Jump to content

Election Outcome


Recommended Posts

Khalsa like party?! Lol how did u conclude that?

I just cant take miliband seriously. The guy looks like monkey and acts like one too. Thankfully hes resigning. But he never was a worthy competitor.

Tory are good for businesses, 1 in 3 sikh families own a business.

The Tory have cut benefits and are to cut them even further which frankly shouldve happened a long time ago. Labour encouraged reliance on the welfare system. Labour just messed up the whole system. Sikhs are the least reliant on the welfare system. Since blair, I've not supported them. Frankly they have very little to offer me. And apart from the above, tory have little to offer either. Liblabcon - theyre all pretty much the same with minor differences.

I voted green because out of all parties they seem to be the most 'common man-ish' party, although we all knew they wouldnt win the election. Their support is growing. Unfortunatly a lot of people dont seem to take them seriously enough :/ but yeah i thought they were the only ones worthy of a vote. If i was scottish, i would most definitely have voted snp. Im all for scottish independance. Too long have they suffered at the hands of the english.

For me, ideally the green party wouldve won. But that was never going to happen. So im glad tory won. I voted tory in the last election. I have little regret.

The question is, why would anyone vote UKIP?! Farage has put in his resignation. Praise the lord!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour are responsible for islamfication and getthoization of the UK that's why alot of people don't vote for them.

The uk isnt "islamified" at all. Islamaphobic much? lol

Evidently, a lot of people do and have voted for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalsa like party?! Lol how did u conclude that?

I just cant take miliband seriously. The guy looks like monkey and acts like one too. Thankfully hes resigning. But he never was a worthy competitor.

Tory are good for businesses, 1 in 3 sikh families own a business.

The Tory have cut benefits and are to cut them even further which frankly shouldve happened a long time ago. Labour encouraged reliance on the welfare system. Labour just messed up the whole system. Sikhs are the least reliant on the welfare system. Since blair, I've not supported them. Frankly they have very little to offer me. And apart from the above, tory have little to offer either. Liblabcon - theyre all pretty much the same with minor differences.

I voted green because out of all parties they seem to be the most 'common man-ish' party, although we all knew they wouldnt win the election. Their support is growing. Unfortunatly a lot of people dont seem to take them seriously enough :/ but yeah i thought they were the only ones worthy of a vote. If i was scottish, i would most definitely have voted snp. Im all for scottish independance. Too long have they suffered at the hands of the english.

For me, ideally the green party wouldve won. But that was never going to happen. So im glad tory won. I voted tory in the last election. I have little regret.

The question is, why would anyone vote UKIP?! Farage has put in his resignation. Praise the lord!!

i say its the most khalsa like aprty because it helps the ordianry people and the working class. the khalsa is the hope for the poor and the voice of the oppressors as ravi singh would put it. green parties aims are too idealistic, we need to start with small change like labour. Conservatives are just a puppet to huge corperations and only benifit the rich by taking money from the poor. we should be for a government that makes rich people pay more tax but instead we have a government protects the rich, atleast laboht would have put some pressure on tax evading companies unlike conservatives will. conservatives aim to make the rich richer, that does not seem like a sikh sentiment to me me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i say its the most khalsa like aprty because it helps the ordianry people and the working class. the khalsa is the hope for the poor and the voice of the oppressors as ravi singh would put it. green parties aims are too idealistic, we need to start with small change like labour. Conservatives are just a puppet to huge corperations and only benifit the rich by taking money from the poor. we should be for a government that makes rich people pay more tax but instead we have a government protects the rich, atleast laboht would have put some pressure on tax evading companies unlike conservatives will. conservatives aim to make the rich richer, that does not seem like a sikh sentiment to me me.

I think youre being rather naive with your opinion of labour...

Labour already had its chance and frankly didnt do a very good job. It wouldnt be a change. Liblabcon are all the same. Labour today is very different to labour back in the day. The huge corperations are always the winners. They fund the economy and these parties. Liblabcon only favour the rich. The only party that stands up for the common man is the party which youve described as being over idealistic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour bankrupted this great country, covered up for muslim paedo gangs, esp jack straw who was approached 15yrs back by the S.A.S, yet were told to get lost. They put r country into a fake fraudulent war in iraq, n spunked all r money, made us pay for bankers who stole all r money n have allowed for muslims to open their own shariah courts etc. Yea man propa khalsa like... Labour is no longer the old labour party, which would appeal to us workin class ppl. All the parties r crap truth be told. Nick clegg is easily the most articulate n nicest party leader ive seen in ages, shame his party is rubbish. I also like nicola sturgeon, n i too hope the jocks have anotha referendum n vote to leave the uk. It just shows u, how the referendum of 2014 was BLATANTLY rigged by westminister, coz only 45% supposedly voted yes to independance...yet 6 or so months later, the same nation has now voted unanimously for SNP (56 seats!). As jagsaw has mentioned on prior posts, ed milibandar, didnt even want journos takin pics of his visit to a gurdwara, as if we would embarass him infront of the nation.......well scumbag u embarassed urself infront of the nation with a hammering n then u resigned....."sikha naal panga isnt very changa".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour deserted the ordinary man and the working classes a very long time ago, possibly around the time they realised they were never going to win an election if they didn't drift towards the centre for starters. Blair and his pals took things further than the centre; it's joked that Blair was the best Tory Prime Minister the Conservatives never had.

To hear today a few influential Labour politicians remarking that Labour should return to the type of policies that gave them success under Blair is an indictment of what this current Labour lot are all about. Instead of saying, "Let's listen to the people, to what they ask of us, and let's make policies that will benefit the ordinary man who desperately wants his voice to be heard at a time when he feels he's being ignored," they talk of only winning elections, i.e. they'll do or say or promise anything to get elected.

I don't like how the middle-class, liberal elite have infiltrated Labour. They genuinely have no concern or empathy for scores of normal, working class people who aren't Right-leaning yet aren't madly on the extreme Left either. Ah well, it's all one big stitch-up anyway, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use