• advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
shastarSingh

spitting-a dirty habit of Indians!

11 posts in this topic

You could've just made all the ways Hindus are unhygienic in one topic rather than continually repeating the same thing. Note to Admin: just merge all the topics related to Hindu hygiene into one topic instead of @shastarSingh repeating the same thing each time.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Benti to mods: Please do some housekeeping. Merge a few threads, move a few others, etc. The place is cluttered. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I second that this shaster singh is starting to sound like a islamic or pakistan nationalist because is the kinda tactics they employ. He keeps creating disgusting vile threads about toilet habits...its starting to get sickening.

As much as I dont like government of India and idea of India as a unified country due to its human rights abuses against our people and other minorities. We should not be indulging in this kinda hating and defaming of Indians when most Sikhs are of Indian heritage and brown desi's are identified as Indians even if we say we are punjabis or khalistani's we will still be labeled as Indians on official docs at the time being. So people are only defaming and making their own colour people look bad

Can we have mods put a stop to these nasty threads and concentrate on Sikh centrist issues.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, genie said:

Yeah I second that this shaster singh is starting to sound like a islamic or pakistan nationalist because is the kinda tactics they employ. He keeps creating disgusting vile threads about toilet habits...its starting to get sickening.

As much as I dont like government of India and idea of India as a unified country due to its human rights abuses against our people and other minorities. We should not be indulging in this kinda hating and defaming of Indians when most Sikhs are of Indian heritage and brown desi's are identified as Indians even if we say we are punjabis or khalistani's we will still be labeled as Indians on official docs at the time being. So people are only defaming and making their own colour people look bad

Can we have mods put a stop to these nasty threads and concentrate on Sikh centrist issues.

 

Lol, very true. Have you noticed how Pakistanis are obsessed to the point of ludicrousness about Hindus drinking cow urine? Now, I've never sampled the delights of the excretions from a bovinal urinary tract, but browse the comments section of a YouTube video about any video even loosely related to Indians, and you've got these clearly Pakistani commenters crying about, "Cow pi55 drinking Hindus" and things of that nature. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, genie said:

Yeah I second that this shaster singh is starting to sound like a islamic or pakistan nationalist because is the kinda tactics they employ. He keeps creating disgusting vile threads about toilet habits...its starting to get sickening.

As much as I dont like government of India and idea of India as a unified country due to its human rights abuses against our people and other minorities. We should not be indulging in this kinda hating and defaming of Indians when most Sikhs are of Indian heritage and brown desi's are identified as Indians even if we say we are punjabis or khalistani's we will still be labeled as Indians on official docs at the time being. So people are only defaming and making their own colour people look bad

Can we have mods put a stop to these nasty threads and concentrate on Sikh centrist issues.

 

I apologize.

I just feel very angry when I hear hindus cracking jokes on sikhs and calling punjab a low IQ backward civilization(and call punjabi a backward language). The fact of the matter is that their civilization is full of crap.

Edited by shastarSingh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

Lol, very true. Have you noticed how Pakistanis are obsessed to the point of ludicrousness about Hindus drinking cow urine? Now, I've never sampled the delights of the excretions from a bovinal urinary tract, but browse the comments section of a YouTube video about any video even loosely related to Indians, and you've got these clearly Pakistani commenters crying about, "Cow pi55 drinking Hindus" and things of that nature. 

yeah and hindus deserve that reputation but ironically when pakistanis attack indians as "pi55 drinkers" they also attacking their 150 million indian muslims too. They should concentrate on attacking just hindus as cow piss drinking is a bjp hindu nationalist promoted activity instead of all Indians.

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

I apologize.

I just feel very angry when I hear hindus cracking jokes on sikhs and calling punjab a low IQ backward civilization(and call punjabi a backward language). The fact of the matter is that their civilization is full of crap.

No problem. We also feel angry when hindus do this and to attack hinduism and muslamic and other rituals and practises is allowed in Sikh scriptures. But to attack Indians as a group is the wrong way to go about it. It should be hindus and hindustanis who target Sikhs most of these anti-sikh scumbags tend to be brahmin hindu punjabis/haryani's when you narrow it down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hinduism and Islam are both false religions; however, what benefit does it do to anyone to mention the faults of their people and organize them all into one lot. All Hindus and All Muslims do have the same basic beliefs with one another; however, some are just less dumb than the others. (Also have some universal brotherhood as humans in the most non-SJW way possible and not actually insulting them directly and just their false beliefs, the average Hindu isn't our enemy).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amazes me how people cannot see any of the above. Are they so blinded by partisanship? Is it only objectionable if the other side does it? So, doesn't that make them bigoted when they adhere to a code of silence when their preferred candidate enacts the same policy? Yet... it's also obvious that Trump is taking baby steps, and he is indeed testing the waters. What his endgame is I have no idea. 
    • which gurbani lines you referring to ? please post.  Also I don't think anywhere any of bhagat, guru ji or bhatts baanis refer to women in any sexual way at all !  It is just example to help us understand jeev-aatma (often referred to as 'jeev-istree' in sikh literature) relationship with param-aatma (god) .  Since we have no inkling of what relationship to god feels like , those who have felt it have tried to pen it in comparison to earthly relationships we do understand ! and what more intimate relation than that of a spouse !  In Gurbani , at places, baani sometimes go along the lines of "Dear sister, tell me how you impressed your husband ? ... he doesn't like me, but likes you, tell me how you impressed ...." something along these lines ! and final closing line is of joy of how the wife finally impresses her husband and the typical shabad would close so ".. and then he came to bed and finally I enjoyed him ... " ..  I think I have read atleast one such shabad although I don't remember which exactly. but trust me, there's no sexual undercurrent in this shabad AT ALL ! it just helps us relate to our bodiless relationship with creator (something we don't understand) by comparing it to a relationship of intimacy that we do understand and often live !  Same can be said of krishna and gopis in hindu literature. Some say krishna had 16500 wives. Its not possible literally ! so again a hidden metaphor . Gopis revolving around krishna in play dance. Trust me, this often gets sexualized, but subtle metaphor is lost, namely that of souls (gopis) enjoying the spiritual bliss of krishna (god) and all of creation revolving around the creator. Rigveda and some upanishads mention the relationship of soul (jeev) and parbrahm as such :  "On a tree bearing multiple fruits, both bitter and sweet, sits two birds of a kind, eternal companions. One , of golden plume and luminous sits serenly on topmost branch, unperturbed and in bliss. On the lower branches, jumping from branch to branch, is its companion, who sometimes eat sweet fruits and sometimes bitter.  When it eats bitter fruits, it sometimes looks up and see its undisturbed , blissed companion of golden feathers. However , it soons forget its sorrows and starts eating sweet and bitter again .  Sometimes, again it eats bitter and this time flies on top branch , approaches the golden plume companion and when it goes very near, it realizes its golden plume is itself only, its inner-most self, the atma !"    the tree refers to body or world, the golden plume companion is the real self, the bird moving from here and there is jeev . the bitter and sweet fruits are dukh and sukh respectively which we bear in this world. When the bird goes on top branch (higher avastha) , it realizes its own self, and attains liberation and bliss, which gurbaani refers to as "mann tu jot saroop hai, apna mool pachaan"  Quite good example these seers made ! many such metaphors throughout in gurbani also.  The bigger question is "Can we believe ? truly?"
    • Exactly, it makes me kinda confused on how in some Gurbani lines it talks about sadhus leaving their wives but then they still keep thinking of women in their mind as a sadhu.. Can the same thing be said for gay people who try to 'leave' the marriage concept while becoming celibate & 'dharmic', but still think of guys? So does that not mean that they should get married as well.... bhul chuk maff kijye
    • Also you assert it took him decades to accept his ineligibility. . Please provide your sources. . How many decades exactly? Are you suggesting he wanted to create a parallel gurgaddi?
    • Now as I have qualified my assertion can you please qualify yours.. what evidence do you have that he didn't accept guru Angad Dev ji?