• ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Freedom maybe but still seen as subordinate. 
    • I've been wondering: just how much of the current indigenous 'anger' at immigration in England is down to certain white people feeling angry that their nation is not able to ruthlessly follow a greedy and violent foreign policy without violent retaliation on their own soil by 'immigrants' or their offspring?   Also, some people are talking about apathy. Well, I think a certain percentage of the indigenous may secretly feel that their own government is largely responsible for the havoc that is taking place around the globe and so shut up about all this terrorist stuff because of their own perceived culpability in matters. What do you think of that MisterrSingh?
    • What about Bhai Gurdas Vaars and Bhai Nand Lal Ghazals? Or even Dhadis?
    • Observe these chalakhiyan: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/25/westminster-attack-khalid-masoon-acted-alone https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/26/intelligence-services-access-whatsapp-amber-rudd-westminster-attack-encrypted-messaging So, first we're told he acted alone; a lone wolf without any direct guidance from an overseeing hand, and that's the narrative they're pushing, in terms of mentally unstable social outcasts acting out of a sense of misplaced grievance against society. Nothing to do with Islam, apparently. Then we have the home secretary telling us WhatsApp will need to be accessible to intelligence services. Why? If the perpetrators of these attacks are mentally disturbed social pariahs whose problems are solely internalised, without any third party influencing their decisions and actions, then why do the security services need access to encrypted messages? Are these guys sending WhatsApp messages to themselves in the lead up to these attacks?
    • Arguing with her is pointless; she keeps repeating the same lies over and over again; and that is Guru Sahib didn't create Damdami Taksal; if she's denying history that basic which is common sense; does anyone really have time to argue with her? Next she's going to deny Baba Deep Singh Ji, (first Jathedar of Damdami Taksal as well as Taruna Dal), fought with his hand on his head and that he fought headless, (because feminism and hate to Taksal and Nihangs). Our Kaurs were so amazing that even the Hindu and Muslim Khatri and Brahmin women were jealous of their freedom.