Guest jagsaw singh

Some Home Truths

169 posts in this topic

23 hours ago, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:

Guest London Jawaan. You don't seem capable of conversing with people with dignity and respect but I'm not going to sink down to your level.  The fact that first cousin marriage is the norm among Arora Sikhs is known to everyone but yourself. You could easily have researched it before throwing insults around.

What I am capable of, behvkoof Singh, is not talking out of rear cavity, which seems to be your preferred approach.

Your stereotypical BS is so nonsensical, I'm still waiting for you to evidence where a yahoo of Russians beat up 150,000 English football supporters......

And it is not typical of arora Sikhs to marry their first cousins. This is yet another baseless bullocks generalisation that had come out of your jagsaw. The "norm" based off your behvkoof delusions?

I would go as far as to say that not only are you this forums uncontested resident behvkoof, you are also a first class t**ser.

Waheguru JI ka Khalsa, Waheguru JI ki fateh 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jagsaw Singh / Legal Singh / West London Singh:

 

I want to send you a private message, but I can't do that since you are posting as a "guest".  If it's not too much trouble, can I have an email address so that I can ask you a question that could use your expertise?

Edited by californiasardar1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-02-12 at 9:46 PM, Akalifauj said:

Sant ji used the word bibi to answer whether women can do certain seva.  In that video sant ji says bibi can't do punj pyare seva but let us know if they are being stopped from doing any other seva as they are allowed.

Present the video you are refering too.

Respectfully, I follow Gurbani which is our living Guru and not any human 'sant' who can have their own opinion. He would have been brought up and instructed in DDT philosophy which as pointed out keeps women from most seva not just Panj Pyaras. And the reasoning has to do with impurity and menstruation. The current DDT can't make any more claim to be 'THE' original started by Guru Gobind Singh Ji himself than any other and anyway aren't we supposed to be a panth and not split into jathas etc? The panthic Rehet Maryada states there is no difference with seva between male and female which are equals. Gurbani our only living guru says every human are to be treated equally. That is all we should go by. Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave the panth ability to make decisions and hence we have Sikh Rehet Maryada. The panth IS the word of the Guru, not just one jatha. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HarkiranKaur said:

Respectfully, I follow Gurbani which is our living Guru and not any human 'sant' who can have their own opinion. He would have been brought up and instructed in DDT philosophy which as pointed out keeps women from most seva not just Panj Pyaras. And the reasoning has to do with impurity and menstruation. The current DDT can't make any more claim to be 'THE' original started by Guru Gobind Singh Ji himself than any other and anyway aren't we supposed to be a panth and not split into jathas etc? The panthic Rehet Maryada states there is no difference with seva between male and female which are equals. Gurbani our only living guru says every human are to be treated equally. That is all we should go by. Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave the panth ability to make decisions and hence we have Sikh Rehet Maryada. The panth IS the word of the Guru, not just one jatha. 

You can't even understand and read punjabi or gurmukhi.  Then you put words in Sant ji mouth.  You can't even read and understand Gurbani, yet you are telling me and Sant ji what Gurbani says????  You are worse than the Hindus who Gurbani says are blind.  English translations done by yoga worshippers is not a repsentation of my Guru; Gurbani.  You have not even entered the door of Gurbani,standing a thousand feet outside, yet you have the nerve to run your mouth on Sikh forums.  

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

You can't even understand and read punjabi or gurmukhi.  Then you put words in Sant ji mouth.  You can't even read and understand Gurbani, yet you are telling me and Sant ji what Gurbani says????  You are worse than the Hindus who Gurbani says are blind.  English translations done by yoga worshippers is not a repsentation of my Guru; Gurbani.  You have not even entered the door of Gurbani,standing a thousand feet outside, yet you have the nerve to run your mouth on Sikh forums.  

... show me where anywhere in Gurbani that it says women should have less rights in Sikhi. Remember I am married to a Punjabi Amritdhari Singh and I double check everything. He has yet to find any tuk in Gurbani to suggest that women should have less rights. Besides that Sikh Rehet Maryada is EXPLICIT on the issue. It's a moot point as far as Akal Takht is concerned. 

SGGSJ IS your Guru. So if you are so sure that women are given lesser position to men by your Guru (our Guru) then please by all means post it along with which ang to find it. Put your money where your mouth is and show us where it says women are to be given a lesser role, lesser position etc. in Gurbani. 

And while Jarnail Singh Ji might be revered as a Sant are his opinions worth more than our Guru's? Does he get to speak for our Gurus directly as complete authority? What about santos from other jathas? Sants from different jathas have disagreed with one another. Should we hang on their every word or should we regard SGGSJ as final authority?? And even when he was at Harmandir Sahib he openly upheld the Sikh Rehet Maryada saying it should be followed and that the gurmat Rehet Maryada was for only Taksalis. 

By the way his reasoning that 'no woman gave her head that day' doesn't make sense. No white man gave his head that day but you won't condemn all white male sikhs from ever being Panj payaras will you? No black man did either. How about Singh's with names different than the original five or castes different? They didn't give their head that day either so we should keep all of them from doing this seva as well? Ask yourself why only gender matters and has to be replicated as the original but no other aspect must be???? It's simply male bias and chauvinism. Nothing more. It's MALE ego and NOT our Guru who wants to limit women. 

Now please show us where in Gurbani it says I as a woman am to be given less privilege than you as a man. And please include ang number so we can all read the full shabad in context. No more ranting that I don't know what I am talking about and prove your point and show us in Gurbani. Or else you are just spouting off with the usual male ego.

I promise I will get my Punjabi husband to also read it. 

I am sure all of the other Kaurs on here would love to see solid evidence that we are to have lesser rights straight from our Guru... once and for all show us. 

And once you do (if you can even find anything remotely suggesting that) I will post many many shabads which show the equality of ALL humans as equal carriers of the divine light. 

Edited by HarkiranKaur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

English translations done by yoga worshippers is not a repsentation of my Guru; Gurbani.

Show me your translation Mr. "holier than thou" ??

Edited by JUSTAJATT
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/18/2017 at 9:41 PM, Guest Jagsaw_Singh said:

Guest London Jawaan. You don't seem capable of conversing with people with dignity and respect but I'm not going to sink down to your level.  The fact that first cousin marriage is the norm among Arora Sikhs is known to everyone but yourself. You could easily have researched it before throwing insults around.

laughing.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woman have the god given right to give human birth (miri) so God gave man the right to give Spiritual Birth (Piri). This way both sexes have the right and the choice to "give birth" so to speak and both are incomplete without the other. You can't become Amritdhari unless you are born and vice versa. This isn't sexism, its equality. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

Respectfully, I follow Gurbani which is our living Guru and not any human 'sant' who can have their own opinion. He would have been brought up and instructed in DDT philosophy which as pointed out keeps women from most seva not just Panj Pyaras. And the reasoning has to do with impurity and menstruation. The current DDT can't make any more claim to be 'THE' original started by Guru Gobind Singh Ji himself than any other and anyway aren't we supposed to be a panth and not split into jathas etc? The panthic Rehet Maryada states there is no difference with seva between male and female which are equals. Gurbani our only living guru says every human are to be treated equally. That is all we should go by. Guru Gobind Singh Ji gave the panth ability to make decisions and hence we have Sikh Rehet Maryada. The panth IS the word of the Guru, not just one jatha. 

The Panth Rehit Maryada was created in the 1930s, it took over 20 years (even longer than that maybe) to get it sorted and even then people bickered and walked out on it. The Rehit Maryada is extremely controversial and using it as a standard is alot like using Prithi Chand as an example of a model Gursikh.  

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

... show me where anywhere in Gurbani that it says women should have less rights in Sikhi.

It doesn't say it anywhere. Now you show us in Gurbani where it says to take "Khande di pahul".

 

8 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

Respectfully, I follow Gurbani which is our living Guru and not any human 'sant' who can have their own opinion. He would have been brought up and instructed in DDT philosophy which as pointed out keeps women from most seva not just Panj Pyaras.

Taksal only at their own gurdwaras do their own sewa. They do not stop any women from doing sewa at any other gurdwaras so stop lying.

 

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

...  Remember I am married to a Punjabi Amritdhari Singh and I double check everything. He has yet to find any tuk in Gurbani to suggest that women should have less rights.

 

The same husband you looked on as ahorse on your wedding day. All you have to do is give him a nose-bag and a bucket of water and he will say what you want him to say.

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

...  Besides that Sikh Rehet Maryada is EXPLICIT on the issue. It's a moot point as far as Akal Takht is concerned.

 

It was forced onto the Panth. Next time you go india, take your husband/horse and go to Sri Akal Takht Sahib and ask them to include women in their monthly sinchaars there.

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

...  Sants from different jathas have disagreed with one another.

 

give one example.

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

...

By the way his reasoning that 'no woman gave her head that day' doesn't make sense. No white man gave his head that day but you won't condemn all white male sikhs from ever being Panj payaras will you? No black man did either. How about Singh's with names different than the original five or castes different? They didn't give their head that day either so we should keep all of them from doing this seva as well? Ask yourself why only gender matters and has to be replicated as the original but no other aspect must be???? It's simply male bias and chauvinism. Nothing more. It's MALE ego and NOT our Guru who wants to limit women.

 

You have already had your answer to this.

Is this male bias and chauvinism:

 

 

ਜਿਉ ਪੁਰਖੈ ਘਰਿ ਭਗਤੀ ਨਾਰਿ ਹੈ ਅਤਿ ਲੋਚੈ ਭਗਤੀ ਭਾਇ
ਬਹੁ ਰਸ ਸਾਲਣੇ ਸਵਾਰਦੀ ਖਟ ਰਸ ਮੀਠੇ ਪਾਇ .
ਤਿਉ ਬਾਣੀ ਭਗਤ ਸਲਾਹਦੇ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੈ ਚਿਤੁ ਲਾਇ
 
੧੪੧੩

 

Now you will say "why isnt there a verse for men to serve their wives with the same devotion?"

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

.

I promise I will get my Punjabi husband to also read it.

 

He doesn't sound like someone who could read. neigh, whinny and trump yes.

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

..

I am sure all of the other Kaurs on here would love to see solid evidence that we are to have lesser rights straight from our Guru... once and for all show us.

 

Speak for yourself. The other kaurs on this fourm have already tried to warn you from making an imbecile of yourself on another public forum. But you haven't listened. Stop trying to drag them into your stupidity and discussions.

 

6 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

And once you do (if you can even find anything remotely suggesting that) I will post many many shabads which show the equality of ALL humans as equal carriers of the divine light. 

Humans?  Only humans?

Post them then.

I will post shabads which show that the divine light in carried in all vegetation, animal life, AND humans. Even stones. And more.

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, chatanga said:

It doesn't say it anywhere. Now you show us in Gurbani where it says to take "Khande di pahul".

 

Taksal only at their own gurdwaras do their own sewa. They do not stop any women from doing sewa at any other gurdwaras so stop lying.

 

 

 

The same husband you looked on as ahorse on your wedding day. All you have to do is give him a nose-bag and a bucket of water and he will say what you want him to say.

 

 

It was forced onto the Panth. Next time you go india, take your husband/horse and go to Sri Akal Takht Sahib and ask them to include women in their monthly sinchaars there.

 

 

give one example.

 

 

You have already had your answer to this.

Is this male bias and chauvinism:

 

 

ਜਿਉ ਪੁਰਖੈ ਘਰਿ ਭਗਤੀ ਨਾਰਿ ਹੈ ਅਤਿ ਲੋਚੈ ਭਗਤੀ ਭਾਇ
ਬਹੁ ਰਸ ਸਾਲਣੇ ਸਵਾਰਦੀ ਖਟ ਰਸ ਮੀਠੇ ਪਾਇ .
ਤਿਉ ਬਾਣੀ ਭਗਤ ਸਲਾਹਦੇ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੈ ਚਿਤੁ ਲਾਇ
 
੧੪੧੩

 

Now you will say "why isnt there a verse for men to serve their wives with the same devotion?"

 

 

He doesn't sound like someone who could read. neigh, whinny and trump yes.

 

 

Speak for yourself. The other kaurs on this fourm have already tried to warn you from making an imbecile of yourself on another public forum. But you haven't listened. Stop trying to drag them into your stupidity and discussions.

 

Humans?  Only humans?

Post them then.

I will post shabads which show that the divine light in carried in all vegetation, animal life, AND humans. Even stones. And more.

 

 

1. Stop twisting Gurbani

2. If you truly understood that the divine light is in everyone you'd know that a husband's duty is to serve his wife with the same devotion as she is one and the same as he 

3. Husbands don't have a higher status than heir wife's and I say that as a husband (Harkiran's) spouse are equal

4. Akal Takht is currently overrun by wrong people I am sure you will agree. Come to Kashmir and we will show you devoted Sikhs without brahminical influence 

5. Women and men have equal right in Sikhi no questions no if and buts

6. Sikh Rehet Maryada was not forced in the panth it was deliberated for years by many Sikhs from different backgrounds 

7. You sound like a child 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, HarkiranKaur said:

 

I promise I will get my Punjabi husband to also read it. 

I am sure all of the other Kaurs on here would love to see solid evidence that we are to have lesser rights straight from our Guru... once and for all show us. 

And once you do (if you can even find anything remotely suggesting that) I will post many many shabads which show the equality of ALL humans as equal carriers of the divine light. 

Instead of getting somebody else to read Gurbani for you, why don't you try learning it yourself, so you can read it and understand it yourself too. 

 

Talk for yourself, as a female I accept the way the Panj Pyare are. And that doesn't make me have sheep mentality before you say that too. It's just that I don't make a song and dance about being a woman. I'm all for women's rights and defending ourselves, but if I can accept it, why can't you penji? Why would you want to change something that's been the same from beginning of Sikhi just to please yourself and that you have no understanding of. And you can stop insulting Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindrawale ji, he had so much kamaiyee and you think you're avasta is better than his? 

Manu tha lagda hatna nai tu drame karn, par hun boring hogeyi a. Change the topic because I'm reading this on other posts too, that's all you go on out, the Panj Pyare, and mixing it in other posts too. Hor koi gal nai aundi? 

And which Sants of different jathas are you even on about ? I've never seen or heard any Sants or Mahapursh argue or debate with other or belittle anybody, so what exactly are you talking about? 

Edited by simran345
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, simran345 said:

Instead of getting somebody else to read Gurbani for you, why don't you try learning it yourself, so you can read it and understand it yourself too. 

 

Talk for yourself, as a female I accept the way the Panj Pyare are. And that doesn't make me have sheep mentality before you say that too. It's just that I don't make a song and dance about being a woman. I'm all for women's rights and defending ourselves, but if I can accept it, why can't you penji? Why would you want to change something that's been the same from beginning of Sikhi just to please yourself and that you have no understanding of. And you can stop insulting Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindrawale ji, he had so much kamaiyee and you think you're avasta is better than his? 

Manu tha lagda hatna nai tu drame karn, par hun boring hogeyi a. Change the topic because I'm reading this on other posts too, that's all you go on out, the Panj Pyare, and mixing it in other posts too. Hor koi gal nai aundi? 

And which Santa of different jathas are you even on about ? I've never seen or heard any Sants or Mahapursh argue or debate with other or belittle anybody, so what exactly are you talking about? 

Bhen Ji 

dont paint yourself lower because of your gender and don't listen to these guys. Sikh Rehet Maryada says you are every bit as capable as they are. They love nothing more than to make you believe you deserve less than they do. But why? You have ask why? Only Hindu believe women were born that way as a punishment and that they have to do service of men (husband) to advance through this and the other 6 lifetimes before being born male and having privilege. Our Gurus did not think this way. You are not born in a lower body as some punishment where you have to do service of men and live a less life. In Kashmir here most families are Amritdhari much higher rate than in Punjab. You won't see cut hairs here or clean shaven. And we don't practice discrimination. Women have been president of Gurdwara, Panj Pyaras and everything in between. We follow only Sikh Rehet Maryada even in historical Gurdwaras here. World didn't shatter when Kaurs were Panj Pyaras. The men didn't feel stepped on or had something taken away because their egos were not so large here. Even the males who regularly do seva as Panj Pyaras tell at every sinchar to the Kaur's present that they want to see some of them do that same seva someday and to never let anyone tell them they have limitations for being female.  By the way you may have guessed this is not Harkiran but her husband. I fully support equality of women. I have told her it's not worth arguing with close minded backward people. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

Bhen Ji 

dont paint yourself lower because of your gender and don't listen to these guys. Sikh Rehet Maryada says you are every bit as capable as they are. They love nothing more than to make you believe you deserve less than they do. But why? You have ask why? Only Hindu believe women were born that way as a punishment and that they have to do service of men (husband) to advance through this and the other 6 lifetimes before being born male and having privilege. Our Gurus did not think this way. You are not born in a lower body as some punishment where you have to do service of men and live a less life. In Kashmir here most families are Amritdhari much higher rate than in Punjab. You won't see cut hairs here or clean shaven. And we don't practice discrimination. Women have been president of Gurdwara, Panj Pyaras and everything in between. We follow only Sikh Rehet Maryada even in historical Gurdwaras here. World didn't shatter when Kaurs were Panj Pyaras. The men didn't feel stepped on or had something taken away because their egos were not so large here. Even the males who regularly do seva as Panj Pyaras tell at every sinchar to the Kaur's present that they want to see some of them do that same seva someday and to never let anyone tell them they have limitations for being female.  By the way you may have guessed this is not Harkiran but her husband. I fully support equality of women. I have told her it's not worth arguing with close minded backward people. 

Be quiet, I'm not painting myself lower than men. But I'm not going to belittle brothers that don't do what you make out. It's not about close minded people, it's about respect. Since I've been reading Harkiran's 10 page lectures, the only thing I'm reading is women this, women that, eh voh. Big deal she's a woman, but she's belittling  people on here and trying to brainwash women into thinking that Sikh men are discriminating against women. 

I haven't heard of any disputes of Panj Pyare seva in our area or anywhere for that matter. This is the first time I'm hearing it and to me it sounds you're both exaggerating something that isn't a big issue as you're making out to be. Good luck to you both in your sewa though. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harkiran,

can you stop labelling women who accept the roles of men and women to different as "regarding" themselves lower.

can you stop forcing your ideas of feminism, since real feminists believe equality is only achieved when women don't have to do the historical works of men to feel equal

can you stop imposing the so called panthic maryada on all of us

can you stop criticising DAMDAMI TAKSAL, started by pita ji

 

can you basically keep quiet.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, simran345 said:

Be quiet, I'm not painting myself lower than men. But I'm not going to belittle brothers that don't do what you make out. It's not about close minded people, it's about respect. Since I've been reading Harkiran's 10 page lectures, the only thing I'm reading is women this, women that, eh voh. Big deal she's a woman, but she's belittling  people on here and trying to brainwash women into thinking that Sikh men are discriminating against women. 

I haven't heard of any disputes of Panj Pyare seva in our area or anywhere for that matter. This is the first time I'm hearing it and to me it sounds you're both exaggerating something that isn't a big issue as you're making out to be. Good luck to you both in your sewa though. 

I have read her posts and nothing she said was belittling anyone. Rather she was only defending women from being belittled. This site has said before it fully supports the panthic Rehet Maryada and won't tolerate anyone putting it down. My wife has only reiterated what the Sikh Rehet Maryada says and nothing she has said is in error. and for the record she can read Gurmukhi and pronounce it. It's the vocabulary she is working on. Please respect that someone from a completely different culture and language it is not easy to learn an entirely new language especially when it's not romanized. It takes years you can't expect someone to know an entire new language in a short time. But just so you know she is strict in her Rehet doing nitnem every day and we do together, she follows Sikh Rehet Maryada strictly. She ties a dastaar every day and fought for the right for Kaur's in Canada to tie them in uniform in the military, and won. By doing so she underwent so much ridicule from Canadian males she worked with you don't even know. Most people would have given up. So please don't generalize or label. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

Harkiran,

can you stop labelling women who accept the roles of men and women to different as "regarding" themselves lower.

can you stop forcing your ideas of feminism, since real feminists believe equality is only achieved when women don't have to do the historical works of men to feel equal

can you stop imposing the so called panthic maryada on all of us

can you stop criticising DAMDAMI TAKSAL, started by pita ji

 

can you basically keep quiet.

As long as you don't force the Taksal Maryada on us you can follow whatever one you wish. By the way damdami taksal of today is not direct lineage. Anyone can use a name even Taksalis have several lineages laying claims. By the way this is not Harkiran, and yes you are falling for the lies fed to you. It's basically lip service to say hey your equal but in this life you have to live a life of less privilege and rights,  but it doesn't mean your lesser. Lip service. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

As long as you don't force the Taksal Maryada on us you can follow whatever one you wish. By the way damdami taksal of today is not direct lineage. Anyone can use a name even Taksalis have several lineages laying claims. By the way this is not Harkiran, and yes you are falling for the lies fed to you. It's basically lip service to say hey your equal but in this life you have to live a life of less privilege and rights,  but it doesn't mean your lesser. Lip service. 

You just perfectly described your own situation. Blindly following whatever your panthic maryada. You need to listen to some katha of suraj parkash, guru nanak parkash and Dasam Granth. 

 

(No one believes that we need another life. Our Mata didnt, we don't either)

bring her to a hospital and have her checked. She needs help.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

You just perfectly described your own situation. Blindly following whatever your panthic maryada. You need to listen to some katha of suraj parkash, guru nanak parkash and Dasam Granth. 

 

(No one believes that we need another life. Our Mata didnt, we don't either)

bring her to a hospital and have her checked. She needs help.

You should follow your own advice and by the way do you know what dasam Granth says about you (female)? 

Edited by HarkiranKaur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HarkiranKaur said:

2. If you truly understood that the divine light is in everyone you'd know that a husband's duty is to serve his wife with the same devotion as she is one and the same as he

So you came up with this list to avoid answering my previous post. Why are you so scared asatkiran of that, that you need to try and move the post onto something else?

 

45 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

By the way you may have guessed this is not Harkiran but her husband.

You are either asatkiran lying, or her horse-partner who has adopted her way of thinking?

 

By the way?....by the way?...by the way? Only asatkiran writes this over and over, if it is really her horse-partner, then the fool has become a parrot of her.

 

I don't beleive it is though. She used to make up guest posts and aliases on Sikhawareness as well.

 

 

30 minutes ago, Khalistanisinghni said:

Harkiran,

can you stop labelling women who accept the roles of men and women to different as "regarding" themselves lower.

No she can't because in her twisted little mind, she thinks she is here to save womankind in Sikhi.

Soon she will start saying that maybe sikhi isn't for her and she may leave it.

 

29 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

I have read her posts and nothing she said was belittling anyone. Rather she was only defending women from being belittled.

Women can defend themselves here thank you very much! asatkiran is not the saviour she wants to be. read the posts by the other women.

 

 

34 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

 Please respect that someone from a completely different culture and language it is not easy to learn an entirely new language especially when it's not romanized. It takes years you can't expect someone to know an entire new language in a short time.

 

If this is Balbir Singh,  then you are a bigger fool for accepting her lies. She claims to have researched Sikhi for over 20 years. yet can speak less words than a 2 year old panjabi child. And look at your Balbir Singh, defending her lies on here. ਥੋੜੀ ਬਹੁਤੀ ਸ਼ਰਮ ਹੋਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ ਬੰਦੇ ਨੂੰ .

 

 

24 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

 By the way this is not Harkiran, and yes you are falling for the lies fed to you.

 

Another "by the way".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HarkiranKaur said:

You should follow your own advice and by the way do you know what dasam Granth says about you (female)? 

Dont move this creature onto Dasam Granth!!

She has absolutely no aware of Dasam Granth. She is the same poster who started the topic on Sri Charitropakhyan about a month ago, showing her ignoracne on it.

 

ਬਲਬੀਰ ਸਿਆ, ਤੁਸੀ ਕਿਹੜੇ   ਮਗਰ ਲਗੇ ਹੋਏ ਹੈ? ਗ੍ਰੀਨ ਕਾਰਡ ਲੇਈ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਕੁਛ? 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   HarkiranKaur 

 

WILL YOU STOP INSULTING THE DASAM GRANTH SAHIB JI?

Edited by sikhojaago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, chatanga said:

Dont move this creature onto Dasam Granth!!

She has absolutely no aware of Dasam Granth. She is the same poster who started the topic on Sri Charitropakhyan about a month ago, showing her ignoracne on it.

 

ਬਲਬੀਰ ਸਿਆ, ਤੁਸੀ ਕਿਹੜੇ   ਮਗਰ ਲਗੇ ਹੋਏ ਹੈ? ਗ੍ਰੀਨ ਕਾਰਡ ਲੇਈ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਕੁਛ? 

I told her not to indulge in arguing with close minded types and you proved the point. You don't even know me but attack me and my wife. She lives here in Kashmir more than we spend in Canada so there goes your whole accusation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bro , I did say sorry if you got offended , it was a misunderstanding on my part because you were talking about something That was not on the page but if you think calling names is warranted be happy .
    • You are not going to apologize for your insulting comment.  I thought you wouldn't.  Do you remember your past and what you have done?  Let's say a women of such a character came along, would we call her a Gundhi, luchi janani?
    •   1.  You are complaining that amritdharis/religious sikhs are failing to do what is necessary to create a "robust fauj."  Let me ask you something: in the 1980s, who stepped up and put their lives on the line?  It was 90% amritdharis and/or religious, keshadhari singhs.  They bled, gave up their lives, had their families subjected to all kinds of atrocities.  How much can these people take?   2.  Your critique is based on the assumption of what a "robust fauj" is.  The world has changed.  The Sikh nation is not going to liberated by a few unorganized, rag-tag gangs of 20 year old boys in the Punjab countryside.  The Sikh nation is also not going to be liberated by vigilante groups of mundey in Canada or the UK.  What we need, what we have been sorely lacking for our entire existence, is a strong group of educated, intelligent, and passionate Sikhs who can formulate nuanced, viable strategies for the quam to meet its challenges, and who have the intelligence, resources, and networks to implement such strategies.  With that in mind, I see nothing wrong in amritdhari/religious kids being groomed for success in academics and the professional world.  Look at Jews.  They are smaller in population than we are, but they are generally very well educated and successful, and, on top of that, help each other out.  They wield a tremendous amount of influence and power because they have positioned themselves in such a way.  That's the way for us to get ahead and protect our interests in the modern world.
    • bro , honestly if we are talking about one link and source , then introducing facts about something different should be clarified  so that misunderstanding doesn't happen . Sorry if you got offended but given what was given I could not see what you accused her of so I did show what I was looking at to clarify what I was talking about to back up what I had said and yes she is clothed there . OP Bibi did not refer to that picture so like another person before me I just saw standard artsy output granted some was not gurmat approved (nudes etc) but not extreme like Rupi's 'art' piece on menstruation so did not expect such an accusation to occur on it .    
    • with your limited searching skills, which you are using as an excuse now.  You decided it was right to blame me as so; Where do you get the nerve to speak in this manner?  I can run a train on you right now and even make you cry.  Keep your mouth shut when you don't know anything.  Got it!!! I have the photo and so does a lot of other people of her tying a dastar with her top off.  She posted it on a social media site.