Jump to content

Flu Vaccine


gsingh12345
 Share

Recommended Posts

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh,

The nasal spray version (for kids) contains porcine gelatine.

I am led to believe that the adult version contains egg (there are 2 versions one has less egg protein) can you confirm this is the case if you work in this field?

Not sure if this will help you.

http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/vaccinations/Pages/Which-children-are-eligible-for-the-flu-vaccine.aspx

http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/pages/who-shouldnt-have-flu-vaccine.aspx

It is best to ask the Gp directly yourselves, who will provide the information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 11/10/2015 at 10:42 PM, simran345 said:

 

It is best to ask the Gp directly yourselves, who will provide the information.

No need to ask GP - in any case the Nurse working in the Medical Centre usually administers.

See official government guidance:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/663694/Greenbook_chapter_19_Influenza_.pdf

"Most of the vaccines are prepared from viruses grown in embryonated hens' eggs."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Premi5 said:

No need to ask GP - in any case the Nurse working in the Medical Centre usually administers.

See official government guidance:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/663694/Greenbook_chapter_19_Influenza_.pdf

"Most of the vaccines are prepared from viruses grown in embryonated hens' eggs."

Thank you for that information Premi ji. That’s what I meant, the Gp, meaning the doctors, medical centre, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

do people hate themselves so much that they are willing to inject aluminium into their bloodtream so it definitely accumulates in their brains and all for a guaranteed efficacy rate of just 13% , year on year?

If the NHS is saying it is best for those who 'should' have it, then I guess so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

ok so a jab which has more than 87% ineffective action  is going to help those people more than a strong immune system through good nutrition and personal hygiene

What I meant is we are just following 'modern science/medicines' advice. 

What are your source(s) about aluminium and 87% ineffective? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

What I meant is we are just following 'modern science/medicines' advice. 

What are your source(s) about aluminium and 87% ineffective? 

the CDC and vaccine manufacturers track efficacy figures on yearly basis  so it is their figures

we know that each year they make new vaccines against a few strains which are predicted to be prominent but most of the time there are hundreds of strains about as the mutation rate is rapid  (I guess a bit too fast for mass vaccination production to truly cover)  thus low hit rate.

Aluminium adjuvants are added to irritate the immune system however aluminium is neuro toxic , you can check the full insert for the vaccine before taking it to be fully informed to ingredients and side-effects

The nasal vaccine is more problematic because the short distance it has to travel to cross the blood brain barrier

http://katlynfoxfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2013-Shaw-CA-LT-Imm-Res-CNS-Toxicity-of-alum-adjuvants-and-autoimmunity-Immunological-Research.pdf

https://www.wddty.com/magazine/2016/december/led-by-the-nose-new-dangers-of-the-flu-vaccine.html

https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/vaccinations/adjuvants-in-vaccines/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

All vaccines are dangerous and cause diseases including cancer, infertility, auto-immune diseases etc. They contain toxic ingredients inc: alum, formaldehyde, mercury, nanoparticles, aborted foetal cells, monkey kidney cells etc. 

There is no 'evidence' base behind it (for all you sheep that blindly follow 'evidence based medicine' without understanding its true intent/purpose).

WHO/UN/gov/drug companies are all involved in making these policies and brainwashing people into destroying their health. If you are unaware then I suggest you stop believing and starting researching and using your own brains. 

If you have a problem with these facts then please do not take it out on me. I'm only trying to help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use