AjeetSinghPunjabi

MUST READ.. The kind of things my hindu colleagues said about my faith

89 posts in this topic

Disclaimer foreword : I don't intend to spread any kind of animosity between two communities but will just share the kind of things hindus said about our sikh gurus, about our dastaar , etc. This is my first hand experience.

 

I joined my current office in July 2015. I wanted to get along well with everyone , but soon realized my distinct appearance (turban and beard) didn't go well along with some of them. 

In lunch table I started getting ridiculed

I remember this motherfucker started mocking me. He was a south indian

1) Why do you tie that thing on your head ? to keep your head from exploding ?

2) Why do you people wear that dagger ? *after I explained him , "So if a sikh woman is gonna chop vegetables, but forgets her knife in kitchen, can she use Kirpan?"

3) What do you do if you gotta ride a bike ? how you going to wear your helmet ?

4) What you gonna do if you got an itch on your head ? how you gonna scratch ? *laughs*

One of them other , when I showed him a pic of Guru Gobind Singh ji made a face of disrespect and said "What has he done ?" . then finds and shows me 'santa banta jokes' . "this is only thing you're good for, this is your only history lol" He's a loyal far-right winger "nationalist".

All the while, these people always kept praising shivaji , their hero , even this south indian guy kept praising shivaji .They would talk of going to temple together. So it proves they do have some hindu sentiment in them . They're not truly atheist ! 

I had heard of RSS people in my earlier years, but this was first hand hate experience of hate from hindus ! 

When I told them of sacrifices of sikh gurus, they usually went in denial mode.

I was honestly very revolted. I once cursed one of them "may you die with maggots inside you " .

Once these people also called Khalsa terrorist ! And mocked sikhs right to wear kirpan ! 

Also , these people always united , even if one of them said wrong to me . 

I didn't used to hate hindus, but after these experience, I would say I don't really call them "brother" as I used to ! 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And yet you still feel compelled to blindly follow aspects of the societal norms of these people. To them you are a slave in mind and soul. When you espouse their ideologies, you are suggesting their ways are true and just. At least they know what they are and are content to exist within that definition even if it is out of total ignorance. 

People use to slander Guru Sahibs to their face because they feared what they represented: a challenge to the status quo. It's an indictment on us as Sikhs that we've allowed the Hindu establishment to erase, distort, and diminish the contributions made to Indian history by our Gurus. That's our fault. Dogs will always bark. In this case we're allowing them to do so. 

Edited by MisterrSingh
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

And yet you still feel compelled to blindly follow aspects of the societal norms of these people. To them you are a slave in mind and soul. When you espouse their ideologies, you are suggesting their ways are true and just. At least they know what they are and are content to exist within that definition even if it is out of total ignorance. 

People use to slander Guru Sahibs to their face because they feared what they represented: a challenge to the status quo. It's an indictment on us as Sikhs that we've allowed the Hindu establishment to erase, distort, and diminish the contributions made to Indian history by our Gurus. That's our fault. Dogs will always bark. In this case we're allowing them to do so. 

Which  aspect of theirs I am following blindly ? sorry didn't get it !  kindly clarify

Also , I did lambast them ! Invoked the fact that despite having their hindu govt in center and despite being 80% of population, they couldn't make their ram temple lol.  You should have seen the expressions on their faces haha, because they know it would never happen. 

When they mocked my turban, its just humor and friendliness and it was a little shock for them , considering sikhs should have been brainwashed by now into believing that they're meant to be laughed at ! When I resisted and returned the favor, they would say "why you always talk of religion and caste?" 

Point is : you, Mr Hindu are a weak person ! it is evident in your national rhetorics when you start movements like "ghar waapis" (returning of non-hindus to hindu fold) and despite being 14% , muslims send a shiver down your spine and your entire right-wing hindu establishment ! 

Muslim brothers in the subcontinent are a blessing to these right-wingers I tell you ! 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

All the while, these people always kept praising shivaji , their hero , even this south indian guy kept praising shivaji

Keeping all your calm, look them in the eye and ask them if Shivaji would be happy and approve of their behaviour of mocking other people. Ask them to point out a verse from their scriptures with which they can justify their actions. 

Dealing with such people is not achieved by showing them your own religion. Question theirs first.

It is human nature to deal with skeptism some culture which you do not understand. When being mocked - it is important to stand your ground and show your intimidator that they have failed in showing you down and making you feel unimportant. 

Your own scripture should be preached to people who honestly seek an answer from you. When your own beliefs get scorned at - you get hurt even more and eventually if you are not strong enough then you get doubts on your own beliefs eventually. 

Things my brothers have had their juris called in Africa ... include tomatoes, potatoes, what are you hiding in there? 

Girls (Sikh) used to ask my own Sikh sister why she has such long hair. We were all proud of my sisters decision to hide it under keski and eventually she managed to get some respect from these girls. 

Someone questioned me - a Christian as to how I can proove that Guru Nanak Dev Ji rose from the dead as Jesus did and appeared to his disciples. I was only 10 then and could not get an appropriate answer. I knew the meanings of the mool mantra - so I managed to convince them that Sikhs believe in One God. That was their main Christian concern at that time. 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must add though that one kashmiri guy said "we are alive today because of Guru Teg Bahadur ji". He atleast recognized sikh history. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

All the while, these people always kept praising shivaji , their hero , even this south indian guy kept praising shivaji .They would talk of going to temple together. So it proves they do have some hindu sentiment in them . They're not truly atheist !

Shivaji was nothing more than a vassal of the Mughals:

"In an ironic twist of faith the Marathas and the Rajputs, who are lauded as the cream of the sub-continent’s military crop by Hindu nationalists, were more or less in cohorts with the Mughals. ‘Only very rarely do we hear of Hindu chieftains seeking to protect Hindus… Rajput chieftains offered no opposition even to temple demolitions by the Mughals…’ (14) The Rajputs were handicapped by three main factors viz. a lack of natural resources (they were mostly desert dwellers) (15), a parochial tendency to concentrate solely upon feudal and dynastic interests (16) and finally their own pecking order. (17) In the aftermath of the Mughal conquest of the sub-continent, the Rajputs were the first to fragment socio-political taboos by offering their females in marriage to Muslim males. (18) At a time when most Hindus despised even the notion of Muslims touching their food, the Rajputs expected their daughters to warm the beds of their Mughal overlords. The main pillars of Mughal administration and security, it is somewhat telling that out Akbar’s 416 military commanders 47 of the most prominent were Rajputs. (19) Whilst Maharana Pratap’s revolt was ongoing, the Rajputs of Marwar, Ambar, Bikaner and Bundi marched against him and played a decisive role in crushing his forces. (20) Their own obdurate interests often collided with any national sentiments they might have possessed and overruled the latter. It is no wonder then that the Rajputs, as a whole, failed to initiate and lead any long-lasting revolution to oust or even break the Mughal grip upon the sub-continent.  

The Marathas, though distinctive in their political acts, were more or less similar to the Rajputs in that that prior to Shivaji they were proud sub-ordinates of the Muslim oppressors. Shivaji’s own father had allied himself with the Southern Pathans during the Karnataka expedition, ‘in which the Hindu religion was ruthlessly put down, lands devastated, shrines desecrated, idols broken, women’s honor violated, and all the accumulated wealth of centuries drained away…’ (21) Though great credit goes to Shivaji for arousing his fellows’ sentiments to counter the pernicious foreigners and their faith, his movement when compared with Banda Singh’s movement falls short in three respects.

1.) The Sikhs rejected Caste and proposed the creation of an egalitarian society. This was an aspect of Banda’s multi-faceted revolution in the Punjab and one which admirably succeeded. In the words of Irvine,‘a low scavenger or leather dresser, the lowest of the low in Indian estimation, had only to leave home and join the Guru (referring to Banda; interjection ours), when in a short time he would return to his birthplace as its ruler with his order of appointment in his hand. As soon as he set foot with the boundaries, the well-born and wealthy went out to greet him and escort him home. Arrived there, they stood with joined palms, awaiting his orders… Not a soul dared to disobey an order, and men who had often risked themselves in battlefields became so cowed down that they were afraid even to remonstrate. Hindus who had not joined the sect were not exempt from this.’ (22) Compare this with Shivaji who according to Basham was, ‘more a restorer of old than… a builder of the new… The Marathas did not encourage reforms in Hindu society, and the India of the 18th century was if anything more conservative than it had been in the days of the first Muslim invasion.’ (23)

Basham’s view is borne out by Shivaji’s own personal correspondence. Whereas Akali Guru Gobind Singh Ji enjoined his Sikhs- among them Banda- to annihilate the very edifices of Caste (24) Shivaji issued a circular edict enjoining, ‘all members of society not to create innovation in Caste practices but follow the traditional path prescribed by the Shastras.’ (25) Furthermore he being a Bhonsle (a tiller of land), Shivaji had to beg ratification from the Brahmins before he could officially declare himself as sovereign. Several Brahmins refused to accede to what they considered as being his ludicrous request before he finally found one willing to enthrone him for a large sum of money. (26) 

2.) Shivaji’s revolt against the Mughals arose more by chance than by design. Whereas the Sikh movement (including Banda’s) was construed to acquire an autonomous Sikh led state, Shivaji initially wanted to be a vassal of the Mughal emperor. His (Shivaji’s father) had been a mercenary in the pay of the triumvirate Pathan principalities of Southern India. (27) Enamoured of his valor, the rulers of these principalities had bequeathed him with several estates. Upon his father’s demise Shivaji succeeded him as the administrator of the aforementioned estates and commenced entertaining notions of his own state. To this end he set out for Delhi and submitted a proposal stating that he, Shivaji, would be more than honored to become a vassal of the Mughals if they recognized his autonomy. (28) Even after his treacherous confinement he would pen a lengthy letter to Raja Jay Singh pledging his life to the Mughals and also swearing an oath to assist them in the conquest of Bijapur. (29) After his escape he would dispatch another lengthy letter to Jay Singh complaining that, ‘the Emperor has cast me off; otherwise I intended to have begged him to allow me to recover Kandhar for him with my own unaided resources.’ (30)  "

-https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2016/06/03/the-stalwarts-revolution/

http://tisarpanth.blogspot.gr/2013/06/the-sikh-influence-on-shivaji-maratha.html

 

Edited by 5akaalsingh
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, 5akaalsingh said:

Shivaji was nothing more than a vassal of the Mughals:

"In an ironic twist of faith the Marathas and the Rajputs, who are lauded as the cream of the sub-continent’s military crop by Hindu nationalists, were more or less in cohorts with the Mughals. ‘Only very rarely do we hear of Hindu chieftains seeking to protect Hindus… Rajput chieftains offered no opposition even to temple demolitions by the Mughals…’ (14) The Rajputs were handicapped by three main factors viz. a lack of natural resources (they were mostly desert dwellers) (15), a parochial tendency to concentrate solely upon feudal and dynastic interests (16) and finally their own pecking order. (17) In the aftermath of the Mughal conquest of the sub-continent, the Rajputs were the first to fragment socio-political taboos by offering their females in marriage to Muslim males. (18) At a time when most Hindus despised even the notion of Muslims touching their food, the Rajputs expected their daughters to warm the beds of their Mughal overlords. The main pillars of Mughal administration and security, it is somewhat telling that out Akbar’s 416 military commanders 47 of the most prominent were Rajputs. (19) Whilst Maharana Pratap’s revolt was ongoing, the Rajputs of Marwar, Ambar, Bikaner and Bundi marched against him and played a decisive role in crushing his forces. (20) Their own obdurate interests often collided with any national sentiments they might have possessed and overruled the latter. It is no wonder then that the Rajputs, as a whole, failed to initiate and lead any long-lasting revolution to oust or even break the Mughal grip upon the sub-continent.  

The Marathas, though distinctive in their political acts, were more or less similar to the Rajputs in that that prior to Shivaji they were proud sub-ordinates of the Muslim oppressors. Shivaji’s own father had allied himself with the Southern Pathans during the Karnataka expedition, ‘in which the Hindu religion was ruthlessly put down, lands devastated, shrines desecrated, idols broken, women’s honor violated, and all the accumulated wealth of centuries drained away…’ (21) Though great credit goes to Shivaji for arousing his fellows’ sentiments to counter the pernicious foreigners and their faith, his movement when compared with Banda Singh’s movement falls short in three respects.

1.) The Sikhs rejected Caste and proposed the creation of an egalitarian society. This was an aspect of Banda’s multi-faceted revolution in the Punjab and one which admirably succeeded. In the words of Irvine,‘a low scavenger or leather dresser, the lowest of the low in Indian estimation, had only to leave home and join the Guru (referring to Banda; interjection ours), when in a short time he would return to his birthplace as its ruler with his order of appointment in his hand. As soon as he set foot with the boundaries, the well-born and wealthy went out to greet him and escort him home. Arrived there, they stood with joined palms, awaiting his orders… Not a soul dared to disobey an order, and men who had often risked themselves in battlefields became so cowed down that they were afraid even to remonstrate. Hindus who had not joined the sect were not exempt from this.’ (22) Compare this with Shivaji who according to Basham was, ‘more a restorer of old than… a builder of the new… The Marathas did not encourage reforms in Hindu society, and the India of the 18th century was if anything more conservative than it had been in the days of the first Muslim invasion.’ (23)

Basham’s view is borne out by Shivaji’s own personal correspondence. Whereas Akali Guru Gobind Singh Ji enjoined his Sikhs- among them Banda- to annihilate the very edifices of Caste (24) Shivaji issued a circular edict enjoining, ‘all members of society not to create innovation in Caste practices but follow the traditional path prescribed by the Shastras.’ (25) Furthermore he being a Bhonsle (a tiller of land), Shivaji had to beg ratification from the Brahmins before he could officially declare himself as sovereign. Several Brahmins refused to accede to what they considered as being his ludicrous request before he finally found one willing to enthrone him for a large sum of money. (26) 

2.) Shivaji’s revolt against the Mughals arose more by chance than by design. Whereas the Sikh movement (including Banda’s) was construed to acquire an autonomous Sikh led state, Shivaji initially wanted to be a vassal of the Mughal emperor. His (Shivaji’s father) had been a mercenary in the pay of the triumvirate Pathan principalities of Southern India. (27) Enamoured of his valor, the rulers of these principalities had bequeathed him with several estates. Upon his father’s demise Shivaji succeeded him as the administrator of the aforementioned estates and commenced entertaining notions of his own state. To this end he set out for Delhi and submitted a proposal stating that he, Shivaji, would be more than honored to become a vassal of the Mughals if they recognized his autonomy. (28) Even after his treacherous confinement he would pen a lengthy letter to Raja Jay Singh pledging his life to the Mughals and also swearing an oath to assist them in the conquest of Bijapur. (29) After his escape he would dispatch another lengthy letter to Jay Singh complaining that, ‘the Emperor has cast me off; otherwise I intended to have begged him to allow me to recover Kandhar for him with my own unaided resources.’ (30)  "

-https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2016/06/03/the-stalwarts-revolution/

http://tisarpanth.blogspot.gr/2013/06/the-sikh-influence-on-shivaji-maratha.html

 

One can easily say that let dogs bark and prod on forward like the mighty elephant, but such a mentality will only signal to our detractors that we are weak. The time is now to unite and launch our own intellectual offensive against such pseudo-intellectuals. Tisarpanth is doing just that. Of course there are many who will argue that such articles take an aggressive line, but I feel that without aggressiveness nothing much can be achieved. At least they don't adopt the Sanataan garbage line and slag off the Singh-Sabha all the time.  

Edited by 13Mirch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, sikhni777 said:

Keeping all your calm, look them in the eye and ask them if Shivaji would be happy and approve of their behaviour of mocking other people. Ask them to point out a verse from their scriptures with which they can justify their actions. 

Dealing with such people is not achieved by showing them your own religion. Question theirs first.

It is human nature to deal with skeptism some culture which you do not understand. When being mocked - it is important to stand your ground and show your intimidator that they have failed in showing you down and making you feel unimportant. 

Your own scripture should be preached to people who honestly seek an answer from you. When your own beliefs get scorned at - you get hurt even more and eventually if you are not strong enough then you get doubts on your own beliefs eventually. 

Things my brothers have had their juris called in Africa ... include tomatoes, potatoes, what are you hiding in there? 

Girls (Sikh) used to ask my own Sikh sister why she has such long hair. We were all proud of my sisters decision to hide it under keski and eventually she managed to get some respect from these girls. 

Someone questioned me - a Christian as to how I can proove that Guru Nanak Dev Ji rose from the dead as Jesus did and appeared to his disciples. I was only 10 then and could not get an appropriate answer. I knew the meanings of the mool mantra - so I managed to convince them that Sikhs believe in One God. That was their main Christian concern at that time. 

 

Keeping calm is one thing, answering such morons is another. As another veer has pointed out on this thread, Shivaji was nothing more than a vassal of the Pathan principalities and offered his services as a mercenary to Aurangzeb. Only when the Emperor ignored him, did he set about carving out a pan-Hindu niche but even this fell to elitist Brahmins. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listen to the hukamnama you were given by Guru sahib.  By claiming to such people your religion is false will be speaking in ego because you want to get revenge for they insulted Sikhi.  Best thing you can do is work on yourself.  Know the knowledge and teach it to actually educate others on who Shiva was.  Not to degrade a person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Listen to the hukamnama you were given by Guru sahib.  By claiming to such people your religion is false will be speaking in ego because you want to get revenge for they insulted Sikhi.  Best thing you can do is work on yourself.  Know the knowledge and teach it to actually educate others on who Shiva was.  Not to degrade a person.

Two points:

One- He is defending his own beliefs and theirs being different to his, friction is bound to occur. That does not mean that he should crawl into his hole and let the situation escalate.

Two- Shivaji was an Indian monarch and not the God. Clearly this point evades you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 13Mirch said:

Two points:

One- He is defending his own beliefs and theirs being different to his, friction is bound to occur. That does not mean that he should crawl into his hole and let the situation escalate.

Read the Hukam Guru Sahib gave him.  Ignorance is bliss.

Quote

Two- Shivaji was an Indian monarch and not the God. Clearly this point evades you.

I never commented on shiva state so keep your deep rooted hate bottled up inside. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

From what I understand (your older posts), your colleagues have a problem with you, not Sikhi. They are bullying you because you are an easy target who lets that happen. I suppose if there was another Sikh there, they would not say the same to them, but they would to you because they have a problem with you rather than Sikhs as a whole. Likewise, I have seen 'Sikhs' making fun of Hindus & Hindu Gods ONLY to annoy their Hindu victim ( it even happens on this forum from Sikhs to Sikhs). They do not have a prejudice against all people of that culture, but just of that certain person. Besides, those are just your colleagues making fun of you, they do not speak for the whole community. This is not even new news to us anymore, it is obvious that they only have a personal problem with you rather than all Sikhs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they target and bully one Sikh alone, that does mean they have a problem with Sikhs. I don't agree that the problem is just with him, because they would not make fun of his Sikhi attire and values. I'm not trying to create any hatred of another religion or faith, but if they have a problem with just him, they would have focused on something else, and not link it to Sikhi. That excuse is not valid. 

They are doing just that as he is the only Sikh guy there and there is no support against so many others if a different religion and they are making it clear it's his Sikhi they are picking on. Obviously they wouldn't pick on him as much if there was a another Sikh, but I don't think it would completely stop. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, simran345 said:

If they target and bully one Sikh alone, that does mean they have a problem with Sikhs. I don't agree that the problem is just with him, because they would not make fun of his Sikhi attire and values. I'm not trying to create any hatred of another religion or faith, but if they have a problem with just him, they would have focused on something else, and not link it to Sikhi. That excuse is not valid. 

They are doing just that as he is the only Sikh guy there and there is no support against so many others if a different religion and they are making it clear it's his Sikhi they are picking on. Obviously they wouldn't pick on him as much if there was a another Sikh, but I don't think it would completely stop. 

They are not doing that because he is Sikh, they are doing that because he is gay. Im sure they all know it, and are bluntly obnoxious about it. Those people are sadists, rather than having problems with Sikhs lol. They are purposely saying weird stuff to him because they want a reaction from HIM. They do not want a reaction from ALL Sikhs, they want a reaction from HIM. Likewise, I saw obnoxious Sikhs making fun of a person who was coincidentally Hindu, and they also made fun of Devtas just to make their victim annoyed. That does not mean they will say it to everyone, they have a problem with him because he is gay & gives the reaction they want. If he was not Sikh they would say the same thing, even the poster said that they do not even practice their own religion & make fun of their own religion, so it is true that religion is not the real issue. The issue is that they are homophobes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Preeet said:

They are not doing that because he is Sikh, they are doing that because he is gay. Im sure they all know it, and are bluntly obnoxious about it. Those people are sadists, rather than having problems with Sikhs lol. They are purposely saying weird stuff to him because they want a reaction from HIM. They do not want a reaction from ALL Sikhs, they want a reaction from HIM. Likewise, I saw obnoxious Sikhs making fun of a person who was coincidentally Hindu, and they also made fun of Devtas just to make their victim annoyed. That does not mean they will say it to everyone, they have a problem with him because he is gay & gives the reaction they want. If he was not Sikh they would say the same thing, even the poster said that they do not even practice their own religion & make fun of their own religion, so it is true that religion is not the real issue. The issue is that they are homophobes.

So why are none of their comments about homosexuality? All are about Sikhism. You just want to defend your Hindu brothers. You're the one in denial, and making up random theories. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

So why are none of their comments about homosexuality? All are about Sikhism. You just want to defend your Hindu brothers. You're the one in denial, and making up random theories. 

Im sure there are comments about homosexuality written in past posts of his. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Im sure there are comments about homosexuality written in past posts of his. 

you're a muppet;. Don't you have anything better to do than offer excuses for people when they attack Sikhism? I'm wiling to bet if someone said all that to you, you wouldn't care as long as no one dare raise an eyebrow against your beloved Devta right?

OP has clearly said they mock how he looks (his identity as a Sikh) and they purposely attack it, fun fact I've been in his shoes and yes they are attacks on Sikhism. How funny that when someone attacks Sikhism you decide to act like its no big deal. But god forbid if a thread went up about Hinduism and its flaws you'd be all over it having a seizure about how everything said in it is Nindya and we're all sinners compared to you.

Give it a rest and grow up. I'm sure there's some idols you could go and perform veneration for instead of coming on here with your daft nonsense.

 

Edit: fun fact for you. Homophobia is rampant in India. There's zero protection and if they were homophobes they could easily go out and say it with zero repercussions. 

Edited by Kira
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Kira said:

you're a muppet;. Don't you have anything better to do than offer excuses for people when they attack Sikhism? I'm wiling to bet if someone said all that to you, you wouldn't care as long as no one dare raise an eyebrow against your beloved Devta right?

OP has clearly said they mock how he looks (his identity as a Sikh) and they purposely attack it, fun fact I've been in his shoes and yes they are attacks on Sikhism. How funny that when someone attacks Sikhism you decide to act like its no big deal. But god forbid if a thread went up about Hinduism and its flaws you'd be all over it having a seizure about how everything said in it is Nindya and we're all sinners compared to you.

Give it a rest and grow up. I'm sure there's some idols you could go and perform veneration for instead of coming on here with your daft nonsense.

 

Edit: fun fact for you. Homophobia is rampant in India. There's zero protection and if they were homophobes they could easily go out and say it with zero repercussions. 

So youre openly gay too? The reason why Id be bothered if someone says anything bad about a religion is because I expected more from my own religion's community and it makes us (as a whole) look bad. If someone who is irreligious says things like that then I would not care because it's clear that they are not trying to prove that they are religious while saying things like that. But if a religious person mocks other religions then it makes them look silly. Keep your fun facts to yourself, dear. Homophobia is a taboo among the younger (city) generation, so that's why they probably are more aware of what they question these days. They are attacking him as an individual, rather than every Sikh they see on the streets because if they did that theyd stop (knowing how theyd get in trouble by any other self respecting Sikh). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Preeet said:

So youre openly gay too? The reason why Id be bothered if someone says anything bad about a religion is because I expected more from my own religion's community and it makes us (as a whole) look bad. If someone who is irreligious says things like that then I would not care because it's clear that they are not trying to prove that they are religious while saying things like that. But if a religious person mocks other religions then it makes them look silly. Keep your fun facts to yourself, dear. Homophobia is a taboo among the younger (city) generation, so that's why they probably are more aware of what they question these days. They are attacking him as an individual, rather than every Sikh they see on the streets because if they did that theyd stop (knowing how theyd get in trouble by any other self respecting Sikh). 

This rss agent is straight crazy.  The hindus directly insult Sikhi by saying the following:

 

1) Why do you tie that thing on your head ? to keep your head from exploding ?

2) Why do you people wear that dagger ? *after I explained him , "So if a sikh woman is gonna chop vegetables, but forgets her knife in kitchen, can she use Kirpan?"

3) What do you do if you gotta ride a bike ? how you going to wear your helmet ?

4) What you gonna do if you got an itch on your head ? how you gonna scratch ? *laughs*

You are very thick headed.  You should be the crash test dummy for vehicles. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Preeet said:

So youre openly gay too? The reason why Id be bothered if someone says anything bad about a religion is because I expected more from my own religion's community and it makes us (as a whole) look bad. If someone who is irreligious says things like that then I would not care because it's clear that they are not trying to prove that they are religious while saying things like that. But if a religious person mocks other religions then it makes them look silly. Keep your fun facts to yourself, dear. Homophobia is a taboo among the younger (city) generation, so that's why they probably are more aware of what they question these days. They are attacking him as an individual, rather than every Sikh they see on the streets because if they did that theyd stop (knowing how theyd get in trouble by any other self respecting Sikh). 

No but I have to subjected to similar abuse. God you're dense. No it isnt a taboo, what world do you live in. LGBT people still have violence aimed at them, far more than any western country. This daft theory of yours might hold up if being Gay was legal in India and being Sikh wasn't. Except it isn't. The exact opposite exists but if you had half a brain you'd see that. As OP has said these people clearly aren't atheists. 

 

If you bothered to read OP properly instead of having a fit because someone dare raise a finger against your hindu friends, you'd know the abuse is strictly Sikh related. Nazi didn't go out on the street and start looking for Jews to beat up, that didn't come till much later. So please. Just because they don't harass Sikhs on the street (which is illegal btw) doesn't mean they don't have anti-sikh feelings. They aim for him because he's there and all alone. Maybe if you grew a brain you'd see that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This rss agent is straight crazy.  The hindus directly insult Sikhi by saying the following:

 

1) Why do you tie that thing on your head ? to keep your head from exploding ?

2) Why do you people wear that dagger ? *after I explained him , "So if a sikh woman is gonna chop vegetables, but forgets her knife in kitchen, can she use Kirpan?"

3) What do you do if you gotta ride a bike ? how you going to wear your helmet ?

4) What you gonna do if you got an itch on your head ? how you gonna scratch ? *laughs*

You are very thick headed.  You should be the crash test dummy for vehicles. 

 They also said this regarding Sikh History 

Quote

 "this is only thing you're good for, this is your only history lol" He's a loyal far-right winger "nationalist".

If that isn't anti-sikh then I'm not even sure what is. Obviously as long as no one insults Hinduism Preeto wont mind. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Akalifauj said:

This rss agent is straight crazy.  The hindus directly insult Sikhi by saying the following:

 

1) Why do you tie that thing on your head ? to keep your head from exploding ?

2) Why do you people wear that dagger ? *after I explained him , "So if a sikh woman is gonna chop vegetables, but forgets her knife in kitchen, can she use Kirpan?"

3) What do you do if you gotta ride a bike ? how you going to wear your helmet ?

4) What you gonna do if you got an itch on your head ? how you gonna scratch ? *laughs*

You are very thick headed.  You should be the crash test dummy for vehicles. 

Why are you resorting to name calling, I did not expect this from you. I am saying that those people were trying to insult him rather than the whole community, & clearly they are successful in it. Theyre only saying that to him since they only want his response to it. Those types of people only want entertainment in the form from him. Thats the difference between them and some of the people here who actually have an agenda against other faiths.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First, preeto is right to an extent but so are rest of you 

Let me clarify again.

When I joined office, there was this psycho madrasi body-builder . But since he's a bloody psycho , he started bullying me, seeing my innocent naive face. And because I looked different (turban and beard).

I tell you these south-indians are least aware of sikhs in all of india !  When I was on client side, an even ruder guy of andhra (again not atheist !) told me "Arey remove this thing (turban) na .. Let fresh air come in !" . He went further and jokingly said "If he were PM of India , he would kill all of punjabis in one day.

"In one day it can be done. How much bullets one would need ?" I was horrified and shocked at what this guy is saying ! But I also told him he would be shot next day if he even dared do such a thing lol. 

I tell you we're IT people, a white collar job and yet we have such nut-jobs ! One of them , an ardent RSS-follower mockingly asked me "Where is your khalistan?" . He brought this up totally irrelevantly .

 I was really shocked considering I am seeing such people first time. 

But slowly when they doubted I am gay, they started gay jokes, but definitely its not just gay jokes. One marathi hindutva-fan guy praised hitler and smirked by saying "operation bluestar". 

Then they also joked on the current state of punjab (drugs) and claimed how sikhs are spreading drugs in india ! 

So , I kicked them in their nuts (religion ) . He also whined by how sikhs killed indra gandhi.   "Where's your ram mandir lol ? You hindus couldn't build it despite being 80% of population and having your own government " haha , you should have looked in their faces.

They picked on me (with anti-sikh vitriol) because they knew they could get away with it. They wouldn't do it against strong singh, but that wouldn't mean they respect singhs in general. It just means their hate (their true face) came in front of weak sikhs like me.

PS : Purpose of this post is not to spread hatred for hindus. It is just to make us aware of not to see one community as more "brother" than other. But at the same time, lets not have hate feelings for anyone. 

Edited by AjeetSinghPunjabi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

OMG ! stop fighting among yourselves again 

First, preeto is right to an extent but so are rest of you 

Let me clarify again.

When I joined office, there was this psycho madrasi body-builder . But since he's a bloody psycho , he started bullying me, seeing my innocent naive face. And because I looked different (turban and beard).

I tell you these south-indians are least aware of sikhs in all of india !  When I was on client side, an even ruder guy of andhra (again not atheist !) told me "Arey remove this thing (turban) na .. Let fresh air come in !" . He went further and jokingly said "If he were PM of India , he would kill all of punjabis in one day.

"In one day it can be done. How much bullets one would need ?" I was horrified and shocked at what this guy is saying ! But I also told him he would be shot next day if he even dared do such a thing lol. 

I tell you we're IT people, a white collar job and yet we have such nut-jobs ! One of them , an ardent RSS-follower mockingly asked me "Where is your khalistan?" . He brought this up totally irrelevantly .

 I was really shocked considering I am seeing such people first time. 

But slowly when they doubted I am gay, they started gay jokes, but definitely its not just gay jokes. One marathi hindutva-fan guy praised hitler and smirked by saying "operation bluestar". 

Then they also joked on the current state of punjab (drugs) and claimed how sikhs are spreading drugs in india ! 

So , I kicked them in their nuts (religion ) . He also whined by how sikhs killed indra gandhi.   "Where's your ram mandir lol ? You hindus couldn't build it despite being 80% of population and having your own government " haha , you should have looked in their faces.

 

PS : Purpose of this post is not to spread hatred for hindus. It is just to make us aware of not to see one community as more "brother" than other. But at the same time, lets not have hate feelings for anyone. 

See, those people are just sick, rather than the avg person from those areas. I have friends from Andhra and they are all really nice, they do not even think of Sikhs from different from Hinduism since that's how close they think we are. Crazy people like those that you work with like to say those things to get a reaction from a specific individual, such sadists. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Why are you resorting to name calling, I did not expect this from you. I am saying that those people were trying to insult him rather than the whole community, & clearly they are successful in it. Theyre only saying that to him since they only want his response to it. Those types of people only want entertainment in the form from him. Thats the difference between them and some of the people here who actually have an agenda against other faiths.

The point is we can't take it lying down. It goes against tenets of sikhi ! So thats why I thrashed them and kicked them in their own nuts and thats when they stopped (recently).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've hit the nail on the head here. 
    • A solution is, if amrit-dharis followed rehit, IF, then, only then more people might want to be Singhs. When I say rehit, I don't mean just the paper rehit maryada people have now. I mean following the active lifestyle rehit like in the rehitnaamas, rehit that has been followed since Guru Hargobind. Doing things like learning archery, shooting, horse-riding etc Follow Gurus hukam of learning shastar everyday, and also learn martial arts. (See Nihang Singh dals for example) Instead of being people that religiously follow football and cricket matches, they would be involved in these activities. Then they would be an actual "practising" amrit dhari, as opposed to someone who took amrit just to do paat, which any sehajdhari or "mona" can actually do! Can gurdwaras and sikh associations organise such activities? Organising kabaddi tournaments isn't really going  to make sangat proper amrit dharis. However, organising kabaddi and wrestling training for sangat to be involved in would help! WE absolutely should not act like the disarmed sikhs of colonial times. Instead of becoming like the naamdharis who put the kirpaan symbol in the kanga, we should get out of this colonial compromise of not following martial rehit and get back to actually being Singhs. Can the community do this?
    • This man passed away he, his son and daughter in law were acting like God's gift. During family gathering/ prayer session at their house the old man literally frowned on seeing monehs. Daughter in law n his son spoke to everyone equally, but they forced others into keeping hair/ take Amrit. Not sure about my dad but my mum got compelled by the daughter's words n took Amrit. She was never happy kno wha am saying? Even today she speaks of leaving Amrit behind. I was a kid then never knew reasons why mum took Amrit. Anyways, the old man? Majority of his grandson's are moneh! When he died they all cut their hair. And his eldest granddaughter?? MARRIED A WHITE MAN KEEPS BOY'S HAIRSTYLE!!! (Daughter of his daughter in law)... SANGAT JIO! something to think about, why force/ compel n pester others? THEY ARE ADULTS AND KNOW ABOUT AMRIT/ PRAYERS!
    • actually due to working across town , Mum and Dad didn't have the same input like you think , he always had non-sikh friends growing up did minimal paat and when he went to uni predominately white friends. He has married a dastarwali bibi out of his choice (love marriage) she is also a coconut but will do the Indian thing if it suits her (I know birds of a feather). He refers to us as 'you Indians'  yep we have a good laugh at that. He's an architect so I guess he mixes with a certain type of people and is sniffy about his starting point which frankly he needs to get major ish kicked out of him since it was Mum's machine sewing and dad's grocery that paid for his ungrateful A$$ to get where he got.  Anyway because she is a socialising sikh he has started doing his banian and going to programs ...one good thing  But lately he tries to Lord it over Mum with his interpretation of what izzat and family values should be , of course he seems to believe that the Mother he abandoned should somehow be consulting him on how to proceed. kal ka shokaraa , akkl gitte'ch showing disrespect to his elders then wants to be the big I am SMH