Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
BSingh87

Maharaja Ranjit Singh

Recommended Posts

Why did Maharaja ranjit singh attack his own people (sikhs) who were known as 'misls' and conquer their lands? Also, what was Ranjit Singh's fascination over a stupid diamond, Koh-i-Noor diamond?

Edited by BSingh87

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

Why did Maharaja ranjit singh attack his own people (sikhs) who were known as 'misls' and conquer their lands? Also, what was Ranjit Singh's fascination over a stupid diamond, Koh-i-Noor diamond?

The Misls were already fighting among themselves ever since Banda Singh Bahadur became Shaheed, they reunited under Baba Deep Singh Ji to fight Abdali for attacking Harimandir Sahib, (they were only United by the Sikh faith, otherwise would go on to fighting each other). Ranjit Singh isn't some Sant who isn't attached to Maya, the diamond is just part of his moh and lobh. " ausqiq inMidAw nwih ijih kMcn loh smwin ] (1427-5)

ustat nindi-aa naahi jihi kanchan loh samaan.

One who is beyond praise and slander, who looks upon gold and iron alike

khu nwnk suin ry mnw mukiq qwih qY jwin ]14] (1427-5)

kaho naanak sun ray manaa mukat taahi tai jaan. ||14||

- says Nanak, listen, mind: know that such a person is liberated. ||14||" (Ang 1427 Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji). Not a fair way of judging him, (do you have any moh or lobh?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Misls were already fighting among themselves ever since Banda Singh Bahadur became Shaheed, they reunited under Baba Deep Singh Ji to fight Abdali for attacking Harimandir Sahib, (they were only United by the Sikh faith, otherwise would go on to fighting each other). Ranjit Singh isn't some Sant who isn't attached to Maya, the diamond is just part of his moh and lobh. " ausqiq inMidAw nwih ijih kMcn loh smwin ] (1427-5)

ustat nindi-aa naahi jihi kanchan loh samaan.

One who is beyond praise and slander, who looks upon gold and iron alike

khu nwnk suin ry mnw mukiq qwih qY jwin ]14] (1427-5)

kaho naanak sun ray manaa mukat taahi tai jaan. ||14||

- says Nanak, listen, mind: know that such a person is liberated. ||14||" (Ang 1427 Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji). Not a fair way of judging him, (do you have any moh or lobh?)

There is nothing wrong in judging someone's fault. It is stupid to be blind just because he was a Sikh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did Maharaja ranjit singh attack his own people (sikhs) who were known as 'misls' and conquer their lands?

Because although Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a great man, he was not a great Sikh. His vain desire to establish himself as the emperor of all Sikhs blinded him to the republican spirit inherent in Sikhi.

This period in history was at once the Golden Age for the Sikh people and their lowest point, the moment in time when they were most detached from the values of their faith. The recently formed Sikh nobility was, towards the end of the misl period and throughout the Empire's brief existence, a degenerate body of individuals who placed their power and their legacies above all else - including Sikhi and Panthic Ekta (which is why competing Misls had few qualms about internecine war). Wearing the Sikh Saroop they partook of alcohol, kept harems and courtesans, and endlessly embroiled themselves in intrigue against one another. Maharaja Ranjit Singh did all of these things - he was typical of his social class.

Edited by Balkaar
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

There is nothing wrong in judging someone's fault. It is stupid to be blind just because he was a Sikh.

I'd rather not judge others, especially since I'm not a righteous human being myself, (I'm not turning a blind eye, just saying I'm not the judge).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the reply. As long as you’re happy, that’s what counts. 
    • Well, we live in a society where marriage is not valued, only for looking on the wedding day. We live in a society where we no longer fix things, we just throw away things once they lose their usefulness.  The human gene pool shows that at least 80 percent of men historically never had children, where at least 80 percent of women did.  What this means before the advent of marriage, one man would have many women to have children with. This is what happens in the animal kingdom, where the alpha male will have his share of the females.  The reality is (I might sound sexist, but it is largely true). Women have sexually selected men for resources and genetic material ). What has happened is that women no longer value marriage with men because they do not require resources so for a lot of them all that is left is the Alpha stud. The vast majority of men are not alpha studs, it is a very tiny percentage. Women will always go for a man that is the highest value, even if she herself are not of the same value. Society seems to be regressing back to the pre-marital age  (like back to hunter gather type society). It is very dangerous because potentially there maybe a lot of unmarried men in society. From a Sikhi point of view, we are supposed to live a ghristi Jeevan life and the regression of society means it is going to be increasing difficult. 
    • Waheguru ji di kirpa naal All's Well  I tend to go jithe lorh hoveh or qadar hoveh. Have become active on Sikh Philosophy Network, Sikhnet Discussion & What's App 😊
    • Well, I'm not jatt and I'll say this much.  After the Vienna murder in 2009, the Ravidassia community protested in London with placards demanding the removal of kirpans from Sikhs. A year or so later, a branch of the Ravidassia community advocated to separate Bhagat Ravidass Ji's bani from the Guru Granth Sahib Ji and to establish a separate granth to be installed in Ravidass Sabha's. These would still loosely be referred to a gurdwarae.... The census was in 2011. Make of that what you want.    On a different note, Afghan Sikhs do indeed marry first cousins. That's not to say, every single Afghan Sikh will marry his/her cousin, but, the behaviour is indeed prevalent in that community.
    • Fikar taan BT nu huna chahidha, teemee dhi kadh je choti vi hoi, shittar taan une hi milne.
×