Jump to content

Recommended Posts

An article exploring the true genesis of the Sikh Warrior-Saint ideal. To quote the hypothesis:

'A creature of classic Indic thought, it was hard for Tagore to comprehend that in Nanakian philosophy spiritual freedom naturally leads to political liberty. The Guru criticized the Siddhs, of Tantric Buddhism, for acquiring some spiritual gains but not utilizing them for the betterment of society at large. (6) It is evident, however, that even centuries after the Guru’s edicts were in circulation the odium attached to force and politics were still in power and men like Tagore were their blind prey. What was Guru Nanak Dev Ji’s perspective on force and it’s utilization? In order to truly understand this query, and subsequently manifest an answer, we will approach it from several various directions.'

To read more, visit:

https://tisarpanthdotcom.wordpress.com/2016/02/09/the-warrior-who-was-nanak/

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

I believe that Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a Siphai; however, how does this post prove it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a Siphai; however, how does this post prove it?

Guru ji's marag and jeevan prove it ...even if the article does not satisfy you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

Guru ji's marag and jeevan prove it ...even if the article does not satisfy you

I already believe he was a Siphai; all I said was this article doesn't prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I already believe he was a Siphai; all I said was this article doesn't prove it.

I read the article and I don't believe it intends to use warrior in the literal sense of the word, but the metaphorical.

Still, it is very probable that Guru Nanak Dev must have had knowledge of shastar vidya. Considering the great extent of his Udaasis, and the profusion of bandits and dangerous animals in the medieval world, Guru Sahib must have been capable of defending themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

I read the article and I don't believe it intends to use warrior in the literal sense of the word, but the metaphorical. Still, it is very probable that Guru Nanak Dev must have had knowledge of shastar vidya. Considering the great extent of his Udaasis, and the profusion of bandits and dangerous animals in the medieval world, Guru Sahib must have been capable of defending themselves.

I think we can know that because Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji was the one who taught Baba Buddha Ji how to use Shastar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the article and I don't believe it intends to use warrior in the literal sense of the word, but the metaphorical.

Still, it is very probable that Guru Nanak Dev must have had knowledge of shastar vidya. Considering the great extent of his Udaasis, and the profusion of bandits and dangerous animals in the medieval world, Guru Sahib must have been capable of defending themselves.

The premises is established in the article itself:

'The image of Akali Guru Nanak Dev Ji was one such (Sikh) fundamental which underwent a radical variation. Gone was the patriarchal figure of a silent, sublime socio-political spiritualist. In it’s stead was born an itinerant, pacifist and reclusive Guru. Doubtless, a dichotomy was soon born between what was perceived as being the Guru’s version of Sikhi, and that of his successors.'

'What was Guru Nanak Dev Ji’s perspective on force and it’s utilization? In order to truly understand this query, and subsequently manifest an answer, we will approach it from several various directions.'

I already believe he was a Siphai; all I said was this article doesn't prove it.

The article argues from an ideological perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, from one point of view, there is only Parmatma. From Rehras: ਤੂੰ ਆਪੇ ਦਾਤਾ ਆਪੇ ਭੁਗਤਾ ਜੀ ਹਉ ਤੁਧੁ ਬਿਨੁ ਅਵਰੁ ਨ ਜਾਣਾ ॥ You Yourself are the Giver, and You Yourself are the Enjoyer. I know no other than You. ਸੋਪੁਰਖੁ ਆਸਾ (ਮਃ ੪) (੧) ੨:੩ - ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੧੧ ਪੰ. ੨ 
      Raag Asa Guru Ram Das   Bhai Gurdas ji elucidates this viewpoint: ਆਪੇ ਭੁਖਾ ਹੋਇਕੈ ਆਪਿ ਜਾਇ ਰਸੋਈ। He (the Lord) Himself posing to be hungry goes into the kitchen and cooks the food kneading in it all sorts of delights. ਭੋਜਨ ਆਪਿ ਬਣਾਇਦਾ ਰਸ ਵਿਚਿ ਰਸ ਗੋਈ। Himself eating and getting satiated He showers praises on the dainty dishes. ਆਪੇ ਖਾਇ ਸਲਾਹਿਕੈ ਹੋਇ ਤ੍ਰਿਪਤਿ ਸਮੋਈ। He Himself is the delight as well as the delighted. ਆਪੇ ਰਸੀਆ, ਆਪਿ ਰਸ, ਰਸੁ ਰਸਨਾ ਭੋਈ। He is the juice as well as the tongue which relishes its taste. ਦਾਤਾ ਭੁਗਤਾ ਆਪਿ ਹੈ, ਸਰਬੰਗ ਸਮੋਈ। He permeating through all, Himself is the giver as well as receiver. ਆਪੇ ਆਪਿ ਵਰਤਦਾ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਸੁਖੁ ਹੋਈ ॥੩॥ Knowing the fact that He permeates among all, the Gurmukh feels immense pleasure. ਵਾਰਾਂ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰਦਾਸ : ਵਾਰ ੨ ਪਉੜੀ ੩ ਪੰ. ੬
    • Could you now pose the questions I posed to your Christian "friend" and tell us what his answers are? Also a few more: Is it possible for Jehovah to cease existing? If Jesus is God, then why did Jesus call out to God the Father asking why He had forsaken him? Does that mean God can fall into low spirits (dhendi kala)? If so, is He really God? If He's depressed, how can he help us out of our depressions? Or is He really all-powerful? If it's possible for him to not be perfect, is it possible that what Jesus taught can be said to be imperfect? If so, cannot his words in the Bible said to be imperfect? And if Jesus was imperfect, then his disciples become imperfect by extension, correct? And if his disciples were imperfect, then what they wrote in the Bible is imperfect, too, by extension, correct? If Jesus is God, then why was Jesus tempted in the desert when Satan tempted him? Is God tempted by Maya? If so, is Maya more powerful than Jesus (or Jehovah)?
       
    • Thank you.  I don't often eat them myself, but I was curious.  I appreciate the feedback.
    • It must be leaving everything which carries a higher life form In  it - as an egg is the food of a chick. There are some papers or maybe rehet in punjabi which mentions not eating eggs.  Most of my elders did eat though. I think it is recently it got practised more and you can see why. Eggs contain harmful bacteria these days. You might fall behind in your simran by falling ill. Just my speculation. 
    • A poster in another thread mentioned eggs being off limit.  So I tried researching dietary teachings of Sikhi.  I ran straight into a wall of conflicting information. Some eating meat as long as its not kosher or halal, others eating jhatka meat only.  Still nothing on eggs.  I respect everyone's personal choice, but where do the eggs come in?  
×