Jump to content
singhbj singh

Introducing Karah Parshad dispensing machine

Recommended Posts

singhbj singh    1,136

A new company called Das Technologies has created the first ever automatic Karah Parshad machine which dispenses Karah Parshad for the sangat automatically. The sensor activated machine was introduced at Gurdwara Fatehgarh Sahib as a way to give parshad to the sangat.

The benefits of the automatic machines is to give Karah Parshad hygienically by avoiding human hands and keeping the parshad nice and warm. The benefits of the machine appear to outweigh any costs particularly due to the ease of getting parshad. The public has responded negatively to the machine on social media. People are outraged as it impact the entire concept of Karah Parshad and they say that connection of getting parshad won’t be the same as one a Gurmukh gives it to their hands folded.

It’ll be interesting to see when the machine gets adopted by other Gurdwaras but the machine received a tremendous response at Fatehgarh Sahib where the number of sangat is much more than other areas.

http://dailysikhupdates.com/introducing-automatic-parshad-machine/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,422

Although they've tried it for the betterment of sangat and sevadars, the views of those asked don't make sense. 

What happens when the sensor stops working? 

They say it's sucham, but how when prashad is going to a big metal chimney or similar type of design. 

There's going to be longer queues of sangat, trying out this gimmick gadget, as it's slower. 

It takes away the whole purpose of seva and nimrata. 

They only had one view from those sangat members and never asked the others behind them, who kept saying one thing "navee technology a" 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
8 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Excommunication for the inventor of this Anti-Seva machine and the committee that hates Seva so much, what's next automatic Langar?

remove the need for sewadars, then remove the granthis, the kirtaniyas , the sikhs, and leave the rest to become a tourist trap where the money goes to the GOI and their lackeys  . I say reverse this destructive trend and restore proper sucham (I mean have you seen the jokers running the roti machine ?) and the interaction of sikhs and sangat . I mean next they will say because we have these machines we don't need rules for langar of amritdhari only making the food (in fact the recent langar fiascoes in UK where due to non amritdhari/rehitvaan sikh being put in charge of pangat) which we have film footage of being bent for media persons and filmi types .

Edited by jkvlondon
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

remove the need for sewadars, then remove the granthis, the kirtaniyas , the sikhs, and leave the rest to become a tourist trap where the money goes to the GOI and their lackeys  . I say reverse this destructive trend and restore proper sucham (I mean have you seen the jokers running the roti machine ?) and the interaction of sikhs and sangat . I mean next they will say because we have these machines we don't need rules for langar of amritdhari only making the food (in fact the recent langar fiascoes in UK where due to non amritdhari/rehitvaan sikh being put in charge of pangat) which we have film footage of being bent for media persons and filmi types .

What happened in those instances, bhenji? I haven't heard anything on that front.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harsharan000    1,903

 

No sewa can be never ever, nor should  be replaced by machinery. It is  we jeevas who need sewa to do some noble and good karam, not the robotized machines.

The next they will say, we shall play a CD or a tape recorder, which will do the simran, paath  for us ..... atee moorakh and manmukhee attitude.

It is we jeevas who need His kirpa, not the insentient machines.... it is we who need mukti, not the machines.

Sat Sree Akal.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jkvlondon    3,419
13 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

What happened in those instances, bhenji? I haven't heard anything on that front.

homeless being refused langar , coloured or 'low caste' sikhs being passed over in pangat instead of served.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

homeless being refused langar , coloured or 'low caste' sikhs being passed over in pangat instead of served.

That happened in a UK gurudwara? Which one? Absolutely disgraceful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,422
1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

That happened in a UK gurudwara? Which one? Absolutely disgraceful.

It was Walsall Gurdwara, but now they've agreed to let Midlands Langar Seva Society carry on doing their seva at the Gurdwara.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kira    1,218
3 hours ago, simran345 said:

It was Walsall Gurdwara, but now they've agreed to let Midlands Langar Seva Society carry on doing their seva at the Gurdwara.

that's disgusting. Sikhs in name but not in deed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MisterrSingh    2,802
3 hours ago, simran345 said:

It was Walsall Gurdwara, but now they've agreed to let Midlands Langar Seva Society carry on doing their seva at the Gurdwara.

That's in the West Mids? 

Shocking. That part of the country has a good reputation for shardaa amongst the sangat, so it's disturbing to hear something like that occurred. Must've been an errant committee that got into power. Although, I can't imagine how the langar servers could glean who was and who wasn't a so-called lower caste Sikh. Did they ask them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
singhbj singh    1,136

Serving hot Karah Parshad, keeping good hygiene & giving equal quantity are all positive steps.

Rather than having sensors & full automation there should be a button or lever for manual Seva.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simran345    2,422
23 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

That's in the West Mids? 

Shocking. That part of the country has a good reputation for shardaa amongst the sangat, so it's disturbing to hear something like that occurred. Must've been an errant committee that got into power. Although, I can't imagine how the langar servers could glean who was and who wasn't a so-called lower caste Sikh. Did they ask them?

Yes West Midlands. Yes sangat is great in West Midlands, but I think it was due to one or two committee members not agreeing with them using the Gurdwara's resources for langar for the homeless. It had nothing to do with caste. 

But as I stated before, the issue has been resolved as far as I know of, that's the last I heard of it. 

 

Edited by simran345
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very nice post. 
    • Where in his Bani or his writings does Guru Gobind Singh give any indication of having that motive for helping Bahadur shah? You should not impose your own motives/agenda on Guru Sahib and assume that you speak for him, particularly when there is zero scriptural evidence for your position. Neither is there any historical evidence that I'm aware of - the histories say that Guru Sahib's motivation for allying with him was the condition that non-Muslims would be treated fairly under his regime. So, I ask you, how do you know that was Guru Sahib's motive for helping Bahadur Shah?     
    • The Dogras were the most immediate cause of the empire's downfall, but the fundamental cause for the collapse of the Sikh Kingdom was Ranjit Singh's fatal decision to make himself king of the Sikhs and replace the Khalsa's republicanism (Sarbat Khalsa, Gurmatta, Jathedari) with a system of absolutist monarchy which centralized all power in his hands - this had no place in a 'Sikh' nation. His miscalculation ensured that the kingdom would all but fall apart his death and be vulnerable to vultures, particularly in light of the uselessness of his heirs.  I disagree veerji. This Sikh kingdom would never have become as powerful as it did if not for non-Sikhs. The Sikh Empire was so successful while Ranjit Singh was alive precisely because he managed to integrate and secure the loyalty of the Punjabi musalman who constituted most of his subjects - and thereby ensured economic productivity and public order. The Khalsa army of the Lahore durbar was also not just made up of Sikhs - all cavalry were Sikh, but virtually the whole of the artillery was Muslim, as was a significant portion of the infantry of the regular army (included Pathans, Punjabi Muslims and Gurkhas). Secondly if not for the induction of non-Sikh European officers into the Sikh army, it would never have relinquished its fixation with irregular cavalry or its revulsion at the idea of infantry. Without the innovations of these non-Sikhs, therefore, the Fauj would never have advanced to first rank among the armies of Asia. An army composed entirely of cavalry is fine when you're fighting a guerilla war, not so much when you're building and defending an empire against men with guns and artillery.  Furthermore not all non-Sikhs in the kingdom were disloyal to the durbar, and not all Sikhs were loyal. The Muslims of Punjab routinely resisted the calls of the Afghans (and later, the mutineers of 1857) to join them in jihad against the infidel Sikhs. The Fakir brothers (Muslims) were loyal to Ranjit Singh's memory to the last, as were several of the other Hindu Dogra generals of the Khalsa army (Dogras are a race, not a family. It was one family of Dogras in particular which caused most of the trouble). And while there were good, loyal Sikh nobles such as the Attariwalas and the Nakkais, there were many more who were fickle and treacherous.  Rani Jindaan was notoriously corrupt , as were the Sandhawalias, who murdered Sher Singh, the only successor of Ranjit Singh with even a shred of competence, by blowing him to pieces with a shotgun. I think your stance is way too absolute bro.   An empire is by definition multicultural and cosmopolitan. The Vatican is not the most apt comparison here (It is a country in name only).   
    • The passage reads: Vol I, Life of Guru Nanak, p51
    •   This is indeed a good post.     
×