Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
thugger

Sikh Americans Fight For Civil Rights In Donald Trump’s America

58 posts in this topic

No matter what happens, no one will be happy when moderation occurs. Either you be reasonable and make a case without getting emotional or you have no right to complain.

Only consistency we can keep is to follow rules to best of our ability and that's it. No one is singled out. Period.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one is singled out. Period.

"ਕੁਫਰ ਗੋਅ ਕੁਫਰਾਣੈ ਪਇਆ ਦਝਸੀ ॥ कुफर गोअ कुफराणै पइआ दझसी ॥ Kufar go▫a kufrāṇai pa▫i▫ā ḏajẖsī. One who speaks lies shall fall into hell and burn.

ਸਭ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਸੁਬਹਾਨੁ ਸਚਿ ਸਮਾਈਐ ॥ सभ दुनीआ सुबहानु सचि समाईऐ ॥ Sabẖ ḏunī▫ā sub▫hān sacẖ samā▫ī▫ai. In all the world, the most blessed and sanctified are those who remain absorbed in Truth.

ਸਿਝੈ ਦਰਿ ਦੀਵਾਨਿ ਆਪੁ ਗਵਾਈਐ ॥੯॥ सिझै दरि दीवानि आपु गवाईऐ ॥९॥ Sijẖai ḏar ḏīvān āp gavā▫ī▫ai. ||9|| One who eliminates selfishness and conceit is redeemed in the Court of the Lord. ||9|" (Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Ang 142) GOOD-BYE! LIAR! The rules have only been enforced whenever you want them to.

Edited by Jacfsing2
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I do admit that the language I did use was not exactly complying with Gurmat. I'm just frustrated, honestly frustrated, that there has seemed to be a new growth in hostility in this website and all the admin and Mods want is just block/ban topics when the "m" word is mentioned, (meat), or pro-nihang topics, yet would rather not do anything else to actual problems. I am also disappointed that certain people who just wanted to learn about the message of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji have felt a feeling of unwelcome behavior, despite being new to the faith or whatever. This has very little to do with Donald John Trump, then it has to for all those who felt left out.

There's more to Sikhi than what goes into your mouth and settles in your stomach. Bro, most of your posts have a subtext that revolves around the consumption of meat, or more accurately, how you wish there was an unequivocal endorsement of consuming Maas. You must realise that's not going to happen. Why are you worried about what others think about the subject unless it troubles your conscience that you might be wrong? Bashing the mods isn't going to help your cause. Chill out and do what you want to do. Why the need to influence or be influenced?

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's more to Sikhi than what goes into your mouth and settles in your stomach. Bro, most of your posts have a subtext that revolves around the consumption of meat, or more accurately, how you wish there was an unequivocal endorsement of consuming Maas. You must realise that's not going to happen. Why are you worried about what others think about the subject unless it troubles your conscience that you might be wrong? Bashing the mods isn't going to help your cause. Chill out and do what you want to do. Why the need to influence or be influenced?

Honestly, I do feel like the issue in what I said was more about how there was hostility, rather than me talking about meat. I know that Sikhi is more than vegetarianism vs non-vegeterianism; the point I was trying to make was how the admin and Mods would prefer to ban a guy just saying anything that they might not agree with, (that's what a forum, any forum is about), and people openly supporting a man, (Trump), who undeniably kicked out a Sikh and called a Dastar, "dirty hat". That's the important thing here. I do admit the language I used was not the best; however, I do feel that the mods should be more active on the forums, (I'm surprised all they wanted to pickup on was me when these Trump supporters are supporting someone who's Anti-Sikh, which is also against the rules). Vaheguru, I do feel sorry about my behavior, but I do feel sometimes we have to look at the bigger picture.

The mods have also tried to insult "Harsharan000", whom I can say is a very respectful person on this forum. http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/77812-bhakti/page-21#entry657002 (if you are against me it's one thing, but "Harsharan000", that's a new low, I'm sorry).

Edited by Jacfsing2
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I do feel like the issue in what I said was more about how there was hostility, rather than me talking about meat. I know that Sikhi is more than vegetarianism vs non-vegeterianism; the point I was trying to make was how the admin and Mods would prefer to ban a guy just saying anything that they might not agree with, (that's what a forum, any forum is about), and people openly supporting a man, (Trump), who undeniably kicked out a Sikh and called a Dastar, "dirty hat". That's the important thing here. I do admit the language I used was not the best; however, I do feel that the mods should be more active on the forums, (I'm surprised all they wanted to pickup on was me when these Trump supporters are supporting someone who's Anti-Sikh, which is also against the rules). Vaheguru, I do feel sorry about my behavior, but I do feel sometimes we have to look at the bigger picture.

The mods have also tried to insult "Harsharan000", whom I can say is a very respectful person on this forum. http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/77812-bhakti/page-21#entry657002 (if you are against me it's one thing, but "Harsharan000", that's a new low, I'm sorry).

The person who Harsharan was referring to was insulted by him saying he had holes in his head and calling him evil. He's complaining, you're complaining and harsharan will too.

Such is the life of taking action. Just putting perspective but if someone tries to point out a rule had been broken we will look at it to make this place be a better environment for people to post on.

The person who filed the report is in QC and accordi g to your logic we have it out for people so why would I listen to his report?

I don't care about who supports who but if you cuss out fellow members on a Sikh forum it will be dealt with. I won't lower myself to post sacred bani to fulfill my ego and argument but I will say it would be wise to admit that you made a mistake of posting the F word and it isn't personal.

Thank you.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://news.yahoo.com/protesters-block-main-road-trump-rally-174524425--election.html

Look at the thugs blocking the road to Trumps rally. Are these what you call 'protesters'? In America one has the right to free speech. But it's obvious America is slowly devolving into a banana republic.

It's important to realise that true (ideologically pure) leftism is implacably in favour of personal freedoms, including the right to free speech. The leftism observed by most today is a parody twisted beyond all recognition by the forces of political correctness. Resistance to free speech has always been a hallmark of the right. It is a sad situation where the right wing, the historical enemy of discourse, has to champion free expression.

Edited by Balkaar
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person who Harsharan was referring to was insulted by him saying he had holes in his head and calling him evil. He's complaining, you're complaining and harsharan will too.

Such is the life of taking action. Just putting perspective but if someone tries to point out a rule had been broken we will look at it to make this place be a better environment for people to post on.

The person who filed the report is in QC and accordi g to your logic we have it out for people so why would I listen to his report?

I don't care about who supports who but if you cuss out fellow members on a Sikh forum it will be dealt with. I won't lower myself to post sacred bani to fulfill my ego and argument but I will say it would be wise to admit that you made a mistake of posting the F word and it isn't personal.

You weren't even on this forum for about a month: also you only came when someone wanted to write something negative about me or whatever. Also I've already given a previous benti on this topic for you to shut it down http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/78939-sikh-americans-fight-for-civil-rights-in-donald-trumps-america/page-2
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Do you mean, "What is Hukam exactly"? The videos may help you to understand it better:         
    • Yes, because that's not the topic here. The point prokharkoo started was bigteras hardon for Jatts. He is saying some Jatts are good, some bad. Nowhere did he mention pride, or that other castes are inferior. But you, as always, start rambling on. If you go to post secondary, these habits will bring some very low marks.  I'm glad you finally dropped the Daas act. It seemed very forced, almost like you had a reminder to use it whenever possible. When you are truly there, then use it, until now keep from making a mockery of the term. 
    • I don't talk to cognitively challenged people. Take your retarded comment to your Hindu masters.  
    • WJKK WJKF I had visited city Brampton in Ontario few years back to visit my massi Ji and there was a store I can't remember the name now. But they were run entirely on non profit (they had a big yellow sign if that helps if anyone who lives there can comment) and they had them for sale. Sorry I can't remember more.    WJKK WJKF
    • WJKK WJKF Well I can see the resentment you harbour toward females (and the sense of entitlement you feel for having the luck to be born male). You and previous poster chatanga have in the last few posts managed to compare women to animals, disabled, and homosexuals or eunichs. Let me ask you brother why do you feel that male gender is so above women? And why do you think some souls are born male and some female? It is some big prize to be born male and we are above females on spiritual ladder? Because I thought gurbani says human body is precious not just males ones. The way you are both talking makes it sounds like no different than our Hindu casteist neighbours who think a woman was born only to serve and has to wait future lifetimes to have any chance to know liberation.  But aside from that your tone made it sound like women are supposed to be the ones hiding behind us? Is this what you want? You think Is it what Sri Guru Gobind singh Ji Maharaj wanted?? Because bro I want nobody hiding and want us all standing together and think that's what Guru Ji wanted. I won't change my mind and I've spoken or rather typed my thoughts why. I don't see any other explanation than haume to explain you and his thoughts.  Abnway my only purpose posting in this thread was not to engage in nonsense arguments. But to just point out about Lucknow Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee and the decision to uphold this principle and they have had several females do this in last few months as an example so it's not mere talk. Other cities will follow and have started to implement as well in india.  Please forgive any mistakes.  With Waheguru Jis kirpa we will all come to understanding.  WJKK WJKF