Jesus said the same things to the Pharisees as Guru Nanak did to the Brahmins.
Read this and you will find similarities in him telling the pharisees that they will suffer too, though he did not specify hell. e does talk about punishment, which we will assume in offered only in hell or on earth. It cannot be in heaven as he talks about them blocking the gates of heaven for others too.
What're you talking about ??!!!
In Bhai Gurdas ji's vaaran , it's clearly mentioned WaHeGuRu mantra is composed by uniting the names of god in 4 yugas.
W - Wasudev (Satjug)
H - Hari (Dwapar)
G - Gobind (Kalyug)
R - Raam (Treta)
As per hindus , Parbrahm is the origin of all things
Hari means Krishna , and Krishna lived in Dwapar yug. But Krishna was named after Parbrahm , as Krishna means "attractor" , one of the names of brahm. Hindus slowly started equating Krishna to Hari.
Ramchandar is from treta, the son of Dasrath. Ram chandra means (moon of Raam) or that which reflects the character of Raam. So Raam was actually another name of Parbrahm.
Wasudev is from Satjug . Wasudev means "the residing lord".
And Guru Gobind Singh ji maharaj is from Kalyug. Go(earth / vedas/ knowledge) + bind (center focal point). So Gobind means "the focal point of knowledge".
So the mantar makes sense . And TBH , our current abrahamic kinda views of sikhi are far more superficial.
We really need to chew in our understanding the baani properly.
I agree we don't believe in hindu devi devte, but TBH karam , dharam philosophy is much older than sikhi . What was lost and found & something which was not earlier revealed is what we collectively call "sikh matt".
It's purely our egos that we despise at anything "hindu" , whereas we ourselves believe in concepts like Karam philosophy, Rebirth, need of Guru , etc which were first found in upanishads (concluding portion of vedas).