Jump to content

Huge Violation Of Sikh Maryada By Akali & Congress Leaders: Chandumarja And Others Impose Tilak On Guru Granth Sahib


Recommended Posts

AMRITSAR SAHIB (May 5, 2015)—A video showing violation of Sikh Rehat Maryada by Akali leaders has gone viral on social media sites. This video is from year 2008 from the village Rodewal of Distt. Patiala. The video shows various politicians imposing Tilak on Sri Guru Granth Sahib on the occasion of 300th Gurtagaddi Diwas at Gurdwara Baba Biram Dass.

General Secretary of Akali Dal (Badal) and Member Parliament from Sri Anandpur Sahib, Prem S. Chandumajra, Akali leader Surjit Singh Rakhra, former Central Minister Praneet Kaur, Cabinet Minister Parminder Singh Dhindsa could be seen performing this ritual. In addition, Panj Pyare are seen placing ‘Naarials’ (coconuts) in front of Guru Granth Sahib. It is notable that politicians also write something on Guru Granth Sahib Ji, however it’s not very clear from the video exactly what is being written.

Sikh24 earlier contacted Chandumajra to get clarification about the incident, he however denied his participation alleging that he doesn’t know whether this was in accordance of Sikh Maryada or not.

Jathedar of Sri Akal Takht Sahib Giani Gurbachan Singh has strongly condemned this shameful act of Akali leaders and stated that if the concerned leaders are found guilty of committing sacrilege, they will be summoned to Sri Akal Takht Sahib

Source : Sikh24.Com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Baba sitting at the tabia of Guru Ji is not Rama Nand. He was a local from Balwant Singh's Dera. The guy looked like Rama Nand. I heard Rama Nand before at my friend's house and this "chour" sewa guy doesn't sound like Rama Nand. And Rama Nand Dera people had no association with Bawant Singh Dera because Rama Nand was chamar and Balwant Singh was jatt. Moreoevr this guy at chour is very dark, Rama Nand was relatively gora. Rama Nand didn't believe in this tilak shilak of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. He was a nice bloke but our idiots killed him.

I know it because one of my relatives went to that Dera too. This video is few years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear SinghSabha1969

wjkk wjkf

What you have written is interesting but I am afraid it is totally wrong. While I am not in love with any dera but those idiots who murdered this Baba were our own Singhs and they have their families living in India who are all in Sikhi saroop. So I don't know where you got this intelligence report of yours from :-)

Sorry to take wind out of your claims. And I heard this Baba too in a program. I didn't see anything wrong in it or any beadbi in it.E Else Singhs would have objected. I think it was about 10 years ago...and he was singing a shabad related to life of Guru Gobind Singh Sahib. The problem is that ravidass people are not Sikhs and they can never be Sikhs because they call Baba Ravidass as Guru. We are not going to allow any further Gurus in Sikhi because Guru Gobind Singh ji has clearly stated who is Guru now. I am glad these Ravidass followers are out of Sikhi and they have their own religion now and follow their own book. Less trouble and violence and they are not the sort of people we want to mess with. They are all over India.

good riddance from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1699 Ji

wjkk wjkf

Wow, you are really passionate about it...

All this talk of RSS, Nehru, Hindutva etc. etc. I don't know what are you trying to prove bro? I don't care who does what. People are not blind. They see what happened and culprits in Austria Jail are Singhs. Read the news because sometime agao they complained about Austrian Police disrespecetd gutkas. They are all Amritdhari Singhs. It is a simple case of our <banned word filter activated> Singhs killing a dera Baba for no reason.

And that guy Rama Nand was not a Singh. He was some Dass I think. Check with your Ballan contacts please.

And who cares whether these people who consider Ravidass as guru remain in Sikhi or not. I wish they get out and make their own gurus. They should leave Sikhi because we can't keep on enlisting more and more Gurus. Either we follow Guru Gobind Singh Sahib or we don't. I respect Ravidass Ji too but it doesn't mean we have to make him Guru. Tomorrow Naamdharis would say their Guru is a Sikh guru (they actually already claim that). Nirankaris say that. I don't know what are you talking about 1699. I never said I don't respect Bhagat Ji. And you address Bahagat Ji as Dhan Dhan Baba Ravidass Ji. Why not Bhagat Ravidass Ji as that's how our Gurus addressed him.

We have to go by Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. We can't accommodate every caste group who wants to have their own Guru. Please don't dilute the Sikhi. Anyway good riddance of Ravidasis and now they have their own religion and book. What else can we SIkhs say. They want their "Guru" Ravidass, they get "Guru" Ravidass but never in Sikhi. Good for them. Good luck and wish peace to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brother 1699

wjkk wjkf

I like your passion.

But you have to realize that we Sikhs are not Raviadssias. Ravidass is NOT our Guru. He is not equal to be Guru. He doesn't deserve to be Guru. Else Guru Nanak Dev Sahib would have addressed him as such in SGGS. Please, I am not against Bhagat Ji or anything but respectfull, we must limit Gurus to 10 and SGGS. If leatherworkers want to come to Sikhi, they must accept only 10 Gurus and SGGS. It is not being fussy, it is just protecting our interests.

According to you, we should assimilate all chamars/leatherworkers and allow them to call Ravidass as Guru then let's bring Naamdharis into Sikhi too and call Balak Nath as 11th Guru (this is what they believe), or get Nirankaris into Sikhi fold too and call thier Hardev Singh as Guru or get Radhaswamis and their head Gurinder Singh Dhillon as Sikh guru and mess up everything.

I have no love for Rama Nand or any Dera or Dera Ballan. Who gives damn whether they are apartheid followers or not. They are raising Ravidass's profile, that's all they do. Good for them. If they are RSS agents, who cares? Not our business. And when I saw Rama Nand many years ago, he didn't look like a Amritdhari from any angle. He had no karra, had no kirpan, regularly called Ravidass as Guru. Which Amritdhari Singh addersses Raviadss as Guru. When you partake Amrit, you limit your reverance to 10 Gurus and Guru Granth Sahib.

If leatherworkers leave Sikhi, it doesn't matter. Who cares? They want to make a non Sikh their Guru, they can do it. Nobody stops them. Power to them but why should we dilute the Sikhi to accommodate them. Sikhs are not Raviadssias. If Sikhs are Ravidassias then Sikh can be Radhaswamis too, Sikhs can be Noormahlias too, SIkhs can be Kabirpanthis too. Where does it stop brother?

I understand that you want to enhance population of Sikhi by bringing in all these groups who want to make their own Gurus and increase our population. This is not how Religion survives. People who come into Sikhi should leave their past behind. They get a new lease of life when they come into Sikhi. They should leave their other Gurus like Ravidass, Kabir behind as "Gurus".

Guru Nanak Sahib did kirpa on these Bhagats, it doesn't mean that we should make them new Gurus in the Sikhism now just because some leatherworkers want to do that. All the power to leatherworkers in their new religion. I actually admire that they had guts to make their own religion and chose their path and respect them for that. They have been tortured through centuries by everybody. They have their own book. I say again, good riddance from them else there would have been another cause of disturbance in our beautiful religion headed by 10 Gurus and SGGS. This is because some would oppose them and they won't stop and there would be disturbance. WY go the path where we know there is cause of strife?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use