Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Jacfsing2

How Do People Give Themselves A Thankhaah For Stuff Ghat Doesn't Require Pesh?

Recommended Posts

Ang 718 Line 13 Raag Todee: Bhagat Namdev

ਕਉਨ ਕੋ ਕਲੰਕੁ ਰਹਿਓ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮੁ ਲੇਤ ਹੀ ॥

Koun Ko Kalank Rehiou Raam Naam Laeth Hee ||

कउन को कलंकु रहिओ राम नामु लेत ही ॥

Whose blemishes remain, when one chants the Lord's Name?

ਪਤਿਤ ਪਵਿਤ ਭਏ ਰਾਮੁ ਕਹਤ ਹੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥

Pathith Pavith Bheae Raam Kehath Hee ||1|| Rehaao ||

पतित पवित भए रामु कहत ही ॥१॥ रहाउ ॥

Sinners become pure, chanting the Lord's Name. ||1||Pause||

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA, VAHEGURU JI KI FATEH

Taksal Maryada prescribes some (if you take your Kirpan off and such), so some may be doing so through those guidelines.

Others are taking what elders have done previously and continuing them.

Others do what they must to get over the guilt of what they have done.

Others, when they are unable to reconcile with the guilt, go to the Punj Pyare (even though the action did not warrant it) and have their guilt resolved by Guru Sahib.

Ultimately, unless it was given to you as a Rehat, you are doing what you need to do to get closure. Sant Jarnail Singh is documented as doing an entire Sehaj Paath because a Gutka Sahib fell at his feet while he was asleep (not his fault, but who knows how Guru Sahib's play works). Sant Gurbachan Singh insisted that the Punj Pyare assemble and give him a tankah when he was separated from his Kirpan for a mere instance while showering (which he was - think 5 Japji Sahib Paaths).

It is love for the Guru and a form of apology. Not everyone apologizes the same and unless prescribed, it is what the individual is able to do to apologize. Simple Ardaas, extra Bani, seva, Simran - Gursikhs will engage in this with extra effort to make their Husban Lord forgive them.

Edited by ms514
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anyone new to this forum might think it was a place to discuss rear pleasures or excretions. Try and display some control of your fetishes.   MODS need to update their banned word filters or at fhe very least warn repeated gutter posters who just have it in each for other.  All for free speech but this thread has warped into something vindictive. 
    • Guest London jwaan
      Err no......that's not a fact. That's your sensationalist factually incorrect anal hyperbole again! You really do need to visit a colo-rectal specialist with some urgency to find out why so much tutee is coming out of your mouth.  The full list of non signatories is here. See what I did there? Showed evidence of a fact. Not empty my anus on a forum for no reason, unlike you.
    • https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15 Interesting article from Nassim Nicholas Taleb regarding how halal has got it's way in the UK. It is quite long though. 
    • Jus Reign is technically correct in his argiement that Sikhi isn’t a religion, however I don’t think he thought about this on a deeper level, and just made an edgy statement that happens to be true once examined on a deeper level.  Guru Nanak Dev Ji never intended to start a “religion”. Sikhi isn’t a “religion” it’s the Sach Dharam. This modern day “Sikhism” most people follow is an Abrahamic knockoff created by the Singh Sabah era with the help of the British, which takes away Sikhi’s universalist Dharmic framework, and replaces it with this abomination calles Sikhism.  Jus Reigns statement also comes from a place of duality. For any educated Sikh, it’s obvious that Guru Nanak never “left” us, and Guru Gobind Singh Ji is just the same as Guru Nanak, who is just the same as Siri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. The Guru is the Bani, the Bani is the Guru, and within it all the Amrit is contained.  As for his comment about rocking the Turban and doing whatever HE wants, from a Sikh point of view his completely wrong. The entire point of being a Sikh is to recognize your own defincies and realize you cannot achieve anything by yourself, this is why you dedicate yourself to an enlightener (Guru) and follow his teachings. Bani time and time again tells us to destroy this false sense of self (ego) and recognize the One. Sikhi isn’t about following yourself, it’s about following the One Guru.  When a Sikh, especially a “Singh” (Man who has received Khand Di Phaul) as Jus Reign claims to be, wears a Dastaar (Turban) then they are representing the Khalsa and the Gurus Saroop. Of course there are things you cannot do, like smoking, drinking (He drinks), or other immoralities because reflects back on the Khalsa. When you go out and do something retarded it reflects bad on that real Singh who keeps the 5K’s, who gets up at Amritvela, who follows Rehat, etc. The fact is that in the modern day, especially for someone who uses the Khalsa title of “Singh”, wearing the Dastaar is not a joke. It’s either you follow the Rehat and maintain proper conduct in the world, or take off the Dastaar, and remove Singh from your name (which you didn’t earn in the first place). 
    • I see.                            
×