Banners At Visakhi Mela Condemned - Khalid Mamood - Nihal To Debate On So Called Asian Network

[Hammertime007]

We also have khalid mamood making a song and dance bout it, probably to take scrutiny of his own community.

[Pakandi baba]

What does that cretin Labour MP Khalid know?

Like it says the Saudis have swords, and some have guns on flags, yet Sikhs display it, they are related to terror? Ask Khanjar Khalid if he's against Azaad Kashmir slogans too! - What an <banned word filter activated>

[StarStriker]

I think we have to be very careful with the symbols and thoughts which we convey in open public. Khalistan is not every body's ideal. I even wonder if it is a Sikh idea. It is a political fight, best left to be used where people are fighting politically i.e. India. In a foreign country - we belong to a different political climate.

I wonder how a gun will help us - who are not even citizens of India - get Khalistan!!!!! We are not terrorists either.

Stop talking rubbish. U wonder if it is a sikh idea? Well who's bloody idea is it then? R u ashamed? U need to study history rather sound like a scared little mug.

Unlike ur precious pyara rapistan, uk gives us freedom to tell the whole world of sikh struggles n genocide.

[StarStriker]

We also have khalid mamood making a song and dance bout it, probably to take scrutiny of his own community.

This khalid is the definition of a pr!ck! So "khalistan zindabad" is somehow supporting a terrorist org? This guy is either a coconut or an inbred, as that slogan simply means 'long live khalistan', just like pakistan/hindustan zindabad.

[sikhni777]

A bare gun on it's own got no meaning. A sikh has uchi mat as well. Mughals had large armies well armed with cannns too. Where did their largest cannon zam zam end up in ? In maharaja Ranjit singhs hands.

Without brains and only bodies and blunt courage is not sikhi. There are other ways to overcome your enemies. Educating your youngsters on sikh history would be a more courageous action than displaying a gun during peaceful celebrations esp when maharaj dhi swari and most of Sikh sangat are out on the roads unarmed.

[Jonny101]

Stop talking rubbish. U wonder if it is a sikh idea? Well who's bloody idea is it then? R u ashamed? U need to study history rather sound like a scared little mug.

Unlike ur precious pyara rapistan, uk gives us freedom to tell the whole world of sikh struggles n genocide.

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

[Akalifauj]

A bare gun on it's own got no meaning. A sikh has uchi mat as well. Mughals had large armies well armed with cannns too. Where did their largest cannon zam zam end up in ? In maharaja Ranjit singhs hands.

Without brains and only bodies and blunt courage is not sikhi. There are other ways to overcome your enemies. Educating your youngsters on sikh history would be a more courageous action than displaying a gun during peaceful celebrations esp when maharaj dhi swari and most of Sikh sangat are out on the roads unarmed.

Showing a gun on a flag is not a sign of aggression. Khalsa Panth always stays armed....kirpan is not a symbol. It is there for protection. Sikhs always have peaceful celebration yet Guru Sahib did not take off his weapons. Sri Guru Granth sahib ji does not teach against weapons nor does Guru Sahib dislike the sight of weapons or think the sight of weapons are a sign of aggression.

The Canadian army who were part of the vasaikhi celebration brought a cannon. No one complained and said this a no meaning and it's a peaceful protest. Sikhs in fact welcomed them with open arms.

[Guest Jacfsing2]

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

What's Vande Mataram?

[WaljinderSingh]

Shastars and Khalsa Raj.

[StarStriker]

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

Indeed jonny, it always amazes me how ppl call sukha/jinder terrorists, yet wat they did is EXACTLY mirror image to what accepted heroes, like udham singh did. Both assassinated 2 evil men whom were responsible for deaths of innocents, yet somehow, jinda/sukha r different kettle of terrorist fish.