Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
thugger

Sikh Americans Fight For Civil Rights In Donald Trump’s America

58 posts in this topic

No matter what happens, no one will be happy when moderation occurs. Either you be reasonable and make a case without getting emotional or you have no right to complain.

Only consistency we can keep is to follow rules to best of our ability and that's it. No one is singled out. Period.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one is singled out. Period.

"ਕੁਫਰ ਗੋਅ ਕੁਫਰਾਣੈ ਪਇਆ ਦਝਸੀ ॥ कुफर गोअ कुफराणै पइआ दझसी ॥ Kufar go▫a kufrāṇai pa▫i▫ā ḏajẖsī. One who speaks lies shall fall into hell and burn.

ਸਭ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਸੁਬਹਾਨੁ ਸਚਿ ਸਮਾਈਐ ॥ सभ दुनीआ सुबहानु सचि समाईऐ ॥ Sabẖ ḏunī▫ā sub▫hān sacẖ samā▫ī▫ai. In all the world, the most blessed and sanctified are those who remain absorbed in Truth.

ਸਿਝੈ ਦਰਿ ਦੀਵਾਨਿ ਆਪੁ ਗਵਾਈਐ ॥੯॥ सिझै दरि दीवानि आपु गवाईऐ ॥९॥ Sijẖai ḏar ḏīvān āp gavā▫ī▫ai. ||9|| One who eliminates selfishness and conceit is redeemed in the Court of the Lord. ||9|" (Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Ang 142) GOOD-BYE! LIAR! The rules have only been enforced whenever you want them to.

Edited by Jacfsing2
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I do admit that the language I did use was not exactly complying with Gurmat. I'm just frustrated, honestly frustrated, that there has seemed to be a new growth in hostility in this website and all the admin and Mods want is just block/ban topics when the "m" word is mentioned, (meat), or pro-nihang topics, yet would rather not do anything else to actual problems. I am also disappointed that certain people who just wanted to learn about the message of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji have felt a feeling of unwelcome behavior, despite being new to the faith or whatever. This has very little to do with Donald John Trump, then it has to for all those who felt left out.

There's more to Sikhi than what goes into your mouth and settles in your stomach. Bro, most of your posts have a subtext that revolves around the consumption of meat, or more accurately, how you wish there was an unequivocal endorsement of consuming Maas. You must realise that's not going to happen. Why are you worried about what others think about the subject unless it troubles your conscience that you might be wrong? Bashing the mods isn't going to help your cause. Chill out and do what you want to do. Why the need to influence or be influenced?

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's more to Sikhi than what goes into your mouth and settles in your stomach. Bro, most of your posts have a subtext that revolves around the consumption of meat, or more accurately, how you wish there was an unequivocal endorsement of consuming Maas. You must realise that's not going to happen. Why are you worried about what others think about the subject unless it troubles your conscience that you might be wrong? Bashing the mods isn't going to help your cause. Chill out and do what you want to do. Why the need to influence or be influenced?

Honestly, I do feel like the issue in what I said was more about how there was hostility, rather than me talking about meat. I know that Sikhi is more than vegetarianism vs non-vegeterianism; the point I was trying to make was how the admin and Mods would prefer to ban a guy just saying anything that they might not agree with, (that's what a forum, any forum is about), and people openly supporting a man, (Trump), who undeniably kicked out a Sikh and called a Dastar, "dirty hat". That's the important thing here. I do admit the language I used was not the best; however, I do feel that the mods should be more active on the forums, (I'm surprised all they wanted to pickup on was me when these Trump supporters are supporting someone who's Anti-Sikh, which is also against the rules). Vaheguru, I do feel sorry about my behavior, but I do feel sometimes we have to look at the bigger picture.

The mods have also tried to insult "Harsharan000", whom I can say is a very respectful person on this forum. http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/77812-bhakti/page-21#entry657002 (if you are against me it's one thing, but "Harsharan000", that's a new low, I'm sorry).

Edited by Jacfsing2
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I do feel like the issue in what I said was more about how there was hostility, rather than me talking about meat. I know that Sikhi is more than vegetarianism vs non-vegeterianism; the point I was trying to make was how the admin and Mods would prefer to ban a guy just saying anything that they might not agree with, (that's what a forum, any forum is about), and people openly supporting a man, (Trump), who undeniably kicked out a Sikh and called a Dastar, "dirty hat". That's the important thing here. I do admit the language I used was not the best; however, I do feel that the mods should be more active on the forums, (I'm surprised all they wanted to pickup on was me when these Trump supporters are supporting someone who's Anti-Sikh, which is also against the rules). Vaheguru, I do feel sorry about my behavior, but I do feel sometimes we have to look at the bigger picture.

The mods have also tried to insult "Harsharan000", whom I can say is a very respectful person on this forum. http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/77812-bhakti/page-21#entry657002 (if you are against me it's one thing, but "Harsharan000", that's a new low, I'm sorry).

The person who Harsharan was referring to was insulted by him saying he had holes in his head and calling him evil. He's complaining, you're complaining and harsharan will too.

Such is the life of taking action. Just putting perspective but if someone tries to point out a rule had been broken we will look at it to make this place be a better environment for people to post on.

The person who filed the report is in QC and accordi g to your logic we have it out for people so why would I listen to his report?

I don't care about who supports who but if you cuss out fellow members on a Sikh forum it will be dealt with. I won't lower myself to post sacred bani to fulfill my ego and argument but I will say it would be wise to admit that you made a mistake of posting the F word and it isn't personal.

Thank you.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://news.yahoo.com/protesters-block-main-road-trump-rally-174524425--election.html

Look at the thugs blocking the road to Trumps rally. Are these what you call 'protesters'? In America one has the right to free speech. But it's obvious America is slowly devolving into a banana republic.

It's important to realise that true (ideologically pure) leftism is implacably in favour of personal freedoms, including the right to free speech. The leftism observed by most today is a parody twisted beyond all recognition by the forces of political correctness. Resistance to free speech has always been a hallmark of the right. It is a sad situation where the right wing, the historical enemy of discourse, has to champion free expression.

Edited by Balkaar
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person who Harsharan was referring to was insulted by him saying he had holes in his head and calling him evil. He's complaining, you're complaining and harsharan will too.

Such is the life of taking action. Just putting perspective but if someone tries to point out a rule had been broken we will look at it to make this place be a better environment for people to post on.

The person who filed the report is in QC and accordi g to your logic we have it out for people so why would I listen to his report?

I don't care about who supports who but if you cuss out fellow members on a Sikh forum it will be dealt with. I won't lower myself to post sacred bani to fulfill my ego and argument but I will say it would be wise to admit that you made a mistake of posting the F word and it isn't personal.

You weren't even on this forum for about a month: also you only came when someone wanted to write something negative about me or whatever. Also I've already given a previous benti on this topic for you to shut it down http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/78939-sikh-americans-fight-for-civil-rights-in-donald-trumps-america/page-2
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • questions were only brought up after the chabeel attack as a form of justification but I've never seen or heard  anything to back up the accusation
    •   Genie, I agree with the spirit of your suggestions, but I'm afraid the situation for Sikhs in America is much different than it is for Sikhs in England  The biggest difference is our population density, and that makes it harder than you might realize to accomplish some of your goals. America has a population that is 6 times as large as the population of England.  On the other hand, America has only half as many Sikhs as England.  To make matters worse, while Sikhs in England are almost entirely concentrated around the London metropolitan area or the West Midlands (two regions that, by American standards, are very close to each other anyway), Sikhs in America are spread out all over the place.  There are only a few places where we have sizable numbers, and even in those cases, it's not remotely close to what you would find in London, Birmingham, Vancouver, Toronto, etc.  To put this in perspective, take two places where incidents have occurred: Gresham, Oregon and Oak Creek, Wisconsin.  Oregon is on the west coast, so you might think it is close to the Sikh community in California, but it is in fact 1000 miles from where I live in Los Angeles (same distance between London and Madrid).  Oak Creek is about 900 miles from New York, and 2000 miles from Los Angeles (greater than the distance between London and Istanbul). So when you ask Sikhs in America what they are going to do about these incidents, and I'm sitting here in Los Angeles, it would sound like me asking Sikhs in London or Birmingham what they are going to do about a random incident that affected the tiny Sikh communities in Madrid, or Athens, or Rome, or Norway, or Belgium.  It's hard to respond collectively as a "community" when the community is so thinly dispersed.  We just don't have the numbers.   I think having a private security force to protect Gurdwaras is a good idea.  However, I am not sure how feasible it would be in terms of raising the money required to fund such an operation.  Also, I imagine a lot of these Gurdwaras in isolated areas have very few sangat and may only be open irregularly.  Does the Sikh community have the resources to provide private security for Gurdwaras in far off places with just a handful of sangat?  Moreoever, such a security force would not address issues that take place outside of Gurdwaras.   What the Sikh community in America has done is establish organizations such as the Sikh Coalition and SALDEF (Sikh American Legal Defense & Education Fund).  These organizations help spread awareness about the Sikh community and provide legal resources to fight for civil rights and fight against hate crimes.  I think that is actually the most effective use of the community's resources, given how spread out and small we are.   Also, while I share your frustration with Sikhs seemingly fighting for other people's interests and neglecting their own, there is a method to their madness.  With how small we are as a community, one of the most effective ways to fight for and ensure our rights and security is to ally with other groups and organizations who are sympathetic to our plight.  By banding together with other oppressed groups who face similar challenges, we are stronger.     I'll add one thing: I think Sikhs in America should take it upon themselves not to live in the middle of nowhere.  We should try to live in metropolitan areas with a relatively large number of Sikhs and a relatively liberal community.  It is a shame that we are as spread out as we are.
    • *URGENT* Property Sale or Rent: URGENT REQUEST TO ALL There is potential of a halal meat shop opening in close proximity of Singh Sabha Gurdwara Sahib Somerset Road Handsworth Wood. The landlord has been made aware of the offence meat sale at the premises will cause to the Sikh Community which indeed will result in an outright objection by Sikhs across UK who fundamentally condemn this. While he understands this as an issue, he as a businessman has indicated the loss he is making with a vacant property. It is a MIXED USE commercial property with self-contained accommodation above. The property already has a constant rental income for the accommodation. There are 2 urgent options proposed to the Sikh Community: Purchase of the property (Currently on market for £149,995, offers are invited) Letting the property on a long-term lease As the Gurdwara are not currently in a position to undertake either of the above options, *we* *are calling upon anyone that may be interested in pursuing the request* Specifications of the property with both options can be made available upon request. The property is located on Somerset Road, Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, B20 2JG. For further information or to express an interest please contact Mandeep Singh, Committee Member of Singh Sabha Gurdwara, Handsworth Wood on 07584374686 or email any inquiries to singhsabhagurdw
      ara@live.com. We urge all members of the sangat to spread this advertisement as much as possible. Thank you- Singh Sabha Gurdwara, Somerset Road.
    • Now that article 50 has been invoked and the UK is set to leave the EU club. What are the ramification for British Sikhs and Sikhs in the EU? What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats once the UK regains its sovereign parliamentary powers.
    • I think you mean Bradford. However, legal action is never a gimmie. It is, moreover, costly. If the halal meat seller does buy the property, there would need to be a planning application to the local council for change of use because the shop is currently a beauty salon. As a neighbour, the Gurdwara would have the right to oppose any application, therefore, the first recourse would be to the local council. However, the anticipated success or failure of this approach depends very much on council policy. I am no expert on this specific area. What I do know is that pak muslims have majority influence in Birmingham just through sheer volume of presence through population. Given many of the councillors, and even the MPs, are muslim, I fear that a challenge to a planning application would simply be brushed aside.   Let's not be coy about this. It will be the latter.