Jump to content

Unbelieavable?


muscleman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your second video insults Kanye West (aka the greatest artist if our generation). I will not stand for this.

Greatest artist of our generation? Erm no, arguably thats ppl like akala, lowkey, amy winehouse, not some k@njar who chats crap about his prostitute wife's fat arse, diamonds n how he sucks off gay-z.

U shud listen to 90s rap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Best to keep it quiet yanky, i have already embarassed u previously on this forum n had u runnin away like a janani wen u couldnt give me rebuttals.

Regarding puttin the videos down, its freedom of speech, any1 can put any video up on youtube, unless it violates rules(racist/religion etc).

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! If they truly owned society, they could easily put it down. (They don't own society at all) Also repeating the same stuff as you've already done doesn't prove anything. You already believe that Saddam Hussein shouldn't have been brought to justice by someone and making some huge excuses on why he wasn't as bad as I described. You're going to continue talking like a manmukh sharing conspiracy theories by manmukhs. (These people want to spread their own propaganda).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greatest artist of our generation? Erm no, arguably thats ppl like akala, lowkey, amy winehouse, not some k@njar who chats crap about his prostitute wife's fat arse, diamonds n how he sucks off gay-z.

U shud listen to 90s rap.

Kanye slander will not be tolerated on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! If they truly owned society, they could easily put it down. (They don't own society at all) Also repeating the same stuff as you've already done doesn't prove anything. You already believe that Saddam Hussein shouldn't have been brought to justice by someone and making some huge excuses on why he wasn't as bad as I described. You're going to continue talking like a manmukh sharing conspiracy theories by manmukhs. (These people want to spread their own propaganda).

Wen did i say saddam shudnt of been brought to justice u thick yank? Every1 knew he was a mass murderer, nobody, esp me aint denying that. However as i sed previously, the REASON for iraqs inavasion had nutin to do wit topplin him, it was to take control of the iraqi national bank. They even admitted the initial reason given to invade iraq...to find the WMD's, was a complete lie. IF saddam HAD WMD's, y didnt he use em on westerners? Stop with ur bakwaas, your embarassing yourself, by attemptin to put words in my mouth (patheticly), and then bein dopey by nature wen it comes to REAL world of politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Wen did i say saddam shudnt of been brought to justice u thick yank? Every1 knew he was a mass murderer, nobody, esp me aint denying that. However as i sed previously, the REASON for iraqs inavasion had nutin to do wit topplin him, it was to take control of the iraqi national bank. They even admitted the initial reason given to invade iraq...to find the WMD's, was a complete lie. IF saddam HAD WMD's, y didnt he use em on westerners? Stop with ur bakwaas, your embarassing yourself, by attemptin to put words in my mouth (patheticly), and then bein dopey by nature wen it comes to REAL world of politics.

Since your so obsessed with conspiracy theories: I'd recommend this video from a former President of the United States Of America, on groups like the illuminati:

Also look at the official reason Saddam Hussein was executed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein crimes against humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since your so obsessed with conspiracy theories: I'd recommend this video from a former President of the United States Of America, on groups like the illuminati:

Also look at the official reason Saddam Hussein was executed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein crimes against humanity.

Firstly...Wikipedia.......dear o dear! Thats like quoting the 'hindustan times' newspaper, wen it comes to news stories about sikhs.

Secondly, he was executed for crimes against humanity....and? AGAIN, WHERE have i denied he wasnt a mass murderer or deserved death? Wat has him bein a mass murderer got to do wit the entire nation of iraq bein illegaly invaded, and havin ALL their oil/natural resources/national bank stolen n taken over n then placin a puppet leader? Differentiate between the two lad.

Ironically u put a video up of kennedy, well he was murdered by the CIA, for bein anti-vietnam, pro-black civil rights and sympathetic to the complete end of segregation in america. He was murdered by the very same ppl ur mockin. Jus read the comments section of that video. That video, jus supports wat me, genie n jkvlondon r tryna tell u lot on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Firstly...Wikipedia.......dear o dear! Thats like quoting the 'hindustan times' newspaper, wen it comes to news stories about sikhs.

Secondly, he was executed for crimes against humanity....and? AGAIN, WHERE have i denied he wasnt a mass murderer or deserved death? Wat has him bein a mass murderer got to do wit the entire nation of iraq bein illegaly invaded, and havin ALL their oil/natural resources/national bank stolen n taken over n then placin a puppet leader? Differentiate between the two lad.

Ironically u put a video up of kennedy, well he was murdered by the CIA, for bein anti-vietnam, pro-black civil rights and sympathetic to the complete end of segregation in america. He was murdered by the very same ppl ur mockin. Jus read the comments section of that video.

Since the entire Saddam argument isn't going anywhere, all I will say to end that conservation is, "the ends justify the means", (we can end that topic). Also, I don't know how you view JFK or whatnot, but in America he's been compared to as a Martyr, (Shaheed). Many people across the spectrum believe he was right on his battle against the "New World Order" and other groups of corruption.

Also I would never quote Hindustan Times for Sikh stuff. They called the 1978 Shaheeds as Fanatics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the entire Saddam argument isn't going anywhere, all I will say to end that conservation is, "the ends justify the means", (we can end that topic). Also, I don't know how you view JFK or whatnot, but in America he's been compared to as a Martyr, (Shaheed). Many people across the spectrum believe he was right on his battle against the "New World Order" and other groups of corruption.

Also I would never quote Hindustan Times for Sikh stuff. They called the 1978 Shaheeds as Fanatics.

JFK in my opinion was a great man, 1 of the very few politicians, esp at his high position, of president, who was deemed worthy of his role. The fact that he wanted to make genuine changes, which was complete opposite to wat the 13 bloodlines/secret societies wanted, and challenged them, gets respect from any1. Sadly politicians r few and very far between. The CIA assassinated him, martin luther king, malcolm x, invaded vietnam to steal the heroin from there, under the false pretence of "protectin" s.vietnamese, all in the space of a few yrs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

truth is the way we should look at politicians of the modern age is amoral/immoral rulers and follow Guru Pita ji 's advice and not trust their words . My key phrase is 'who benefits from this?' and thinking on it, it becomes clear following the money leads to the culprits and the people who are destroying this world's sukh shanti

As for SIlverstein he made 4.9 billion out of the attack , this was capped he originally asked for 11 billion considering he only paid around 120 million for the buildings he minted it . None of the insurance dudes will shout fraud because it will expose the government complicity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use