Jump to content

Recommended Posts

While travelling through pakistan i came across these scriptures (pics attached) , can someone help me here with identifying these ? Are these of any historical or spiritual value to Sikhism ? (These are currently not in my possession, but with some Pakistani antique dealer) would it be worth getting these from him ?

Any help translating these would be much appreciated !!

 

 

 

Edited by pavitarsin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are from a different book from the same collection :

 

There are four books in total & I'm thinking about getting these & donating to a Sikh museum.

 

 

 

Edited by pavitarsin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/23/2017 at 7:07 PM, pavitarsin said:

These are from a different book from the same collection :

 

There are four books in total & I'm thinking about getting these & donating to a Sikh museum.

IMG_20170201_210148.jpg

tmp_11017-IMG_20170201_2101481816065148.jpg

IMG_20170201_210138.jpg

From what I see, there is a pic of Shri Guru Hargobind Sahib. Maybe it is a pothi of Gurbilas Patshahi Shevin or something related. If I were you I would never let this opportunity get away. You should buy it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/26/2017 at 8:23 PM, 5akaalsingh said:

From what I see, there is a pic of Shri Guru Hargobind Sahib. Maybe it is a pothi of Gurbilas Patshahi Shevin or something related. If I were you I would never let this opportunity get away. You should buy it. 

Yea, I'm in the process of buying these.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/07/2017 at 10:13 AM, Preeet said:

That is Sri Varaha Avtar in the first photo. That's all I understand.

I think it says baerha avtar !

tmp_16362-IMG_20170201_210010_011779183148.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like the Gurbani is Sukhmani Sahib.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

story the Varaha Avtar , from this it is clear that the devte had too trigger happy krodh , so were really stuck in maya too

and it is interesting to note that they considered human birth as inferior when Gurbani tells us that they envy human birth as we have the ability to do bhagti and serve Akal Purakh...hmm

http://www.importantindia.com/2693/varaha-avatar-story/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aw okayy, thanks for replying guys, i just recieved one "pothi" by courier, I'll try to take a better look, & scan and upload better pages.

Edited by pavitarsin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
On 3/9/2017 at 6:36 AM, jkvlondon said:

story the Varaha Avtar , from this it is clear that the devte had too trigger happy krodh , so were really stuck in maya too

and it is interesting to note that they considered human birth as inferior when Gurbani tells us that they envy human birth as we have the ability to do bhagti and serve Akal Purakh...hmm

http://www.importantindia.com/2693/varaha-avatar-story/

What's happy Krodh? But I can guess why the artist would depict him, it represents sin and how he's lost and trying to find Vaheguru somehow. (Just my interpretation, don't know if this was from the Ranjit Singh kingdom as there were a lot of Hinduized Sikh practices at the time).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MAN, please possess them ! I am willing to PAY ! But just get these in a sikh museum . Please don't keep with yourself forever lol.

They seem historical ! It will be of value to us I think , as a community 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

What's happy Krodh? But I can guess why the artist would depict him, it represents sin and how he's lost and trying to find Vaheguru somehow. (Just my interpretation, don't know if this was from the Ranjit Singh kingdom as there were a lot of Hinduized Sikh practices at the time).

'trigger happy' in other words quick to trip into Krodh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Preeet said:

I read the site and it left out so much from the story.. Like where they were given a choice to be born as Sri Vishnu's foes (less rebirths) or friends (more births); and they chose foes because it meant that theyd be separated for less births from Sri Vishnu rather than the other option.

That is so illogical if you are saying Vishnu is a good guy ...it is like saying if you are friends with a good man you are going to be punished by Akal Purakh whereas if you are a good man's enemy you with get rewarded by Akal Purakh ..It is irrelevant to a sikh however as just need to put a name to a face ....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't get entangled or criticizing of three dieties of hinduism : brahma vishnu shiva

In words of Mazumdar , a bengali hindu historian

Quote

Its most notable expression is to be found in the theological conception of the Trimūrti, i.e., the manifestation of the supreme God in three forms of Brahmā, Viṣṇu, and Śiva... But the attempt cannot be regarded as a great success, for Brahmā never gained an ascendancy comparable to that of Śiva or Viṣṇu, and the different sects often conceived the Trimūrti as really the three manifestations of their own sectarian god, whom they regarded as Brahman or Absolute.[12]

Who 's this supreme god that vedas speak of ?

its known as "brahm" or "parbrahm" , same words SGGS used as well numerous times.

Our hindu brothers got confused on this one ! If you ask a vaishnav brother who's the supreme god, he will say vishnu. 

If you ask a shaivite who's the supreme god, he will say shiva . No one worships brahma btw ! 

I had read little on english translation of 10 major upanishads . Upanishads are like embedded texts within vedas . Like how sukhmani sahib is embedded in SGGS.

One of the foremost ones , Katha upanishad says
 

Quote

 

This is that eternal Asvattha Tree with its root above and branches below. That root, indeed, is called the Bright; That is Brahman and That alone is the Immortal. In That all worlds are contained and none can pass beyond. This, verily, is That.

2) Whatever there is—the whole universe—vibrates because it has gone forth from Brahman, which exists as its Ground. That Brahman is a great terror, like a poised thunderbolt. Those who know It become immortal.

3) From terror of Brahman, fire burns; from terror of It, the sun shines; from terror of It, Indra and Vayu and Death, the fifth, run.


 

This sounds quite familiar to gurbani "Bhae vich agan ... bhae vich ... " (so sorry don't remember the full shabad). 

Ignorance comes because people don't want to understand their own scriptures 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2
8 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

MAN, please possess them ! I am willing to PAY ! But just get these in a sikh museum . Please don't keep with yourself forever lol.

They seem historical ! It will be of value to us I think , as a community 

In this world, of not having a Khalistan or Theocratic Punjab, I'd avoid just putting it in a museum owned by Indian lands. Most Punjabis now have been to desensitized to even support maintaining anything Sikh related. If you were to go to Nankana, you'd see none of the historical things that were there before, (such as Guru Sahib's kitchen, Guru Sahib's utensils, or even his home, which they destroyed to build a Gurdwara). There are non-religious things owned by non-sikhs that still stayed the same for thousands of years, and we Sikhs change everything in a few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jacfsing2 said:

In this world, of not having a Khalistan or Theocratic Punjab, I'd avoid just putting it in a museum owned by Indian lands. Most Punjabis now have been to desensitized to even support maintaining anything Sikh related. If you were to go to Nankana, you'd see none of the historical things that were there before, (such as Guru Sahib's kitchen, Guru Sahib's utensils, or even his home, which they destroyed to build a Gurdwara). There are non-religious things owned by non-sikhs that still stayed the same for thousands of years, and we Sikhs change everything in a few years.

are there pics of guru sahibs' home ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In urdu we also use 'Mauze' so i doubt if it is hindi word.It sounds like a persian one.Indians have problem prouncing words which end with sound 'z'.Just like Mumtaz Mehal became Mumtaj Mehal and now just Taj Mehal.
    • i have no issue using persian,hindi,english words in my day to day conversations in punjab.I just though a good opportunity to learn "shuddh" punjabi. 
    • Sikhism needs neither a reformation nor a philosophy of free will. Reformations are for religions that are at a primitive tribal level in the first place. Sikhi starts off with Guru Nanak Ji feeding people langar, and preaching meditation of Satnam. If you start off with capturing war booty and sex slaves killing all the males, yeah, you need a reformation. Philosophy is (mostly) for people trying desperately to understand the universe without real divine knowledge. These types of efforts are called ਸਿਆਣਪਾਂ in Gurbani. (You did you Japji this morning, right?) All of these sianapan don't amount to a hill of beans. We don't have the burning need for philosophy that Westerners do because we can obtain complete knowledge via simran. ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕੈ ਸਿਮਰਨਿ ਸਭੁ ਕਿਛੁ ਸੁਝੈ ॥
    • it's my fault, i should have phrased things a bit better. Basically based on the data he gathered same sex couples are more likely to settle into a routine and are less likely to do things out of said routine (such as cheating, which according to the data he gathered was surprisingly low compared to straight couples). By similar attributes I mean people like them in terms of personality and taste. In straight couples you can usually note a sort of polarity in the way they behave and their personalities.  Again this is based on one study, nothing official or on a large scale really.
×