Jump to content

Banners At Visakhi Mela Condemned - Khalid Mamood - Nihal To Debate On So Called Asian Network


Recommended Posts

I think we have to be very careful with the symbols and thoughts which we convey in open public. Khalistan is not every body's ideal. I even wonder if it is a Sikh idea. It is a political fight, best left to be used where people are fighting politically i.e. India. In a foreign country - we belong to a different political climate.

I wonder how a gun will help us - who are not even citizens of India - get Khalistan!!!!! We are not terrorists either.

Stop talking rubbish. U wonder if it is a sikh idea? Well who's bloody idea is it then? R u ashamed? U need to study history rather sound like a scared little mug.

Unlike ur precious pyara rapistan, uk gives us freedom to tell the whole world of sikh struggles n genocide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also have khalid mamood making a song and dance bout it, probably to take scrutiny of his own community.

This khalid is the definition of a pr!ck! So "khalistan zindabad" is somehow supporting a terrorist org? This guy is either a coconut or an inbred, as that slogan simply means 'long live khalistan', just like pakistan/hindustan zindabad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bare gun on it's own got no meaning. A sikh has uchi mat as well. Mughals had large armies well armed with cannns too. Where did their largest cannon zam zam end up in ? In maharaja Ranjit singhs hands.

Without brains and only bodies and blunt courage is not sikhi. There are other ways to overcome your enemies. Educating your youngsters on sikh history would be a more courageous action than displaying a gun during peaceful celebrations esp when maharaj dhi swari and most of Sikh sangat are out on the roads unarmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bare gun on it's own got no meaning. A sikh has uchi mat as well. Mughals had large armies well armed with cannns too. Where did their largest cannon zam zam end up in ? In maharaja Ranjit singhs hands.

Without brains and only bodies and blunt courage is not sikhi. There are other ways to overcome your enemies. Educating your youngsters on sikh history would be a more courageous action than displaying a gun during peaceful celebrations esp when maharaj dhi swari and most of Sikh sangat are out on the roads unarmed.

Showing a gun on a flag is not a sign of aggression. Khalsa Panth always stays armed....kirpan is not a symbol. It is there for protection. Sikhs always have peaceful celebration yet Guru Sahib did not take off his weapons. Sri Guru Granth sahib ji does not teach against weapons nor does Guru Sahib dislike the sight of weapons or think the sight of weapons are a sign of aggression.

The Canadian army who were part of the vasaikhi celebration brought a cannon. No one complained and said this a no meaning and it's a peaceful protest. Sikhs in fact welcomed them with open arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

What's Vande Mataram?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

Indeed jonny, it always amazes me how ppl call sukha/jinder terrorists, yet wat they did is EXACTLY mirror image to what accepted heroes, like udham singh did. Both assassinated 2 evil men whom were responsible for deaths of innocents, yet somehow, jinda/sukha r different kettle of terrorist fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use