Jump to content

Kashmir protests and killings


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2
29 minutes ago, mrggg123 said:

Been a while just thought id get your opinions on whats happening there and should we support it? Is the stone pelting right? If they somehow do get freedom what about khalistan? 

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh, the possibility of Khalistan would be revived among Sikhs living in Punjab; however, what must be noticed is over the years the Punjabi people are hooked to Badal selling them drugs, (how else does he continually get democratically elected?) Now should we support Kashmir Independence, that is the tough question, since on one side they get their freedom, and on the other hand, would the Kashmiri Sikh population be allowed to visit the Gurdwaras in an independent Khalistan, we don't know? (That's partly a reason why some Sikhs during the Independence for those Hindus and Muslims in 1947 wanted Pakistan not to leave, the city of Nankana Sahib). To be honest, Daas cares very little about the independence of Kashmiri folk, (they were traitors to the Ranjit Singh Empire), but rather actually on the independence of a Khalsa Raj, (independent Punjab) is way more important, but would like open access with Gurdwaras all over the Subcontinent, not just India and Punjab also put Haryana and Himatchel as part of Independent Punjab, since neither Haryana nor Himachel existed during the era of the old Sikh Raj. Just Daas 2 cents. Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh, the possibility of Khalistan would be revived among Sikhs living in Punjab; however, what must be noticed is over the years the Punjabi people are hooked to Badal selling them drugs, (how else does he continually get democratically elected?) Now should we support Kashmir Independence, that is the tough question, since on one side they get their freedom, and on the other hand, would the Kashmiri Sikh population be allowed to visit the Gurdwaras in an independent Khalistan, we don't know? (That's partly a reason why some Sikhs during the Independence for those Hindus and Muslims in 1947 wanted Pakistan not to leave, the city of Nankana Sahib). To be honest, Daas cares very little about the independence of Kashmiri folk, (they were traitors to the Ranjit Singh Empire), but rather actually on the independence of a Khalsa Raj, (independent Punjab) is way more important, but would like open access with Gurdwaras all over the Subcontinent, not just India and Punjab also put Haryana and Himatchel as part of Independent Punjab, since neither Haryana nor Himachel existed during the era of the old Sikh Raj. Just Daas 2 cents. Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Dogras were from Jammu not Kashmir 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Jacfsing2
1 hour ago, Jonny101 said:

Watch this video. It gives a good analysis and background about the current Kashmiri uprising

 

Why do some Sikhs expect helping the Muslims would benefit us in anyway? All we have to do is a see a BasicsOfSikhi video featuring a person Muslim debate to see that they really won't be friendly. What will they, (Muslims), do to Sikhs when they get yet another country for themselves? (Our people bow way too much to Muslims these days, just look at that Sunny Hundal).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Why do some Sikhs expect helping the Muslims would benefit us in anyway? All we have to do is a see a BasicsOfSikhi video featuring a person Muslim debate to see that they really won't be friendly. What will they, (Muslims), do to Sikhs when they get yet another country for themselves? (Our people bow way too much to Muslims these days, just look at that Sunny Hundal).

kashmiris were orginally sufi until pak made them extreme, sufis were the ones on our side in history, hopefully they come back to sufism as they just want freedom like us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
5 minutes ago, mrggg123 said:

kashmiris were orginally sufi until pak made them extreme, sufis were the ones on our side in history, hopefully they come back to sufism as they just want freedom like us. 

Daas expects that an independent Kashmir would most likely turn into Sharia, (Jinnah was a very liberal Muslim, ate pork and had a few drinks, but look at Pakistan today). Also lets not forget how Kashmiris were heavily brought into Islam, it was heavy force, so much so that they went to the House of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji, and asked the one who refused to take a Janeu, to protect their Janeu. Aurangzeb did a lot to expand his faith in that area, and if it wasn't for Sikhs Kashmir would not only be majority Muslim, but 100% Muslim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Daas expects that an independent Kashmir would most likely turn into Sharia, (Jinnah was a very liberal Muslim, ate pork and had a few drinks, but look at Pakistan today). Also lets not forget how Kashmiris were heavily brought into Islam, it was heavy force, so much so that they went to the House of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji, and asked the one who refused to take a Janeu, to protect their Janeu. Aurangzeb did a lot to expand his faith in that area, and if it wasn't for Sikhs Kashmir would not only be majority Muslim, but 100% Muslim.

paaji you have a point there. Lets not forget hindu hill rajas exist today because of us and the reason kashmiri isnt 100 percent muslim is because the hill rajas boot licking the british and backstabbing us. Kashmiris are certainlly converts if you look at their faces they look the same as the hindu rajas of jammu and border areas, it just everyone has an assumption all hindus look dark like the rest of india but this isnt true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use