Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
joti jot rali

Singh In Gay Night Club

Recommended Posts

Here's a question:

If a Sikh male brought up with kesh is gay, and pursues his attractions, should he cut his kesh to avoid associating it with that lifestyle, or should he just continue with it wearing a visual Sikh identity?

Bro, that's something between you and God, and you'll have to decide what needs to be done. Only your conscience can guide you to the best choice. Good luck.

Joking, lmao.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bro, that's something between you and God, and you'll have to decide what needs to be done. Only your conscience can guide you to the best choice. Good luck.

Joking, lmao.

megalol!!

I iz no batty man and ting bruv! lol

But what I asked in the previous post is a serious question still.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a question:

If a Sikh male brought up with kesh is gay, and pursues his attractions, should he cut his kesh to avoid associating it with that lifestyle, or should he just continue with it wearing a visual Sikh identity?

Unless he's intent on living a stereotypically promiscuous gay lifestyle complete with cruising and go-go dancers, he definitely shouldn't cut it. The law of paramatmaan doesn't suddenly stop applying to him because he likes kissing boys, lol.

5% of the human race is gay, and I see no reason to doubt that this statistic applies to our community too. Like you said, they've always been there. As there are about 30 million Sikhs today, we can confidently assume that about 1.5 million of them are homosexual and suffering in silence because of it. That's a lot of souls, more than in all the other jathas, sampardas and sects combined. It isn't right that their issues should be ignored by the rest of us.

Edited by Balkaar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5% of the human race is gay, and I see no reason to doubt that this statistic applies to our community too. Like you said, they've always been there. As there are about 30 million Sikhs today, we can confidently assume that about 1.5 million of them are homosexual and suffering in silence because of it. That's a lot of souls, more than in all the other jathas, sampardas and sects combined. It isn't right that their issues should be ignored by the rest of us.

Humans are born with all sorts of sexual fetishes. It doesn't mean we should change our rehit for them. 1.5 million feel sexual attraction towards same sex. About the same % of men feel sexual attraction towards children, another feel the same sexual attraction towards animals and even incest towards their family members. We should not change our Dharm by accommodating the various fetishes people have. Accomodating one sexual fetishe will open the pandora's box to all sorts of weird sexual deviations. These sexual deviations are the signs of this sansaar sinking even deeper into kalyug. It is only a matter of time before incest will also one day raise it's head and become the norm as homosexuality has now become in the last 20 years.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Humans are born with all sorts of sexual fetishes. It doesn't mean we should change our rehit for them. 1.5 million feel sexual attraction towards same sex. About the same % of men feel sexual attraction towards children, another feel the same sexual attraction towards animals and even incest towards their family members. We should not change our Dharm by accommodating the various fetishes people have. Accomodating one sexual fetishe will open the pandora's box to all sorts of weird sexual deviations. These sexual deviations are the signs of this sansaar sinking even deeper into kalyug. It is only a matter of time before incest will also one day raise it's head and become the norm as homosexuality has now become in the last 20 years.

this is what is happening the 5% is nodding the head of the 95% , and then apparently the 95% are being abusive by just talking about being hetero relationship wise as opposed to what ever they like. Sorry I'm a sikh and I represent a small fraction of the planet's population and I can live my life without clutching my handbag in horror to my chest at every non-sikh I see and I can be mature enough to realise I am a minority and the majority do something different . LGBTXYZ's need to grow up and stop deluding themselves that they need to have their private sexlives on display everywhere , if they are that needy I suggest they need a therapist not a soapbox.

This new BS transgender is simply people with mental issues who need support rather than surgery , but the type of help they get is to force them towards slice and dice, and then left to their own devices . Afterwards they realise it didn't solve the problem just added to it, then they commit suicide . It's sad really , the med machine just takes their money and then spits them out.

Guru ji had warned us and it is coming to pass

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11119062/Incest-a-fundamental-right-German-committee-says.html

Incest remains illegal in the UK and most European countries, although France abolished its incest laws under Napoleon I and there has been growing debate over the taboo in Germany. Around two to four per cent of Germans have had “incestuous experiences”, according to an estimate by the Max Planck Institute.

in 2010 France reinstated its incest laws.

Edited by jkvlondon
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Humans are born with all sorts of sexual fetishes. It doesn't mean we should change our rehit for them. 1.5 million feel sexual attraction towards same sex. About the same % of men feel sexual attraction towards children, another feel the same sexual attraction towards animals and even incest towards their family members. We should not change our Dharm by accommodating the various fetishes people have. Accomodating one sexual fetishe will open the pandora's box to all sorts of weird sexual deviations. These sexual deviations are the signs of this sansaar sinking even deeper into kalyug. It is only a matter of time before incest will also one day raise it's head and become the norm as homosexuality has now become in the last 20 years.

Homosexuality has not increased in the 20th/21st century, it has always been there, we just never heard about it until now because it's discussion was taboo.

Singh Ji I'm not sure that gays deserve to be lumped into the same category as incest and paedophilia. Homosexuality is demonstrably contingent on genes, paedophilia is not. This is why you get all sorts of gay animals [penguins, giraffes, insects etc] in nature, but not a single instance of a paedophile lizard or dog or bat. Paedophilia requires a capability for complex abstract thought, which only humans have. In other words it's all in their heads, it's a mental problem caused by some trauma, not a genetic accident like being gay. A consenting relationship between adults is also very different from the forceful rape of a kid.

There is no relationship at all between perceptions of homosexuality and perceptions of incest, it does not follow that one influences the other. The ancient Zoroastrians of Iran claimed that men who lay with men were 'Daevas', or Demons, and yet they considered marriage between a father and daughter, or a mother and a son, or a brother and a sister one of the most sacred sacraments of their faith. The Egyptians also condemned homosexuality yet practiced incest. So did many of the Jews of the Old Testament. And look at all these Muslims and Christians who've been marrying their cousins for centuries and hating gays all the while. Whereas if we take an opposite example, several of the historical societies where homosexuality was widespread - ancient China, Japan, Rome and even ancient India - had very strict taboos against incest. Hence I'm not convinced that easing up on the gays will automatically lead to the proliferation of incest.

Edited by Balkaar
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone else find lesbianism a bit of a contradiction? I'm sure we've all seen the butch, masculine-looking females (not transgender) who claim they find other women attractive, but if you stop to think for a moment, if these women were attracted solely to the fairer sex for their feminine traits, then why "man" yourself up and assume masculine traits and features like a short hairstyle, etc? Why not just be with a guy if you like your women to resemble to men? What's going on there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone else find lesbianism a bit of a contradiction? I'm sure we've all seen the butch, masculine-looking females (not transgender) who claim they find other women attractive, but if you stop to think for a moment, if these women were attracted solely to the fairer sex for their feminine traits, then why "man" yourself up and assume masculine traits and features like a short hairstyle, etc? Why not just be with a guy if you like your women to resemble to men? What's going on there?

There is definitely some p****-envy.

They hate being women and wish they were men. But they make very poor men.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is definitely some p****-envy.

They hate being women and wish they were men. But they make very poor men.

I read (or heard) something quite recently that female sexuality is a heck of a lot more fluid than male sexuality. You see it in some women who get divorced in middle age (not through choice but due to their husband hitting the road), and then suddenly realise they find women attractive. It's that kind of behaviour that adds to the belief that for some people their sexuality is a choice. I don't know where I stand on that issue, because I haven't chosen to be attracted to the opposite sex, so I'm not quite comfortable in jumping on that bandwagon.

Edited by MisterrSingh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read (or heard) something quite recently that female sexuality is a heck of a lot more fluid than male sexuality. You see it in some women who get divorced in middle age (not through choice but due to their husband hitting the road), and then suddenly realise they find women attractive. It's that kind of behaviour that adds to the belief that for some people their sexuality is a choice. I don't know where I stand on that issue, because I haven't chosen to be attracted to the opposite sex, so I'm not quite comfortable in jumping on that bandwagon.

It's complicated. Some women who have been sexually abused by older paedos in their fam apparently turn lesbian when older (I presume some of this is down to feeling disgusted with men because of their experiences), but then I've heard many go back to hetero later on in life and settle down with a bloke.

I think women can appreciate another women's physical beauty a lot more openly and comfortably than men. They do it all the time. They are always looking at other women in magazines and idolising them (and sometimes getting depressed about it).

Saying that, I realise that blokes who train often look at the physiques of other geezers as goals for themselves, without any sexual attraction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's complicated. Some women who have been sexually abused by older paedos in their fam apparently turn lesbian when older (I presume some of this is down to feeling disgusted with men because of their experiences), but then I've heard many go back to hetero later on in life and settle down with a bloke.

I think women can appreciate another women's physical beauty a lot more openly and comfortably than men. They do it all the time. They are always looking at other women in magazines and idolising them (and sometimes getting depressed about it).

The opposite is occasionally true for males, when a male paedo abuses a boy, the victim grows up to be gay (and in some cases they too become abusers when they mature). But some don't. Yeah, it is complicated.

Saying that, I realise that blokes who train often look at the physiques of other geezers as goals for themselves, without any sexual attraction.

It's like guys admiring the aesthetics of Arnie in his hey-day. It's from an almost detached, observational perspective, much like admiring a piece of art or a sculpture. A gay fella would get hot under the collar checking out biceps and pecs, but a straight guy wouldn't go there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's interesting though I had heard a few testamonials of people who were gay who did ardas for help and the whole thing was no longer an issue , some were christian some were sikh or other faiths so I am not convinced that it is a genetic thing (genetics only account for 30 % of our function 70 % is experience/attitudes). It could be an epigenetic thing that until you get triggered it doesn't come into play

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read (or heard) something quite recently that female sexuality is a heck of a lot more fluid than male sexuality. You see it in some women who get divorced in middle age (not through choice but due to their husband hitting the road), and then suddenly realise they find women attractive. It's that kind of behaviour that adds to the belief that for some people their sexuality is a choice. I don't know where I stand on that issue, because I haven't chosen to be attracted to the opposite sex, so I'm not quite comfortable in jumping on that bandwagon.

I have distant relative who is a lesbian and is involved in a relationship with another woman. I met both of them at a wedding of another relation and she excitedly mentioned how there was a lot of young boys at this wedding.

This made me wonder whether she really was a lesbian or whether she was one because she could not find a man.

There are theories of how some divorced women become lesbian, but women do tend be more fluid. However, women are attracted to the masculine and if they find those masculine traits in other women rather than a feminised husband then they will go for the masculine.

Another point you will need to consider of how "fashionable" and "trendy" being a lesbian is in some quarters and some women jump on the bandwagon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Used to be able to, slowed down. Found that if one can read Jaap Sahib between 10-11 minutes they know it by heart.
    • Sister i have nothing against someone who removes hair for medical purposes but what about the people who still wear a kirpan and do sharaab and other things. Not all amritdharis are bad i know but the ones that are really create hate and dislike for the ones who are not.    Its the experinces i have had in real life that have made me label amritdharis as frauds fakes.   Its gonna hit fan the the videos i am gonna post.  
    • I could do japji sahib in about 6-7 mins
    • Are you sure ? I have see ladies and heard who have had threading and laser removal despite being amritdhari. No they don't cope fine.   Without mentioning anyone i know many amrtidhari people and trust me i have had a few experinces that are not nice when it came to money.   My fellow member i know i am the most hated and disliked user to exist on this site as of now. So why don't we have a vote system to see who hates me the most so then i will leave. Personally i have nothing against anyone on this site and i am glad that they gave me good advice being amritdhari or not i am very thankful for the time effort spent on me .   But the things i have seen in real life involving amritdhari people are very shocking to mention on here publicly. So thats why i label them in real life  Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. I will never insult my Guru Ji but i hope God exposes the false prophets that exist today in our society especially amritdharis gurdwara people as well
    • No need to look at just Mahapursh. Some of the bhindri taksal Singhs have really long Nitnem, barely finish before going to sleep. Bibeki Jatha Singhs daily read Panj Granthi in addition to Maryada prescribed bani.  Sant Attar Singh read 100 Japji Sahib daily, Sant Jarnail Singh I hear between 101 and 125 per day. For this you need to be reaching high speed or in surti to read additional paath. I knew a Singh who reads Sukhmani Sahib in 30 mins. Japji Sahib for relatively fast readers is 5 or 6 mins.
×