Jump to content

Why I'm not going to listen to few Sikhs asking me not to celebrate Diwali


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Im not attacking anyone!  As for the lines presented, those gopis prayed for him to become their husband! They prayed to goddess parvati ji to help them attain sri krishna ji as their husband, and at that time whoever you saw without vastras were to be married to them. Sri Krishna ji knew about them praying to her and their wishes became true. That is the true story, you have not read the backstory of that and that is why it is giving you shankas. & you may make fun of me and other sants who believe that the Sriiii Gita ji is not about God, but it does not change the fact that bhagats know of it's status. I gave you lines where it said he gave moksha to followers, but I don't think it matters anymore because you have made up your mind. This convo isn't even about dharma to you anymore, you just want to insult. Besides, how can you call me Preeto anyways considering Sri Guru Sahib ji said that we use full names for all Sikhs? 

So? it clearly said he went around fondling them and was filled with lust? did you not read that part? are you so blind? Mata Sahib Kaur prayed for Guru Gobind Singh Ji to be her husband, yet he never once touched her. Some Prostitutes came to Guru Nanak and he called them his daughters. Your lines are taken out of context, they come from the point of view of Krishna's followers. Like it or not he fondled them and misbehaved with them, the verse even stated he was filled with lust, but of course since your beloved Krishna is suddenly presented in a negative light its wrong.

Yes you are, you just can't handle the fact that Mahapurkhs are all against your line of thinking so you decide you'll attack their character to discredit them. Just go and listen to Katha by Maskeen Ji or Gynai Gurbachan Singh Ji, They all say Krishna is an insect compared to Guru Sahib and filled with flaws. You just took the word of 1 person on TV and decided that Guru Harkrishan was Krishna in a previous life. How stupid can someone get?

 

Guru Sahib also said never to consider any other scripture akin to Gurbani, yet here you are? its all fine and easy to throw stones when your just as bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Preeet said:

So what? That was the way in that specific yug regarding how they got married to Sri Krishna ji, those gopis reached their goal from their puja to goddess parvati ji. & by that logic of our 1st sri guru sahib ji calling them daughters, then did our 2nd last sri guru sahib ji not say the same then?? The lines I said are not out of context, that was the context even before our religion existed on this earth. Lust means wish, anything or anyone who has a wish can be seen as lustful. It was not the word of just 1 person, everyone there agreed with him and it made sense. What is Sri Krishna ji to you anyways? Sri Krishna ji is a personal form, while Sri Vaheguru ji is the impersonal form. So many lines say that God came down as Narsingh and who is Narsingh really? Narsingh is Sri Krishna ji. I can reveal so many lines regarding this but we know that you are not interested. Instead of breaking other people's shraddha, why not maintain your own shraddha which is fading?

Marriage? lmao. They had foreplay in the middle of a forest, marriage in that yug was something else completely, he fondled multiple woman and you said its just marriage. loool i guess by that logic in pornos when men do the same its fine, its just "marriage". I've yet to hear of a single marriage where foreplay comes before someone becomes husband and wife.

No it wasn't, that was the point of view of the people present, Guru Gobind Singh already discredit that Krishna is incapable of saving anyone in Shabad Hazare P. 10

 

No Kaam = lust in that context. He wanted to kiss them and fondle their breasts, Now you're grasping at straws as the word for wish is ਇੱਛਤ  in Krishnavtr, But thanks for admitting to everyone here that even you can see Krishna was a LUSTFUL person, once again stop pulling things out of context,Krishna is aboout as much of Waheguru as I am, he's a creation, a puppet.  Having any form of desire = entangled in maya, thank you for admitting to everyone here even you don't think he's a Satguru.

You don't need to reveal anything, its pretty apparent you're fine defending perverts because you think its fine to grope woman like that. My "shraddha" is fine, unlike yours I don't have my foot in 2 ships with one going down in flames. 

 

Since you're obviously so far engrossed in your own mess maybe you should learn to read the context before jumping in, this is just like the time you started saying that it was fine being a follower of Vishnu as God's ok with it and then when a scholar disproved you, you started using other lines to get the same meaning across. Utter stupidity, the words of a Mahapurkh mean nothing to you in comparison to your own opinion. That is the height of arrogance and you say my "Shraddha"is fading. I'm not the one doing Sant Nindya here, you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Preeet said:

Im this your that blah blah waste of time, that's all you are capable rather than true bhakti. My shradda, and countless other's is not going to fade forever, once you have a taste of this anand you will then understand. I rest my case, you are not willing to listen, so why should I bark like a dog anyways. If someone else were to say the same thing it wouldn't matter as your karma is different, may Sri Vaheguru ji have kirpa on us.

So much ego in someone so uptight about their "shradda" you're free to continue thinking its alright for men to grope woman, no wonder Indian woman get such a bad rep as being downtrodden, they have gems like you amongst them. You're free to tell me I'm only capable of this or that lol it only further proves my point you have more ego than anyone here, you just try to hide it. My journey to god is fine :) . Everyone on this forum knows you talk alot of tosh and have the intelligence range of a teaspoon, feel free to look down from the high perch you like to put yourself on :) 

your case was about as convincing as vegetarian carnivore. Feel free to live in your delusions all you want, just don't thrust Sikhi into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Preeet said:

Im not attacking anyone!  As for the lines presented, those gopis prayed for him to become their husband! They prayed to goddess parvati ji to help them attain sri krishna ji as their husband, and at that time whoever you saw without vastras were to be married to them. Sri Krishna ji knew about them praying to her and their wishes became true. That is the true story, you have not read the backstory of that and that is why it is giving you shankas. & you may make fun of me and other sants who believe that the Sriiii Gita ji is not about God, but it does not change the fact that bhagats know of it's status. I gave you lines where it said he gave moksha to followers, but I don't think it matters anymore because you have made up your mind. This convo isn't even about dharma to you anymore, you just want to insult. Besides, how can you call me Preeto anyways considering Sri Guru Sahib ji said that we use full names for all Sikhs? 

When she believes Krishna is being praised in Dasam bani, she takes the words out of context.  When Dasam Bani shows the true colors of Krishna, she disregard what is said and trust a story over Guru Sahib Bani.

She went to the extent of changing the meaning of kaam to save her Lord Krishna.  This is why never too attach yourself to a  person. Only Guru Sahib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use