Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Singh, Mahan

Important Videos On Sikh Politics

Recommended Posts

First video presenter Gurdarshan dhillon is a hard core kala afghana follower.Such people are actors and not well wishers

of sikh panth.

Their main aim is to divide sikhs by creating phony issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First video presenter Gurdarshan dhillon is a hard core kala afghana follower.Such people are actors and not well wishers

of sikh panth.

Their main aim is to divide sikhs by creating phony issues.

Have you seen the the movie 'The matrix'? Maybe you never took the red pill which Neo chose.

Gurdarshan Singh has been supporting and visiting Bapu Surat Singh Khalsa since the early days of Bapu ji's hunger strike. Atleast he is doing something. If possible can you please give reference of some 'well wishers of sikh panth' who have well-wished and 'united the panth' recently?

General comment- I don't understand this empirical relationship in sikh community of the day. Educated people are ridiculed while completely uneducated people are given big self-made titles like bhramgyani,sant,etc. and followed blindly. Education is so underrated in sikhi today. Anpadhta is highly lauded. Well, there is no shortage of padhe like anpadh too.

Edited by SikhiInspire
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

General comment- I don't understand this empirical relationship in sikh community of the day. Educated people are ridiculed while completely uneducated people are given big self-made titles like bhramgyani,sant,etc. and followed blindly. Education is so underrated in sikhi today. Anpadhta is highly lauded. Well, there is no shortage of padhe like anpadh too.

Haven't seen a good orator like him in a while who speaks substance.

I have been listening to his videos the last few days with an open mind. He is a very Panthic minded person no doubt. He is claimed to be a historian. I'm not a scholar or anything but I like to read history. Listening to Dr Dhillon's videos I have noticed he makes a lot of historically inaccurate claims. Maybe semi literate people who are not knowledgeable in history might be impressed by Dhillon. In comparison I would say Dr Harjinder Singh Dilgeer who is also a hardcore Kala Afghanist minded person is much more accurate and credible in the field of history than this man.

As for his oratory skills, I feel our people too easily get impressed by smooth talking orators. Too much style yet too little substance is what is impressing our people.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is claimed to be a historian. I'm not a scholar or anything but I like to read history. Listening to Dr Dhillon's videos I have noticed he makes a lot of historically inaccurate claims. Maybe semi literate people who are not knowledgeable in history might be impressed by Dhillon.

Claimed historian? Thats your definition of open minded? LOL Posting his resume here. Atleast read this with "open mind" veerji.

http://www.globalsikhstudies.net/pdf/biodata/Gurdarshan%20Singh%20Dhillon..PDF

Veerji can you please enligten lost and poor souls like me with some "educated" people you follow and listen to (any kathavachak, so called bhramgyani or so)? I would definitely advice you enrol in some university, get a first class degree, then go for masters, then a Phd. Maybe it will be helpful to you in understanding something called "education" then. I don't know if you do it out of sheer ignorance of sikhi or some motive but you put everybody who disagrees with your thinking, into "Kala Afghana" basket. Please watch "The matrix" and eat a blue pill veerji. Maybe you were wrong all these years. It maybe time to enter Morpheus's world. lol

Listening to Dr Dhillon's videos I have noticed he makes a lot of historically inaccurate claims. Maybe semi literate people who are not knowledgeable in history might be impressed by Dhillon.

Maybe its time someone needs to brush up their history knowledge. Can you point the inaccuracies? And how you conclude they are inaccurate? On one side you say you are not a scholar, but it takes a scholar to rebut another phd scholar (dr dhillon in this case). So either you just threw a free volley here, or you are actually quite learned in the subject. And please cite your sources too which you used to label him inaccurate.

As for his oratory skills, I feel our people too easily get impressed by smooth talking orators. Too much style yet too little substance is what is impressing our people.

Who do you get impressed with? Stephen hawkins or Neil deGrasse tyson must be the benchmark personalities to impress you. And again please provide us with atleast ONE name of someone who talks substance. Enlighten us veerji.

For open minded and rational people, here are some more videos of Dr. Dhillon:

Edited by SikhiInspire

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimed historian? Thats your definition of open minded? LOL Posting his resume here. Atleast read this with "open mind" veerji.

http://www.globalsikhstudies.net/pdf/biodata/Gurdarshan%20Singh%20Dhillon..PDF

Veerji can you please enligten lost and poor souls like me with some "educated" people you follow and listen to (any kathavachak, so called bhramgyani or so)? I would definitely advice you enrol in some university, get a first class degree, then go for masters, then a Phd. Maybe it will be helpful to you in understanding something called "education" then. I don't know if you do it out of sheer ignorance of sikhi or some motive but you put everybody who disagrees with your thinking, into "Kala Afghana" basket. Please watch "The matrix" and eat a blue pill veerji. Maybe you were wrong all these years. It maybe time to enter Morpheus's world. lol

Maybe its time someone needs to brush up their history knowledge. Can you point the inaccuracies? And how you conclude they are inaccurate? On one side you say you are not a scholar, but it takes a scholar to rebut another phd scholar (dr dhillon in this case). So either you just threw a free volley here, or you are actually quite learned in the subject. And please cite your sources too which you used to label him inaccurate.

Who do you get impressed with? Stephen hawkins or Neil deGrasse tyson must be the benchmark personalities to impress you. And again please provide us with atleast ONE name of someone who talks substance. Enlighten us veerji.

For open minded and rational people, here are some more videos of Dr. Dhillon:

I dont like to nit pick but since you're asking for it I'll tell you why. Sifting through some of his videos I notice he makes a lot of inaccurate claims. For example when trying to show how evil the Arya Samajis are he starts to claim that Satyarth Prakash which is the book written by Dayanand Sarasvati has a lot of Gali Galoch(profanities) about Guru Sahib. Now he probably knows most people don't even have the remotest idea who Dayanand Sarasvati is or what his book has contained in it about Sikhi or Sikh Gurus. So most of his audience will probably just swallow what he has said without questioning him. Well I have read most of it. And what Dayanand wrote in Satyarth Prakash is that he tried to show Guru Nanak Dev Jee was not educated because according to him ਨਿਰਭਉ in mool mantar should be written as ਨਿਰਭੈ/ਨਿਰਭਯ according to proper Sanskrit. No profanities(Gali Galoch) were used.

And I have also read parts of Prof Sahib Singh's Gurbani Vyakaran book. In it Prof Jee has shown through Gurbani Vyakaran why ਨਿਰਭਉ is correct as written by Sri Guru Nanak Dev Jee and why Nirbhae would have been incorrect. By systematically dissecting the issue, Prof Sahib Singh Jee ended up showing why Dayanand is the ignorant fool for questioning Guru Jee. Since you claim to have read that book Gurbani Vyakaran, you should know this.

Another instance Dhillon jee claims that Arya Samaj used to organised programs or seminars in which Sikhs would have their hair cut on stage in front of an audience of people during pre partition Punjab. Now if such an incident had occurred, it would have caused shock waves in the panth and would have been mentioned by some reputable historian. But it is not mentioned by any Sikh historian whether it be Harjinder Singh Dilgeer's multi volume book set on Sikh history or Dr Sangat Singh's Sikhs in history book or anyone else. Then from were he is making such a claim only he knows. I'm sure he made this claim because he wanted to convince the audience how anti Sikh they are, but he could have done that by telling it truthfully instead of making things up.

Another historical inaccurate claim he made was in one video he was trying to show how extensive his knowledge of world history is, he claimed that Hitler killed 8 million Jews even though the historic number is about 6 million. In the west even a school going child knows this. Now it could have been forgiven had it been someone like you or me, but when a historian makes such an inaccurate claim which otherwise is a well known fact, then it's hard to take this guy seriously.

I appreciate it that he's Panthic minded person. But when you are trying to make him out to be some kind of authority in the field of historical studies then you really do him disservice to be honest.

Edited by Jonny101
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Johny101 ji

He is a traitor of sikh panth. What kind of a historian is he. Had he been a historian he would not have become a disciple of kala afghana.

Had he been a historian he would not have dared to disown bani of dasam pita which is lifeline of sikhi.He would not have supported Ragi darshan

and gone 200 miles to karnal to give him a gold medal.

Had he been a historian he should have known that birthdays of guru sahibans are recorded in history per lunar calendar and phases of moon.Hence

cann't be converted to a solar date.He would have not supported solar calendar of purewal.

I wish such facts are known to people who tout such traitors.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

General comment- I don't understand this empirical relationship in sikh community of the day. Educated people are ridiculed while completely uneducated people are given big self-made titles like bhramgyani,sant,etc. and followed blindly. Education is so underrated in sikhi today. Anpadhta is highly lauded. Well, there is no shortage of padhe like anpadh too.

Academic achievement and spiritual advancement are different domains.
This man has academic credentials.credential Kapur singh also had good education. Sardar Kapoor singh was a dedicated sikh whereas dhillon is not.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×