Jump to content

How Jathebandis proliferate


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
11 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

That site is owned by Naamdharis not Sikhs. From their "Guru",(he was a Sikh of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib and never called himself Guru) Ram Singh post: 

"

It is a historical fact that in 1858, Satguru Ram Singh Ji was the initiator of the Amrit Ceremony to be performed for the women-folk, thus giving them equal rights and standing without any discrimination.

"

These false stories were made by his "successor", who was the true Ghadhar and his name was "Guru" Hari Singh. 

You can't really complain since their not Sikh, they even mention the Sant Nirankari movement, (the one led by Buta Singh and Gurbachana, not the Dayal Singh version), as like they are some type of Mahapurukhs, or even divine themselves. http://www.<banned site filter activated>/movements/Nirankaris/Sant Nirankari.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

That site is owned by Naamdharis not Sikhs. From their "Guru",(he was a Sikh of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib and never called himself Guru) Ram Singh post: 

"

It is a historical fact that in 1858, Satguru Ram Singh Ji was the initiator of the Amrit Ceremony to be performed for the women-folk, thus giving them equal rights and standing without any discrimination.

"

These false stories were made by his "successor", who was the true Ghadhar and his name was "Guru" Hari Singh. 

You can't really complain since their not Sikh, they even mention the Sant Nirankari movement, (the one led by Buta Singh and Gurbachana, not the Dayal Singh version), as like they are some type of Mahapurukhs, or even divine themselves. http://www.<banned site filter activated>/movements/Nirankaris/Sant Nirankari.htm

hmm seem like a collection of jathe bashing of asli gursikhs versus praise pieces of nakli sikhs ... had to smile wryily at the description of panj piarey go around abhilakhis with their hands on the abhilakee's head . I never saw any of that nonsense going on . They fail to mention that the rehit of dastaar applies to both sexes in akal takht maryada but has not been reinstated after temporary relaxation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
On 2/24/2017 at 6:27 PM, jkvlondon said:

hmm seem like a collection of jathe bashing of asli gursikhs versus praise pieces of nakli sikhs ... had to smile wryily at the description of panj piarey go around abhilakhis with their hands on the abhilakee's head . I never saw any of that nonsense going on . They fail to mention that the rehit of dastaar applies to both sexes in akal takht maryada but has not been reinstated after temporary relaxation.

To be completely honest I don't know what side they are on. What I do know is this; at the 10th light of Guru Sahib; they stop ant then they start a new column which begins with "Guru" Balak Singh, they have a different ideology on that idea alone. http://www.<banned site filter activated>/gurus/GuruPg2.htm On an actual Namdhari, (which actually doesn't hide behind the word "Sikh") website Daas read this at the description of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji which basically summed up why they aren't Sikh:

"Guru Nanak Dev Ji initiated the maryada of 'The Deghdhari Guru' by passing the Gurgaddi to Guru Angad Dev Ji."

They have so much they could actually offer, but are really busy with this false ideology to promote themselves. (They don't even have one "Guru" anymore and are currently led by 3 "Gurus")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use