Jump to content

Why Nanaksar Ragiis Are Celibate


Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2

Only benders say that. Are you a bender? You got Grindr installed on your phone?

I'm pulling your leg, bro, I know your tastes lie strictly in the hetero sphere... I've checked your internet history. I'm kidding!

The spoiler was just strange. Also what's a bender? (Is that some regional slang?)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brother Singhbj Ji,

interesting observations made by you above.

But if anyone trespasses the law, the law is not at fault.

So if Gurmat says, having intimate with your spouse, and the majority, as you say, do not follow it, it is people´s fault. The trespassers will be fined for it.

These trespassers know not Gurmat, nor anything about Naam or Shabad, so naturally they are prey to "kaam vaasna",poor fellows....... so how come will they ever not do these mistakes.

And the worst part is, they do not even know, kaam is a vikar.

For them( vishtaa ke kirey ) kaam, is a hobby....

Then forget these people, but brother Singh jee, even in our khalsa panth, if we do not follow Gurmat implicitly, we can also probably be victims of kaam, and as well as other vikars.

Just as if we are driving the car, and there is red signal, if we do not stop until it is green, it is just normal, that we will be fined by the police/law, or incurr in an accident which can have fatalistc results for us.

Gurmat is perfect by itself. It is we who are weak in faith, and will power to follow morality and righteousness, and then foolishly give excuses.

I also mentioned our Guru Sahibans as an example or role model for us, as they themselves were girashtees.

And moreover Singh paa jee, as you say, most of the world beleives in: yeh jag meetha, agla kin deetha.

Gurmat is only for those, who want intensely desire Wahiguru, and thus do the needful, to achieve this their objective of being born as humans.

Sat Sree Akal.

I'm just saying Nobody's Perfect, whether grehasti or celibate.

Kudos to grehasti's who are Dharmi n celibates who are Bairaagi (free from attachment).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just saying Nobody's Perfect, whether grehasti or celibate.

Kudos to grehasti's who are Dharmi n celibates who are Bairaagi (free from attachment).

Very well said.

And if that is the case, we ourselves are our own blockers for not trying to be so, in any case perfection for both of these two parties can only be had by keeping as goal and merging in Him, the only Perfect One, which is none other than Wahiguru Akal Purukh.

Only full devoted bhakti, is the needful requirement.

Waheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the term is actually "Gender Bender" and the person is also referred to as "Bent"

If someone understands that "Kaam" is NOT "sex" and that "sex" is NOT "kaam".....then I may continue to have some fruitful discussion on this misunderstood topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This very forum had a lengthy discussion 10+ years ago regarding a Nanaksar giani (can't recall the precise status he held in the Nanaksar establishment) and paedophilia activity with a child in Edmonton/Calgary.

There are very obvious clear reasons why the guru's advocated family life for Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been, throughout history, many intellectual and philosophical discussions within Sikhi. This is natural as man needs to find peace as to why he is here. But.......this is the first time in Sikh history....and the history of Sikh intellectual discussion worldwide.....that a thread espousing Ghandiesque celibacy has reached 14 pages.

Gandhi, if you'll remember, was a great supporter of celibacy, and so used to sleep naked with his young neices in order to show how "devoted to God he was" and how his celibacy "could not, in the slightest, tempt him".

In this day and age, when men with such thoughts will undoubetdly be placed on the sex offenders register as definitive perverts its hard to understand why anyone still, on page 14 of a thread that never needed to be born in the first place, is still arguing the Ghandiesque point of view.

For those of you new to the world, perhaps only just come out of your mother's womb, Ghandi was a man who, to the whole world, kinda represents Hinduism. But leaving that aside lets go back to the Indian ascetic train of thought about celibacy.

Our Gurus have told you time and time and time and time and time and time again that it is your duty as a Sikh to marry, have kids, work hard (not claim social security...not commit mortgage/insurance fraud (i.e social security) and live the life of an honest hardworking householder. So what exactly is it that makes so many 'Sikhs' on this thread ignore the obvious and embrace the hindu ascetic Gandhiesque philosophy ? :wow:

I don't know but...as I said before on a previous page...assuming these Gandiesque lovers are right (and of course we should all do whats right) I'll be celibate...you'll be celibate....uncle Joginder will be celibate....cousin Manpreet will be celibate....auntie kalwainder will be celibate......cousin Simran will no longer exist because uncle Joginder was celibate......cousin Jaspreet will be celibate........nephew Arun will be celibate....neice Prabhjyot will be celibate and then...............BANG :wow: There's no one left. No Sikh is getting married and so no Sikh is having babies anymore and so the Sikh population of the world = Zero. :surrender:

Welcome, my friends, to the world (thread) of the people that have more time than sense and take a non-brainer issue like this to 14 pages.

If he was such a celibate he should have experimented with his gharwali instead of ruining innocent lives , most girls were shunned by their families and many ended up with mental problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use