Linguist Concludes: Islam Is The Most Violent Religion.

[eduardo]

After three years of research in texts of 10 biggest religions linguist concludes: Islam is the most violent religion.

JANUARY 12, 2015 , BY NICOLAI SENNELS

What makes this research project special is that it is not done by somebody working inside the field of religion, but by a linguist. Magaard’s conclusion that “If it is true that many Muslims view the Qur’an as God’s own words that can not be interpreted or rephrased, we have a problem.” is spot on. And unfortunately the answer is yes, it is true: 75 percent of Muslims in Europe think that the Quran can not be interpreted.

Translated from JP:

“For three years a Danish linguist has analyzed the basic texts of 10 religions. She concludes that the texts of Islam stand out by encouraging terrorism and violence more than other religions. …

On the fourth anniversary of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, the Danish linguist Tina Magaard presented an analysis that questions the relationship between Islam and terrorism, violence and holy war.

Islam’s religious texts call upon its followers to commit terror and to fight to a much higher degree than any other religion, concludes Tina Magaard, who graduated from the Sorbonne in Paris as a Ph.D. in Textual Analysis and Intercultural Communication after a three-year research project that compared the basic texts of 10 religions.

‘The texts in Islam are clearly distinct from the other religious texts as they to a much higher degree call for violence and aggression against followers of other faiths. There are also direct incitements to terror. This has long been a taboo in research in Islam, but it is a fact we have to acknowledge,’ says Tina Magaard.

Furthermore, the Quran contains hundreds of calls to fight against followers of other faiths.

‘If it is true that many Muslims view the Quran as God’s own words that can not be interpreted or rephrased, we have a problem.'”

http://10news.dk/?p=855

http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=28037.msg818645;topicseen#new

[Guest Jacfsing2]

I thought everyone already knew that? It's not something they had to declare. (Maybe I'll be famous for saying the truth lol).

[Koi]

I would like to see this so called research

[eduardo]

I would like to see this so called research

Try the second link in my post.

[JagsawSingh]

Try the second link in my post.

Listen, basically you're saying "bloke down pub told me a bloke in Denmark done some research"

You then provide 2 links....neither of which actually takes us to the actual research.

The first link just takes us to a blog in which someone, just like you, is saying that a bloke in Denmark did some research. But no link to the actual research.

Your second link takes us full circle back to where we started from because the link takes us to a discussion forum where someone, just like you, posts a thread in which he says some bloke in Denmark done some research.

Is this one of the modern day's great mysteries ? The Case of the Missing Research ? All we know so far is that the bloke who allegedly done it is a Dane and he likes a bit of linguistics. What we don't know is if he a professor qualified in research or a warehouse forklift driver who did some research while sitting on the toilet.

[S4NGH]

Listen, basically you're saying "bloke down pub told me a bloke in Denmark done some research"

You then provide 2 links....neither of which actually takes us to the actual research.

The first link just takes us to a blog in which someone, just like you, is saying that a bloke in Denmark did some research. But no link to the actual research.

Your second link takes us full circle back to where we started from because the link takes us to a discussion forum where someone, just like you, posts a thread in which he says some bloke in Denmark done some research.

Is this one of the modern day's great mysteries ? The Case of the Missing Research ? All we know so far is that the bloke who allegedly done it is a Dane and he likes a bit of linguistics. What we don't know is if he a professor qualified in research or a warehouse forklift driver who did some research while sitting on the toilet.

I rarely agree with or find ur posts amusing but this lol this made me smile

[Koi]

So, someone in Denmark doesn't like Muslims. ... hands up if that came as a complete shock to you..

[eduardo]

Your second link takes us full circle back to where we started from because the link takes us to a discussion forum where someone, just like you, posts a thread in which he says some bloke in Denmark done some research.

The second link is not posted by a bloke like me, the site is the council of ex muslims, in fact judging by the name the poster may well be a female apostate and not a bloke at all.

Nearly everyone on that site was a Muslim and is now an apostate.

They were once enveloped in the religion and have now risked life and limb by leaving.

They risk violence and complete disownment from their families for making this decision, in the UK in 2015 for God's sake.

As ex muslims they give an insiders view as to what belonging to that religion is really like and it is ex muslims who are discussing the research.

So you can't really say some bloke down the pub can you as they probably don't go down the pub or maybe some do now.

The point I am making is that it is ex muslims who agree with this research.

You should try reading more of that website and some of the threads that are started by ex muslims regarding the religion they have left, it's really quite shocking in places.

But I guess it's only really politically correct to criticise Islam if you were once a muslim yourself.