was a nice guy? (At a minimum?) I may not be a supporter of Jesus; however, at least his intention was legit, (not logical; however, for a false God his heart was in the right place), but with Muhammad he was a mad man.

Do you know Jesus personally? Or are you going by the bedtime stories told by the children of his friends and followers and god knows who many many years after his death, which have been altered 100s of times often to suit political agendas? I've no idea where Jesus's heart was or whether the guy even existed. Frankly, I care not. Do I think Muhammed was a nice guy? What does it matter what I think? I'm nobody. Again, I really couldn't give a hoot.

I only care about Jagat Guru. Ain't no one compare to them. :) peace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/03/2017 at 4:26 PM, Jacfsing2 said:

Do you think Muhammad was a nice guy? (At a minimum?) I may not be a supporter of Jesus; however, at least his intention was legit, (not logical; however, for a false God his heart was in the right place), but with Muhammad he was a mad man.

Actually Jesus never said he was the son of god or God for that part. That was a delusion later on propagated by the Roman Christian Church under Constantine I think.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...