Jump to content

Now the gorey are warning our girls ...


jkvlondon
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Anglos didn't race-mix like crazy, those were the Spaniards, they, (Anglos), had a racial supremacy system in their little heads. Anglo women though seem to be sleeping with just about anyone, when our Sikh Mahapurukhs were in Europe these Anglos and the Belgian women were just ready to try to destroy our Sikhi from their Kaam. (They proved our people were the superior ones)

Are you reading history books  written by someone like you? I have never read such flapdoodle in my entire 19 years on this planet! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jacfsing2 said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Indian these numbers are pathetic. There are more Spainard, Arab breed mixing than this. You are more likely to see Amritdhari Khalsas than you will see these Anglo-Indians. Ghenghis Khan and Alexander the Great have more descandents than this pathetic number, some Punjabis actually have Greek blood, never met a Punjabi with Anglo blood though. (But have met some with different mixed ancestors). Also even today the Anglos that go around other countries finding women to marry, they marry prostitutes.

Oh no! Not again! Flapdoodle in 225 words!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Anglos didn't race-mix like crazy, those were the Spaniards, they, (Anglos), had a racial supremacy system in their little heads. 

A big part of this supremacy thinking involves the belief that the women of non-whites are your property, in that you've got more rights to them than any non-white man, should you desire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
3 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

A big part of this supremacy thinking involves the belief that the women of non-whites are your property, in that you've got more rights to them than any non-white man, should you desire. 

So why'd the Spaniards and Arabs mix more than the Anglos? Unless you seriously believe that they both mixed equally? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

spaniards and arabs have one thing in common subjugation of people through sword, pillage  and rape 

If I may add, Anglos veiled their expansionism behind the cover of deliverance and enlightenment; bringing the savages to heel, so to speak; spreading the light of western enlightenment to the places where the apparent darkest reaches of humanity were yet to be civilised. Spaniards and Arabs didn't give two hoots about much of that, and just wanted to conquer and be all powerful, even if there was more than a hint of the Arabs being influenced by their faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MisterrSingh said:

If I may add, Anglos veiled their expansionism behind the cover of deliverance and enlightenment; bringing the savages to heel, so to speak; spreading the light of western enlightenment to the places where the apparent darkest reaches of humanity were yet to be civilised. Spaniards and Arabs didn't give two hoots about much of that, and just wanted to conquer and be all powerful, even if there was more than a hint of the Arabs being influenced by their faith.

funny how the spaniards didn't take too kindly to the same treatment by the Arab hordes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

 Now that there's a ground swell of whites becoming emboldened by the populism that's gradually spreading through their countries - in response to the failure of extreme liberalism - instead of addressing their own people on how they should behave, they want to drag us into the foreground in the hope that we take the front-loaded brunt of the so-called fightback. We should absolutely confront those vile Islamics and their social warfare, but we do it for us, not because "massa" granted us insight into the problems.

Although, I never thought white Canadians would ever speak up for themselves. There's this stereotype that they're extremely pliant and accommodating even in circumstances that are quite bad for them. Things must be getting really dicey over in Canada for these white Canadians to find their voice.

After the Trump win, alt right and white supremacists have come into the public and onto social media out og nowhere.

These ppl r trying to get sikhs to spearhead the attack so they cant be called racist.

Rebel Media is an alt right youtube video gaining alot of popularity in Canada. These ppl r so biased they refused to acknowledge attack on.the mosque in Quebec. They went with a conspiracy that it was actually 2 muslims who did it, witnesses heard the attacker say allah akbar and the police and media r covering this up

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jkvlondon said:

funny how the spaniards didn't take too kindly to the same treatment by the Arab hordes

Yeah, very true. They cleansed their country of all Arab influence (aside from the obvious affect on genes and ethnicity) within 700 years, and reverted to Catholicism under - was it Catherine? - almost in relief. 700 years may sound like a long time, but it's quite a feat to remove nearly all signs and affects of a foreign power's total dominance over an entire culture, country, and its people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

After the Trump win, alt right and white supremacists have come into the public and onto social media out of nowhere.

These ppl r trying to get sikhs to spearhead the attack so they cant be called racist.

Rebel Media is an alt right youtube video gaining alot of popularity in Canada. These ppl r so biased they refused to acknowledge attack on.the mosque in Quebec. They went with a conspiracy that it was actually 2 muslims who did it, witnesses heard the attacker say allah akbar and the police and media r covering this up.

Whilst there's a few of them with genuine insight, I take most of what they have to say with a huge dollop of salt considering most of the problems they're rallying against are rooted in the failed policies of the white establishment. Yet the way they behave, you'd think the mess the West finds itself in is due to campus SJWs and fresh off the boat immigrants. Those are symptoms; why do they hesitate in identifying the cause?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use