• advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
TuhadaDaas

Muslim Getting Married In Shepherds Bush Gurdwara This Friday

142 posts in this topic

"Never argue with an <banned word filter activated>. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."

I d i o t is a banned word? Really?!

Indeed you need to take your own advice mate especially if your the "i d i o t" who thinks its fine to let his sikh sister or mother get married to a non-sikh in a gurdwara.

What would Guru ji think or do about such a scenario ever thought about that? Ever thought if he would bless a union of his sikh daughter with a non-sikh guy in his presence? If you think he would you are basically saying Guru Ji wants no sikhs left and doesnt care if your a sikh or not because he would allow marrying out and bless it too which is beyond comprehension for any sane person to believe that.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It begins and ends with the Gurdwara committees. Kick the old, atheistic uncles out (yes even the ones with dastaars and flowing beards, because it's clear by now it's all for show) and you've solved the problem. Don't make the youth enforce maryada and then get them tarred by the extremist / militant brush. Get these old, greedy fools OUT.

Well said. We should have a black list of gurdwara commitee's that allow this disgraceful practise to go on in guru's house. They might aswell hold sex parties and drinking sessions if they want their daughters married off to non-sikhs just like the times of the mughuls. It's deeply shameful and humiliating for any proud Sikh of any gurdwara commitee to allow this to go on if their a Sikh.

However if they an atheistic punjabi then to them it doesnt matter because to them Sikhi is a joke and a money making business. Therefore they are not a Sikh and must not be allowed to be in any Sikh gurdwara committee.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Newsflash: Muslim boy marries Sikh girl in Gurdwara. Meanwhile Sikh boys debate amongst each other on online forum. Debate is not what we need. We need action. I feel demoralised.

I already made it clear, is the girl Amritdhari? If not, I don't care they're not Sikh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed you need to take your own advice mate especially if your the "i d i o t" who thinks its fine to let his sikh sister or mother get married to a non-sikh in a gurdwara.

What would Guru ji think or do about such a scenario ever thought about that? Ever thought if he would bless a union of his sikh daughter with a non-sikh guy in his presence? If you think he would you are basically saying Guru Ji wants no sikhs left and doesnt care if your a sikh or not because he would allow marrying out and bless it too which is beyond comprehension for any sane person to believe that.

Im not your mate. Unfortunately im stuck with you as my brother lol

Hey where have i said that interfaith anand karajs are ok?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am. Now if you'll excuse me if I'm off to officiate over the wedding of two gay Singhs...

Stop being a fool. I have no patience for lily-livered left-wingers and their blinkered views on the world. However, some of you on this site aren't shy of the kind of fascism that rears its ugly head when people's heads are turned the other way. Who are you to decree who is important or not? Who are you to affix value and importance to a human life that doesn't share the same values or experience as you?

If it's not what you said, then next time make your point clearer, because that's exactly how it seemed.

I didn't say the rules:rehat pyari mujhko sikh pyara nahi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say the rules:rehat pyari mujhko sikh pyara nahi

Unfortunately for you, rehat won't be able to paper over the huge chasms in your character and your lack of soul. Unless you believe Dasme Paatshah is short-sighted enough to surround himself with Sikhs who look the part but have blackness where they should have souls. Is that what you're trying to say about Dasme Paatshah? That he's not the King of Kings, but just a normal man who can't tell the difference between a truly rehatvaan Sikh (inside AND out) and a Sikh playing at being pious on account of what's on the surface? Is that what you're saying? Then you really don't think much of Guru Sahib, do you, if you think he can be easily hoodwinked by the likes of you.

Thankfully, he's a lot smarter than that.

Oh, BTW, before a devious Singh like you tries to twist my words I should make it clear that I am PRO-arranged (not forced) marriages AND I'm PRO-Anand Karaj between Sikhs ONLY. I'd go as far to say Anand Karaj should be for Gursikhs only, but I haven't given that line of thought much consideration at the moment. It might certainly be a way of stopping people making a mockery of the whole sacred process. But it also might push good, simple people from our background who aren't Gursikh yet equally aren't the kind who think of Sikhi as a joke into the arms of Christians and Muslims who want converts.

The difference between you and me is that I don't think people are lesser human beings or aren't worthy to be alive because of the choices they make. Anyway, it's too early for this nonsense.

Edited by missedAsingh
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately for you, rehat won't be able to paper over the huge chasms in your character and your lack of soul. Unless you believe Dasme Paatshah is short-sighted enough to surround himself with Sikhs who look the part but have blackness where they should have souls. Is that what you're trying to say about Dasme Paatshah? That he's not the King of Kings, but just a normal man who can't tell the difference between a truly rehatvaan Sikh (inside AND out) and a Sikh playing at being pious on account of what's on the surface? Is that what you're saying? Then you really don't think much of Guru Sahib, do you, if you think he can be easily hoodwinked by the likes of you.

Thankfully, he's a lot smarter than that.

Oh, BTW, before a devious Singh like you tries to twist my words I should make it clear that I am PRO-arranged (not forced) marriages AND I'm PRO-Anand Karaj between Sikhs ONLY. I'd go as far to say Anand Karaj should be for Gursikhs only, but I haven't given that line of thought much consideration at the moment. It might certainly be a way of stopping people making a mockery of the whole sacred process. But it also might push good, simple people from our background who aren't Gursikh yet equally aren't the kind who think of Sikhi as a joke into the arms of Christians and Muslims who want converts.

The difference between you and me is that I don't think people are lesser human beings or aren't worthy to be alive because of the choices they make. Anyway, it's too early for this nonsense.

I never said non-Sikhs were less than Sikhs: Guru Sahib became a shaheed in his 9th form for non-Sikhs rights to practice their faith, I don't know why you take words out of mouth that I never said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never said non-Sikhs were less than Sikhs: Guru Sahib became a shaheed in his 9th form for non-Sikhs rights to practice their faith, I don't know why you take words out of mouth that I never said.

That's fine. Your "not important" line made it seem you were prioritising someone's worth. Don't get me wrong, I get annoyed by the kind of people who do the things you said, but I don't consider them lesser beings or anything like that. Just different to me. Not better or worse or inferior, just different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine. Your "not important" line made it seem you were prioritising someone's worth. Don't get me wrong, I get annoyed by the kind of people who do the things you said, but I don't consider them lesser beings or anything like that. Just different to me. Not better or worse or inferior, just different.

At least you understand what I mean.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2015 at 10:20 AM, Not2Cool2Argue said:

The Mai Bhago version of the story is right. After Guru Ji allowed them to leave, it is no use saying don't talk to them as they are gone. Also they all admitted to not being Sikhs. And don't associate/talk to someone is used as a punishment. But if ur not Sikh, no need to punish. It was the singhnia who rightly punished their men for desertation.and not associating/talking with them might have been the punishment they chose. After the mehne/tahne/insults of course :)

Whaat..? Why cant we communicate with the Chali Mukte ji? Why do we remember them daily in Sri Ardas Sahib ji if we are told not to communicate with them.. This is a serious question!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I've spoken to people about this i put it down to 'house rules'. The anand karaj ceremony is in a par with our baptism , birth, and death 'ceremonies' (forgive me can't think of a better word). So they are events for 'sikhs' to participate in . Now clearly we can debate what is a Sikh, but on a simple level it's believing that what our guru ji says is the truth and accepting it as such. Next time you get some 'liberal' (hate using that term, but really mean wants to twist Sikhi to suit themselves and not the guru) questioning about the rules ask them if they would go to a 'work event ' dressed in inappropriate clothing,acting foolishly or openly brag about how good a 'competitor' is . They will say they wouldn't and you know why? They 'respect' and 'obey' the bosses who pay them , but they don't respect or obey the 'one' who gave them everything. Likewise if they were offered a knighthood, an obe or some other 'empire' suck up, they would follow the rules and codes of conduct  at Buckingham palace as they perceive it as benefitting their world view. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Sukhvirk76 said:

Isn't that soorma Singh in the Picture? 

nah Soorma SIngh has more beard ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, imhosingh said:

When I've spoken to people about this i put it down to 'house rules'. The anand karaj ceremony is in a par with our baptism , birth, and death 'ceremonies' (forgive me can't think of a better word). So they are events for 'sikhs' to participate in . Now clearly we can debate what is a Sikh, but on a simple level it's believing that what our guru ji says is the truth and accepting it as such. Next time you get some 'liberal' (hate using that term, but really mean wants to twist Sikhi to suit themselves and not the guru) questioning about the rules ask them if they would go to a 'work event ' dressed in inappropriate clothing,acting foolishly or openly brag about how good a 'competitor' is . They will say they wouldn't and you know why? They 'respect' and 'obey' the bosses who pay them , but they don't respect or obey the 'one' who gave them everything. Likewise if they were offered a knighthood, an obe or some other 'empire' suck up, they would follow the rules and codes of conduct  at Buckingham palace as they perceive it as benefitting their world view. 

'rites of passage' is the term, we only have four . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, imhosingh said:

When I've spoken to people about this i put it down to 'house rules'. The anand karaj ceremony is in a par with our baptism , birth, and death 'ceremonies' (forgive me can't think of a better word). So they are events for 'sikhs' to participate in . Now clearly we can debate what is a Sikh, but on a simple level it's believing that what our guru ji says is the truth and accepting it as such. Next time you get some 'liberal' (hate using that term, but really mean wants to twist Sikhi to suit themselves and not the guru) questioning about the rules ask them if they would go to a 'work event ' dressed in inappropriate clothing,acting foolishly or openly brag about how good a 'competitor' is . They will say they wouldn't and you know why? They 'respect' and 'obey' the bosses who pay them , but they don't respect or obey the 'one' who gave them everything. Likewise if they were offered a knighthood, an obe or some other 'empire' suck up, they would follow the rules and codes of conduct  at Buckingham palace as they perceive it as benefitting their world view. 

It was more simple in the past when only Amritdharis could get an Anand Karaj. (Sehajdharis and Keshdharis would only be allowed a Hindu wedding). I highly doubt we will go back to the era when Sikhs actually agreed on one Maryada: but now we got people who don't have Kesh and drunkards having Anand Karaj, which our true history was always against.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/04/2017 at 0:51 AM, Sukhvirk76 said:

Isn't that soorma Singh in the Picture? 

I'm proud of that couple.

May God bless them with a long and happy marriage.

Respect to the bride for not being a racist and by virtue of their Anand Karaj ensuring her husband is a new Sikh so that their children will be Sikhs too.

The husband is clearly of West Indian background and those folks are natural born Sikhs given that Sikhi alone opposes slavery unlike Christianity and Islam which both condone it.

Globally: 99.7% are non-Sikhs

India: 98.4% are non-Sikhs

Canada: 98.5% are non-Sikhs

UK: 99.4% are non-Sikhs

USA: 99.9% are non-Sikhs 

So is it logical to expect all within our community to marry only those whose parents are both Sikhs? By excluding some sincere couples from partaking in an Anand Karaj to enable their non-Abrahamic non-proselytising new spouses to become new Sikhs, it will only become the fastest way to demographic oblivion for the Sikh Diaspora (by effectively excluding the future children of all such couples from the Sikh Panth). 

We need to think do we encourage people towards Sikhi or drive them away (to our Panth's long term detriment)?

Edited by SinghSabha1699

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now