Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Hammertime007

Banners At Visakhi Mela Condemned - Khalid Mamood - Nihal To Debate On So Called Asian Network

69 posts in this topic

Been told the so called 'asian' network could hold a debate on the birmingham Visakhi mela, where there flags with ak47 with khalistan Zindabad slogans

Edited by Hammertime007

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been told the so called 'asian' network could hold a debate on the birmingham Visakhi mela, where there flags with ak47 with khalistan Zindabad slogans

Nope

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have to be very careful with the symbols and thoughts which we convey in open public. Khalistan is not every body's ideal. I even wonder if it is a Sikh idea. It is a political fight, best left to be used where people are fighting politically i.e. India. In a foreign country - we belong to a different political climate.

I wonder how a gun will help us - who are not even citizens of India - get Khalistan!!!!! We are not terrorists either.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Birmingham Mail have probably run out of stories, but like what Daily Mail does. If the flag had shown a Khanda or something else, they wouldn't have done an article, but they've exaggerated it because of the symbol on it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Birmingham Mail have probably run out of stories, but like what Daily Mail does. If the flag had shown a Khanda or something else, they wouldn't have done an article, but they've exaggerated it because of the symbol on it.

A Khanda has 4 shastars, (2 Kirpans, 1 Khanda, and 1 Chackram), this flag has 3 less shastars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Birmingham Mail have probably run out of stories, but like what Daily Mail does. If the flag had shown a Khanda or something else, they wouldn't have done an article, but they've exaggerated it because of the symbol on it.

Very poor paper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Khanda has 4 shastars, (2 Kirpans, 1 Khanda, and 1 Chackram), this flag has 3 less shastars

You are not getting the point Paji, It's because they are associating the the symbol on the flag with terrorism. A Khanda is normally a symbol used in Sikhi, whereas a gun is rarely seen or not at all. So they have took one flag and made it into a big story.

Edited by simran345
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We also have khalid mamood making a song and dance bout it, probably to take scrutiny of his own community.

Edited by Hammertime007
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What does that cretin Labour MP Khalid know?

Like it says the Saudis have swords, and some have guns on flags, yet Sikhs display it, they are related to terror? Ask Khanjar Khalid if he's against Azaad Kashmir slogans too! - What an <banned word filter activated>

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have to be very careful with the symbols and thoughts which we convey in open public. Khalistan is not every body's ideal. I even wonder if it is a Sikh idea. It is a political fight, best left to be used where people are fighting politically i.e. India. In a foreign country - we belong to a different political climate.

I wonder how a gun will help us - who are not even citizens of India - get Khalistan!!!!! We are not terrorists either.

Stop talking rubbish. U wonder if it is a sikh idea? Well who's bloody idea is it then? R u ashamed? U need to study history rather sound like a scared little mug.

Unlike ur precious pyara rapistan, uk gives us freedom to tell the whole world of sikh struggles n genocide.

Edited by StarStriker
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We also have khalid mamood making a song and dance bout it, probably to take scrutiny of his own community.

This khalid is the definition of a pr!ck! So "khalistan zindabad" is somehow supporting a terrorist org? This guy is either a coconut or an inbred, as that slogan simply means 'long live khalistan', just like pakistan/hindustan zindabad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A bare gun on it's own got no meaning. A sikh has uchi mat as well. Mughals had large armies well armed with cannns too. Where did their largest cannon zam zam end up in ? In maharaja Ranjit singhs hands.

Without brains and only bodies and blunt courage is not sikhi. There are other ways to overcome your enemies. Educating your youngsters on sikh history would be a more courageous action than displaying a gun during peaceful celebrations esp when maharaj dhi swari and most of Sikh sangat are out on the roads unarmed.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop talking rubbish. U wonder if it is a sikh idea? Well who's bloody idea is it then? R u ashamed? U need to study history rather sound like a scared little mug.

Unlike ur precious pyara rapistan, uk gives us freedom to tell the whole world of sikh struggles n genocide.

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

Edited by Jonny101
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A bare gun on it's own got no meaning. A sikh has uchi mat as well. Mughals had large armies well armed with cannns too. Where did their largest cannon zam zam end up in ? In maharaja Ranjit singhs hands.

Without brains and only bodies and blunt courage is not sikhi. There are other ways to overcome your enemies. Educating your youngsters on sikh history would be a more courageous action than displaying a gun during peaceful celebrations esp when maharaj dhi swari and most of Sikh sangat are out on the roads unarmed.

Showing a gun on a flag is not a sign of aggression. Khalsa Panth always stays armed....kirpan is not a symbol. It is there for protection. Sikhs always have peaceful celebration yet Guru Sahib did not take off his weapons. Sri Guru Granth sahib ji does not teach against weapons nor does Guru Sahib dislike the sight of weapons or think the sight of weapons are a sign of aggression.

The Canadian army who were part of the vasaikhi celebration brought a cannon. No one complained and said this a no meaning and it's a peaceful protest. Sikhs in fact welcomed them with open arms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

What's Vande Mataram?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For Rapistanis, the idea if Khalistan is about terrorism just as a Sikh state was for the Mughals and Afghans. First they need to read Dasam Banis like Shastar Nam Mala where Guru jee has called weapons as his peer.

Freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh and Udham Singh were also once called terrorists now the same Rapistan calls them heroes.

Future of Rapistan is not good. We already have people saying you should be beheaded if you are not willing to say Vande Mataram. SIkh intellectuals like Ajmer Singh have warned Sikhs to prepare.

Indeed jonny, it always amazes me how ppl call sukha/jinder terrorists, yet wat they did is EXACTLY mirror image to what accepted heroes, like udham singh did. Both assassinated 2 evil men whom were responsible for deaths of innocents, yet somehow, jinda/sukha r different kettle of terrorist fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming we were all armed who would you point your gun to and what would you achieve?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as no one was and is and will be killed, sit back and enjoy the publicity. That is what the sole aim of that symbol was. Hurray.... it's working. Shock !!!! This product actually works! !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's Vande Mataram?

A national song of India. Haven't you ever hard it Paji, it's on YouTube.

Some kids sometimes sing the national anthem which is different, but everybody doesn't.

This explains it:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vande_Mataram

Edited by simran345
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @harsharan000 i miss your words of wisdom posts... hope all is well. 
    • It's not just RS, you have other cults out there too. They use gurbani to lure people to fill their pockets. They are leeches, do not follow these so called cults... so called baba trilochan das has even started charging money for prashad. Rebranding Ayurvedic as guru prashadam and sell it to their followers - google it.... People Need to wake up. Faith is a business for these so called pakhadis.
    • God doesn't have a name, if you were a true Sikh you'd know that from Jaap Sahib. Nice try but your Devta Pooja Bhajans are just that, don't lump it with the supreme essence of God, that stuff there is trash compared to it. You didn't even know that the name Raam used in Gurbani isn't a name but a divine attribute.  Nice try but that song is talking about a being filling the person with energy and being their life support. You're so biased that just because the word Raam is there you start screeching its about God, when the person who sung it has a page devoted ENTIRELY to Ram Chander.  Well what do you expect. She had no come-back for the fact that she thinks she's got more knowledge and insight than a Brahmgyani, Honestly I'd rather watch "cartoons" than the drivel she does and above all I'm certainly not a massive hypocrite like her, my feet aren't in 2 boats with one sinking down to hell and the other rising up.   Since we're on the topic of "Bhajans" and Blasphemy. Here guy, according to Preeto this is also Praise of God.   I'll let you in on a little secret....this time it uses the word God.  
    • You know you don't have to hide behind a Sikh mask and can admit to being Hindu; nobody going to judge you, but when you try to use Sikhi as a shield to preach Hinduism; that's when it gets on people's nerves. Now your insulting his taste in t.v., when you've been watching Bhagat Beadbi of Ravidas.